Xfce ~ Lost all menu icons in Rawhide and Beta Branch
In Rawhide (fc39) and the beta branch (fc38), with all updates applied, I'm seeing all menu icons are gone in Xfce... both the system menu and right-click context menus. Seems the Settings Tab in Settings->Appearance now has all options turned off, including "Show images in menus". Updates did this. Ticking this option brings sanity back. Was this really intentional or is it a bug? I think this deviation from traditional defaults is going to cause beginners a lot of grief. The Xfce updates in the total update payload were as follows: xfce4-about-4.18.2-1.fc38.x86_64 xfce4-notifyd-0.8.0-1.fc38.x86_64 xfce4-panel-4.18.2-1.fc38.x86_64 xfce4-power-manager-4.18.1-1.fc38.x86_64 xfce4-session-4.18.1-1.fc38.x86_64 xfce4-settings-4.18.2-1.fc38.x86_64 I'm guessing it was xfce4-settings that did it? If this was intentional I think it was a really bad idea. Ian -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:23:13PM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote: > > Yep. Lovely. Getting Microsoft and Google to fix this should be easy (ok, > not really). I read somewhere that google has already updated things internally, it's just going thru some process to publish. (I can't recall where off hand). kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38
On 2/15/2023 11:35 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:41:47AM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote: Greetings, I've been unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38. Example attempts: $ sudo rpm --import https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub [sudo] password for scott: error: Certificate A040830F7FAC5991: Policy rejects A040830F7FAC5991: No binding signature at time 2023-02-15T15:31:30Z error: https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub: key 1 import failed. error: Certificate 7721F63BD38B4796: Policy rejects 7721F63BD38B4796: No binding signature at time 2023-02-15T15:31:30Z error: https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub: key 2 import failed. AND $ sudo rpm --import https://packages.microsoft.com/keys/microsoft.asc error: Certificate EB3E94ADBE1229CF: Policy rejects EB3E94ADBE1229CF: No binding signature at time 2023-02-15T15:32:55Z error: https://packages.microsoft.com/keys/microsoft.asc: key 1 import failed. I'm not sure what the problem is. It's not been an issue in Fedora 37. It's likely the crypto-policy disallowing SHA-1. See: https://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2023/01/31/error-rpmdbnextiterator-skipping-in-fedora-38/ https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/certain-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-sha1-signature-verification/31594 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2 kevin Yep. Lovely. Getting Microsoft and Google to fix this should be easy (ok, not really). Thanks. Scott ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
F37 retrospective survey open through 9 March
In case you missed it on the Community Blog[1], the F37 retrospective survey[2] is open through 9 March. As a reminder, this survey is about the _process_ of creating F37, not the end result. This is the third such survey, so we'll be able to start putting together trends. This survey uses Fedora's LimeSurvey instance. Responses are anonymous. [1] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/f37-retrospective-survey-open/ [2] https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/37 -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:41:47AM -0800, Scott Beamer wrote: > Greetings, > > I've been unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38. Example attempts: > > $ sudo rpm --import https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub > [sudo] password for scott: > error: Certificate A040830F7FAC5991: > Policy rejects A040830F7FAC5991: No binding signature at time > 2023-02-15T15:31:30Z > error: https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub: key 1 import > failed. > error: Certificate 7721F63BD38B4796: > Policy rejects 7721F63BD38B4796: No binding signature at time > 2023-02-15T15:31:30Z > error: https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub: key 2 import > failed. > > AND > > $ sudo rpm --import https://packages.microsoft.com/keys/microsoft.asc > error: Certificate EB3E94ADBE1229CF: > Policy rejects EB3E94ADBE1229CF: No binding signature at time > 2023-02-15T15:32:55Z > error: https://packages.microsoft.com/keys/microsoft.asc: key 1 import > failed. > > I'm not sure what the problem is. It's not been an issue in Fedora 37. It's likely the crypto-policy disallowing SHA-1. See: https://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2023/01/31/error-rpmdbnextiterator-skipping-in-fedora-38/ https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/certain-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-sha1-signature-verification/31594 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2 kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38
Greetings, I've been unable to import public GPG keys in Fedora 38. Example attempts: $ sudo rpm --import https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub [sudo] password for scott: error: Certificate A040830F7FAC5991: Policy rejects A040830F7FAC5991: No binding signature at time 2023-02-15T15:31:30Z error: https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub: key 1 import failed. error: Certificate 7721F63BD38B4796: Policy rejects 7721F63BD38B4796: No binding signature at time 2023-02-15T15:31:30Z error: https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub: key 2 import failed. AND $ sudo rpm --import https://packages.microsoft.com/keys/microsoft.asc error: Certificate EB3E94ADBE1229CF: Policy rejects EB3E94ADBE1229CF: No binding signature at time 2023-02-15T15:32:55Z error: https://packages.microsoft.com/keys/microsoft.asc: key 1 import failed. I'm not sure what the problem is. It's not been an issue in Fedora 37. Scott ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How do I upgrade from F37 to Branched (F38)?
On 2/13/2023 3:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 08:29 -0800, Scott Beamer wrote: On 2/13/23 1:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote: Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800): I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the repos are still pointing to rawhide. I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine, anyway. I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora* packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to exclude= in dnf.conf. Yeah, sounds like we've got a bug. Well, it's not so much a bug as we haven't been able to do a second Branched compose. The first one didn't get the updated fedora-release and fedora-repos; the second one should, but we haven't been able to do a compose for days because of the s390x outage holding up builds that we needed to get a compose done. We should hopefully be able to get a compose through by end of today. In the meantime you can just update to the latest fedora-release and fedora-repos packages from Koji if you like. Yep. It's all good now. Thanks. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
