The desktop of Fedora Robotics top left corner no display “Activity”, is a white cube

2023-10-05 Thread wang_chen
When install Fedora Robotics in virtualbox 7.0.10, after start Fedora Robotics, 
top left corner is a white cube, then install into disk,chinese version, reboot 
again,top left corner is a white cube as before。
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: why is my ESP filesystem getting mounted to /efi/???

2023-10-05 Thread luya

/efi/ is the default mount of EFI System Partition. Take a look at 
https://0pointer.net/blog/linux-boot-partitions.html on why mount ESP on 
/boot/efi should be discouraged.

On 2023-10-04 6:27 p.m., Felix Miata  wrote:

# inxi -S
System:
   Host: ab560 Kernel: 6.4.16-200.fc38.x86_64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64
 Console: pty pts/1 Distro: Fedora release 39 (Thirty Nine)
# rpm -qa | grep grub
# grep -w /efi /proc/mounts
systemd-1 /efi autofs 
rw,relatime,fd=52,pgrp=1,timeout=120,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct,pipe_ino=24799
 0 0
/dev/nvme0n1p1 /efi vfat 
rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,nosymfollow,fmask=0077,dmask=0077,codepage=437,iocharset=ascii,shortname=mixed,errors=remount-ro
 0 0
# tree /efi/
/efi/
├── EFI
│   ├── BOOT
│   │   ├── BOOTX64.EFI
│   │   ├── fbx64.efi
│   │   ├── grubx64.efi
│   │   └── mt74x64.efi
│   ├── opensusetw
│   │   └── grubx64.efi
│   └── tubuntu
├── grub2
│   ├── customAB250-17.cfg
│   └── custom.cfg
├── MemTest86.log
├── mt74x64.efi
└── mt83x64.efi

11 directories, 10 files
# efibootmgr
BootCurrent: 
Timeout: 1 seconds
BootOrder: ,0001
Boot* opensusetw
HD(1,GPT,5b33...,0x800,0xa)/File(\EFI\OPENSUSETW\GRUBX64.EFI)
Boot0001* UEFI OS   
HD(1,GPT,5b33...,0x800,0xa)/File(\EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI)424f
# grep -E 'efi|boot|esp' /etc/fstab
#LABEL=TM8P01ESP/boot/efi   vfatcodepage=4370 0
#

This is a multiboot PC. Only one bootloader is necessary. It isn't Fedora on
this one. I noticed existence of /efi/ shortly after last dnf upgrade, looked
at its content, thought it must have been an errant backup of some kind, moved
the content elsewhere as just-in-case before removing it all, and sure enough,
no more booting possible from NVME until after restoring from the backup and
recreating the required EFI boot entry.

Why was/is the ESP mounted anywhere when there is/was no fstab entry for it?

Why does /efi/ exist?

I added a new noauto fstab entry for the ESP to a unique location not within
/boot/ and deleted /efi/, with the result that it stays unmounted, and /efi/
stays absent.


___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: sudo make install for homebrewed kernel on F39 runs in a error

2023-10-05 Thread old sixpack13
...
> error message:
>   INSTALL /boot
> grub2-mkrelpath: error: failed to get canonical path of 
> `/boot/vmlinuz-6.5.4_MY'.
> dirname: missing operand
> Try 'dirname --help' for more information.
> 

for the record:
fixed with todays grub2-2.06-103.fc39

Thanks
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[Test-Announce] Fedora 39 Upgrade Test Day is underway!

2023-10-05 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All,

As we come closer to Fedora 39 release dates, it's time to test upgrades.
Fedora 39 has a lot of changesets and it becomes essential that we
test the graphical upgrade methods as well as the command line.
As a part of this test day[0], we will test upgrading from a full
updated, F37 and F38 to the F39 for all architectures(x86_64,ARM,aarch
64) and variants(WS,cloud,server,silverblue,IoT).

We understand that upgrade takes time and testing if things work as
expected, takes more.
We will be accepting results throughout the weekend!

The results can be submitted here[1]

As usual, we hang out on the #fedora-test-day, should you have questions.

[0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2023-10-05_F39_Upgrade_Test_Day
[1] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/158


-- 
//sumantro
Fedora QE
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Fedora 39 Upgrade Test Day is underway!

2023-10-05 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hey All,

As we come closer to Fedora 39 release dates, it's time to test upgrades.
Fedora 39 has a lot of changesets and it becomes essential that we
test the graphical upgrade methods as well as the command line.
As a part of this test day[0], we will test upgrading from a full
updated, F37 and F38 to the F39 for all architectures(x86_64,ARM,aarch
64) and variants(WS,cloud,server,silverblue,IoT).

We understand that upgrade takes time and testing if things work as
expected, takes more.
We will be accepting results throughout the weekend!

The results can be submitted here[1]

As usual, we hang out on the #fedora-test-day, should you have questions.

[0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2023-10-05_F39_Upgrade_Test_Day
[1] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/158


-- 
//sumantro
Fedora QE
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue