Re: /boot on btrfs
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 11:18 AM Proprietary Chrome-chan < theevilskele...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi, > > `/boot` can be used on btrfs. However, Anaconda forces me to use ext4 in > that specific, when it shouldn't if you use btrfs. > > I'd like to request allowing `/boot` to be used on btrfs. > You've gotten plenty of responses on the HOW TO but I'm more curious about the WHY? :) Personally if I was going to modify the default install behavior it would be to make a decent size exFAT partition and combine /boot and /boot/EFI and use systemd-boot. It's a way simpler boot process than GRUB. I didn't know about it until I had trouble running Fedora on a Microsoft GO Tablet and grub just didn't know how to boot it. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: External monitor via USB-C hub no longer works with F34
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 1:56 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > I have an Anker USB-C hub which also has HDMI out. (This one: > > https://www.anker.com/products/variant/usb-c-hub,-7in1-usb-c-adapter/A83460A1 > ) > > This "Just Worked™" when I plugged it in with F33. > > I updated my laptop to Fedora Workstation 34 today, and discovered that the > monitor no longer is recognized. If I move to the laptop's own HDMI port, > it > works, but the USB-C one no longer shows up. > Have you tried running a F33 kernel? Worst case you can downgrade because you made a btrfs snapshot first, right? ;) Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Need help with btrfs.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 3:26 PM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > I recall a long and detailed discussion on this list before F33 was > released concerning what disk maintenance would be required with BTRFS. > As I recall, the final word was along the lines the running Scrub and > the other BTRFS utilities wouldn't be necessary since it was being set > up so maintenance shouldn't be needed. There was also some hesitancy to > call for running scrub because, depending on how often it's run Scrub > can be hard on SSDs (they wear out faster). > >From what I can tell scrubbing only reads data and compares to the stored checksum. Why would that wear out a SSD? Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Self-introduction: Joydeep Sen Gupta
Sorry, gmail jumped with new messages as I was clicking on which email to respond to. Please ignore. Thanks, Richard > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self-introduction: Joydeep Sen Gupta
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 2:53 PM Joydeep Sen Gupta wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I'm Joydeep Sen Gupta, an engineering student from India. I have a keen > interest in Linux (user for more than 3 years) and absolutely LOVE Fedora > (user since F28). I am now looking to contribute and be a part of the > quality assurance group and have been actively participating in the various > test days in the F33 development cycle and Bodhi update testing for various > packages. Maybe badges is a good way to show that: > https://badges.fedoraproject.org/user/joydeep :) > > I have also applied for a membership to the QA group and am super excited > to be part of the team! > Joydeep, I am the Fedora maintainer of fldigi, I'm not aware of any issues installing fldigi on Fedora but if you can provide additional details (such as from dnf) I'm more than happy to look into it. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: sort of related to Ryzen 3 performance and Rawhide
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:59 PM David wrote: > I do not know yet how to check other temperatures while in Fedora. > I really like the terminal application 'glances' for seeing what's going on in my system. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: AMD Ryzen purchasing question
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:16 PM murph nj wrote: > On a related note: I recently built a 3700X machine, with my old, > existing nVidia Ti750 card. I've never been happy with the nVidia > drivers. > > Can anyone recommend an AMD video card to replace it at a reasonable > price? ($150-200 US) > Hard to find it at this price now, but I got my AMD RX 580 on Ebay new for $144 delivered. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: AMD Ryzen purchasing question
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:48 PM David wrote: > > If nobody cares, then I will just look for a good sale - which is likely > going to be the Ryzen 5 3600. > Unless you plan on overclocking, I think the Ryzen 5 3600 provides the best value at 65W TDP which is why I picked it (and the 2600 prior). My office is already 10F higher than the rest of the house running Folding@Home on my RX 580. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Testing with NVMe
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 4:03 PM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > On 4/4/20 15:27, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 10:45 AM pmkel...@frontier.com < > pmkel...@frontier.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm not sure the having UEFI is the differentiator... I have a 6th gen I5 > > computer which boots UEFI fine but predates NVMe. On that one I use a > > PCIEx4 adapter and have /boot and /boot/EFI on the HD and then the system > > on the NVMe drive. > > > > My test machine is a 4th gen. i5-4570. From what I can tell it wouldn't > be able to boot to a NVMe on a PCI adapter. > Correct. > I could get a NVMe set up on an adapter like I was originally thinking, > but I do testing on Workstation-Live and I take the defaults for > installation; so is there someplace where I can learn how to split the > installation like you've done it with the /boot and /boot/EFI on the HD > and the System on the NVMe? > You have to setup all the partitioning manually unfortunately. > Then there is the question: Would testing Workstation set up like that > would be of value to the project? I'm thinking there aren't many users > set up like that. Also, it might be a confusion factor for any bugs I find. > Nope, I wouldn't bother testing it that way. I think in the original thread you said you don't have a new enough computer that has M.2/NVMe built-in correct? Kinda hard to test it then :) If you really want to be able to then you'll need some newer hardware. If $$$ is a problem, maybe an inexpensive micro-ATX and Athlon 200GE chip. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Testing with NVMe
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 10:45 AM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > On 4/4/20 10:24, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 9:14 AM pmkel...@frontier.com < > pmkel...@frontier.com> > > wrote: > > M.2 SSD's can come in SATA and NVMe variants. > > > > As far as USB 3.0, it's pretty fast and someone may want compact a M.2 > NVMe > > SSD in a USB 3.0 enclosure for convenience. > > I guess, but an ordinary SSD in an external box would do as well. USB 3 > is the limiting factor for speed. Though being able to boot might be an > advantage for test. In this case I would ask what is it we really want > to test, high speed access and data flow, or just ordinary operation > like booting and normal use at desktop kind of speeds? > Can't say why manufacturing make 'em, but M.2 form is a little smaller than a 2.5" drive... > > From the various conversations with the test folks over time, it seems > >> many in the group test on laptops. Many of the newer lap tops have a > >> connector on the motherboard that connects an NVMe to PCI-E. This and > >> the above leads me to believe that the testing we want to do is with > >> NVMe on PCI-E. That's what I'm planning at this time. > >> > > > > Yes I think that would cover the vast majority of situations, but that > > includes many desktops today too, not just laptops. I'm running a Samsung > > 970 EVO on my Ryzen 5 2600 system. > > > > > > Is that your only "disk" for boot and whatever else you do? > I run it as my system drive with a 2TB drive dedicated to /home. > > I have only desktops none of the ones I support have such a slot on the > >> mother board. No worries; There are PCI-E adapter boards that NVMe > >> modules can be plugged into then the board plugs into a standard PCI-E > >> four channel slot. This is the route I'm planning to go. > >> > > > > That should work for secondary storage (and testing) but frequently the > > system can't boot from a NVMe add-in card because the BIOS doesn't > support > > it. > > > > Well that's certainly another point to consider. Do you happen to know > if UEFI supports it? I'll have to reboot my test machine later to see if > there is anything that looks like it in the config. pages. > I'm not sure the having UEFI is the differentiator... I have a 6th gen I5 computer which boots UEFI fine but predates NVMe. On that one I use a PCIEx4 adapter and have /boot and /boot/EFI on the HD and then the system on the NVMe drive. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Testing with NVMe
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 9:14 AM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > One thing that seems rather puzzling is that NVMe is offered in three > different connection configurations. PCI-E, USB (with a USB connector), > and SSD via SATA (with an SATA connector. Since multichannel PCI-E is > very much faster that either USB or SATA I don't really understand why > the USB and SATA options are offered. It seems a bit like having a car > that's designed and built for racing and only driving it on city streets. > Are you sure you're not conflating M.2 and NVMe? From what I can tell NVMe is only for storage whereas M.2 is primarily used for storage but there are other types of M.2 cards. M.2 SSD's can come in SATA and NVMe variants. As far as USB 3.0, it's pretty fast and someone may want compact a M.2 NVMe SSD in a USB 3.0 enclosure for convenience. From the various conversations with the test folks over time, it seems > many in the group test on laptops. Many of the newer lap tops have a > connector on the motherboard that connects an NVMe to PCI-E. This and > the above leads me to believe that the testing we want to do is with > NVMe on PCI-E. That's what I'm planning at this time. > Yes I think that would cover the vast majority of situations, but that includes many desktops today too, not just laptops. I'm running a Samsung 970 EVO on my Ryzen 5 2600 system. I have only desktops none of the ones I support have such a slot on the > mother board. No worries; There are PCI-E adapter boards that NVMe > modules can be plugged into then the board plugs into a standard PCI-E > four channel slot. This is the route I'm planning to go. > That should work for secondary storage (and testing) but frequently the system can't boot from a NVMe add-in card because the BIOS doesn't support it. The complication is that there are different kinds of NVMe modules and > the PCI-E boards have different configurations as well. At this point I > think I will get a board for "M.2" modules and a module to go with it. > There are still some points I want to investigate before I go ahead. I > want read some of the module data sheets in detail to see if there are > any GotYas that need to be considered. Also I want to see what the "raw" > formatting of the module looks like and if it changes from brand to > brand or with module capacity. My observation has been that > manufacturers always want a "competitive advantage" and sometimes those > "advantages" can turn into "let the buyer beware". > > In regard to actual procurement. Many of the modules require heat > sinking most of the adapter boards provide at least some minimal > provision for adding a heat sink. Others come complete with all required > hardware for heat sinking. This gets a bit tricky. The modules provide > the specifications necessary to calculate temperature rise from modules > heat dissipating surface. I still need to find an adapter card with the > corresponding specifications. so a complete thermal analysis can be done. > > A final point of interest is that there are some NVMe modules that are > being called SATA instead of just being called NVMe. My google-fu may be failing me here, however there appear to be adapters, but again I think you're conflating NVMe and M.2. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Memtest86+
My experience is that you need to change the bios to legacy and then it works fine. Thanks Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Bug report #1804709
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:24 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 08:02 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:56 AM Soham Gumaste wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > (I hope this is the correct list) > > > > > > > Unfortunately not :) This is the test list which is for unreleased > version > > of Fedora but your bug report is for Fedora 31 so the regular user list > > would be a good place for general discussion. > > Sorry, no, I don't think that's correct. > > test@ is the QA team list. Discussion of testing of stable releases is > perfectly on-topic here. The description of the list in Hyperkitty / > Mailman is "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" - not > just *pre* releases. > Well I guess I need to eat my words then :) But to be fair, I have seen the same/similar statement made many times over the years... > > You *could* talk about this on the users list, but I don't think it's > off topic here at all! > It's is much lower volume and may not be monitored as much as other lists... Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Bug report #1804709
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:56 AM Soham Gumaste wrote: > Hello, > (I hope this is the correct list) > Unfortunately not :) This is the test list which is for unreleased version of Fedora but your bug report is for Fedora 31 so the regular user list would be a good place for general discussion. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Closing bug reports
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 7:15 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I personally really prefer comments in bugs over needinfo (which seems > "pushy" to me? I am not sure why, but I think of needinfo as a > escalation over just adding a comment. Sort of a 'hey! you never > answered me, and I NEED INFO NOW'. > Well yes, they are "pushy" but to me that's the whole point. To be fair, I will ask in a comment first, but if I don't get a response after a week or two (for low priority stuff) then I'll do a NEEDINFO. It's way to easy to ignore/gloss over BZ emails so sometimes something more direct is needed. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: regarding fedora contributor
Welcome Shiwani! This is the test mailing list for soon to be released versions of Fedora and is very low volume. I would recommend you reintroduce yourself on the users list instead :) https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/us...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ Or if you plan to become a packager, join QA or infrastructure groups, etc the devel list would be most appropriate. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:48 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Adam Williamson > > So...what should we do? Here are the options as I see 'em: > > > > 1. Keep supporting btrfs > > 2. Just modify the criterion with a btrfs exception, even if it's weird > > 3. Rewrite the criterion entirely > > 4. Keep btrfs support in the installer (and blivet-gui) but hide it as > > we used to - require a special boot argument for it to be visible > > 5. Drop btrfs support from the installer > > > I would opt for 4 or 5, and would be in full support of 5. I do not > think that it can (or should) be dropped from the kernel, because we > don't want to cut off existing users, and it can still be a useful > filesystem for specific cases. > Would option 5 prevent people from doing fresh installs with existing btrfs file systems from tying them in during the install process? If so, I think 4 is the better option. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problem with mcelog.service
mcelog is only for Intel, but it autostarts so you have to disable and mask it, but letting it run (and fail) doesn't hurt anything... FYI, you posted this to the test list but F30 is released :) Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Server and disk space
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 5:07 AM wrote: > I installed Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-30-20190415.n.2.iso, selecting > Automatic storage configuration. > Once installed, I spotted that the configured root partition is 15GB > even if the disk is bigger. > I would guess it's on purpose. On Workstation it's 50GB (unless it's changed in f30). I would think the assumption would be on a server you're not going to install a bunch of big GUI applications so less space is needed an can be reserved for other purposes. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
Tried on my Gigabyte AM4 X370 w/ AMD Ryzen 2600 and Nvidia GT1050 I got to GDM just fine but there was some weird jerkiness when I moused over the "Try Fedora / Install" buttons but not when moving the mouse cursor over the desktop area. I coped dmesg and journalctl to a separate machine if it's needed. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F29 / Rawhide - Bogus ssh host key mismatch errors mentioning "rsa-sha2-256"
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:22 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just a heads up, if anyone on F29 or Rawhide finds that > suddenly ssh connections are failing, claiming the host key does not > match and asking for a 'rsa-sha2-256' key: a mysterious hero known only > as 'sedrubal' figured out that this is caused by a crypto-policies > update, this one - > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-854e0caf7b > > you can get back to normal by downgrading back to this build: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1133273 > > (for both F29 and Rawhide). We've got enough negative karma on the > update now that it should be removed from updates-testing on the next > push, but some folks will have got the update already. I'll ask tmraz > if he can either fix it promptly or revert it temporarily, for Rawhide > users. > This may not be limited to F29... I noticed this on F28 several weeks ago and had to go in and remove entries from known_hosts... Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: proposal: drop optical media from release criteria
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:06 PM Fred Smith wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 08:42:13PM +0200, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > >I keep an optical driver in a box under the desk, it might be useful > >someday. > >I haven't used it for years. So yeah, it's time to clean the box > > So, does this mean the images can can no longer be made to boot from > optical media? > Please read the whole thread. This has been addressed multiple times already. No one it taking away your ability to burn an iso, it is simply removing the TESTING as a blocker for release. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: proposal: drop optical media from release criteria
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 12:49 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > Justification: > http://newsthump.com/2018/05/21/man-decides-to-keep-box-of-cables-hes-has-since-2002-for-another-year/ Ouch, that stings just a little :) But yeah, I have burned an install disk in years. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 29 Silverblue Test Day 2018-09-20
Added it as a NOTE on the testdays page with screenshot. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 29 Silverblue Test Day 2018-09-20
This is my first time trying it out and I installed it in VirtualBox. The only thing I noticed is that I pulled up Gnome Software and it showed one update, which I clicked on it it shows one upgrade and one downgrade. What was interesting is that it listed the exact same package multiple times for both. Is that a known issue? I have a screenshot if it helps... Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nvidia and Fedora current state
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:52 AM Michael Schwendt wrote: > The F28 reference installation with rpmfusion's nvidia driver packages > (based on akmod I think) has stopped working all of a sudden, warns about > falling back to nouveau and then crashes upon gdm login. > The errors messages are not helpful and it took me a while to figure out but when I had that problem it's because my card was no longer compatible with the latest drivers (GTS-450) and as soon as I downloaded one of the older versions and rerun akmods it worked. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Nvidia and Fedora current state
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 6:19 AM Michael Schwendt wrote: > On a machine with GeForce GTX 1060, Fedora 28 suffers badly from freezes > and > slowdowns during boot, unbearable slow mouse movement on the GDM login > screen, then more freezes before GNOME Shell appears but isn't really > usable because everything is slow as a snail. Switching the login settings > from Wayland to Xorg at least results in a usable GNOME Shell. Installing > the Nvidia driver packages from rpmfusion hasn't made a difference. > I've had mostly good experiences while using the binary drivers from Nvidia (with a few exceptions over the years). If it's still not working properly with them there may be something else going on, but I'd like to know if you figure it out because I'm looking to upgrade to a 1050Ti in the near future. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org > wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 13:13 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Adam Williamson < > > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:48 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 28 Candidate Beta-1.1 is now > > > > available for testing. > > > > > > This is Beta RC1, folks, so please do help test it! So far as we're > > > aware, all accepted blockers should be addressed in this compose. > > > Please help fill out the matrices as much as we can. Thanks a lot! > > > > > > Download links? I was planning on running from a USB stick as to not > upset > > my current 27 install. > > The validation pages, linked from the original mail, have download > links. Ok, there are a lot of links and "Test_Results" doesn't scream "download me here". Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Candidate Beta-1.1 Available Now!
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Adam Williamson < adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:48 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 28 Candidate Beta-1.1 is now > > available for testing. > > This is Beta RC1, folks, so please do help test it! So far as we're > aware, all accepted blockers should be addressed in this compose. > Please help fill out the matrices as much as we can. Thanks a lot! Download links? I was planning on running from a USB stick as to not upset my current 27 install. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F27 my problem with brasero-3.12.2-2.fc27
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Joerg Lechnerwrote: > Hi, > try to burn a 1.2GB mp4 film onto a DVD or as iso to a foulder. Result > only about 200MB a burned (readable) to the DVD and the source file of > 1.2GB is cut also to about 200MB (same size as shown on DVD), the size of > the burned 1.2GB film varied in 2 trials from about 80MB to about 200MB. To > check wether it's my system or not, I made a new installation of F27, same > error. F26 does not show this error ( brasero-3.12.1-5.fc26 ) > > - brasero-3.12.2-2.fc27 > - Name : kernel > Version : 4.15.4 > Release : 300.fc27 > Arch : x86_64 > I'm the current maintainer of the brasero package in Fedora but be aware that it doesn't get a lot of attention upstream but I'm happy to work with you to see if the problem can be fixed, however, you posted to the test mailing list and Fedora 27 is released so it would be better to post to the users list. Thanks, Richard ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rawhide, NVIDIA, Nouveau
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 11:07 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > […] > > > > Once I have got rid of all errant GL files I will remake an initramfs > > with > > dracut. > > Removed some more NVIDIA GL library detritus and reinstalled more mesa- > ? packages and it cleared the ldd "missing files" and GDM works :-) > > Now I can switch off the non-debug kernel repo and use standard Rawhide > kernels. > > > Thanks for emailing on this, the ideas and pointers are most, most > > helpful. > > Thanks again, your emails were a great help in pushing me on. I'm glad you got if figured out! I use the packages from RPM Fusion so I can remove the packages and know it's gone but that's a luxury of running F22 instead of Rawhide :) I only run that in a docker image! Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rawhide, NVIDIA, Nouveau
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 09:24 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > […] > > > > Not enough detail to give any specific help, but I would start with > > looking > > through the logs. Reboot to something working, even if it's console only > > and do something like: > > > > # journalctl -b -1 > > > > And look through to see if you can find a hint or smoking gun. > > I'd forgotten how much I hate journalctl. 35,000 messages in 3 minutes of > a > boot! > > Anyway, spurred on by your email (sorry for lack of data first time round, > I > was frustrated and annoyed, so terse) I sifted the output with grep and > started at the beginning and: > > gdm-wayland-session fails due to lack of libnvidia-tls.so.358.16. > > Clearly I have missed cleaning up something to do with ld.so or something > as > gdm-wayland-session thinks the NVIDIA driver is still installed. > > If i try executing Xwayland from a command prompt I get the same message > about libnvidia-tls.so.358.16 not being present. > The only things I can think of are double checking ld.conf? The xorg nvidia driver package that provides the tls library also provides these two files... Something from them still lurking about? $ rpm -ql xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-358.16-1.fc22.x86_64 /etc/ld.so.conf.d/nvidia-lib64.conf /etc/prelink.conf.d/nvidia-lib64.conf ... And a WAG to double check your initrd? And make sure all nvidia packages are removed? Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rawhide, NVIDIA, Nouveau
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Russel Winderwrote: > I decided this morning (no idea why) to follow up on people saying "do > not use the NVIDIA driver with Rawhide, just use Nouveau". So I > uninstalled the NVIDIA driver, manually removed all the detritus the > uninstaller just leaves behind, undid the blacklisting of nouveau, > rebooted, created a new initramfs using dracut, and rebooted. > > The nouveau driver loads and everything seems fine, except that GDM > doesn't do anything. > > I am clearly missing something very simple, has anyone any possible > suggestions? Not enough detail to give any specific help, but I would start with looking through the logs. Reboot to something working, even if it's console only and do something like: # journalctl -b -1 And look through to see if you can find a hint or smoking gun. Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rawhide, kernels and NVIDIA
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Russel Winderwrote: > Since kernel 4.1.0, I have not been able to get an NVIDIA > driver/support to compile and work on Rawhide. Either the download > would not compile at all, or now it compiles but fails to work > correctly. As far as I can tell (I may well be wrong) the beta 358.09 > is the only driver/support that compiles against kernels 4.2.0 and > later. I don't know how much this helps but I'm running 355.11 on Fedora 22 with a 4.2.5 kernel without issue on m GTS450... Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: how do i enable the updates-testing repo?
This may or may not have anything to do with your problem but it's one I ran into with dnf... I was trying to update a package I KNEW was in updates-testing (I pushed it myself) but when I asked dnf to update it it gave me the Nothing to do message. After that I tried all the dnf clean metadata|all tricks and it still wouldn't find the updated package. Then I tried dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing list package and lo and behold it was there! Then I released that because it was a library, and another package was dependent on it, that it was refusing to update the package! While that's certainly the correct behavior, the lack of any sort of USEFUL message to the user is extremely confusing and frustrating. Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: how do i enable the updates-testing repo?
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 09:09 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: While that's certainly the correct behavior, the lack of any sort of USEFUL message to the user is extremely confusing and frustrating. You could use --best : I would expect silent behavior from a gui/automatic updates, but if a user is specifically asking for something from the command line, shouldn't --best be the default? Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Gnutls 3??
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote: Nettle contains many pieces so I've taken an alternative approach to packaging it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573 Yes, I noticed the separate libraries but was doing a minimal packaging job. I wonder, is the package name libnettle acceptable? Generally the main package name needs to be the same as the upstream name, which is just nettle. Also, the Requires: on the sub-packages should probably be arch specific, i.e.: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} should be Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Gnutls 3??
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote: The new version of the Pan newsreader wants gnutls 3 but Fedora seems stuck on 2.12. Is there a plan to bring Fedora gnutls up to date? Can I compile gnutls 3 from sources and install on Fedora without throwing a spanner in the works? No such luck for me. I tried updating to 3.0.9 and even went though the patches to fix them but when I tried configure it failed due to lack of libnettle which doesn't exist in Fedora and doesn't appear to be optional anymore. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Gnutls 3??
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: No such luck for me. I tried updating to 3.0.9 and even went though the patches to fix them but when I tried configure it failed due to lack of libnettle which doesn't exist in Fedora and doesn't appear to be optional anymore. nettle was easy enough to package[1]... Took about 10 minutes, but I don't have any real interest in maintaining it... Someone want to pick it up? I also got gnutls 3.0.9 to build[2] but it was pretty much brute force. I fixed the patches where I could and removed the ones that where the files no longer existed. Richard [1] https://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/nettle-2.4-1.fc16.src.rpm [2] https://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/gnutls-3.0.9-1.fc16.src.rpm -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Inadequate sound device control
I've been following this thread with interest so I did some searching and found alsamixergui which is UGLY. I also found gnome-alsamixer for Debian/Ubuntu. The upstream seems to be dead but Debian is keeping it going, probably from lack of an alternative. Between the SRPM from ATRPMs (Why is this not allowed in Fedora?), the newer sources and patches from Debian, and a hour stolen from work I've been able to cobble together a package that needs testing. I have tested it over X11 forwarding though... I've only built for F16 x86_64 so let me know if you need another release/arch. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/gnome-alsamixer-0.9.7-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Inadequate sound device control
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: Qastools is coming to Fedora soon which is Qt based [1]. It is also being used in the Qt Razor desktop which I hope will make it to Fedora someday [1] http://xwmw.org/qastools/ Trying it out now. If I like it I'll submit a Review Request. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Inadequate sound device control
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: Qastools is coming to Fedora soon which is Qt based [1]. It is also being used in the Qt Razor desktop which I hope will make it to Fedora someday [1] http://xwmw.org/qastools/ Try this: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/qastools/qastools-0.17.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm I love packaging cmake projects because they're a lot easier for me to fix if there's something wrong, but in this case all I had to do was patch a few desktop files for desktop-file-validate. Nice clean project overall! Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Inadequate sound device control
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/17/2012 06:13 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: Qastools is coming to Fedora soon which is Qt based [1]. It is also being used in the Qt Razor desktop which I hope will make it to Fedora someday [1] http://xwmw.org/qastools/ Try this: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/qastools/qastools-0.17.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm I love packaging cmake projects because they're a lot easier for me to fix if there's something wrong, but in this case all I had to do was patch a few desktop files for desktop-file-validate. Nice clean project overall! Thanks, Richard Thanks Richard, looks good. If you submit it for review can you tag it with the FedoraAudio tracker? I can review it for you. Will do. I had been trying out the Qt Razor repo (really slick lightweight DE - all cmake you'd be glad to know). There was talk of a Fedora spin none of it is the Fedora repos as yet as yet. This looks neat. I'm currently using LXDE on my MythTV box to keep things lightweight but development seems to be very slow... Your qastools is more complete going by the filelist. Not sure why. I didn't do anything special, just let 'make install' do it's work. Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Inadequate sound device control
Review request submitted! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813420 Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: How to install some software that requires Python 2.6 and rejects 2.7?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 18:31, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry yes! That's my updated version. I think it'd be nice if you could do a small txt explaining what you had to change, and then forward it to Matej, the person doing the builds at the fedorapeople url mentioned on the OP. I did a Google search: Matej Cepl mcepl (@) redhat ! com Well I wouldn't consider my modifications upstreamable. It was really just a quick hack. The right way would be to fix/work around the autoconf errors but I just don't know autoconf well enough. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: How to install some software that requires Python 2.6 and rejects 2.7?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote: of which http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ maintains Fedora RPMs for here http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/scribes-0.4-0.bzr2017r1032.1.el6.noarch.rpm You're trying to install the el6 package which must ship with Python 2.6. Easiest solution is to download the source RPM instead and rebuild it on your system: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/scribes-0.4-0.bzr2017r1032.1.el6.src.rpm I took a look at the spec file for it and I didn't see anything obvious that would make it fail on f17 but autoreconf is complaining. I'm not much of an autoconf guru but I'll see if it's something easy. On a side note it looks like scribes was added to Fedora some time ago but I can't find it now so I assumed it was retired. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189727 Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: How to install some software that requires Python 2.6 and rejects 2.7?
You can try this source RPM. For whatever reason the configure shortcut doesn't work in F17 so autogen.sh needs to be run. Of course this means that you end up running ./configure twice but it doesn't hurt anything and it does build for F17 in mock for me. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/scribes-0.4-0.bzr2017r1032.2.fc16.src.rpm Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: How to install some software that requires Python 2.6 and rejects 2.7?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 18:15, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/scribes-0.4-0.bzr2017r1032.2.fc16.src.rpm Is this a different version from the one at people.fedora.org??. Sorry I got confused by the dropbox url. Or did you edit/fix it and uploaded it there? Sorry yes! That's my updated version. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: blenderplayer, Field3D, OpenImageIO dependency issues
Should be fixed in -testing now! Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: blenderplayer, Field3D, OpenImageIO dependency issues
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote: I wouldn't know which package to pick to file a bug report, so I thought I'd just mention it here. No need to. I'm aware of the problem. I had thought that I hadn't built OpenImageIO against Field3D yet but I had. Most of my packages are unrelated so this is the first time I've run into having to tie updates together and unfortunately I didn't do it right. If you really want to get updates from testing then you can remove blenderplayer or run yum with --skip-broken until I get it resolved. Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: VirtualBox and test releases
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Claude Jones cjonesli...@tehogeeservices.com wrote: ... Then I followed Andre's suggestion and after a lot of fiddling and having to install gcc and its dependencies and other stuff, I finally got the GL module to build successfully; that's where I'm rebooting from now...so, let's see what we've got - Although the interface is slow, I haven't had the same multi-minute delays you speak of. Also, I've found that to build guest additions all you need is: $ yum install gcc kernel-headers kernel-devel make dkms this is pretty useless I hope you figure out what the problem is! Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Anyone with a colour PXL-capable printer able to test this?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to figure out if bug #709689 is due to a ghostscript bug or a firmware bug in the printer. It would be really helpful if someone with a colour PXL-capable printer (see list below) could try the instructions here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709689#c16 and report results. I may have access to one of the HP color printers at work but today I'm at another location. I'll be at my usual location tomorrow. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 16 RC1 NetworkManager bug?
I just installed RC1 and when I have a live ethernet cable plugged in I can not connect to wireless. Steps to reproduce: 1. Boot with wired ethernet cable connected. 2. Wired left at defaulted to off 3. Attempt to connect to WPA2 wireless access point. The connection attempt fails without asking for the passphrase. If I disconnect the wired eithernet and choose my access point again the wireless connection succeeds. As an aside, it seems to take more time to make the wireless connection than in the past... Can anyone else confirm? Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 16 RC1 NetworkManager bug?
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote: On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:54 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: I just installed RC1 and when I have a live ethernet cable plugged in I can not connect to wireless. Steps to reproduce: 1. Boot with wired ethernet cable connected. 2. Wired left at defaulted to off 3. Attempt to connect to WPA2 wireless access point. The connection attempt fails without asking for the passphrase. If I disconnect the wired eithernet and choose my access point again the wireless connection succeeds. As an aside, it seems to take more time to make the wireless connection than in the past... Not asking to be a smartass, cause I don't see how that's a bug. Why would you even WANT to connect via wireless if the cable is plugged in? Does it matter? 1. Instead of telling me what I'm doing wrong or just working I get Connection Failed 2. Wired is OFF, it shouldn't matter if something is plugged in or not. As far as to why you'd want to. What if you wanted to setup your laptop as a wireless access point? Now why wired defaults to OFF is another matter all together. And out of curiousity, what if you connected wirelessly THEN connected the network cable? The network connection is dropped even though wired is still set to OFF. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 64bit FC14 can't input password when login
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Chen Gang-Cuble fou...@sina.com.cn wrote: Hi: After the last update, my 64bit FC14 can't login when start the graphic mode. In the login screen, there was a GOK Keyboard started, and the right half of the screen is totally black, which like a amplifier. After I choose the account, no matter the GOK Keyboard or my real key board can't input the password. No react to the keyboard at all. I tried to start the terminal, and removed the gok. After that, when going to the login screen, the GOK Keyboard will not start, but the amplifier still there make the right half black, when move the mouse, part of the contents will be zoom up on that part. Password still can't be input. Is there anyone knows the problem? Or how can I remove this amplifier and fix this graphic startup problem? Thank you! First, this is the test list, and as Fedora 14 is oldest supported release, questions should go to the regular user list. To answer your question, Slow Keys probably got enabled[1]. I had that happen to me once. Click the accessibility icon while in GDM and turn it off. Richard [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/758335 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: reboot after updates didn't work
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote: I just applied latest f16 updates, had a whole bunch of files skipped due to dependency problems, but a vast number of updates applied OK. I then told system to reboot, the screen went totally black, and the reboot never happened. The only thing in the /var/log/messages file was the normal entry that says rsyslogd is exiting on signal 15. I was able to boot back into f16 after power cycling the system, and all appears normal now (it will even reboot OK). I've had this happen a couple of times on F15 on my desktop as well as my wife's laptop... Hm.. I wonder if there's a BZ for it? Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F16 Where?
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote: Does Fedora 16 exist yet separate from rawhide? If so, where can the files be downloaded from? Where are the installation ISOs? I'm guessing just some patience is in order. There are 100 builds pending in admin.fedoraproject.org/updates. Is this a mass rebuld for F16? Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: RPMFusion not working for Fedora 15
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote: After installing RPMFusion and enabling it in sources, downloading vlc or ffpmeg fails: GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-15-x86_64 fed After that (just now) I installed VLC on Fedora 14 and there were no complaints. Even though I'm sure many of the RPMFusion admins monitor this list It would be better to post this to the RPMFusion mailing list. I recently became a RPMFusion packager and still don't understand the inner workings but I know there was some effort to branch F15 on RPMFusion as it was still using the devel branch. It's either not complete yet or maybe something went wrong. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_announcement Let me know if you have any comments. Feel free to edit the wiki directly if needed. I assume since btrfs is available without a special boot command that it now has fsck? If so it might be a good thing to mention since I think the lack of it has scared a lot of people off from trying it. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/19/2011 07:28 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_announcement Let me know if you have any comments. Feel free to edit the wiki directly if needed. I assume since btrfs is available without a special boot command that it now has fsck? If so it might be a good thing to mention since I think the lack of it has scared a lot of people off from trying it. It has a limited fsck. A more feature rich version is under active development and that is the only reason it is not the default filesystem yet. Two questions: 1. Do we need a Fedora specific btrfs wiki page? (I think so) 2. If so, would now be a good time to start one? One reason why: I've seen many references to converting an EXT3/4 volume to btrfs but I couldn't find any official documentation on how to do it. The only wiki pages I can find related to btrfs are: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs_in_Fedora_13 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemRollbackWithBtrfs Which are standalone pages. I'm not very experienced yet on the Fedora wiki system nor am I very familiar with the wiki guidelines but I might be willing to volunteer, assuming some guidance would be provided. Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Sure. If you have a Fedora account, you can create Yup, already a contributor. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs So THAT'S how you create a new page... simple, and intuitive (if you're not already used to looking for a link/button!) I did one for Ext4 when it was introduced http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ext4_in_Fedora_11 I can help out. If you are on irc, ping me. I am mether in #fedora-devel I'll look at creating the page when I'm home from work. I'm not on IRC much but I may start a thread on the -devel list to generate some discussion and content ideas. Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Too much work for irq18
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote: I don't recall seeing this during boot for F14... From DEMSG: [ 42.001543] modem-manager[967]: info (ttyS1) closing serial port... [ 42.023151] modem-manager[967]: info (ttyS1) serial port closed [ 42.023301] modem-manager[967]: info (ttyS2) closing serial port... [ 42.045138] modem-manager[967]: info (ttyS2) serial port closed [ 42.045258] modem-manager[967]: info (ttyS3) closing serial port... [ 42.067966] serial8250: too much work for irq18 There is a unused modem installed in this computer. Is this merely an information message or is it a problem that needs to be addressed? I ran into this after installing F14 on my dad's computer. The only solution I found was to pull the modem... Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Assistace to build gimp-2.7.2
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: Then a little later I saw: + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile /usr/bin/python 1 + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars Processing files: gimp-2.7.2-1.fc15.x86_64 error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gimp-2.7.2-1.fc15.x86_64/etc/gimp/2.0/ps-menurc Perhaps some files either moved or are no longer part of the source? I could not find this file anywhere in BUILD or BUILDROOT so I'm guessing it's gone. Not sure if it's needed. To get by this error comment out line 400 of the spec file. Another issue, a macro minorver. I think it would be better to figure out how to pull this from the source rather than statically set it but it's currently set to 701 on line number 39 and needs to be incremented to 702, i.e.: %define minorver 702 I'm building again but will probably go to bed before it finishes so I'll see if it completed or not in the morning. The packages successfully built with the above changes but I have not installed them for testing. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: GNOME Shell frippery for grumpy old stick-in-the-muds Fedora 15 64Bit
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Leslie S Satenstein lsatenst...@yahoo.comwrote: I see that you were able to activate System Tools. This menu entry does not appear in the fallback mode. It does appear in alacarte (Menu editor), along with a preferences menu. But there are many items in the preferences menu that are not available in Fallback mode. In particular, I did not find gnome screensaver preferences. Does your patch fix this problem? Do you mean the System menu and not Applications-System Tools? At least that's what I've noticed. I've got F15 64bit installed in virtualbox and apparently the VB video driver is not compatible with Gnome 3 or I have something set wrong. Either way I have no System menu on the top panel. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: effect of xz compression change on deltaiso users
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Richard Shaw hobbes1069 at gmail.com writes: I assume if I can get a F15 TC virtual machine installed and working that I could just use the VM to apply the diso's? That's correct. Of course, the VM is less efficient than bare metal, and since I'm too chicken to install test releases on bare metal, I'll be using a modified F14 system to build and test the F15 disos, until F15 Final. The modification is pretty easy if you've already saved all the needed RPMs in a directory. Hmm... In that case I may just install a F14 virtual machine and leave it modified just for this purpose. Not worried about efficiency, I'll just leave it going in the background. Thanks, Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F14 cpuspeed / ondemand broken?
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Steven Haigh net...@crc.id.au wrote: On 24/12/2010 4:59 PM, Steven Haigh wrote: I've been trying to nut out an issue with cpuspeed on a Fedora14 box... It seems when cpuspeed is started, it clocks the frequency back to the lowest available (350Mhz in my case), and there it stays. If I do something to create CPU load ( while true; do true; done ) then the CPU fails to be clocked back up to max frequency. In fact, no matter what I do on that box the CPU doesn't move from 350Mhz... To get the system back to 2.8Ghz I need to rmmod the p4-clockmod module. I thought this might have been something silly with the thresholds so I set UP_THRESHOLD and DOWN_THRESHOLD manually in /etc/sysconfig/cpuspeed - however then when starting cpuspeed I see: # /etc/init.d/cpuspeed restart Disabling performance cpu frequency scaling: [ OK ] /etc/init.d/cpuspeed: line 86: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold: No such file or directory /etc/init.d/cpuspeed: line 86: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/ondemand/up_threshold: No such file or directory Enabling ondemand cpu frequency scaling: [ OK ] Kernel version is: # cat /proc/version Linux version 2.6.35.6-45.fc14.i686 (mockbu...@x86-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) (gcc version 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 4.5.1-4) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Mon Oct 18 23:56:17 UTC 2010 Anyone have any ideas on this? :\ This gets even more interesting! # cpufreq-info cpufrequtils 008: cpufreq-info (C) Dominik Brodowski 2004-2009 Report errors and bugs to cpuf...@vger.kernel.org, please. analyzing CPU 0: driver: p4-clockmod CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0 maximum transition latency: 10.00 ms. hardware limits: 350 MHz - 2.80 GHz available frequency steps: 350 MHz, 700 MHz, 1.05 GHz, 1.40 GHz, 1.75 GHz, 2.10 GHz, 2.45 GHz, 2.80 GHz available cpufreq governors: ondemand, userspace, performance current policy: frequency should be within 350 MHz and 2.80 GHz. The governor performance may decide which speed to use within this range. current CPU frequency is 2.80 GHz (asserted by call to hardware). analyzing CPU 1: driver: p4-clockmod CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 1 CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 1 maximum transition latency: 10.00 ms. hardware limits: 350 MHz - 2.80 GHz available frequency steps: 350 MHz, 700 MHz, 1.05 GHz, 1.40 GHz, 1.75 GHz, 2.10 GHz, 2.45 GHz, 2.80 GHz available cpufreq governors: ondemand, userspace, performance current policy: frequency should be within 350 MHz and 2.80 GHz. The governor performance may decide which speed to use within this range. current CPU frequency is 2.80 GHz (asserted by call to hardware). Ok, so it thinks its using the performance governor - even though the config files for cpuspeed say to use ondemand.. # cpufreq-set -g ondemand # echo $? 0 Now it should have set ondemand as the governor. # cpufreq-info | grep governor available cpufreq governors: ondemand, userspace, performance The governor performance may decide which speed to use available cpufreq governors: ondemand, userspace, performance The governor performance may decide which speed to use Interesting. No change at all. I wish I could find the site where I got this information as my recollection of it is a bit hazy but part of your problem may be that the p4-clockmod and ondemand are more or less incompatible. I remember reading something on kerneltrap or something. Basically the latency of changing frequencies are so bad with p4-clockmod that ondemand gives up on it or something like that. I think I could force it to work on my Celeron based EEEPC by manually setting the governor something like this[1]: --- Using Frequency Scaling Governors You can get a list of available governors with (as root): # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors conservative ondemand powersave userspace performance Note: If the governors are compiled as modules, load them first: # modprobe cpufreq_performance cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_userspace Now we set our governor: What is our current governor? # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor userspace Set new governor and watch if it has changed # echo conservative /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor conservative Congrats! Your governor is active. You may set the governor in your rc.local, to make it used on every boot. --- Richard [1] http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_make_use_of_Dynamic_Frequency_Scaling -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:
Re: Grrr... modprobe.conf
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: So, if this bug is valid as described it's a significant security issue. However, I'm not sure it's simple. I've just checked, and none of my F14 test spins (basically RC2) have a modprobe.conf booted live. The clean installed system from the desktop live image that I have in my test VM currently doesn't have one either. Neither does my 'work' system itself. If it's dracut as you surmise, it may perhaps happen only on installing a kernel after initial install. I guess also it may only happen when installing from non-live media. We should definitely look into this urgently. What's the last-touched date of your /etc/modprobe.conf ? Do you know when that is in relation to the lifetime of the install? I have some anecdotal evidence. I installed F13 (x86_64) on my dad's computer this weekend. I did not see the empty modprobe.conf until after I did a kernel update. The only packages I updated was the kernel and the firmware package at that time. Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Blank screen in Virtualbox after Running anaconda...
Ever since the kernel panic problem was fixed (TC 2?) I could only get as far as the Running anaconda... even up to current RC4. After that I just get a blank screen and no further disk activity. I tried the basic video driver boot option but the results are the same. Host: F13 x86_64 VirtualBox 3.2.8 Virtualbox log below. Richard ### Begin Log ### 00:00:00.359 VirtualBox 3.2.8 r64453 linux.amd64 (Aug 5 2010 14:59:11) release log 00:00:00.359 Log opened 2010-08-15T15:03:25.31217Z 00:00:00.359 OS Product: Linux 00:00:00.359 OS Release: 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.x86_64 00:00:00.359 OS Version: #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 17:14:44 UTC 2010 00:00:00.359 DMI Product Name: GA-MA770-UD3 00:00:00.359 DMI Product Version: 00:00:00.360 Host RAM: 3961MB RAM, available: 3198MB 00:00:00.360 Executable: /usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox 00:00:00.360 Process ID: 30987 00:00:00.360 Package type: LINUX_64BITS_FEDORA_13 00:00:00.441 SUP: Loaded VMMR0.r0 (/usr/lib/virtualbox/VMMR0.r0) at 0xa0caea20 - ModuleInit at a0cc33f0 and ModuleTerm at a0cc33d0 00:00:00.441 SUP: VMMR0EntryEx located at a0cc32f0, VMMR0EntryFast at a0cc2460 and VMMR0EntryInt at a0cc2290 00:00:00.484 File system of '/home/richard/.VirtualBox/HardDisks/Fedora Test.vdi' is ext4 00:00:00.505 VBoxSharedClipboard mode: Bidirectional 00:00:00.508 * CFGM dump * 00:00:00.508 [/] (level 0) 00:00:00.508 CSAMEnabled integer = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 EnablePAE integer = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 HwVirtExtForced integer = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 MemBalloonSize integer = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 Namestring = Fedora Test (cb=12) 00:00:00.508 NumCPUs integer = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 PATMEnabled integer = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 PageFusion integer = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 RamHoleSize integer = 0x2000 (536870912) 00:00:00.508 RamSize integer = 0x2000 (536870912) 00:00:00.508 RawR0Enabledinteger = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 RawR3Enabledinteger = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 SyntheticCpuinteger = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 TimerMilliesinteger = 0x000a (10) 00:00:00.508 UUIDbytes = 29 a2 50 73 6e 29 0f 45 90 2f 5e cd 86 bf c2 d0 (cb=16) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/CPUM/] (level 1) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/] (level 1) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/8237A/] (level 2) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/8237A/0/] (level 3) 00:00:00.508 Trusted integer = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/AudioSniffer/] (level 2) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/AudioSniffer/0/] (level 3) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/AudioSniffer/0/Config/] (level 4) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/AudioSniffer/0/LUN#0/] (level 4) 00:00:00.508 Driver string = MainAudioSniffer (cb=17) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/AudioSniffer/0/LUN#0/Config/] (level 5) 00:00:00.508 Object integer = 0x7f73780024b0 (140133911241904) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/VMMDev/] (level 2) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/VMMDev/0/] (level 3) 00:00:00.508 PCIDeviceNo integer = 0x0004 (4) 00:00:00.508 PCIFunctionNo integer = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 Trusted integer = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/VMMDev/0/Config/] (level 4) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/VMMDev/0/LUN#0/] (level 4) 00:00:00.508 Driver string = HGCM (cb=5) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/VMMDev/0/LUN#0/Config/] (level 5) 00:00:00.508 Object integer = 0x7f73780029b0 (140133911243184) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/VMMDev/0/LUN#999/] (level 4) 00:00:00.508 Driver string = MainStatus (cb=11) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/VMMDev/0/LUN#999/Config/] (level 5) 00:00:00.508 First integer = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 Lastinteger = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 papLeds integer = 0x7f7378001680 (140133911238272) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/acpi/] (level 2) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/acpi/0/] (level 3) 00:00:00.508 PCIDeviceNo integer = 0x0007 (7) 00:00:00.508 PCIFunctionNo integer = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 Trusted integer = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 00:00:00.508 [/Devices/acpi/0/Config/] (level 4) 00:00:00.508 CpuHotPlug integer = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 FdcEnabled integer = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 HpetEnabled integer = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 IOAPIC integer = 0x (0) 00:00:00.508 NumCPUs integer = 0x0001 (1) 00:00:00.508 RamHoleSize integer = 0x2000 (536870912) 00:00:00.508 RamSize integer = 0x2000 (536870912) 00:00:00.508 ShowCpu integer = 0x