Fedora-Cloud-33-20201104.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201103.0): ID: 714798 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714798 ID: 714809 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714809 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-IoT-33-20201104.1 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201102.0): ID: 714779 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714779 ID: 714787 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714787 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201102.0): ID: 714784 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714784 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201102.0): ID: 714766 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714766 Passed openQA tests: 13/15 (aarch64), 14/16 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201102.0): ID: 714786 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714786 ID: 714795 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714795 Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.04 to 0.18 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/713777#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714765#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Rawhide broken networking
Hello, I've been running Rawhide as a combined Xfce/MATE VM for a long while (over a year). A few days ago an update broke networking, in that after the next boot after the update NetworkManager was dead and died instantly if you tried to launch it. Yesterday I built a Rawhide Workstation from the latest ISO and networking was working, so I did the same for MATE and out of the box networking was non-functional. The funny part is that I built both systems from the ISO: Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20201102.n.0.iso So in fact networking was working during the install of MATE, just not after the first boot after installation. I can't see anything obvious in the auto test logs that get posted. Is networking in spins other than GNOME known to be broken? I should add that both VMs cause 4 kernel-core crashes during boot, none are reportable (so I haven't created a bug in Bugzilla) but the reasons are as follows: (for both GNOME and MATE systems) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 601 at net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:622 nf_tables_expr_parse+0x1af/0x270 [nf_tables] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 601 at net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:622 nf_tables_newset+0xd40/0xd90 [nf_tables] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 601 at net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:622 nft_chain_parse_hook+0x2eb/0x310 [nf_tables] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 776 at net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:622 nft_chain_parse_hook+0x26d/0x310 [nf_tables] To be clear, networking in the GMOME workstation does work, but is broken in MATE. To ensure I am not going nuts, I just build another MATE VM from the above ISO image (still the latest available) and after the first reboot after the install, networking is non-functional. -- Ian Laurie ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30
On 11/3/20 7:48 AM, Klein Kravis wrote: It seems like you may have the wrong list It's spam using old subject lines. Please don't reply to it. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30
It seems like you may have the wrong list Klein Kravis kleinkra...@fedoraproject.org Design team On Nov 2 2020, at 8:55 pm, MGWIN88 wrote: > MGWIN88 Watch football online. Online football betting > Our website present live football streaming directly to your PC, tablet, or > cell phones, covering > almost every competition around the world > Besides, we provide sports betting service, just register the account with us, > then you can start making profit at home or anywhere > Our website put together all kinds of online gambling to members > We also have special promotions for existing and new customers > Fast deposit, and fast withdraw process > 24/7 customer service teams are always ready to serve you. > > Contact : https://mgwin88s.com/sport.html > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Introduction: thewanderer
On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 12:45 +0100, Kornél Géza Szűcs wrote: > Hello guys, > > My name is Kornél, Welcome Kornél. I sponsored you in the QA group. You can start by tisting updates for Fedora 31, Fedora 32, and Fedora 33 before they reach the stable repository. Update testing is where a tester tests a package and gives out a +1 Karma for PASS and -1 Karma for FAIL. You can read much about update testing here [1]. You can also use the fedora-easy-karma rpm package for giving out feedbacks. It is a bit early, but you can perform some validation test [0] [1] on Fedora Rawhide. The next week will be Fedora 33 CoreOS Test Week [3]. Test weeks/days in Fedora are days dedicated to test some novelty or some particular aspect in the operating system. Fedora community members often participate, and the public is welcome at these events. If you’ve never contributed before, this is a perfect way to get started. Join #fedora- test-day channel on Freenode IRC to meet, discuss and share experiences with other participants to the event. We usually involve ourselves in activities marked in [2], you can catch us mostly at #fedora-qa on freenode IRC or Telegram. If you have any question, please ask! [0] https://fedoramagazine.org/release-validation-testing-fedora/ [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA#Activities [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Fedora_33_CoreOS_2020-11-06 Ciao, A. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Introduction: thewanderer
Hello guys, My name is Kornél, I'm from Hungary. I'm currently studying IT engineering at the university. I'd like to help test programs which I'm using day to day. I use Fedora on my machines, and I think this is a good way to help improve the OS, and other users' experience with it. I've been using Linux since 2010 on my workstations and my servers. I like playing video games and playing with my virtual servers :) Bye thewanderer ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Automated Script for Kernel Regression Testing - HELP
On bodhi, I see kernel updates quite frequently and to do the Kernel
Regression Testing, I have to redo those steps again and again and also I
felt an issue in that i.e. it tells me after the complete test run, that
authentication failed if my given FAS credentials for upload were wrong.
So I created a script using the original scripts, that would help us do the
complete test in one go and authentication is done before the tests run.
Please look through it and tell me what you think and also help me fix an
error I am facing
Repo Link - https://github.com/akumar-99/kernel-regression-test-and-upload
I face this error only when my scripts runs both the tests together. If I
run with only one test, the scripts runs without any issues.
ERROR -
Your log file is being submitted...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/fedora/client/openidbaseclient.py", line
249, in send_request
data = output.json()
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/requests/models.py", line 897, in
json
return complexjson.loads(self.text, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib64/python3.8/json/__init__.py", line 357, in loads
return _default_decoder.decode(s)
File "/usr/lib64/python3.8/json/decoder.py", line 337, in decode
obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
File "/usr/lib64/python3.8/json/decoder.py", line 355, in raw_decode
raise JSONDecodeError("Expecting value", s, err.value) from None
json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./fedora_submit.py", line 48, in
req = submitclient.send_request(
File
"/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/fedora/client/openidbaseclient.py", line
252, in send_request
raise ServerError(
fedora.client.ServerError: ServerError(
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/kerneltest/upload/anonymous, 413, Error
returned from json module while processing b'
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/kerneltest/upload/anonymous': b'Expecting
value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)'
b'\n413
Request Entity Too Large\nRequest Entity Too Large\nThe
data value transmitted exceeds the capacity limit.\n')
FAS - akumar99
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-32-20201103.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201102.0): ID: 714229 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714229 ID: 714240 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/714240 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
