Re: Proposal: Migrate “Common Bugs” from the wiki to Ask Fedora
On Sat, 2021-11-06 at 17:09 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Yes, absolutely. My goal is to make it better not worse, and overall less > work shared among more people. So instead of going point-by-point, I'll just say this would be fine, but I'd feel rather better about it if the proposal: * Acknowledged and had a definite plan to replace the existing tooling and practices at least at the same level as currently. * Came with people attached who are definitely committed to working on the implementation and all the work of writing issues, wrangling replies, tagging things, aging things out... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 33 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 33 Security updates need testing: Age URL 210 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c3d587d52c shim-15.4-1 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-70dd0b9f5d community-mysql-8.0.27-1.fc33 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a5e55a9e02 vim-8.2.3568-1.fc33 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bbe47cbab6 awscli-1.18.223-2.fc33 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-eb8dab50ba bind-9.11.36-1.fc33 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cfc1913b5f cacti-1.2.19-1.fc33 cacti-spine-1.2.19-1.fc33 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-443139f67c rust-1.56.1-1.fc33 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-52398e2ff4 firefox-94.0-1.fc33 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-632bbbf893 radeontop-1.3.post4-4g1552170.fc33 The following Fedora 33 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 229 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2961f34ccb PackageKit-1.2.3-1.fc33 164 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4797e362b3 abrt-2.14.6-1.fc33 libreport-2.15.1-1.fc33 satyr-0.37-2.fc33 80 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4ccf3840ed gnome-shell-3.38.6-1.fc33 mutter-3.38.6-1.fc33 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b90eada621 pungi-4.3.1-1.fc33 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-42f8ec7391 tzdata-2021e-1.fc33 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-52398e2ff4 firefox-94.0-1.fc33 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b24a901545 kernel-5.14.16-101.fc33 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-daa75353ff hwdata-0.353-1.fc33 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 33 updates-testing clustershell-1.8.4-1.fc33 libseccomp-2.5.3-1.fc33 perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.17-1.fc33 vdr-live-3.1.1-2.fc33 Details about builds: clustershell-1.8.4-1.fc33 (FEDORA-2021-8211cdbd7a) Python framework for efficient cluster administration Update Information: Update to upstream version 1.8.4. ChangeLog: * Fri Nov 5 2021 Stephane Thiell 1.8.4-1 - update to 1.8.4 * Wed Jul 21 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.8.3-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jun 4 2021 Python Maint - 1.8.3-7 - Rebuilt for Python 3.10 * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.8.3-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild libseccomp-2.5.3-1.fc33 (FEDORA-2021-8ece66acb6) Enhanced seccomp library Update Information: Update libseccomp for Flatpak Changes * Update the syscall table for Linux v5.15 * Fix issues with multiplexed syscalls on mipsel introduced in v2.5.2 * Document that `seccomp_rule_add()` may return `-EACCES` * Fix issues with test `11-basic-basic_errors` on old kernels (API level < 5) ChangeLog: * Sat Nov 6 2021 Neal Gompa - 2.5.3-1 - New upstream version (#2020824) * Wed Nov 3 2021 Debarshi Ray - 2.5.2-1 - New upstream version (#1900097) * Wed Nov 3 2021 Debarshi Ray - 2.5.1-1 - New upstream version (#1900097) * Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.5.0-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.5.0-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #2020824 - libseccomp-2.5.3 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020824 perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.17-1.fc33 (FEDORA-2021-294ece8510) Perl extension for reading Microsoft Excel 2007 files Update Information: Spreadsheet::XLSX 0.17 ==- Fix RT #139898: missing file from MANIFEST - Fix RT #127829, #80565, #79016: [Warning] Argument "#N/A" isn't numeric in int ChangeLog: * Fri Nov 5 2021 Robert Scheck 0.17.1 - Upgrade to 0.17 (#2020025) ---
Re: Proposal: Migrate “Common Bugs” from the wiki to Ask Fedora
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 05:35:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > - The given solution works for most people, but clearly many are not > > seeing it. > > I suspect this is more of a universal truth than something easily > improvable. We could fly a plane above every town on Earth and some > people wouldn't see it. We could hire Mark Zuckerberg to transmit it > direct to the eyeballs of everyone in the world (you know he can!) and > someone would still manage not to see it. People are *really good* at > not seeing documentation. :D Heh. Probably true. But I'm _definitely_ seeing a lot of folks not finding this doc in specific. > > - Directly linked to where we’re telling people to go for help, and > > where people are talking about their problems. > > This seems trivial. We invented hyperlinks a long time ago, and the > account system for the wiki and Ask is the same account system. I guess I mean "linked" in a deeper sense. Found in (or at least very near) the same place, same kind of user experience. And, the wiki continues to be a minefield of outdated information. Like, the Common Bugs page prominently links to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs_and_feature_requests, which links to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow, which is... more than somewhat outdated. > > - Gives a place to comment on and discuss the problem *other* than > > cluttering the bug in bugzilla. > > This could equally be phrased as "encourages splitting the discussion > of the bugs to a place where people already following them, notably > including the maintainers, may never see it". I think this kind of split is Good, Actually™! It separates initial triage (which we know from long sad experience is futile in bugzilla; RIP BugZappers) and user support / response from the business of solving the probem. I (not coincidentally) just wrote a whole long thing about this. https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/questions-bugs-incidents-and-problems-oh-my/17910 > > - Right now, *Lots* of people on Ask coming in with new questions about > > the no-sound-on-upgrade issue. Even if they don’t find it and avoid > > needing to ask, we can easily merge those into the main topic. > > But you could also merge them into a single topic for the bug which has > a prominent link to the common bugs page. Is that really a big > difference? We could do that, but then we're redirecting people twice, first to the single topic and then to the separate doc. And, I have a sense, as a user of other support services / forums, that having a post merged into "big general thing" can feel dismissive, whereas having it merged into "oh, yes, that's precisely a duplicate" does not. That approach also doesn't have some of the other advantages, like voting on issues and measuring their individual activity. > > - Conversely, when a person has a *different* issue, it’s easy to split > > that into its own help thread. > I don't really see where this is an advantage compared to the current > system. In the current system there is no discussion, so there's > nothing to split off. If people discuss different problems in a bug > report, it's easy enough to ask them to file a new bug too. We could > hide or delete their comments if we wanted to, but we tend not to do > that sort of thing in Bugzilla as a matter of policy. Yeah, Bugzilla doesn't have good tools for this -- there's no split, only "duplicate and clean up". > > > - And we can moderate and organize response in general to make sure > > people are seeing the most helpful advice and not getting > > misdirected. > > Again, this doesn't seem like something you can't do right now. To me, > we have two functions: documentation and discussion. The Common Bugs > pages are documentation. Discourse is for discussion. The discussion is > already happening on Discourse, so...what's the issue? I quite like > that there *is* this distinction, honestly. I like common bugs entries > to be clear, distinct and ideally authoritative. I don't think it would > be *more* helpful for people to see a whole forum thread for every > documented issue. It would just muddy the waters. This is why I propose the separate category; that category can have more stringent rules. There's still a distinction between the first post in the topic and the comments, and we could make that stronger in several ways for this category (theming). We _could_ do what Discourse does with posts in some of their own support categories (like https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-voting/40121/237) — they set it so replies are automatically deleted after a month, but move particularly useful or relevant replies to their own topics (and then those links persist). I'm not sure that's the best for this, but it's one possibility. As I'm thinking about this, I guess maybe I just disagree with you about whether a forum thread would be helpful or muddy the waters. And I have no _particular_ dat
Persistence through Sleep for Mounted LUKS Encrypted USB devices
Greetings, My laptop enters a sleep state when I close the lid (monitor). That is normal. However, if I mounted a LUKS-encrypted device connected via a USB port, the session breaks when the machine wakes. Is that still normal? BASH tells me that the mount point is engaged, whereas the device has been relabelled (from /dev/sdc to /dev/sdd or something else). The "lsblk" command indicates that the device is not mounted anymore. Of course, that disrupts any process accessing the USB storage device when I close the lid. The troubling part is that the mount point stays busy as though it is mounted. Trying to umount is futile (umount: /mnt/usb: target is busy.). How do I break out of this? I still ask, Is this the design, or should I be reporting a bug? Regards Onyeibo -- uname -a: 5.15.0-0.rc6.47.fc36.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 18 17:11:29 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Fedora Rawhide. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20211106.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 108/206 (x86_64), 66/141 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211105.n.0): ID: 1054168 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054168 ID: 1054171 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054171 ID: 1054211 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054211 ID: 1054213 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054213 ID: 1054214 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054214 ID: 1054222 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054222 ID: 1054238 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054238 ID: 1054240 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054240 ID: 1054260 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054260 ID: 1054298 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054298 ID: 1054379 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054379 ID: 1054380 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054380 ID: 1054383 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054383 ID: 1054397 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054397 ID: 1054423 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054423 ID: 1054424 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054424 ID: 1054432 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054432 ID: 1054435 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054435 ID: 1054447 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054447 ID: 1054450 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054450 ID: 1054452 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054452 ID: 1054454 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054454 ID: 1054474 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054474 ID: 1054479 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054479 ID: 1054487 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054487 ID: 1054489 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054489 ID: 1054499 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054499 ID: 1054500 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054500 ID: 1054501 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054501 ID: 1054502 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054502 ID: 1054503 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054503 ID: 1054504 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054504 ID: 1054505 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054505 ID: 1054506 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054506 ID: 1054507 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054507 ID: 1054508 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054508 ID: 1054509 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054509 ID: 1054510 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054510 ID: 1054511 Test:
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211106.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211105.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211106.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 75 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:8.45 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 4.88 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 1.53 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: fedmod-0.6.4-2.fc35 Summary: Utilities for generating & maintaining modulemd files RPMs:fedmod Size:129.65 KiB Package: kdevelop-python-5.6.2-1.fc34 Summary: Python 3 Plugin for KDevelop RPMs:kdevelop-python Size:6.41 MiB Package: python-parallel-ssh-1.9.1-9.fc35 Summary: Asynchronous parallel SSH library RPMs:python3-parallel-ssh Size:527.26 KiB Package: python-ssh2-python-0.26.0-1.fc36 Summary: Super fast SSH library - bindings for libssh2 RPMs:python3-ssh2-python Size:1.12 MiB Package: waiverdb-1.3.0-2.fc35 Summary: Service for waiving results in ResultsDB RPMs:waiverdb waiverdb-cli waiverdb-common Size:283.98 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: archlinux-keyring-20211028-1.fc36 Old package: archlinux-keyring-20210902-1.fc36 Summary: GPG keys used by Arch distribution to sign packages RPMs: archlinux-keyring Size: 984.51 KiB Size change: 1.40 KiB Changelog: * Fri Nov 05 2021 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek 20211028-1 - Version 20211028 (#2018137) Package: awscli-1.21.12-1.fc36 Old package: awscli-1.21.11-1.fc36 Summary: Universal Command Line Environment for AWS RPMs: awscli Size: 2.11 MiB Size change: 66 B Changelog: * Fri Nov 05 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.21.12-1 - 1.21.12 Package: bash-5.1.8-3.fc36 Old package: bash-5.1.8-2.fc36 Summary: The GNU Bourne Again shell RPMs: bash bash-devel bash-doc Size: 15.36 MiB Size change: 7.70 KiB Changelog: * Fri Nov 05 2021 Siteshwar Vashisht - 5.1.8-3 - Add a runtime option to enable history logging to syslog Resolves: #2020528 Package: btrfs-progs-5.15-1.fc36 Old package: btrfs-progs-5.14.91-1.fc36 Summary: Userspace programs for btrfs RPMs: btrfs-progs btrfs-progs-devel libbtrfs libbtrfsutil python3-btrfsutil Size: 6.60 MiB Size change: 323 B Changelog: * Fri Nov 05 2021 Neal Gompa - 5.15-1 - Update to 5.15 Package: clustershell-1.8.4-1.fc36 Old package: clustershell-1.8.3-8.fc35 Summary: Python framework for efficient cluster administration RPMs: clustershell python3-clustershell Size: 377.09 KiB Size change: 1.61 KiB Changelog: * Fri Nov 05 2021 Stephane Thiell 1.8.4-1 - update to 1.8.4 Package: cpuid-20211031-1.fc36 Old package: cpuid-20201006-2.fc35 Summary: Dumps information about the CPU(s) RPMs: cpuid Size: 131.59 KiB Size change: 3.97 KiB Changelog: * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering 20201006-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Jul 21 2021 Fedora Release Engineering 20201006-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Nov 05 2021 Fabian Affolter 20211031-1 - Update to latest upstream release 20211031 (closes rhbz#2018845) Package: crun-1.3-1.fc36 Old package: crun-1.2-1.fc36 Summary: OCI runtime written in C RPMs: crun Size: 863.11 KiB Size change: 7.63 KiB Changelog: * Fri Nov 05 2021 RH Container Bot - 1.3-1 - autobuilt 1.3 Package: debconf-1.5.79-1.fc36 Old package: debconf-1.5.77-1.fc36 Summary: Debian configuration management system RPMs: debconf debconf-LDAP debconf-doc debconf-gnome debconf-i18n debconf-utils python3-debconf Size: 772.03 KiB Size change: 4.89 KiB Changelog: * Sat Nov 06 2021 S??rgio Basto - 1.5.79-1 - Update debconf to 1.5.79 (#2016839) Package: digikam-7.3.0-4.fc36 Old package: digikam-7.3.0-3.fc36 Summary: A digital camera accessing & photo management application RPMs: digikam digikam-devel digikam-doc digikam-libs Size: 124.36 MiB Size change: -19.47 KiB Changelog: * Fri Nov 05 2021 Rex Dieter - 7.3.0-4 - rebuild (ImageMagick) Package: dracut-055-7.fc36 Old package: dracut-055-6.fc36 Summary: Initramfs generator using udev RPMs: dracut dracut-caps dracut-config-generic dracut-config-rescue dracut-live dracut-network dracut-squash dracut-tools Size: 2.41 MiB Size change: 5.08 KiB Changelog: * Thu Nov 04 2021 Jeremy Linton - 055-7 - Backport Upstream: 15398458 fix(90kernel-modules): add isp1760 USB controller Package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-5656.fc36 Old package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-5636.fc36 Summary: Dummy Test Package called Glos
Fedora-Cloud-34-20211106.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211105.0): ID: 1054145 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054145 ID: 1054146 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054146 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-35-20211106.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211105.0): ID: 1054129 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054129 ID: 1054130 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054130 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20211106.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211105.0): ID: 1054113 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054113 ID: 1054114 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1054114 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
