[Test-Announce] Fedora 33 End Of Life
Hello all, Fedora 33 will go end of life for updates and support on 30th of November 2021. No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 33 after the said date. All the updates of Fedora 33 being pushed to stable will be stopped as well. Fedora 34 will continue to receive updates until approximately one month after the release of Fedora 36. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Regards, Mohan Boddu. [0]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle#Maintenance_Schedule [1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading?rd=DistributionUpgrades ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Proposal: Migrate “Common Bugs” from the wiki to Ask Fedora
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 06:29:37PM -, Marius Schwarz wrote: > I suggest just to post Booting related Bugs on the Web and implement a > "F.H.B." tool ( Frequently Hit Bugs ) > in the Distro. > > You may ask "Why?" > > If the system boots, but i.e. it's a network problem occurs, a local > Bugs-and-theire-Solutions List would help to solve it fast. Maybe. I'm assuming that at this point most people with a computer also have another device (a phone, at least) with internet access. > How do we get this? > > It does not need to be fancy, a simple onepage Website presented in the > Defaultbrowser would be enough. But how does the content get there? > This also gives a good connectivity to "Ask Fedora" as that content is > already HTML. > > The script that creates this, just needs to stich some HTML headers > together and combines selected Bugs & Solutions into the page. Simple > approach. Simple Solution. What is it stitching it _from_? How does it get into the install media? How do we update it? What if it's a problem discovered after we go "gold"? Do we pull back the release? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Proposal: Migrate “Common Bugs” from the wiki to Ask Fedora
Hi, I suggest just to post Booting related Bugs on the Web and implement a "F.H.B." tool ( Frequently Hit Bugs ) in the Distro. You may ask "Why?" If the system boots, but i.e. it's a network problem occurs, a local Bugs-and-theire-Solutions List would help to solve it fast. How do we get this? It does not need to be fancy, a simple onepage Website presented in the Defaultbrowser would be enough. This also gives a good connectivity to "Ask Fedora" as that content is already HTML. The script that creates this, just needs to stich some HTML headers together and combines selected Bugs & Solutions into the page. Simple approach. Simple Solution. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35 retrospective follow-up: proposed actions
On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 09:38 -0600, Brandon Nielsen wrote: > > One additional thought: I feel like the graphical package managers are > becoming an increasingly important first touchpoint for newcomers to a > distribution. Taking a page from 4, 7, and 9 above, maybe we have a > dedicated graphical package manager test day after some predefined > milestone, announced on the users list? It might also bring in some > additional feedback from people that usually don't use them. Thanks for the idea! I think it certainly wouldn't be a bad idea to have one of these for a cycle, Sumantro could include it on the list for this time around maybe. As I said, I think having specific criteria - and then specific test cases to back the criteria - for this area will help as well. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] Help test (and contribute to) new experimental Common Issues section on Ask Fedora
Short background: a little while ago, I proposed that we move CommonBugs from the wiki to a special section of Ask Fedora. Details here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/NE6IKJMLKUK2BB4HGBQTALXKJFKVKTR7/ Over the Thanksgiving holiday, I hacked up some starting ideas, and am now ready for other people to help. I'm looking for a) People who are interested in helping figure out how this new system should work, and possibly helping document and code. b) People who are interested in helping maintain the posts as part of the Common Issues Triage Team, which I imagine existing as a sub-group of Fedora QA. I'd like to _lighten_ the work for the QA team members who are currently maintaining the wiki. c) Those current folks for input and hopefully also a & b going forward. d) Someone to help me put my prototype bot script into production. e) People who are entirely skeptical of this whole idea, because I'd like to (at best) try and convince you or (failing that) at least include your perspective. If you fit any of these categories, please join me at https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/new-common-issues-process-trial-next-steps/18781 Thanks! -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20211129.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 3/208 (x86_64), 11/142 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211128.n.0): ID: 1073177 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073177 ID: 1073178 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073178 ID: 1073202 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073202 ID: 1073282 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073282 ID: 1073296 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073296 ID: 1073385 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073385 ID: 1073418 Test: aarch64 universal install_package_set_minimal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073418 ID: 1073436 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073436 ID: 1073437 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073437 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211128.n.0): ID: 1073262 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073262 ID: 1073263 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073263 ID: 1073291 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073291 ID: 1073386 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073386 ID: 1073433 Test: aarch64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073433 Soft failed openQA tests: 6/208 (x86_64), 3/142 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211128.n.0): ID: 1073152 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073152 ID: 1073167 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073167 ID: 1073201 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073201 ID: 1073203 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073203 ID: 1073213 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073213 ID: 1073280 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073280 ID: 1073305 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073305 ID: 1073352 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073352 ID: 1073401 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073401 Passed openQA tests: 199/208 (x86_64), 128/142 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211128.n.0): ID: 1073086 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073086 ID: 1073093 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073093 ID: 1073094 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073094 ID: 1073170 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073170 ID: 1073171 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073171 ID: 1073173 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073173 ID: 1073174 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073174 ID: 1073176 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073176 ID: 1073179 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_reboot_unmount URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073179 ID: 1073180 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073180 ID: 1073181 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073181 ID: 1073182 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_package_install_remove URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073182 ID: 1073183 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1073183 ID: 1073184 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL:
Re: F35 retrospective follow-up: proposed actions
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 7:06 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > 3. "Ahmedalmeleh - Bugzilla is challenging to me and still getting used > to it. I wish I was able to learn how to operate OpenQA's automated > tests, in the given timeframe and was given guidance sooner.", also > Ahmed's 'wishlist' item and Matt's item - I'll plan to file a ticket > for improved guidance on using Bugzilla, I'm happy to work with you on that. Or just let you assign it to Program Management. I've been thinking about putting together some "helpful Bugzilla tips" docs and potentially making videos for them. Mainly, what I'd need to get started is some things that people want to know. I've been around Bugzilla long enough to have lost track of what "everyone knows". -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211129.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211128.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211129.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 107
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.94 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages: 935.62 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B
Size change of upgraded packages: 47.79 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B
= ADDED IMAGES =
= DROPPED IMAGES =
= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: golang-github-tscholl2-siec-0-1.20211128git9bdfc48.fc36
Summary: Super-Isolated Elliptic Curve Implementation in Go
RPMs:golang-github-tscholl2-siec golang-github-tscholl2-siec-devel
Size:2.79 MiB
Package: python-ajsonrpc-1.2.0-1.fc36
Summary: Lightweight JSON-RPC 2.0 protocol implementation and asynchronous
server
RPMs:python3-ajsonrpc
Size:49.81 KiB
Package: rust-self_cell-0.10.2-1.fc36
Summary: Safe-to-use proc-macro-free self-referential structs in stable Rust
RPMs:rust-self_cell+default-devel rust-self_cell+old_rust-devel
rust-self_cell+rustversion-devel rust-self_cell-devel
Size:43.16 KiB
Package: rust-trash-2.0.2-1.fc36
Summary: Library for moving files and folders to the Recycle Bin
RPMs:rust-trash+coinit_apartmentthreaded-devel
rust-trash+coinit_disable_ole1dde-devel rust-trash+coinit_multithreaded-devel
rust-trash+coinit_speed_over_memory-devel rust-trash+default-devel
rust-trash-devel
Size:68.23 KiB
= DROPPED PACKAGES =
= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package: OpenImageIO-2.3.9.1-3.fc36
Old package: OpenImageIO-2.3.9.1-2.fc36
Summary: Library for reading and writing images
RPMs: OpenImageIO OpenImageIO-devel OpenImageIO-iv OpenImageIO-utils
python3-openimageio
Size: 20.93 MiB
Size change: 7.58 KiB
Changelog:
* Sun Nov 28 2021 Richard Shaw - 2.3.9.1-3
- Rebuild for OpenVDB 9.
Package: aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-3.101-3.fc36
Old package: aajohan-comfortaa-fonts-3.101-2.fc35
Summary: Modern style true type font
RPMs: aajohan-comfortaa-fonts
Size: 271.31 KiB
Size change: 2.06 KiB
Changelog:
* Wed Nov 10 2021 Parag Nemade - 3.101-3
- Convert this package to new fonts packaging guidelines
Package: akmods-0.5.7-1.fc36
Old package: akmods-0.5.6-28.fc35
Summary: Automatic kmods build and install tool
RPMs: akmods
Size: 27.32 KiB
Size change: 4.66 KiB
Changelog:
* Fri Oct 22 2021 Nicolas Vi??ville - 0.5.6-29
- Remove trailing spaces and clean-up
- Use %{name} when possible
- Convert if statement from "[!] $variable" to "[!] -n $variable"
- Fix kernel list build when parsing command line options
- Ensure to build for grub default kernel
- Improve detection of already installed (weak-)modules in akmods (RHEL)
- akmods uses logrotate and clean-up /var/cache/akmods sub-directories of
old logs and rpm files from no more installed kmod packages
(rhbz #1542658).
* Fri Oct 22 2021 Nicolas Vi??ville - 0.5.7-1
- Add local akmods CA signing keys and support tools to sign modules for
Secure boot thanks to Stanislas Leduc
- Add akmods-keygen service to generate MOK key pair on first run
Package: argparse-manpage-2-1.fc36
Old package: argparse-manpage-1.5-4.fc35
Summary: Build manual page from Python ArgumentParser object
RPMs: argparse-manpage python3-argparse-manpage
Size: 47.17 KiB
Size change: 343 B
Changelog:
* Sun Nov 28 2021 Pavel Raiskup - 2-1
- new upstream release:
https://github.com/praiskup/argparse-manpage/releases/tag/v2
Package: astigmatic-grand-hotel-fonts-1.000-14.fc36
Old package: astigmatic-grand-hotel-fonts-1.000-13.fc35
Summary: Script retro style fonts
RPMs: astigmatic-grand-hotel-fonts
Size: 36.03 KiB
Size change: 454 B
Changelog:
* Tue Nov 09 2021 Parag Nemade - 1.000-14
- Convert this package to new fonts packaging guidelines
Package: bcal-2.3-1.fc36
Old package: bcal-2.2-5.fc35
Summary: Storage conversion and expression calculator
RPMs: bcal
Size: 204.65 KiB
Size change: 757 B
Changelog:
* Sun Nov 28 2021 Robert-Andr?? Mauchin 2.3-1
- Update to 2.3 Close: rhbz#2014565
Package: blender-1:2.93.6-1.fc36
Old package: blender-1:2.93.5-1.fc36
Summary: 3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
RPMs: blender blender-rpm-macros
Size: 173.53 MiB
Size change: 36.54 MiB
Changelog:
* Sat Nov 27 2021 Luya Tshimbalanga 1:2.93.6-1
- RPMAUTOSPEC: changelog file removed
Package: blueberry-1.4.5-1.fc36
Old package: blueberry-1.4.4-2.fc35
Summary: Bluetooth configuration tool
RPMs: blueberry
Size: 1.22 MiB
Size change: -359 B
Changelog:
* Sun Nov 28 2021 Kevin Fenzi - 1.4.5-1
- Update to 1.4.5. Fixes rhbz#2026900
Package: bottles-2021.11.28-1.fc36
Old package: bottles-2021.
Fedora-Cloud-35-20211129.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211128.0): ID: 1072937 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1072937 ID: 1072945 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1072945 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20211129.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211128.0): ID: 1072921 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1072921 ID: 1072929 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1072929 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
