Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton
It nothing wrong of using pseudo name, unless you do something break the rule and law (eventually, the people with real name also did break the law and rules nowadays)shrug I see it as TheEvilSkeleton come to contribute and "break" the software as QA test. I am curious guy, so I did some search... Look like TheEvilSkeleton is good writer and he/she already have experience a lot with flatplak. Welcome to Fedora QA, take look on wiki [1]. Do you have FAS? go and get it, Fedora have interesting way of reward if you contribute, it give you badge[2] [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Open_Badges -- Email : Robbi Nespu PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA PGP key : https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc OpenPGP_0x0C81FA303B3A80BA_and_old_rev.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Proposal to modify: Working Sound Beta Release Criterion
On 29/1/2021 8:40 am, Lukas Ruzicka wrote I have found a page that records audio and plays it back and I believe that we could use it for testing, check it: https://online-voice-recorder.com/ <https://online-voice-recorder.com/> They privacy policies[1] also look good. "No registration is necessary for the use of our Services. We do not collect any personally identifiable information, your IP address, or any other Information which either alone or in connection with other data can be used to identify you" +1 from me 1. https://online-voice-recorder.com/legal -- Email: Robbi Nespu PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA PGP key : https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc OpenPGP_0x0C81FA303B3A80BA_and_old_rev.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Proposal to modify: Working Sound Beta Release Criterion
On 28/1/2021 9:55 pm, Lukas Ruzicka wrote: Ok, after an offline part of discussion with @Kamil Paral <mailto:kpa...@redhat.com>, we both have agreed that: 1. The beta criterion for *Working sound *should remain as is now (no change needed). 2. We would like to introduce a *new final criterion *saying*: */"The installed system must be able to record audio using the default web browser (if applicable) and gstreamer-based applications."/ What do you think? +1 for me.. On Arch wiki mentioned "Firefox (84+) supports this method by default, while on Chromium (73+) one needs to enable WebRTC PipeWire support by setting the corresponding (experimental) flag" this is for WebRTC screen sharing, not sure it also can be part of audio testing or not. Maybe can use https://test.webrtc.org/ to the the audio recording / capture work or not -- Email: Robbi Nespu PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA PGP key : https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc OpenPGP_0x0C81FA303B3A80BA_and_old_rev.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Introduction Amanda Cavalcante
On 20/1/2021 9:26 am, Amanda dos Santos Cavalcante wrote: Hello, Fedora Project people !!! I am very happy to join the Fedora team !!! I'm a beginner in the Linux universe and I'm very excited to help. I have only 6 months of experience in Linux, but I want to enjoy it for the rest of my life. My name is Amanda dos Santos Cavalcante, I am 34 years old, I live in Recife-PE, Brazil. As I started to use a computer, around 2007, I always used Windows. Linux here in Brazil is still very wronged. It was in 2018 that I started flirting with Linux through YouTuber Diolinux. But only in 2020 did I have direct contact with Linux. My first contact with Linux was EndlessOS when I bought a notebook that came with the system by default. But I found it very limited for my profile and installed Mint 20 Cinnamon. I was using Mint for 3 months and then came to Fedora Mate 33. I am in love with Fedora Mate 33 because it is teaching me to understand much more about Linux !!! So I want to be able to help in whatever I can. I hope to be useful so that the Fedora Project can be stronger and stronger !!! Fas account: amandacavalcante Telegram: @Amandextra Emails: amanda_kid...@hotmail.com cavalcante...@gmail.com Welcome to Fedora, this is testing (QA) mailing list so people here expect you interested to do testing. You can check here[1] for information. If you want to test new package, you can install testing repo[2] and give feedback on Bodhi if you encounter bug or nobug by giving karma. Warning: If it maybe breaking you system and IMO, I think new linux don't like it..but to me, this is fun. You can learn and contribute at the same time. Since you are using Fedora Mate Compiz, you can report bug if you encounter. I am sorry, I could find Fedora Mate Compiz SIG or it own mail list. Maybe someone else can show where it hide :) If you think you are in wrong mail list, then check[4]. It can guide you which area you like to contribute. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing [3] http://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ [4] https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/en -- Email: robbinespu[@]fedoraproject[.]org PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA PGP key: https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc OpenPGP_0x0C81FA303B3A80BA_and_old_rev.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Do Fedora only keep latest package on repo? How to get verbose/debug output of dnf history
Oh that was nice, i never know such repo are available. Thanks James Cassell for sharing On 1/1/2021 1:20 am, James Cassell wrote: To make downgrade work, you can install the fedora-repos-archive package and pass --enablerepo=fedora-archive when you attempt the downgrade/undo. Installed and the repo (fedora-repos-archive) are enabled by default $ grep "enabled" /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-archive.repo enabled=1 $ dnf history info 15 Transaction ID : 15 Begin time : Thu 31 Dec 2020 09:31:29 AM +08 Begin rpmdb: 1448:392d27370be7608526fcef0475d4bee78ebffc22 End time : Thu 31 Dec 2020 09:31:47 AM +08 (18 seconds) End rpmdb : 1448:46959b33ef3c9604fe74ec6a98b5d13771f73f3b User : robbi Return-Code: Success Releasever : 33 Command Line : update icecat Comment: Packages Altered: Upgrade icecat-78.6.0-2.rh1.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded icecat-78.5.0-2.rh2.fc33.x86_64 @@System $ dnf history undo 15 Fedora 33 - x86_64 - Updates Fedora 33 - x86_64 - Updates Fedora 33 - x86_64 - Updates Archive Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:15 ago on Fri 01 Jan 2021 01:41:18 PM +08. Undoing transaction 15, from Thu 31 Dec 2020 09:31:29 AM +08 Upgrade icecat-78.6.0-2.rh1.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded icecat-78.5.0-2.rh2.fc33.x86_64 @@System Dependencies resolved. === Package Architecture Version === Downgrading: icecat x86_64 78.5.0-2.rh2.fc33 Transaction Summary === Downgrade 1 Package Total download size: 95 M Is this ok [y/N]: Yup, this is what i expected and looking for,Thank you! Happy new years everyone! -- Email: robbinespu[@]fedoraproject[.]org PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA PGP key: https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Do Fedora only keep latest package on repo? How to get verbose/debug output of dnf history
Hello Samuel, I don't get what you want show to me. On 31/12/2020 1:20 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/30/20 6:15 PM, Robbi Nespu wrote: # dnf history list ID | Command line | Date and time | Action(s) | Altered -- 308 | upgrade firefox | 2020-12-22 20:00 | Upgrade | 11 307 | upgrade discord | 2020-12-21 17:28 | Upgrade | 1 306 | install bcc-tools | 2020-12-06 22:00 | Install | 5 305 | install hdparm | 2020-12-02 23:05 | Install | 1 # dnf history info 308 Transaction ID : 308 Begin time : Tue 22 Dec 2020 08:00:37 PM PST Begin rpmdb : 4729:6558da3dc52d9b2bc70074fe0d9e30d3c91c2f5e End time : Tue 22 Dec 2020 08:00:48 PM PST (11 seconds) End rpmdb : 4729:498b70f56df409c6d591a4fd90d5b54a02636fb1 User : Me Return-Code : Success Releasever : 33 Command Line : upgrade firefox Comment : Packages Altered: Upgrade firefox-84.0-6.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded firefox-82.0.2-1.fc33.x86_64 @@System Upgrade nss-3.59.0-3.fc33.i686 @updates Upgraded nss-3.58.0-3.fc33.i686 @@System Upgrade nss-3.59.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded nss-3.58.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @@System Upgrade nss-softokn-3.59.0-3.fc33.i686 @updates Upgraded nss-softokn-3.58.0-3.fc33.i686 @@System Upgrade nss-softokn-3.59.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded nss-softokn-3.58.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @@System Upgrade nss-softokn-freebl-3.59.0-3.fc33.i686 @updates Upgraded nss-softokn-freebl-3.58.0-3.fc33.i686 @@System Upgrade nss-softokn-freebl-3.59.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded nss-softokn-freebl-3.58.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @@System Upgrade nss-sysinit-3.59.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded nss-sysinit-3.58.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @@System Upgrade nss-tools-3.59.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded nss-tools-3.58.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @@System Upgrade nss-util-3.59.0-3.fc33.i686 @updates Upgraded nss-util-3.58.0-3.fc33.i686 @@System Upgrade nss-util-3.59.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded nss-util-3.58.0-3.fc33.x86_64 @@System -- Email: robbinespu[@]fedoraproject[.]org PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA PGP key: https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do Fedora only keep latest package on repo? How to get verbose/debug output of dnf history
Do fedora only keep latest package version on repository? When i tried undo/downgrade, it not working. I also reported on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911753 which I assume maybe thus required older packager version not available are there is someway to see verbose/debug of `dnf history` ? I tried with `-v` but nothing much $ sudo dnf history undo last -v Loaded plugins: builddep, changelog, config-manager, copr, debug, debuginfo-install, download, generate_completion_cache, needs-restarting, playground, repoclosure, repodiff, repograph, repomanage, reposync DNF version: 4.5.2 cachedir: /var/cache/dnf User-Agent: constructed: 'libdnf (Fedora 33; generic; Linux.x86_64)' repo: using cache for: fedora-cisco-openh264 fedora-cisco-openh264: using metadata from Wed 26 Aug 2020 03:10:34 AM +08. repo: using cache for: updates updates: using metadata from Wed 30 Dec 2020 09:28:11 AM +08. repo: using cache for: fedora fedora: using metadata from Tue 20 Oct 2020 07:27:19 AM +08. Last metadata expiration check: 0:47:53 ago on Thu 31 Dec 2020 09:18:49 AM +08. Completion plugin: Generating completion cache... Undoing transaction 15, from Thu 31 Dec 2020 09:31:29 AM +08 Upgrade icecat-78.6.0-2.rh1.fc33.x86_64 @updates Upgraded icecat-78.5.0-2.rh2.fc33.x86_64 @@System No package icecat-78.5.0-2.rh2.fc33.x86_64 available. Error: no package matched -- Email: robbinespu[@]fedoraproject[.]org | PGP key: https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Neverending CPU usage by gnome-software and packagekit
> On Mon, 2018-09-17 at 13:24 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> It's over 35 minutes since booting F29, and the two processes are still >> working on something. What is it? 35 minutes and more to boot is too long. This is normal for rawhide? ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Not received badges when testing kernel
I doing 2 kernel testing (default and performance test) and automate submit log with my FAS, but I din't receive any badges. Anyone has the same issue here? -- Best Regards, RN ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Introduction
Hi tester, I'd like to introduce myself.. I am Robbi Nespu and live at Malaysia. I started using Linux since 2005, Started with OpenSUSE, Ubuntu, Debian, Knoppix, Oshirix SPE (local linux from Malaysia, but the project are dead since 2013), Centos, Redhat and Fedora (Which I stick using this distro since Fedora 21 and I like it). Professionally I work as a software engineer. I am certified as tester (CTFL) and requirement engineer (CPRE) but I would still call myself a beginner. Why did I decide to join? I want to contribute something and decide to start with Quality Assurance. My thanks to Adam Williamson for sponsor my membership as part of QA and Kamil Paral for appoved my subscription too this mail list (He said, there seems to be some bug in mailman during subscription and needed to manualy approved) Looking forward to collaborate and learn. Best Regards RN ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
