Re: QCad
I would do exactly that (report bug against qcad component at bugzilla.redhat.com). Don't forget it's a Fedora product. You are welcome all the same Regards Onyeibo (@twohot) On September 14, 2023 5:59:31 PM GMT+01:00, ppadilcdx wrote: > >I'm new to Fedora so not sure if this is the correct list to send this >to or if I should open a bug report. > >Regards > >Pete ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Rawhide Nightlies crashes on reaching Graphical Environment
Hi Adam, Check out the bug report at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238995 I successfully booted Fedora Sway from https://getfedora.org on the same machine. There has to be something off in recent composes. The error occurs when anaconda wants to start a chronyd service. Hoping someone can replicate this on a similar machine or any other physical machine. Regards Onyeibo (@twohot) On September 14, 2023 5:50:54 PM GMT+01:00, Adam Williamson wrote: >On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 16:18 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote: >> Greetings everyone >> >> I am trying to install Fedora Server Edition using netinstall images from >> https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/nightlies.html >> >> So far, I have not been successful. I tried the installation with >> yesterday's image and today's image (few minutes ago). I got the same error >> message as soon as it reaches graphical environment. >> >> After few traceback lines, the last line says: >> pyanaconda errors.ExitError: gnome_kiosk exited on signal 5 >> >It's probably hardware-specific. "Last Known Good" means the image >passed all its tests in openQA, which tests in a virtual machine. > >Are you able to test on other hardware? > >Has anyone else encountered this problem trying to boot F39 or Rawhide >installer images? > >Thanks folks! ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Rawhide Nightlies crashes on reaching Graphical Environment
Greetings everyone I am trying to install Fedora Server Edition using netinstall images from https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/nightlies.html So far, I have not been successful. I tried the installation with yesterday's image and today's image (few minutes ago). I got the same error message as soon as it reaches graphical environment. I used images from the "Last Known Good" (green) column in the "Server boot" table/section. After few traceback lines, the last line says: pyanaconda errors.ExitError: gnome_kiosk exited on signal 5 That was surprising. The box is a Dell Optiplex 3050 though. I tried exporting a comprehensive report but the box has no internet yet. I might be able to fire off nmcli if I can get a shell. I am open to ideas as I suspect this is peculiar. Otherwise those images won't be on the "Last Known Good" column. Regards Onyeibo (@twohot)___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: DNF 5 Test Week starts today!
Yes! This is something I'd like to do, considering that DNF5 frustrated me last week. Do we get badges for this one? On Fri Aug 11, 2023 at 4:26 AM WAT, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey Folks, > > DNF 5 landed in rawhide sometime back and has now been taken off F39 > schedule. DNF 5 awaits testing and feedback before it can be > considered stable for Fedora users. DNF and Fedora Quality are hosting > a week-long testing period from Friday, August 11th through Thursday, > August 17th. > > The wiki[0] contains all information and the results can be submitted > by the test days app[1] > > > [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2023-08-11_Fedora_39_DNF_5 > [1] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/163 > > Happy Testing! ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Not seeing "check" in dnf5
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 17:59:46 +0100 Onyeibo Oku wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:17:27 -0700 > stan via test wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:54:56 +0100 > > Onyeibo Oku wrote: > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > Then I would run a > > dnf --distro-sync > > to ensure that everything is at the latest available version and > > remove all the older versions. > > > Apart from the Kernel Panics,. it appears something went wrong while > updating Python. dnf ls --installed | grep python3 tells me I have the recent Python3 (and Python3-libs, Python3-tkinter) with copies of py3.11 (as Python3.11-libs, Python3.11-tkinter etc) on the list. This should be fine since the packages bear different names However, when I run: dnf update I get conflicts as exemplified in my previous reply. The update path goes on to involve python3.11-libs when it should not. Somehow python3, python3-libs, and python3-tkinter picks up both 3.12 and 3.11 while processing the update. The two packages share something in common and dnf is confused. I can remove the older Python via: dnf remove python3.11-libs It pulls sudo-python-plugin and python-setuptools-wheel for removal as well. How safe is that? Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Not seeing "check" in dnf5
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:17:27 -0700 stan via test wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:54:56 +0100 > Onyeibo Oku wrote: > > > Any ideas? > > > Then I would run a > dnf --distro-sync > to ensure that everything is at the latest available version and > remove all the older versions. dnf distro-sync Updating and loading repositories: Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release 100% | 22.3 KiB/s | 42.3 KiB | 00m02s Repositories loaded. Problem 1: cannot install both python3-3.11.3-2.fc39.x86_64 and python3-3.12.0~b4-1.fc39.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package python3.11-3.11.4-2.fc39.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package python3-3.12.0~b4-1.fc39.x86_64 Problem 2: cannot install both python3-libs-3.11.3-2.fc39.x86_64 and python3-libs-3.12.0~b4-1.fc39.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package python3.11-libs-3.11.4-2.fc39.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package python3-libs-3.12.0~b4-1.fc39.x86_64 Problem 3: cannot install both python3-tkinter-3.11.3-2.fc39.x86_64 and python3-tkinter-3.12.0~b4-1.fc39.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package python3.11-tkinter-3.11.4-2.fc39.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package python3-tkinter-3.12.0~b4-1.fc39.x86_64 Apart from the Kernel Panics,. it appears something went wrong while updating Python. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Not seeing "check" in dnf5
Greetings I am getting kernel panics after recent updates. Strangely, lots of things are also broken (e.g. Python 3.12 getting mixed up with 3.11, virtual environments, etc.). I suspect the update did not conclude properly because dnf5 tends to stop midway when it encounters an issue. So, I ran a "dnf check". What do you know? "check" command appears to be absent in dnf5. I think my local repo (RPMs) are in a bad state. I am running Rawhide. Any ideas? Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Last known Good for Rawhide (Server Edition) -- Not Good
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 08:51:14 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2022-12-10 at 12:01 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 11:47:39 +0100 > > Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > > > o/ , > > > > > > Please note that "last known good" for rawhide nightlies actually > > > means that it installs to VM, not via usb. > > > > Interesting. That should be explicit on the page then. Some people > > still run server editions outside the cloud. > > It is. > > "This is not as strong an indication of quality as official Alpha or > Beta status, but at least indicates that the image successfully boots, > completes a system installation, and boots to the installed system, in > a straightforward virtual machine configuration." > > That's right there at the top of the page. How did I miss that? > > > Just to be sure, did you create the usb media via Fedora Media > > > Writer? > > > > Kinda saw this coming. Short Answer: NO > > I used Rufus and never had issues with that prior to this image. > > The last Server edition I tried in November worked. > > Please try with straight dd or Fedora Media Writer. We can't be sure > how any other tool writes images or if it's causing the problem. So I did. I created the USB with Fedora Media Writer and it worked! I am sending this mail from the box. I now have added respect for Fedora Media Writer, more than ever before. I always ran to Rufus in the past. On that note, I tender my apologies to the QA team for my baseless complaints. It is was all good. Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Last known Good for Rawhide (Server Edition) -- Not Good
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 11:47:39 +0100 Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > o/ , > > Please note that "last known good" for rawhide nightlies actually > means that it installs to VM, not via usb. Interesting. That should be explicit on the page then. Some people still run server editions outside the cloud. > Just to be sure, did you create the usb media via Fedora Media Writer? > Kinda saw this coming. Short Answer: NO I used Rufus and never had issues with that prior to this image. The last Server edition I tried in November worked. Thanks for the heads-up Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Last known Good for Rawhide (Server Edition) -- Not Good
Good Morning, I'd like to bring something to attention. I just downloaded Server Boot Media (Netinstall) from: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20221209.n.0/compose/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20221209.n.0.iso I made a USB boot disk out of that and it failed to boot. Here is what I get after choosing to install at the GRUB Menu: error: ../../grub-core/fs/fshelp.c:257:file '/images/pxeboot/vmlinuz' not found error: ../../grub-core/loader/i386/efi/linux.c:258:you need to load the kernel first. Press any key to continue ... The ISO was registered as "last known good". This can't be good. Which one really works? ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Cannot reach Bugzilla
Greetings everyone, Is it just me or is Bugzilla offline? I have been trying that site for the past 2 hours. What's happening? Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Something is not right (Fc37-Rawhide)
I eventually reinstalled from latest nightly image and the following issue disappeared: On Sat Feb 26, 2022 at 2:08 PM WAT, Onyeibo Oku wrote: > Hi, > > All of a sudden I am getting the following out put for every package i > update with dnf: > > 2022-02-25T20:51:14+0100 INFO /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libnss_compat.so.2 > is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libutil.so.1 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libresolv.so.2 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libnss_dns.so.2 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libthread_db.so.1 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libanl.so.1 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libdl.so.2 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/librt.so.1 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libmvec.so.1 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libm.so.6 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libc.so.6 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libc_malloc_debug.so.0 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libBrokenLocale.so.1 is not a symbolic link > /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libnss_files.so.2 is not a symbolic link > > Is anyone else seeing this? Most of those messages point to > glibc-2.35.9000-5.fc37.x86_64. I have tried reinstalling > glibc-2.35.9000-5.fc37.x86_64. The output persists. Any ideas? > I got glibc-2.35.9000-6.fc37.x86_64 instead. Perhaps that fixed it. Strangely I am unable to install Firefox after the fresh installation. Output: --- Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 155 kB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 (0x5323552A) is already installed The GPG keys listed for the "Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing package is: mozilla-openh264-2.1.1-3.fc36.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Public key for openh264-2.1.1-3.fc36.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: openh264-2.1.1-3.fc36.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Error: GPG check FAILED Is it safe to add --nogpgcheck dnf parameter for this installation? Otherwise, the keys are out of sync. Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Something is not right (Fc37-Rawhide)
Hi, All of a sudden I am getting the following out put for every package i update with dnf: 2022-02-25T20:51:14+0100 INFO /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libnss_compat.so.2 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libutil.so.1 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libresolv.so.2 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libnss_dns.so.2 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libthread_db.so.1 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libanl.so.1 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libdl.so.2 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/librt.so.1 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libmvec.so.1 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libm.so.6 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libc.so.6 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libc_malloc_debug.so.0 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libBrokenLocale.so.1 is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /lib64/libnss_files.so.2 is not a symbolic link Is anyone else seeing this? Most of those messages point to glibc-2.35.9000-5.fc37.x86_64. I have tried reinstalling glibc-2.35.9000-5.fc37.x86_64. The output persists. Any ideas? Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: tty broken after "latest" upgrade
You beat me to it. I can confirm your observation. I was set to post the draft below: I updated my Rawhide 24-hours ago. Since then, I lost textual output. I can see the GRUB menu and the Plymouth screen. After those, no texts show up any more -- only the blinking cursor remains. I can tell that there is activity on the machine because the cursor keeps moving around (changing lines like it is printing out stuff, only I can't see any texts). Some commands execute as expected (without visuals, that is). For example, "clear" sends the cursor back to the top-left corner of the screen; but I do not see the text while typing. The phenomenon is strange. So, I went on to download the latest rawhide ISO (Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-Rawhide-20210424.n.0.iso). The installation went fine (graphics and all). However, after installing, I am back to the same phenomena. This behaviour implies that one or more recent packages in rawhide repositories have bugs. Has anyone experienced this recently? Perhaps I should investigate further. Regards Onyeibo On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:38:59 + (UTC) George R Goffe via test wrote: > Hi, > > I ran a system upgrade late last night and at reboot noticed a major > problem with tty (possibly). > > I run this system with the multi-user target active, which means I > get a text based invitation to login and have to start X manually. > This is NOT a new change. > > Instead of seeing text "printed" on the screen, I see nothing. It's > like the text is invisible. This situation happens near the time of > the font change for the various boot messages. After this change, > nothing appears except for a blinking "text" cursor. This happens > with and without the "nomodeset" boot command line operand present. > All the ttys are affected so I doubt that it's an X problem. Hitting > enter acts like I entered a blank userid. I visualize logging in and > then starting X. This works and I get an X session, windowmaker in my > case. ALL the other ttys behave the same... no characters appear > except for the cursor. I don't see anything obvious in the output of > "journalctl -x -b0". > > This system is at the "latest" Fedora 35 (x86_64) upgrades installed. > > I'm kinda lost as to just where this problem "lives". Any/all help, > hints, tips, suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Best regards, > > George... > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Strange performance on Rawhide this morning (UTC+1)
Good morning, After powering down my box to change power source, I attempted to boot again. I noticed that the process hangs after selecting Kernel. For a moment, I couldn't boot. Then I chose the test kernel (5.10.5-200.fc33.x86_64) and it went well. I figured the kernel was the culprit so I ran an update. I got the following: Cleanup : btrfs-progs-5.9-1.fc34.x86_64 265/266 Cleanup : SDL2-2.0.12-4.fc33.x86_64 266/266 Running scriptlet: kernel-core-5.11.0-0.rc4.129.fc34.x86_64 266/266 sort: fflush failed: 'standard output': Broken pipe sort: write error gzip: stdout: Broken pipe gzip: stdout: Broken pipe sort: write failed: 'standard output': Broken pipe sort: write error . Huh? Should I be worried? Previous kernel was kernel-5.11.0-0.rc3.122.fc34.x86_64 Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: heads up: nss 3.59 breaks firefox add-ons
Is this still active? My Firefox plugins are getting disabled and I cannot install new ones (they are reported as corrupt). Is there a new instance of this bug? Regards Onyeibo On Fri Dec 18, 2020 at 5:30 PM WAT, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 07:33 -0700, James Szinger wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:17:21 -0800 > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons > > > will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have > > > to remove them and re-install them (after downgrading nss). > > > > > > For now, downgrade nss or avoid updating to it until things can get > > > sorted out. > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908018 > > > > > > kevin > > > > I see nss.x86_64 3.59.0-3.fc33 in today’s updates. Is this fixed or > > are there going to be a lot of unhappy Firefox users? > > It's fixed. > > > The bug is still open. > > Because we still need to do something (or, rather, get Mozilla to do > something) about the underlying situation. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA > IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha > https://www.happyassassin.net > > > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rawhide users: don't update to 20201208.n.0 packages (fprintd 1.90.6), console login and su are broken
So that's what's wrong with my Firefox addons. Downgrading ... -- Onyeibo On Tue Dec 15, 2020 at 7:37 PM WAT, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2020-12-15 at 10:17 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote: > > Update was a success! Everything is running fine. > > Great. Now, don't update to nss 3.59.0 if you like your Firefox add-ons > to work. :) > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA > IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha > https://www.happyassassin.net > > > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rawhide users: don't update to 20201208.n.0 packages (fprintd 1.90.6), console login and su are broken
Update was a success! Everything is running fine. Much regards Onyeibo On Sun Dec 13, 2020 at 8:27 AM WAT, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 07:43 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > Looking to run an installation (and update perhaps). Is it now safe? > > > > Maybe: > > sudo dnf update --exclude=fprintd > > > > Regards and thanks for the early warning. > > Hi Onyeibo! We had trouble getting a successful compose with the fixes > for a bit, but one just got through today. openQA testing shows > 20201212.n.0 has the glibc and fprintd bugs fixed and looks generally > OK, there are some test failures that will need looking into but > nothing super-critical. So as long as your mirror has synced to that > compose you should be OK to install/update. If you want to be sure, > wait another few hours first. The fixed versions are glibc-2.32.9000- > 20.fc34 and fprintd-1.90.7-1.fc34 or higher (I think the compose got 8- > 1.fc34). > > Thanks! > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA > IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha > https://www.happyassassin.net > > > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rawhide users: don't update to 20201208.n.0 packages (fprintd 1.90.6), console login and su are broken
Greetings. Looking to run an installation (and update perhaps). Is it now safe? Maybe: sudo dnf update --exclude=fprintd Regards and thanks for the early warning. Onyeibo On Wed Dec 9, 2020 at 9:53 PM WAT, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 12:02 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 10:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hey folks! > > > > > > Just a heads up that the most recent Rawhide compose (20201208.n.0) > > > seems badly broken; console login doesn't work and 'su' segfaults. I > > > think the most likely cause of these issues is the new glibc 2.32.9000- > > > 19.fc34 build. > > > > > > So if you're running Rawhide I'd recommend holding off on updating, and > > > especially on updating glibc, if you didn't do it already. If you've > > > updated glibc you may want to downgrade it (if you still have a root > > > shell somewhere :>) > > > > Still looking into this, but it seems kinda complex. Downgrading glibc > > on my test VM didn't fix the issues. I thought sssd might be the > > culprit, but downgrading that didn't help either. > > > > It seems like the console login bug at least doesn't happen with a > > minimal package install: > > https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/737305 > > passed, including console login as user and root, and I verified that > > it used the packages from the 1208.n.0 compose. But it seems to > > reliably happen on Server, Workstation and KDE installs. So it's > > apparently caused by something present in those installs but not in > > minimal... > > > > Still looking into this, my advice for now is still not to upgrade past > > the 1207.n.0 package state until it's figured out :) > > OK, further update: culprit seems to be fprintd. fprintd 1.90.6 is the > bad version. A 1.90.7 build is done which should fix it: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1656747 > > A libfprint 1.90.6 is also done, not sure if that's also needed: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1656771 > > There were bug reports already that I hadn't found as I was looking for > glibc bugs: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905667 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905964 > > so, skip fprintd 1.90.6! > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA > IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha > https://www.happyassassin.net > > > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self-introduction: Onyeibo Oku
On Sun, 09 Aug 2020 19:10:29 +0200 Alessio wrote: > Welcome Onyeibo! > Are you the twohot helping on Ask Fedora? Hi @alciregi Yes sir! That's me. Regards @twohot ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Getting dumps from coredumpctl
On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 12:58:36 +0800 Ian Kent wrote: > I don't think you need to change that behaviour. You're right. I eventually extracted the core dump without touching systemcd-coredump settings. > Have a look at the man page for coredumpctl(1). Actually, I only needed to set soft limits for ulimit. Thanks for the cue. Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Getting dumps from coredumpctl
Greetings, I am trying to supply core dump for a bug report. The app segfaults and coredumpctl sees the entry. However, the dump is not written to disk so there's nothing to attach to the report. How do I change this behaviour? Regards Onyeibo ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Self-introduction: Onyeibo Oku
Hi, I am stepping forward to contribute to the Fedora Community as part of the Quality Assurance Team and its not for the love of badges. I already report bugs at bugzilla.redhat.com. Occasionally, I hang around #fedora-qa at freenode ... mostly to confirm current observations in Rawhide. So, yes, Rawhide is my preferred Fedora-version because it provides more challenges to fast-track my understanding of Linux. I like learning and computers make it exhilarating. I am Nigerian. I studied architecture (houses etc.). There is more about me on my Fedora wiki too (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:twohot). I hope to make new friends here. Regards to you all. Onyeibo twitter: @onyetwo irc: t2hot or twohot ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
