Fedora-Cloud-33-20210104.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210103.0): ID: 750418 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750418 ID: 750425 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750425 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Test Week] Fedora Kernel 5.10
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:45 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better > - > Host OS 2p/0K 2p/16K 2p/64K 8p/16K 8p/64K 16p/16K 16p/64K > ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw > - - -- -- -- -- -- --- --- > fmac.loca Linux 5.9.16- 3.2700 2.3000 4.0800 2.8600 2.8400 3.04000 3.28000 > fmac.loca Linux 5.10.4- 3.2800 3.5900 5.3500 2.8400 3.1500 3.0300083.0 fmac.loca Linux 5.10.4- 3.2100 3.7300 3.9100 2.8400 3.2000 3.06000 4.0 I guess something must've caused a one off anomalous result. -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Test Week] Fedora Kernel 5.10
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 1:41 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 08:46:33PM +0100, Alessio wrote: > > What about that story related to the drop in the Btrfs performances in > > Kernel 5.10? Is it still true? Can we perform some specific test? > > Looks like a fix is on the way: > https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs=160883350502962=2 > > It would be interesting to see if the performance regression is caught with > `sudo ./runtests.sh -t performance` as part of the standard test day tests. I haven't experienced it day to day. But I can reproduce it as originally described. I'm not seeing kernel-test suite pick up on anything file system specific, but I do see quite a weird result for 16p/64K context switching. It's ~3 for 5.9 and ~83 for 5.10. Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better -- Host OS Mhz null null open slct sig sig fork exec sh call I/O stat clos TCP inst hndl proc proc proc - - fmac.loca Linux 5.9.16- 3396 0.05 0.11 0.91 1.66 2.45 0.11 0.72 794. 2338 3244 fmac.loca Linux 5.10.4- 3396 0.06 0.10 0.84 1.66 2.77 0.12 0.73 838. 2312 3298 Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better - Host OS 2p/0K 2p/16K 2p/64K 8p/16K 8p/64K 16p/16K 16p/64K ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw - - -- -- -- -- -- --- --- fmac.loca Linux 5.9.16- 3.2700 2.3000 4.0800 2.8600 2.8400 3.04000 3.28000 fmac.loca Linux 5.10.4- 3.2800 3.5900 5.3500 2.8400 3.1500 3.0300083.0 *Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better - Host OS 2p/0K Pipe AF UDP RPC/ TCP RPC/ TCP ctxsw UNIX UDP TCP conn - - - - - - - - fmac.loca Linux 5.9.16- 3.270 5.154 14.1 25.525.840. fmac.loca Linux 5.10.4- 3.280 6.072 13.0 25.723.544. File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better --- Host OS 0K File 10K File MmapProt Page 100fd Create Delete Create Delete Latency Fault Fault selct - - -- -- -- -- --- - --- - fmac.loca Linux 5.9.16- 16.4 16.3 25.2 20.0 1751.3K 0.357 0.00260 1.124 fmac.loca Linux 5.10.4- 16.8 16.7 26.1 20.0 1726.9K 0.335 0.00260 1.184 *Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better - HostOS Pipe AFTCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write - - -- -- -- -- - fmac.loca Linux 5.9.16- 4150 9401 4573 6874.8 10.7K 6556.7 4081.1 9265 6472. fmac.loca Linux 5.10.4- 4045 9500 4534 6597.2 10.3K 5523.1 4034.5 9107 6076. [chris@fmac kernel-tests]$ -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Test Week] Fedora Kernel 5.10
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 08:46:33PM +0100, Alessio wrote: > What about that story related to the drop in the Btrfs performances in > Kernel 5.10? Is it still true? Can we perform some specific test? Looks like a fix is on the way: https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs=160883350502962=2 It would be interesting to see if the performance regression is caught with `sudo ./runtests.sh -t performance` as part of the standard test day tests. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Test Week] Fedora Kernel 5.10
On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 08:36 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey All, > > I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.10 > Test week which is happening from 2021-01-04 to 2021-01-11. It's > fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in details about > the > test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your > results. What about that story related to the drop in the Btrfs performances in Kernel 5.10? Is it still true? Can we perform some specific test? Ciao, A. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Rawhide-20210103.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 9/180 (x86_64), 8/122 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210102.n.0): ID: 750166 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750166 ID: 750169 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750169 ID: 750226 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750226 ID: 750247 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750247 ID: 750279 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750279 ID: 750281 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750281 ID: 750367 Test: aarch64 universal install_package_set_minimal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750367 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210102.n.0): ID: 750164 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750164 ID: 750171 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750171 ID: 750181 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750181 ID: 750190 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750190 ID: 750192 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750192 ID: 750204 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750204 ID: 750344 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750344 ID: 750371 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750371 ID: 750398 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750398 ID: 750407 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750407 Soft failed openQA tests: 22/180 (x86_64), 14/122 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210102.n.0): ID: 750299 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750299 ID: 750302 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750302 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210102.n.0): ID: 750110 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750110 ID: 750111 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750111 ID: 750118 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750118 ID: 750122 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750122 ID: 750126 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750126 ID: 750127 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750127 ID: 750140 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750140 ID: 750149 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750149 ID: 750173 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750173 ID: 750212 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750212 ID: 750221 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750221 ID: 750222 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750222 ID: 750230 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750230 ID: 750241 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750241 ID: 750261 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750261 ID: 750265 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750265 ID: 750288 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210103.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210102.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210103.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 107 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 36.37 MiB Size of dropped packages:3.18 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 2.81 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -7.73 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Security live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210103.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Astronomy_KDE live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210102.n.0.iso Image: Design_suite live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Design_suite-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210102.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: openexr-2.5.3-1.fc34 Summary: Provides the specification and reference implementation of the EXR file format RPMs:openexr openexr-devel openexr-libs python3-openexr Size:36.37 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: python2-pillow-6.2.2-3.fc33 Summary: Python image processing library RPMs:python2-pillow Size:3.18 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: CTL-1.5.2-14.fc34 Old package: CTL-1.5.2-13.fc34 Summary: The Color Transformation Language RPMs: CTL CTL-devel CTL-docs OpenEXR_CTL Size: 6.87 MiB Size change: -7.54 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jan 01 2021 Richard Shaw - 1.5.2-14 - Rebuild for OpenEXR 2.5.3. Package: Field3D-1.7.3-6.fc34 Old package: Field3D-1.7.3-5.fc33 Summary: Library for storing voxel data RPMs: Field3D Field3D-devel Size: 9.43 MiB Size change: -5.65 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jan 01 2021 Richard Shaw - 1.7.3-6 - Rebuild for OpenEXR 2.5.3. Package: ImageMagick-1:6.9.11.27-2.fc34 Old package: ImageMagick-1:6.9.11.27-1.fc33 Summary: An X application for displaying and manipulating images RPMs: ImageMagick ImageMagick-c++ ImageMagick-c++-devel ImageMagick-devel ImageMagick-djvu ImageMagick-doc ImageMagick-libs ImageMagick-perl Size: 41.18 MiB Size change: -64.92 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jan 01 2021 Richard Shaw - 1:6.9.11.27-2 - Rebuild for OpenEXR 2.5.3. Package: OpenImageIO-2.2.10.0-2.fc34 Old package: OpenImageIO-2.2.10.0-1.fc34 Summary: Library for reading and writing images RPMs: OpenImageIO OpenImageIO-devel OpenImageIO-iv OpenImageIO-utils python3-openimageio Size: 20.69 MiB Size change: -2.98 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jan 01 2021 Richard Shaw - 2.2.10.0-2 - Rebuild for OpenEXR 2.5.3. Package: OpenSceneGraph-3.4.1-21.fc34 Old package: OpenSceneGraph-3.4.1-20.fc33 Summary: High performance real-time graphics toolkit RPMs: OpenSceneGraph OpenSceneGraph-Collada OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR OpenSceneGraph-devel OpenSceneGraph-examples OpenSceneGraph-examples-SDL OpenSceneGraph-examples-fltk OpenSceneGraph-examples-gtk OpenSceneGraph-examples-qt OpenSceneGraph-gdal OpenSceneGraph-gstreamer OpenSceneGraph-libs OpenSceneGraph-qt OpenSceneGraph-qt-devel OpenThreads OpenThreads-devel Size: 57.88 MiB Size change: -171.30 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jan 01 2021 Richard Shaw - 3.4.1-21 - Rebuild for OpenEXR 2.5.3. Package: YafaRay-3.5.1-4.fc34.1 Old package: YafaRay-3.5.1-4.fc34 Summary: A free open-source ray-tracing render engine RPMs: YafaRay YafaRay-blender YafaRay-devel YafaRay-lib python3-YafaRay Size: 4.50 MiB Size change: -2.34 KiB Changelog: * Fri Jan 01 2021 Richard Shaw - 3.5.1-4.1 - Rebuild for OpenEXR 2.5.3. Package: alembic-1.7.16-2.fc34 Old package: alembic-1.7.13-3.fc33 Summary: Open framework for storing and sharing scene data RPMs: alembic alembic-devel alembic-libs Size: 5.51 MiB Size change: -29.42 KiB Changelog: * Sun Sep 13 2020 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.7.15-1 - Update to 1.7.15 (#1856031) * Mon Oct 26 2020 Luya Tshimbalanga - 1.7.16-1 - Update to 1.7.16 (#1856031) * Fri Jan 01 2021 Richard Shaw - 1.7.16-2 - Rebuild for OpenEXR 2.5.3. Package: aqsis-1.8.2-41.fc34 Old package: aqsis-1.8.2-39.fc33 Summary: Open source 3D rendering solution adhering to the RenderMan standard RPMs: aqsis aqsis-core aqsis-data aqsis-devel aqsis-libs Size: 14.43 MiB Size change: -43.35 KiB Changelog: * Tue Aug 18 2020 Jeff Law - 1.8.2-40 - Fix C++17 problems * Fri Jan 01 2021 Richard Shaw - 1.8.2-41 - Rebuild for OpenEXR 2.5.3. Package: blender-1:2.91.0-3.fc34 Old package: blender-1:2.91.0-2.fc34 Summary: 3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production RPMs: blender blender-fonts blender-rpm-macros Size: 117.44 MiB Size change: -1.11 MiB Changelog: * Fri Jan 01 2021 Richard Shaw - 1:2.91.0-3 - Rebuild for OpenEXR 2.5.3. Package: blueberry-1.4.2-1.fc34 Old package: blueberry-1.4.1-1.fc34 Summary
testcase base update cli
First!... Happy New Year Everyone. I hope you all had Great holidays. While running tests on Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210102.n.0, I saw a problem that has been present for about a year now. If it's considered a but, I am at a loss to understand what category to put it in. When running test case QA:Testcase base update cli, it used to be that there was a single file (something not essential as I recall) that would be found so you could watch the update run and judge if it went okay. Such a file no longer seem to be available (as I said for a long time now) The only result obtained is (complete nothing to do). Is this intentional or did that just get lost somehow? As a side note, the command used in the test case is "dnf update". As I recall "update" was deprecated in favor of "upgrade". However, I see that "update" still works though it doesn't appear to be in the man pages anymore. Shall I prepare an update to the test case or did I miss something? Have a Great 2021 Everyone! Pat(tablepc) ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210103.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210102.0): ID: 750102 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750102 ID: 750109 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/750109 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
