Re: Access a Virtual disk without the VM running

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi,

you may do boot in rescue mode , or live mode with an iso , may be a
solution for you ... 

From server edition, download Network Install iso [1], boot your vm
with iso and choose troubleshoot -> rescue , rescue may allow you to do
: chroot /mnt/sysimage,  also you can mount share folders . to copy
files from your system 

Other solution is with one live iso , accessing to disk , but rescue
mode is not available , anyway rescue mode is just some bash commands
like 

https://www.turnkeylinux.org/docs/chroot-to-repair-system


[1]  
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/38/Server/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-38-1.6.iso

On Sat, 2023-10-14 at 22:04 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm having some problems installing the latest Fedora iso images for
> the past week or so (Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-
> 20231014.n.0.iso) under VirtualBox... I keep getting fatal error
> messages "Error in POSTIN for rpm pkg dbus-common" and then the
> install fails. I have captured /tmp into a tar file and would like to
> make the files available to this list for debugging purposes but now
> need to move the file from the VM into my host. 
> 
> Ideally, I would mount the VDI on the host and just copy the file. Is
> there a way to do this easily?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> George...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> For the past week
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Rawhide ~ kernel-6.5.0 doesn't allow VirtualBox shared folders

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2023-07-13 at 07:29 +1000, Ian Laurie wrote:
> On 7/13/23 05:00, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > what is os Server , and what is os guest ?
> > 
> > and do you use rpmfusion rpms for the server ?
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 11:48 +1000, Ian Laurie wrote:
> 
> 
> Guest is Fedora Rawhide with kernel-6.5.0-0.rc1.11.fc39.x86_64.
> 
> Host is Fedora 38 with kernel-6.4.3-200.fc38.x86_64 (test week kernel
> from koji).
> 
> Copy/paste between guest and host is working, just not shared folders
> since kernel-6.5 hit Rawhide.  If I select an older kernel when
> booting
> (I keep 6 not 3) all the 6.4-rc kernels work fine.
> 
> VirtualBox is VirtualBox-7.0.8-1.fc38.x86_64 from RPMFusion.


OK , shared folders is part of guest drives , maybe the best is report
in bugzilla 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?component=virtualbox-guest-additions=Fedora


> --
> Ian Laurie
> FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
> TZ: Australia/Sydney
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Rawhide ~ kernel-6.5.0 doesn't allow VirtualBox shared folders

[Sérgio Basto]

what is os Server , and what is os guest ? 

and do you use rpmfusion rpms for the server ? 


On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 11:48 +1000, Ian Laurie wrote:
> I'm not able to mount VirtualBox shared folders in Rawhide since
> kernel-6.5 began.  Works fine up to kernel-6.4.0-59.fc39.x86_64.
> 
> My mount commands look like this:
> 
> sudo mount -t vboxsf -o rw,uid=$UID,gid=$(id -g) share_name local_mnt
> 
> Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong for 6.5?
> 
> Ian
> --
> Ian Laurie
> FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
> TZ: Australia/Sydney
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: DNF5 testing ~ Unknown argument "--skip-broken"

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2023-06-15 at 07:32 +1000, Ian Laurie via test wrote:
> On 6/15/23 00:15, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Is this option being added or is this a bug?
> > > 
> > 
> > seems related with
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501804
> > 
> > --skip-broken is not helpful anymore
> 
> Ok thanks. It's an error in the man page then.
> 

I think that --skip-broken is not helpful anymore , not sure . 



-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: DNF5 testing ~ Unknown argument "--skip-broken"

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 11:54 +1000, Ian Laurie via test wrote:
> The man page for DNF5 in Rawhide shows --skip-broken to be a legal 
> generic option, however it does not show up in a "dnf --help" and in 
> practice its use results in this error:
> 
> Unknown argument "--skip-broken" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for
> more information about the arguments.
> 
> Is this option being added or is this a bug?
> 

seems related with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501804 

--skip-broken is not helpful anymore 

> Ian
> -- 
> Ian Laurie
> FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
> TZ: Australia/Sydney
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: rpm very noisy in f38

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 02:41 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> Is anyone using rpm besides dnf and me? It has gotten very noisy:
> 
> # rpm -qa | grep intel
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#   2
> Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 81b46521: BAD
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#  13
> Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 8898875c: BAD
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> ...
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#  75
> Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 2ab131c6: BAD
> Header SHA256 digest: OK
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#  76
> Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 2ab131c6: BAD
> Header SHA256 digest: OK
> Header SHA1 digest: OK
> xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-55.20210115.fc38.x86_64
> intel-gpu-firmware-20230210-147.fc38.noarch
> #
> 
> Bug searches for rpmdbNextIterator came up empty.



https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/popular-third-party-rpms-fail-to-install-update-remove-due-to-security-policies-verification/7049

https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/header-v3-rsa-sha1-signature-key-id-d651ff2e-bad/42350/4


> -- 
> Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion,
> based on faith, not based on science.
> 
>  Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
> 
> Felix Miata
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: What to do after a system crash during dnf upgrade

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 02:40 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Running dnf upgrade during periods of system instability seems to
> leave the system in an unknown state.
> 
> How does one recover from this situation?
> 

checkdupes:
package-cleanup --dupes

package-cleanup --problems

dnf remove --duplicated

checkdeps (this is more for corrupted file systems I guess)
rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

> Best regards,
> 
> George...
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: 有2天时间没有发布Fedora-Robotics-Live了

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 11:27 +, wang_chen wrote:
> Fedora-Robotics-Live 不再发布了吗？

the Respins Sig never have released robotics 


https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/robotics/

Fedora-Robotics-Live-x86_64-37-1.7.iso




-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 37 on todays LUP

[Sérgio Basto]

On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 10:49 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 08:36 +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > https://linuxunplugged.com/484
> > 

Very depressing 



> > Fedora 37 review on todays Linux Unplugged
> 
> Please don´t cross-post:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Do_not_Cross_Post
> 
> Also, F37 hasn´t been released yet.

It will be today ! 

> poc
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Chromium doesn't respond to clicks or typing in 1 external monitor

[Sérgio Basto]

On Tue, 2022-10-04 at 17:30 +0700, Frederic Muller wrote:
> On 03/10/2022 19:40, Kamil Paral wrote:
>  
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 2:19 PM Frederic Muller 
> > wrote:
> >  
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > This one is really weird and probably too specific:
> > > 
> > > I start chromium and move it to my lower left monitor (I have 4 
> > > screens). I can do nothing with it.
> > > 
> > > I move it back to either center (the primary display) or even the
> > > upper 
> > > left monitor and can type or click. I then move it to the lower
> > > left 
> > > monitor back and then it's working.
> > > 
> > > As I said this really is weird. But if anyone is interested I can
> > > file a 
> > > bug and do further testing.
> > > 
> > 
> > You should definitely file a bug. This is probably the best place
> > for it:
> > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter
> > 
> >  This time, try to post the link to the reported bug ;-) Thanks.
> > 
> Sure things, here it is
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2454


this is not
about https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-iGPU-Avoid-Linux-5.19.12 ? 



-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Loud PC speaker beep during reboot, sometimes

[Sérgio Basto]

On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 17:20 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 5:13 PM stan via test
>  wrote:
> > I forgot to reply to this part of the message.  I have been running
> > F37
> > since it was rawhide, and have never heard this beep.  But, I'm
> > running
> > a desktop, so that might make a difference.  And a question.  Are
> > you
> > sure this is the PC speaker, and not something sending sound to the
> > sound device during startup? 
> > 
> 
> 
> It's during shutdown, not startup. Yes, I'm sure. It's the same sound
> as when I want to go to UEFI config during startup or show a one-time
> boot menu. The sound is unmistakable.
>  
> > 
> > I run a custom kernel, and I have the config options for the
> > speaker
> > set as follows:
> > 
> > CONFIG_HAVE_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y
> > CONFIG_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y
> > # CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR is not set
> > 
> 
> 
> I have the stock Fedora kernel:
> 
> # grep -i pcspkr /boot/config-5.19.9-300.fc37.x86_64 
> CONFIG_HAVE_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y
> CONFIG_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y
> CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR=m
> 
> I'm aware I could blacklist the pcspkr module, but I don't want to fix this 
> just for myself.


I found this behavior on my Fedora 35 


grep -i pcspkr /boot/config-5.19.8-100.fc35.x86_64
CONFIG_HAVE_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y
CONFIG_PCSPKR_PLATFORM=y
CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR=m


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too. (Samuel Sieb)

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sun, 2022-07-10 at 15:34 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> Sam,
> 
> Thanks for responding to this plea for help... It's appreciated.
> 
> As expected, all kernel packages would have been successful... EXCEPT
> for the kernel-headers package... 503 packages affected. Sigh.
> 

yes , you should keep kernel-headers , you may do 

dnf distro-sync kernel-headers 



> What are your thoughts?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> George...
> 
> Sam wrote, "Try uninstalling each one separately to see which one is
> causing the 
> problem."
> 
> --
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: dependency problems in rawhide as of 20220614

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2022-06-15 at 08:50 -0700, stan via test wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 08:12:57 -0700
> stan via test  wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 19:20:22 +0100
> > Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 07:05 -0700, stan via test wrote:  
> > > > There are a lot of dependency problems in rawhide after a large
> > > > update
> > > > a few days ago.  I'm attaching the list in case anyone is
> > > > interested in
> > > > pursuing them at this early date.  One, that seems to be with
> > > > gdal- libs,
> > > > is holding up a perl update, and there also seems to be a kde
> > > > conflict.    
> > > 
> > > First you should report is on Rpmfusion mailing list , 
> > > I think Rpmfusion need rebuild his perl packages 
> 
> PS  Becuase of your suggestion, in future, I will copy the rpmfusion
> list when I make such posts. 

Hi, ok , RPMFusion started perl mass rebuild yesterday, the perl
maintainer notice that 
"at least some of the perl packages in this output have been retired in
Fedora, e.g.

 * perl-HTML-Tidy
 * perl-Math-Pari
 * perl-Crypt-Random
 * perl-Crypt-Primes
 * perl-Crypt-RSA

Things might look a bit better after removing those. " 


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: dependency problems in rawhide as of 20220614

[Sérgio Basto]

On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 07:05 -0700, stan via test wrote:
> There are a lot of dependency problems in rawhide after a large
> update
> a few days ago.  I'm attaching the list in case anyone is interested
> in
> pursuing them at this early date.  One, that seems to be with gdal-
> libs,
> is holding up a perl update, and there also seems to be a kde
> conflict.

First you should report is on Rpmfusion mailing list , 
I think Rpmfusion need rebuild his perl packages 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Problem: package lilv-0.24.12-4.fc37.x86_64 obsoletes lilv < 0.24.12-2 provided by lilv-0.24.12-1.fc36.i686

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 22:54 +, Reon Beon via test wrote:
> Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64   1.7
> kB/s | 989  B 00:00    
> Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora r  27
> kB/s |  12 kB 00:00    
> Fedora - Modular Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next   28
> kB/s |  12 kB 00:00    
> RPM Fusion for Fedora Rawhide - Free 12
> kB/s | 6.7 kB 00:00    
> RPM Fusion for Fedora Rawhide - Nonfree  16
> kB/s | 6.8 kB 00:00    
> RPM Fusion for Fedora rawhide - Nonfree - Steam  13
> kB/s | 5.5 kB 00:00    
> Dependencies resolved.
> 
>  Problem: package lilv-0.24.12-4.fc37.x86_64 obsoletes lilv <
> 0.24.12-2 provided by lilv-0.24.12-1.fc36.i686
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package lilv-
> 0.24.12-1.fc36.x86_64
>   - problem with installed package lilv-0.24.12-1.fc36.i686
> Nothing to do.
> Complete!

adding --allowerasing  , seems that works


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037703

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi George,

you are using rawhide kernel, VirtualBox officially , just support
stable kernels . 
how you install VirtualBox and what is the host system and are you
using virtualbox_guest_additions ? 

Depending in what packages you are using . you should report in
different places , because we have in some cases different sources. 


Best regards,
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 20:57 +, George R Goffe wrote:
> 
> Sergio,
> Thanks for the response.
> I'll ask the VBox mailing list.
> Regards,
> George...
> 
> On Wednesday, January 26, 2022, 02:45:13 AM PST, Sérgio Basto
>  wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 00:09 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Could I get someone from this list to take a peek at the above
> > named
> > bug report please? I'm STILL seeing this issue with the "latest"
> > Fedora upgrade. The extra text does NOT appear in the dmesg output.
> > 
> 
> > Could it be something with console support in VirtualBox?
> 
> 
> yes, maybe kernel 5.16.0 is not compatible with vbox modules
> 
> 
> > Best regards and STAY SAFE!
> > 
> > George...
> 
> > ___
> > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> 
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, January 26, 2022, 02:45:13 AM PST, Sérgio Basto
>  wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 00:09 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Could I get someone from this list to take a peek at the above
> > named
> > bug report please? I'm STILL seeing this issue with the "latest"
> > Fedora upgrade. The extra text does NOT appear in the dmesg output.
> > 
> 
> > Could it be something with console support in VirtualBox?
> 
> 
> yes, maybe kernel 5.16.0 is not compatible with vbox modules 
> 
> 
> > Best regards and STAY SAFE!
> > 
> > George...
> 
> > ___
> > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037703

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 00:09 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could I get someone from this list to take a peek at the above named
> bug report please? I'm STILL seeing this issue with the "latest"
> Fedora upgrade. The extra text does NOT appear in the dmesg output.
> 

> Could it be something with console support in VirtualBox?


yes, maybe kernel 5.16.0 is not compatible with vbox modules 

> Best regards and STAY SAFE!
> 
> George...
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: kernel 5.12 test week: no 5.12.x kernel available on koji for F33

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 21:23 +, Flo H wrote:
> Hi,
> usually I give a new kernel a test run during test week, however, I
> just noted that this time there is no 5.12.x kernel available on koji
> that was built for F33. 
> 
> What am I missing?

As usual  you can find builds for proper branch on 
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jforbes/kernel-stabilization/

> Thanks, Flo
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: A question about upgrading kernels, again

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sun, 2021-05-09 at 03:55 -0400, Francisco Tissera wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> 
> I know I have created a thred about this specific question, but I am
> not 
> able to find it. Because of that, I created a new one, I apologize
> for 
> the inconvenience.
> 
> Someone, in the previous thred, advised me to type, in order to get
> the 
> latest kernel from Fedora 34's repositories
> 
> sudo dnf update --releasever=34 'kernel*'
> 
> I tried typing that with and without ticks enclosing the kernnel* 
> parameter, but this is what I got, and it's not what should be 
> happening, is it?
> 
> 
> Dependencies resolved.
>   80 equals characters
>   Package   Arch   Version Repo Size
>   80 equals characters
> Installing:
>   kernel-modules-internal
>     x86_64 5.13.0-0.rc0.20210428gitacd3d2859453.2.fc35 
> rawhide 477 k

you should have rawhide repos enabled please run and check the list of:

dnf repolist

> Installing dependencies:
>   kernel    x86_64 5.13.0-0.rc0.20210428gitacd3d2859453.2.fc35 
> rawhide 296 k
>   kernel-core   x86_64 5.13.0-0.rc0.20210428gitacd3d2859453.2.fc35 
> rawhide  36 M
>   kernel-devel  x86_64 5.13.0-0.rc0.20210428gitacd3d2859453.2.fc35 
> rawhide  15 M
>   kernel-modules
>     x86_64 5.13.0-0.rc0.20210428gitacd3d2859453.2.fc35 
> rawhide  32 M
>   kernel-modules-extra
>     x86_64 5.13.0-0.rc0.20210428gitacd3d2859453.2.fc35 
> rawhide 2.3 M
> Transaction Summary
>   80 equals characters
> Install  6 Packages
> Total download size: 86 M
> Installed size: 168 M
> Is this ok [y/N]:
> 
> 
> I of course said no, and, funny thing is, it refreshed everything,
> from 
> the copr repos I have to fedora 34 modular etc. So I don't know
> what's 
> happening.
> 
> Any help would be apriciated.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> Francisco.
> 
> P.S. Using Fedora rawhide with kernel 5.11.17, trying to see if there
> are any updates available to 5.11.18 or 19 or something like that.
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:  
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:  
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:  
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:  
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: post go upgrades (re)testing

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 10:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:47:39AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 11:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Hey folks. 
> > > 
> > > I wonder if we couldn't add in some (re)testing of upgrades after
> > > a
> > > release
> > > is 'go' but before it's actually released. We hit at least two
> > > issues I
> > > am aware of with f34 due to multilib. ;( 
> > > 
> > 
> > I'm asking this for years and to not stress and delay to much the
> > release, I proposed do a second release in this case it would be
> > 34.1
> 
> That would be prohibive on resources and there would be a lot of
> process
> that we do now once per 6 months that would need to be done in
> days/weeks. :( So no, I dont think thats a good answer unless we
> can't
> avoid it. 

I had an idea and if instead of calling it stable, we call it RC1
(release candidate 1) and only after adding all the updates in the base
version and (re) testing, we finally call it Fedora 34 stable ? 

> kevin
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: post go upgrades (re)testing

[Sérgio Basto]

On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 11:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hey folks. 
> 
> I wonder if we couldn't add in some (re)testing of upgrades after a
> release
> is 'go' but before it's actually released. We hit at least two issues I
> am aware of with f34 due to multilib. ;( 
> 

I'm asking this for years and to not stress and delay to much the
release, I proposed do a second release in this case it would be 34.1


> first: 
> pipewire.i686 is in the base x86_64 repo and users had/have it
> installed.
> 
> pipewire.i686 is pulled into the x86_64 base repo by mutter
> (mutter.i686
> is there and requires pipewire.i686). 
> 
> In any case it is not in the updates repo, so once an update of them
> is pushed (which it has been), upgrades fail due to the missing
> packages. 
> 
> I have modified the updates pungi config to whitelist pipewire for
> multilib and it's in f34-updates now. 
> 
> second: 
> There's still an issue with iptables. 
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953178
> basically the version in the base repo has a 'iptables' package. 
> The one in updates Obsoletes this for a iptables-compat, but yet it's
> not doing things correctly as users are getting dnf errors. 
> 
> Anyhow, I think it might be good to perhaps schedule some re-resting of
> upgrades after the 0 day updates repo is populated to try and catch
> these and fix them before release day. 
> 
> We can't test this fully before there is an updates repo (I mean we
> kind
> of can with updates-testing, but it's not the exact same repo). 
> 
> kevin
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Reboot and poweroff commands not working in Rawhide

[Sérgio Basto]

On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 12:58 +0100, Ifejika Somtochukwu Noble wrote:
> Hi Everyone,Does anyone know why i experience this once in a while? 
> I am running Fedora Rawhide
> 
> [noble@noblecontracts ~]$ su
> Password: 
> [root@noblecontracts noble]# reboot
> [root@noblecontracts noble]# poweroff
> [root@noblecontracts noble]#
> 
> The commands don't seem to have any effect.  Why?

and systemctl reboot ? and systemctl poweroff ? 

BTW even in Centos 7, I noticed or I have the imprecision that
systemctl commands works better , but now reboot is a symbol link to
bin/systemctl 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: problems to run vboxconfig [VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64] under kernel 5.6.3-300.fc31.x86_64

[Sérgio Basto]

On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 12:19 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi ,
> 
> today I installed kernel-5.6.3-300.fc31.x86_64  (from Koji). It
> runs, 
> but having the problem to get running vboxconfig (from 
> VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64):
> 
> vboxdrv.sh: Stopping VirtualBox services.
> vboxdrv.sh: Starting VirtualBox services.
> vboxdrv.sh: Building VirtualBox kernel modules.
> vboxdrv.sh: failed: Look at /var/log/vbox-setup.log to find out what 
> went wrong.
> 
> There were problems setting up VirtualBox.  To re-start the set-up 
> process, run
>/sbin/vboxconfig
> as root.  If your system is using EFI Secure Boot you may need to
> sign the
> kernel modules (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetadp, vboxpci) before you
> can 
> load
> them.
> 
> No probs when using kernel-5.5.16
> 
> Anybody has experience in solving this problem?

Usually , RPMFusion is more quick to support the new kernels than
Official repos ,so I invite you to test VirtualBox from RPMFusion :)

https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox#Uninstall_.22official.22_virtual
-guest-additions_and_use_virtualbox-guest-
additions_package_provide_by_Fedora

> Kind regards
> 
> Joachim Backes
> 
> -- 
> 
> Fedora release 31 (Thirty One)
> Kernel-5.6.3-300.fc31.x86_64
> 
> 
> Joachim Backes 
> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F30 server boot.iso fails in rescue mode option 1

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 02:28 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 02:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> Sorry email jumped but is not yet finished I have another test to
> do.  
> 

After fix grub entries of grub , the bug is gone ... i.e. recuse works
as expect have a python exception . 

Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how /etc/default/grub was generated on a clean install of F30 server with boot.iso

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 22:31 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 7:27 PM Sérgio Basto 
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The F30 server with boot.iso  made a install of Fedora with
> > partitions
> > on xfs and we can't shrink it , So I had to dump and restore the
> > content , and I changed disk geometry , for ext4 with 3 primary
> > partitions (without LVM) .
> > 
> > But /etc/default/grub have command line with something like
> > resume=/dev/mapper/fedora-swap .
> > 
> > How I regenerate the /etc/default/grub to comand-line use the new
> > swap
> > partition and adjust other commands (like LVM), etc ?
> 
> resume=UUID=
> 
> So you use that instead of resume/dev/mapper/fedora-swap
> And you can remove all the rd.lvm related stuff. Then grub2-mkconfig
> like normal. That will stuff it where it really goes, starting with
> Fedora 30, which is in the grubenv

Thanks for the answer 
Correct  , but anaconda generate /etc/default/grub and GRUB comand-line 
in particularity and I'd like have a way to generate /etc/default/grub
again without run anaconda installer again ... .

All the magic that anaconda does , should be interesting reproduce inbash shell 
. 

Best regards,
 

> 
> -- 
> Chris Murphy
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F30 server boot.iso fails in rescue mode option 1

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 02:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,

Sorry email jumped but is not yet finished I have another test to do.  

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

how /etc/default/grub was generated on a clean install of F30 server with boot.iso

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi,
The F30 server with boot.iso  made a install of Fedora with partitions
on xfs and we can't shrink it , So I had to dump and restore the
content , and I changed disk geometry , for ext4 with 3 primary
partitions (without LVM) .

But /etc/default/grub have command line with something like 
resume=/dev/mapper/fedora-swap .

How I regenerate the /etc/default/grub to comand-line use the new swap
partition and adjust other commands (like LVM), etc ? 

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

F30 server boot.iso fails in rescue mode option 1

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi,

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: List of files in f31 repositories that fail to install.

[Sérgio Basto]

Thanks , I don't have rawhide installed 

for example :   - nothing provides jchardet needed by eclipse-m2e-core-
1.11.0-1.fc31.noarch

and jchardet was retired on 2019-04-01 [1] which is bad

[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jchardet/commits/master

On Sun, 2019-06-09 at 19:45 -0700, stan via test wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 02:20:50 +0100
> Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2019-06-09 at 17:54 -0700, stan via test wrote:
> > > I had occasion to install many packages from f31 today.  The
> > > large
> > > majority of them installed successfully, but the packages in the
> > > attached file didn't.  There are 411 of them, which is few for as
> > > many
> > > packages as there are in Fedora.
> > > 
> > > I'm curious why the same mechanism that dnf uses on install on a
> > > pc
> > > couldn't be used in the build process.  When someone submits a
> > > build, wouldn't it be possible to see if it would break the
> > > existing state, and ask the submitter if they would like to build
> > > the dependencies with
> > > their new package?  Too complex?  
> > 
> > Can you send results with `dnf install -b yourpackages ` please ? 
> > 
> > to have some clues .
> 
> It's a bash file that runs dnf.  The files are listed inside.  All
> you
> have to do is edit the command line to change -y --skip-broken to 
> -y -b, and you can run it using bash and see the results on your
> system
> if you have rawhide installed.  That puts you in control of the
> output.
> 
> I've also attached the file.
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: List of files in f31 repositories that fail to install.

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sun, 2019-06-09 at 17:54 -0700, stan via test wrote:
> I had occasion to install many packages from f31 today.  The large
> majority of them installed successfully, but the packages in the
> attached file didn't.  There are 411 of them, which is few for as
> many
> packages as there are in Fedora.
> 
> I'm curious why the same mechanism that dnf uses on install on a pc
> couldn't be used in the build process.  When someone submits a build,
> wouldn't it be possible to see if it would break the existing state,
> and ask the submitter if they would like to build the dependencies
> with
> their new package?  Too complex?

Can you send results with `dnf install -b yourpackages ` please ? 

to have some clues .

Thanks 
 
> 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:27 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I'd wait for at least a few days for things to settle down. Since the
> branching finished only a few hours ago, there probably hasn't been
> even an attempted compose for fedora 30. Until that happens, the
> repositories for fedora 30 might as well not even exist (not sure how
> that's actually handled by releng).

you can check here : 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/  
The yetarday compose DOOMED and the compose of today is not finish yet
, maybe in 4 hours will finish , after that we need to wait for mirrors
get synced another 12 hours ... 



-- Sérgio M. B.

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30

[Sérgio Basto]

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/30/ still
empty , you need wait for a message with "Fedora 30 ... compose check
report" 


On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 09:51 +0100, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule 30
> has
> been branched. So time for me to upgrade from 29 so I can report
> issue
> with the way I use fedora.
> 
> 
> I'm using https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade to
> upgrade.
> 
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'luminoso-Signal-Desktop',
> ignoring
> this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'athmane-gns3-extra', ignoring
> this
> repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates',
> ignoring
> this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free', ignoring this
> repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates',
> ignoring this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree', ignoring
> this
> repo.
> Modular dependency problems:
> 
>  Problem 1: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> avocado:stable:3020190213205848:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 2: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> bat:latest:3020190214090936:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
>  Problem 3: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> dwm:6.1:3020190213215420:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 4: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> exa:latest:3020190214120734:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
>  Problem 5: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> fish:3:3020190216163513:602da195-0.x86_64
>  Problem 6: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> gimp:2.10:20181223154246:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 7: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> libgit2:0.27:3020190128145600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 8: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> meson:latest:3020190123223713:36245242-0.x86_64
>  Problem 9: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> ninja:latest:3020190131012415:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 10: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> ripgrep:latest:3020190214090003:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 11: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> standard-test-roles:3.0:3020190214144451:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 12: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> stratis:1:20181215204600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
> Error:
>  Problem 1: package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 requires
> rdma-core(x86-64) = 16.2-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - rdma-core-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 2: package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - ImageMagick-libs-1:6.9.9.38-3.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64
>  Problem 3: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires
> system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
>  Problem 4: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64
>  Problem 5: package fedora-release-29-7.noarch requires fedora-
> repos(29)
> > = 1, but none of the providers can be installed
> 
>   - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires
> system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-repos-29-2.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-
> 1.noarch
>  Problem 6: problem with installed package blender-1:2.79b-
> 9.fc29.x86_64
>   - package blender-1:2.79b-10.fc30.x86_64 requires
> libboost_locale.so.1.66.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - boost-locale-1.66.0-14.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade
> repository
>   - blender-1:2.79b-9.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>  Problem 7: problem with installed package darktable-2.6.0-
> 2.fc29.x86_64
>   - package 

Re: Are non-sse2 CPUs officially dead on F29?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 23:51 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Sérgio Basto composed on 2018-09-20 04:39 (UTC+0100):
> 
> > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 22:50 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> > > Non-sse2 
> > what is your non-sse2 [1] ? Pentium 3 (Produced
> > from early 1999 to 2003) ? or pentium 2 ? 
> > In July of 2016 , we talked about enable or disable sse2
> > capabalities on i686 for x264 [2] 
> > On Tuesday, 26 July kwizart test it on KVM guest with pentium 2 cpu
> > emulated , you may read in thread in Pentium 3 code works
> > an in pentium 2 code doesn't work but also doesn't crash  
> > I vote in enable sse2 , and not support Pentium 2 or 3 , why not
> > but an non-sse2 kernel in a copr repo for example ? .
> 
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> cpu family: 6
> model : 8
> model name: AMD Sempron(tm)  2800+
> stepping  : 1
> cpu MHz   : 1996.334
> cache size: 256 KB
> fdiv_bug  : no
> hlt_bug   : no
> f00f_bug  : no
> coma_bug  : no
> fpu   : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level   : 1
> wp: yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep
> mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mp mmxext 3dnowext
> 3dnow up
> bogomips  : 3992.66
> clflush size  : 32
> cache_alignment   : 32
> address sizes : 34 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
> power management: ts
> 
> PC hard locked up after just past halfway done, so I gave up trying.

yeah , you may have one of last cpu that not support SSE2 [1], it was
released on about August/September of 2004 . 
Now IMO, enable SSE2 is correct, because the big majority of i686
computers (now a days) have SSE2 and they benefit a lot with it, on
other hand your computer is not on default , so you may build an non-
default kernel disabling SSE2 . 

Best regards

[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Sempron_microprocessors#%22Thorton%22_(Socket_A,_130_nm,_Model_10)


> -- 
> "Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Whatever else you
> get, get wisdom." Proverbs 4:7 (New Living Translation)
> 
>  Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
> 
> Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin
> es
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lis
> ts.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Are non-sse2 CPUs officially dead on F29?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 22:50 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Non-sse2 

what is your non-sse2 [1] ? Pentium 3 (Produced
from early 1999 to 2003) ? or pentium 2 ? 

In July of 2016 , we talked about enable or disable sse2 capabalities on i686 
for x264 [2] 
On Tuesday, 26 July kwizart test it on KVM guest with pentium 2 cpu emulated , 
you may read in thread in Pentium 3 code works
an in pentium 2 code doesn't work but also doesn't crash  

I vote in enable sse2 , and not support Pentium 2 or 3 , why not but an 
non-sse2 kernel in a copr repo for example ? .



[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSE2

[2]
https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-develop...@lists.rpmfusion.org/thread/O2LMKYOO5VAK4J5SVHNJAHHCZ27QS5ZI/#M4LX2AOVD6Q6WQE4APIBEF7CQKPZPF7U






> won't work on openSUSE Tumbleweed, but does on Debian next
> (10/Buster).
> I have a 28 attempting to dnf upgrade to 29, but I'm seeing a ton of
> entries
> filling up /var/lib/systemd/coredump, 197 files and still counting.
> :-(
> -- 
> "Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Whatever else you
> get, get wisdom." Proverbs 4:7 (New Living Translation)
> 
>  Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
> 
> Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin
> es
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lis
> ts.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Rawhide groupinstall error

[Sérgio Basto]

On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 11:33 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 10:27 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > ValueError: no group 'hawaii-desktop' from environment 'basic-
> > desktop-environment'


Clarify : hawaii-desktop should be remove from comps.xml , I guess .

> 
> Also the remaining packages of hawaii should be retired , I mention
> it
> in [1] my list of obsoleted  packages
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594605
> 
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin
> es
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lis
> ts.fedoraproject.org/message/TNAHE5SNV4TWRJFSRPX7E7YDKEA4VOOY/
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KVF5RLVK4AK2QJVLTIXNRKOQFV4R3YAM/

Re: Rawhide groupinstall error

[Sérgio Basto]

On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 10:27 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> ValueError: no group 'hawaii-desktop' from environment 'basic-
> desktop-environment'

Should be remove from comps.xml , I guess .

Also the remaining packages of hawaii should be retired , I mention it
in [1] my list of obsoleted  packages


[1] 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594605

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TNAHE5SNV4TWRJFSRPX7E7YDKEA4VOOY/

Re: f28 stale debuginfo repo?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 21:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 22:44 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Last week doing 'coredumpctl gdb' or abrt-cli report, to get a
> > local
> > stack trace, asks for debuginfo and sometimes debugsource packages
> > installed. But when I follow the suggested dnf command, what I
> > actually have downloaded are a bunch of stale packages, and then
> > gdb
> > complains that there's no debug symbols available.
> > 
> > a. By stale, I mean a week old; gnome-shell-3.27.92-1.fc28 ~ March
> > 5
> > is installed, and the debug info I get for a dozen dependencies are
> > for e.g. gnome-shell-3.27.91-2.fc28 ~ Feb 22.
> > 
> > b. Even though the dnf command is version specific, it proceeds to
> > offer up a substitute that's stale and pointless. I think it should
> > fail.
> > 
> > Any suggestions? If it's just a hiccup and should be cleared out by
> > now then I'm just going to ignore it
> 
> This. As was discussed in quite a lot of places, composes were
> failing
> all last week.

Since yesterday composes start working as usual and  
fedora-secondary was synced and all debug trees seems updated .
Did you try dnf --refresh  ? 


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

i386 buildroot broken Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180309.n.0 compose check report

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 04:10 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 03:56 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> 
> > -- 
> > Mail generated by check-compose:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
> 
> 
> Please  check if secondary arches are updated [1] 
> latest updates are from 2018-03-04 19:48
> 

[1] 
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/development/rawhide/Everything/
 


Packages in secondary arch did not updated , it seems also happens with 
branched repo [2]
this breaks copr builds 

[2]
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/development/28/Everything/

> Thanks,
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180309.n.0 compose check report

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 03:56 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:

> -- 
> Mail generated by check-compose:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose


Please  check if secondary arches are updated [1] 
latest updates are from 2018-03-04 19:48

[1] 
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/development/rawhide/Everything/

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: VirtualBox-5.2-5.2.6_120293_fedora26-1.x86_64 won't install properly under kernel-4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64

[Sérgio Basto]

yes , vbox 5.2.6 won't build all modules ... 

you need patch the kmod vbox sources [1] 

Is on updates-testing of F27 RPMFusion, VirtualBox-5.2.6-2.fc27

https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox

If you try it, you need uninstall oracle rpm sources and all files left
in system ... (because don't use akmods) , if you succeeded let me know
to update wiki on how clean files generated by oracle scripts.

Best regards,

[1] 
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/VirtualBox-kmod.git/tree/fixes_for
_4.15.v2.patch?id=9e509eaddb14831da29e8ce519e262e82a9cce45


On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 11:26 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Trying to install VirtualBox-5.2-5.2.6_120293_fedora26-1.x86_64.rpm 
> (downloaded from virtualbox.org) won't run under 
> kernel-4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64. But the same procedure runs
> flawlessly 
> under
> kernel-4.14.14-300.fc27.x86_64
> 
> 
> sudo /sbin/vboxconfig
> vboxdrv.sh: Stopping VirtualBox services.
> vboxdrv.sh: Building VirtualBox kernel modules.
> vboxdrv.sh: Starting VirtualBox services.
> vboxdrv.sh: Building VirtualBox kernel modules.
> vboxdrv.sh: failed: modprobe vboxdrv failed. Please use 'dmesg' to
> find 
> out why.
> 
> dmesg|grep vbox
> 
> [   20.791165] audit: type=1130 audit(1516787818.981:81): pid=1
> uid=0 
> auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 
> msg='unit=systemd-fsck@dev-disk-by\x2dlabel-vbox comm="systemd" 
> exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=?
> res=success'
> [  159.762672] vboxdrv: version magic '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP 
> mod_unload ' should be '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP mod_unload
> retpoline '
> [  672.246426] vboxdrv: version magic '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP 
> mod_unload ' should be '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP mod_unload
> retpoline '
> [  726.090858] vboxdrv: version magic '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP 
> mod_unload ' should be '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP mod_unload
> retpoline '
> [ 1492.245456] vboxdrv: version magic '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP 
> mod_unload ' should be '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP mod_unload
> retpoline '
> [ 1545.881588] vboxdrv: version magic '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP 
> mod_unload ' should be '4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64 SMP mod_unload
> retpoline '
> 
> Anybody sees a solution?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Joachim Backes
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven)
> Kernel-4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64
> 
> 
> Joachim Backes 
> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: DevedeNG F27

[Sérgio Basto]

it is in RPMFusion 3rd party repos 

On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 01:46 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I didn't find DevedeNG for F27, is this App still in the development
> phase?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: high priority updates for samba need testing

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 13:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:20:19AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Fixes CVE-2017-7494 — remote code execution from a writable share.
> > 
> > F24: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-570c0071c4
> > F25: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-642a0eca75
> > 
> > Not seen one for F26 yet...
> 
> F26: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c729c6123c
> 
> This particular bug is Really Quite Bad, despite not having a
> dramatic
> name, so I definitely appreciate all help in checking this out and
> making sure the fix goes out quickly.

F26 looks like it was frozen , smb4k was sent to stable 9 days ago ... 

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f7849e04f4


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: PSA: Fedora Easy Karma - remove ~/.fedora/openidbaseclient-sessions.cache when getting "You must provide a captcha_key" error

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 

what does mean PSA ? 

On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 08:42 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> if fedora-easy-karma fails with an error message saying "You must
> provide a captcha_key" it should help to remove the file
> 
> ~/.fedora/openidbaseclient-sessions.cache
> 
> This will also log you out from other Fedora Web apps that you
> access with command-line tools, I suppose. The bug report is here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445703
> 
> Kind regards
> Till
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: gnome-software no notifications, but pending updates

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2016-12-23 at 15:52 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> In gnome-shell if I go to restart (upper right corner, power button
> icon) I have an 'install pending software updates' now for two days,
> but there's no other notification that there are pending software
> updates.
> 
> Is this change in behavior expected? Seems like a bug. Maybe I'll
> leave it alone for a couple more days and see if it continues to
> accumulate updates without any notification.

pkcon refresh force (should fix it) if yes, we have many bugs reports
opened with this problem. 

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763566

in resume is a PackageKit cache age problem , try set cache age fewer
in gnome-software ... 

Cheers,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[solved ?] samba browsing blocked even with the samba-client service enabled, works with connection/interface in 'trusted' zone

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 
Finally someone seems that found the mystery with firewalld, we need
open on source port ! more details in [1], Adam can you make it happen
for F25 ? also we need test it . 
Thanks,

[1] 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297235
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 15:46 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 10/11/16 14:48, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-
> > > > > > 1.5.0
> > > > > > source rpm and
> > > > > > give it a different name like libvpx-compat, build and
> > > > > > install
> > > > > > it then the
> > > > > > requirement of VirtualBox should be met without the
> > > > > > dependencyLuxemburgo confessa agora que foi longe de mais,
> > > > > > mas
> > > > > > era inevitável. "Hoje não o faria, mas pela forma como se
> > > > > > acercou de mim... Nenhum dirigente pode falar assim a um
> > > > > > treinador ou a um jogador quando a adrenalina ainda está a
> > > > > > correr". side effects
> > > > > > above.
> > > > > https://smani.fedorapeople.org/compat-libvpx-1.5.0-1.fc26.src
> > > > > .rpm
> > > > Well done Sandro, I see you've taken care to clean up the extra
> > > > installed files,
> > > > this should work just fine Joachim.
> > > Hi Ian Kent and Sandro Mani,
> > > 
> > > this worked flawlessly (The only additional thing I had to do was
> > > to
> > > install /usr/bin/rpmbuild). After having installed the newly
> > > built
> > > rpm,
> > > I could install a working VirtualBox.
> > > 
> > > Tank you very much.
> > May I recomend you rpmfusion rpms ? I am the packager maintainer
> > and
> > any feedback is welcome)
> Hi Sergio,
> 
> i switched from Rpmfusion to Unitedrpms because Rpmfusion always
> laggs 
> behind new Fedora versions, so  ready-for-use packages are missing
> for a 
> longer time period after a new Fedora appears. Unitedrpms seems to
> be 
> faster.

Hopefully not anymore , RPMFusion is ready for F25 and rawhide now . 

> Kind regards
> 
> Joachim Backes
> > 
> > http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox
> > 
> > > 
> > > Joachim Backes
> > > 
> 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > [...]
> > > > I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-1.5.0
> > > > source rpm and
> > > > give it a different name like libvpx-compat, build and install
> > > > it then the
> > > > requirement of VirtualBox should be met without the
> > > > dependencyLuxemburgo confessa agora que foi longe de mais, mas
> > > > era inevitável. "Hoje não o faria, mas pela forma como se
> > > > acercou de mim... Nenhum dirigente pode falar assim a um
> > > > treinador ou a um jogador quando a adrenalina ainda está a
> > > > correr". side effects
> > > > above.
> > > https://smani.fedorapeople.org/compat-libvpx-1.5.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
> > Well done Sandro, I see you've taken care to clean up the extra
> > installed files,
> > this should work just fine Joachim.
> Hi Ian Kent and Sandro Mani,
> 
> this worked flawlessly (The only additional thing I had to do was to 
> install /usr/bin/rpmbuild). After having installed the newly built
> rpm, 
> I could install a working VirtualBox.
> 
> Tank you very much.

May I recomend you rpmfusion rpms ? I am the packager maintainer and
any feedback is welcome)  

http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox

> Joachim Backes
> 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: mplayer and vlc errors in F25 and rawhide (F26) after friday and saturday's updates

[Sérgio Basto]

Hello , 

mplayer and vlc are rpmfusion packages therefore you should report it
on rpmfusion-users  maliling list
, not here . 

Thanks

On Seg, 2016-10-03 at 10:21 -0700, stan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm running F25.  On Friday, mplayer worked as expected.  I then
> updated to the latest updates (I have updates testing enabled).  I
> didn't use mplayer again, and the next day, updated to the latest
> updates again.  After that mplayer doesn't work properly.  It runs
> way
> too slowly, and any video I play runs at about 1/8 speed.  It
> complains
> that my system is too slow to run the video, a video is has run
> before
> without problem.  I experimented, and the same behavior is true of
> vlc
> when run in X. However, when I run mplayer in a virtual console (with
> -vo fbdev2), it works properly except that it doesn't respond to
> keyboard commands when using the full screen. This might be another
> unrelated error, since its been a long time since I did that. ffplay
> works properly in X, but doesn't play the complete video, as it gets
> seek errors towards the end of the video.
> 
> There was no kernel update, so this is not a problem with the video
> driver (radeon in my case).
> 
> To look at this further, I then went to my rawhide installation and
> updated it to the latest version as of Saturday night.  The same
> problems occurred there, so this is something common to both F25 and
> F26.
> 
> I then returned to F25, and pulled the mplayer subversion repository,
> and compiled it to see if it would point to a problem.  It compiled
> without problem, but the executable still has the problem.
> 
> There were hundreds of updates, so it is hard to say which is the
> culprit, but I did notice that the xorg packages were updated.  I
> also
> saw on the devel list that they excluded some libraries that had
> been previously included.  I don't know if that would be relevant.
> 
> I have no idea where to go from here.  These programs aren't working
> for me, but I'm not sure why.  I don't think it it the program
> itself,
> but a library it is using that changed.  But *which* library?
> 
> Sep 29 15:38:50 INFO
> Installed:
>   perl-JSON-WebToken.noarch 0.10-
> 2.fc25   
> systemd-bootchart.x86_64 231-
> 2.fc25   
>   
>  
> 
> Upgraded:
>   amule-nogui.x86_64 2.3.2-
> 3.fc26  autocorr-en.noarch 1:5.2.2.2-
> 1.fc25 avogadro-libs.x86_64 1.2.0-
> 1.fc25  bind.x86_64 32:9.10.4-
> 2.P3.fc25 
>   
>   bind-chroot.x86_64 32:9.10.4-2.P3.fc25   bind-
> devel.x86_64 32:9.10.4-2.P3.fc25   bind-
> libs.x86_64 32:9.10.4-2.P3.fc25   bind-libs-
> lite.x86_64 32:9.10.4-2.P3.fc25   
>   
>   bind-license.noarch 32:9.10.4-2.P3.fc25  bind-
> lite-devel.x86_64 32:9.10.4-2.P3.fc25  bind-
> sdb.x86_64 32:9.10.4-2.P3.fc25bind-utils.x86_64
> 32:9.10.4-2.P3.fc25   
>   
>   bind99-libs.x86_64 9.9.9-
> 2.P3.fc25   bind99-license.noarch 9.9.9-
> 2.P3.fc25   devedeng.noarch 4.8.2-
> 1.fc26   engrid-doc.noarch 2.0.0-
> 0.13.gitbaef0ce.fc25  
>   gdb.x86_64 7.12-0.19.20160929.fc25   gdb-
> doc.noarch 7.12-0.19.20160929.fc25  gdb-
> gdbserver.x86_64 7.12-0.19.20160929.fc25   gdb-
> headless.x86_64 7.12-0.19.20160929.fc25   
>   gtk-update-icon-cache.x86_64 3.22.0-
> 2.fc25   gtk3.x86_64 3.22.0-
> 2.fc25   gtk3-devel.x86_64 3.22.0-
> 2.fc25gtk3-devel-docs.x86_64 3.22.0-
> 2.fc25  
>   gtk3-immodule-xim.x86_64 3.22.0-2.fc25   gtk3-
> immodules.x86_64 3.22.0-2.fc25 gtk3-
> tests.x86_64 3.22.0-2.fc25imapsync.noarch
> 1.727-1.fc25  
>   kdelibs3.x86_64 3.5.10-
> 77.fc25   kdelibs3-devel.x86_64 3.5.10-
> 77.fc25koji.noarch 1.10.1-
> 13.fc25 koji-hub.noarch 1.10.1-
> 13.fc25
>   koji-utils.noarch 1.10.1-13.fc25 koji-
> web.noarch 1.10.1-
> 13.fc25  konsole5.x86_64 16.08.1-
> 2.fc25 konsole5-part.x86_64 16.08.1-
> 2.fc25   
>   libass.x86_64 0.13.3-
> 1.fc25  libass-devel.x86_64 0.13.3-
> 1.fc25   liblxqt.x86_64 0.11.0-
> 1.fc25   libqtxdg.x86_64 2.0.0-
> 2.fc25  

Re: devedeng problem F24 -> could this also happen to F25 ?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2016-08-17 at 08:25 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi, 
> after production of DVD iso out of MP4 file, F24 breaks down, no
> shutdown, the screen is dark and the blue lamp, which signals the
> system is on, is still on? The produced iso is complete and can be
> burned successfully with Brasero. Is this Gnome? GDM?
> This is new since the last 2 Kernels or updates (modules?). How can I
> read a log about this breakdown?

The only thing that devedeng can do to break down your computer , is
full the disk ... 
what is output of  df -h  ? 
to check kernel: dmesg and journalctl -p err -b 

anyway try boot with one kernel 4.5 , instead 4.6 ... see if helps 


> My system: Acer Laptop, 6GB Ram
> SW:
> [joerg@linux ~]$ dnf info devedeng
> Letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten: vor 0:01:49 am Wed Aug 17
> 14:11:07 2016.
> Installierte Pakete
> Name    : devedeng
> Arch    : noarch
> Epoch   : 0
> Version : 4.7.1
> Release : 1.fc24
> Größe   : 3.2 M
> Paketquelle : @System
> Aus Paketqu : rpmfusion-free-updates
> Zusammenfas : A program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or
> CVD)
> URL : http://www.rastersoft.com/programas/devede.html
> Lizenz  : GPLv3+
> Beschreibun : DevedeNG is a program to create video DVDs and CDs
> (VCD, sVCD or
>     : CVD), suitable for home players, from any number of
> video files,
>     : in any of the formats supported by FFMpeg.
>     : 
>     : The suffix NG is because it is a rewrite from scratch
> of the old
>     : Devede, to work with Python3 and Gtk3, and with a new
> internal
>     : architecture that allows to expand it and easily add
> new features.
> 
> [joerg@linux ~]$ dnf info kernel
> Letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten: vor 0:02:12 am Wed Aug 17
> 14:11:07 2016.
> Installierte Pakete
> Name    : kernel
> Arch    : x86_64
> Epoch   : 0
> Version : 4.6.4
> Release : 301.fc24
> Größe   : 0.0  
> Paketquelle : @System
> Aus Paketqu : updates
> Zusammenfas : The Linux kernel
> URL : http://www.kernel.org/
> Lizenz  : GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
> Beschreibun : The kernel meta package
> 
> Name    : kernel
> Arch    : x86_64
> Epoch   : 0
> Version : 4.6.5
> Release : 300.fc24
> Größe   : 0.0  
> Paketquelle : @System
> Aus Paketqu : updates
> Zusammenfas : The Linux kernel
> URL : http://www.kernel.org/
> Lizenz  : GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
> Beschreibun : The kernel meta package
> 
> Name    : kernel
> Arch    : x86_64
> Epoch   : 0
> Version : 4.6.6
> Release : 300.fc24
> Größe   : 0.0  
> Paketquelle : @System
> Aus Paketqu : updates
> Zusammenfas : The Linux kernel
> URL : http://www.kernel.org/
> Lizenz  : GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
> Beschreibun : The kernel meta package
> 
> Kind Regards
>  --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.
> org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: devede beta1 nok

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2016-07-22 at 23:47 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> not possible to run, the result of a "run trial" I had included,
> after successful dnf update, where devede beta1 is in. Thank You for
> Your advice, I will investigate a little bit and file a bug. After
> downgrade the previous version of devede "runs" again.
> Kind regards
> 

devede-3.23.0-7.20151018git.fc23.noarch works for me 

please try: 

   rm ~/.devede


-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: devede beta1 nok

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2016-07-22 at 14:17 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> just saw in F23 - this might also be valid for the F23 followers:
> 
> Aktualisiert:
>   audit.x86_64 2.6.5-
> 1.fc23 
>   audit-libs.x86_64 2.6.5-
> 1.fc23
>   audit-libs-python3.x86_64 2.6.5-
> 1.fc23
>   devede.noarch 3.23.0-7.20151018git.fc23 > doesn't work,
> also as user  nok  - not only as root  nok                           
> 

what is not ok ? , devede.noarch 3.23.0-7.20151018git.fc23 is from
RPMFusion , not Fedora, please report it on RPMFusion channels .
(Mailing list or bugzilla or irc) 

>       
>   gnome-calculator.x86_64 3.18.3-
> 1.fc23 
> 
> Komplett!
> [root@linux joerg]# devede
> DeVeDe 3.23.0 beta1
> Locale: de_DE.UTF-8
> Using package-installed files
> /root/
> Cores: 2 Virtual cores: 4
> Entro en fonts
> Salgo de fonts
> /root/
> Temp Directory is:  /var/tmp
> home load:  /root/.devede
> linea:  video_format:pal
> 
> linea:  temp_folder:/var/tmp/
> 
> linea:  multicore:1
> 
> linea:  hyperthreading:1
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/devede", line 303, in 
>     devede_other.load_config(global_vars) # load configuration
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/devede/devede_other.py",
> line 484, in load_config
>     value=to_bool(value)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/devede/devede_other.py",
> line 422, in to_bool
>     raise Exception('Invalid value for boolean conversion: ' +
> str(value))
> Exception: Invalid value for boolean conversion: 1
> [root@linux joerg]#
> 
> Kind regards 
> 
>  --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.
> org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Propose for onbaording session for new contributors

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2016-06-28 at 09:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, if you use https://meet.jit.si/ (Their hosted server) you
> can use any web browser, it doesn't need any kind of dedicated
> client.

and can we have one private hosted server ? 


-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Propose for onbaording session for new contributors

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2016-06-24 at 10:12 +0800, Dev wrote:
> I found opensource alternative -  https://jitsi.org

I found 2 rpm spec to build it on Fedora :
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:zhonghuaren/jitsi/jit
si.spec?expand=1

https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi/blob/master/resources/install/rpm/SPECS/
jitsi.spec

> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Dev  wrote:
> > Hi there! How about the deal? I found another alternative for
> > Hangout, check https://www.join.me - "Collaborate instantly with
> > free screen sharing, unlimited audio, and ridiculously simple video
> > conferencing. No registration required."
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Sumantro Mukherjee  > t.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Just as a note, Fedora is usually uncomfortable with using
> > > proprietary
> > > > services for official purposes, but I think for an informal
> > > meeting
> > > > like this it should be no problem.
> > > >
> > > > We could use something like http://whenisgood.net/ to figure
> > > out a time
> > > > that works for everyone who's interested.
> > > >
> > > > The only other problem with a video/voice service is that some
> > > people
> > > > may not have the ability to use it, or if English is not their
> > > first
> > > > language, may be more comfortable with text. If anyone is in
> > > that
> > > > position, we can arrange an alternative session via IRC or
> > > something
> > > > similar, so please do speak up if you'd like this :)
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Hey Adam,
> > > 
> > > I have tried searching for open source alternatives and figured
> > > out that there isn't much option, so I propose to have it on the
> > > Hangout itself with an IRC temporary channel #fedoraqa-intro
> > > after onboarding we can always route them back to #fedora-qa . I
> > > am still waiting for few more responses and will open up the poll
> > > with timings to get the desired time of the new comers.
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > Sumantro
> > > --
> > > test mailing list
> > > test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproj
> > > ect.org
> > > 
> > 
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.
> org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd/sendmail problem - seeking help

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 18:04 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 18:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> > On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 09:06 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:26:57AM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > and journalctl has the entry 
> > > > "sendmail.service: PID file /run/sendmail.pid not readable
> > > > (yet?) 
> > > >   after start:  No such file or directory".
> > > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057879
> > > from 2014-01-25.  It is somewhat annoying/misleading but it does
> > > not
> > > seem to really affect a sendmail operation and nobody seems to be
> > > in
> > > a
> > > hurry to fix it.  Apparently your problem is somewhere else.
> > yes this is a very old issue , seems harmless , 
> > I even forgot it . 
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848172#c24 
> I will check this post : 
> 
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1613628=15

no,  not a good tip .

From 
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.service.html

"Please set PIDFile= accordingly. Note that the daemon should write
that file before finishing with its initialization. Otherwise, systemd
might try to read the file before it exists."

So it looks like sendmail creates pid file before exit ... (makes sense
since sendmail have 2 processes) , editing
/usr/lib/systemd/system/sendmail.service and comment out PIDFile entry
[1], solves the problem, I don't known if it's worth report it, but
seems still works correctly and don't report any warning.   

[1]
#PIDFile=/run/sendmail.pid


> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >    Michal
> > > --
> > > test mailing list
> > > test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproj
> > > ec
> > > t.
> > > org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd/sendmail problem - seeking help

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 09:06 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:26:57AM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> ...
> > 
> > and journalctl has the entry 
> > "sendmail.service: PID file /run/sendmail.pid not readable (yet?) 
> >   after start:  No such file or directory".
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057879
> from 2014-01-25.  It is somewhat annoying/misleading but it does not
> seem to really affect a sendmail operation and nobody seems to be in
> a
> hurry to fix it.  Apparently your problem is somewhere else.

yes this is a very old issue , seems harmless , 
I even forgot it . 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848172#c24 


>    Michal
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.
> org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd/sendmail problem - seeking help

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 18:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 09:06 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:26:57AM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > ...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > and journalctl has the entry 
> > > "sendmail.service: PID file /run/sendmail.pid not readable
> > > (yet?) 
> > >   after start:  No such file or directory".
> > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057879
> > from 2014-01-25.  It is somewhat annoying/misleading but it does
> > not
> > seem to really affect a sendmail operation and nobody seems to be
> > in
> > a
> > hurry to fix it.  Apparently your problem is somewhere else.
> yes this is a very old issue , seems harmless , 
> I even forgot it . 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848172#c24 

I will check this post : 

http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1613628=15

> > 
> >    Michal
> > --
> > test mailing list
> > test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraprojec
> > t.
> > org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Congratulations for F24β

[Sérgio Basto]

subject fixed :-)

On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 09:01 -0600, Peter G.  wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> 
> > 
> > yeah ß is not an β
> > alt gr + s writes ß ( but this is not an beta )
> I never knew that there was a real beta character! es-zett is 
> easy to type: just right-alt-s. How do you type the Greek beta 
> from the keyboard (I use US dead keys—always and exclusively)?
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.o
> rg
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Congratulations for F24ß

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 14:41 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:26:41PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> > On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 09:13 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 05/11/2016 08:01 AM, Peter G. wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > How do you type the Greek beta
> > > > from the keyboard (I use US dead keys—always and exclusively)?
> > > One way is C-S-u 0 3 b 2 Space
> > what you mean by C-S-u ? can't figure out 
> ctrl-shift-u followed by a zero, a 3, a b, a 2, and a space.
> 
> try it at a terminal prompt, follow it with a space, and see what you
> get.
> I get a beta.

ah only works on gnome terminal , not in konsole 

http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/12244/how-can-i-type-unicode-ch
aracters-into-kdes-konsole-terminal-from-a-gnome-deskt

I could workaround running:
python -c "print u'\u03b2'"

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Congratulations for F24ß

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 09:13 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 08:01 AM, Peter G. wrote:
> > 
> > How do you type the Greek beta
> > from the keyboard (I use US dead keys—always and exclusively)?
> 
> One way is C-S-u 0 3 b 2 Space

what you mean by C-S-u ? can't figure out 

> Not entirely convenient or memorable.



-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Congratulations for F24ß

[Sérgio Basto]

yeah ß is not an β  
alt gr + s writes ß ( but this is not an beta ) 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F#Graphically_similar_letters

However, the reverse substitution of using German "ß" as a surrogate
for Greek "β" once was common when describing beta test versions of
application programs for older operating systems

not the case (older operating systems) , but I don't know type one beta
character 

On Ter, 2016-05-10 at 22:47 +0100, Pawel Bogucki wrote:
> Probably because it looks similar to β when looking at keyboard map
> :-)
> On 10 May 2016 9:21 p.m., "Gordon Messmer" 
> wrote:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F
> > 
> > Why eszett?
> > --
> > test mailing list
> > test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject
> > .org
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.o
> rg
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: why we don't have kernel updates on F24

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2016-03-29 at 21:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Adam Williamson
> <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 20:28 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > kernel-4.5.0-0.rc7.git0.2.fc24 have almost 20 days
> > > > I see here : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?pac
> > > > kageID=8
> > > > many kernels updates for F24 , but none is in bodhi
> > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel
> > > > 
> > > > Am I missing something ?
> > > Good question, kernel 4.5.0 was released two weeks ago, so I'd
> > > think
> > > that kernel-4.5.0-301.fc24 should be in u-t by now. I'm gonna
> > > guess
> > > very soon now that freeze is lifted.
> > The freeze has nothing to do with when things go to updates-
> > testing, u-
> > t is never frozen. It's entirely up to the package maintainer when
> > to
> > send things to u-t. I'll ask the kernel folks tomorrow why they
> > haven't
> > submitted updates recently.
> 
> Well I'm confused in more way than one when I go to bodhi. When I do
> a
> search, no F24 packages come up in the results for anything.
> 
> If I go to the Released drop down menu on the upper right corner,
> there is a separate Fedora 24 option, I click that, and see Fedora 24
> only  packages. But if I do a search again, it reverts and it's only
> Fedora 22 and 23 packages. I'm not finding an easy way to search for
> Fedora 24 packages in Bodhi. I seem to have to click on View All and
> just scroll and hunt page by page. I've got to be doing something
> wrong.

I go by search :
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel

still no kernels for F24 there 


-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

why we don't have kernel updates on F24

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 

kernel-4.5.0-0.rc7.git0.2.fc24 have almost 20 days 
I see here : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
many kernels updates for F24 , but none is in bodhi 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel

Am I missing something ?

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.



--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to create grub rescue kernel entry?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2016-03-18 at 01:47 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> The F24 lives don't contain a rescue kernel or generate the
> corresponding
> grub entry (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317709
> ). Is
> there a way to install the rescue kernel if it was not done during
> the
> initial install? (The package dracut-config-rescue was not installed,
> and
> I've installed that manually.) I've nominated this bug as a FE, but
> it would
> be less important if there's a way to fix the problem after install.

I remember that ask have this question and the answer. 

/etc/kernel/postinst.d/51-dracut-rescue-postinst.sh $(uname -r)
/boot/vmlinuz-$(uname -r)

works for me in F23 .

after google it: "how to create grub rescue
site:ask.fedoraproject.org"best reference is : 
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/40409/cant-boot-into-rescue-m
ode-how-to-re-generate-initramfs/

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: acroread

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2015-10-09 at 03:02 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> My laptop is a 64-bit Acer. I installed via:
> [root@linux joerg]# dnf install 
> http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/AdbeRdr9.5.5-1_i486linux_enu.rpm. 
> Acroread runs ok.


dnf install 
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.5.5/enu/AdbeRdr9.5.5-1_i486linux_enu.rpm

Fedora 23 - x86_64 - Test Updates   
3.0 MB/s |  19 MB 00:06
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:09 ago on Thu Oct  8 22:35:27 
2015.
Dependencies resolved.

 Package  Arch Version  
  Repository   Size

Installing:
 AdobeReader_enu  i486 9.5.5-1  
  @commandline 57 M
 gdk-pixbuf2-xlib i686 2.32.1-1.fc23
  updates-testing  49 k


and acroread seems to work without any problem.
Note : I don't use acroread for a long time it was replaced by okular 


-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: problems with redhat bugzilla?

[Sérgio Basto]

Hello,

On Qua, 2015-09-30 at 14:41 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> just FTR,

what FTR means ? 

> > Bugzilla doesn't not accept weak password anymore .
> 
> not exactly true, now I have weaker password than before Bugzilla forced me 
> to change it
> 
> and by "weaker" I mean _really weak_ ... but if that is what do the admins 
> consider more secure, well ... not my problem

Maybe my assumption was not totally correct but now bugzilla says:

The password must contain at least one:

letter
special character
digit


After the new "Mozilla says hacker compromised Bugzilla and used stolen
‘security-sensitive’ info to attack Firefox users" , I thought RedHat
adopted strong passwords, IMHO should be adopted (in bugzilla ) ... 

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2015-09-29 at 11:51 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote:
> I installed the F23 beta last week when it first came out.  There were
> 483MB of updates on 23rd September.  I didn't use it again until today.
> I was expecting another bumper load of updates, GNOME 3.18 in particular.
> 
> However, 'dnf update' and 'dnf --best update' both report there's nothing
> to do.

For all dnf problems, we got yum-deprecated to work around ! 


> rpm tells me I have gnome-shell 3.17.92-1.  'dnf update gnome-shell' wants
> to update gnome-shell and mutter to 3.18.0-1.  'dnf repolist -v' tells me
> I have the following metadata:
> 
>updates-testing: using metadata from Tue Sep 29 06:54:57 2015.
>fedora: using metadata from Mon Sep 28 09:56:23 2015.
>updates: using metadata from Thu Jul 16 17:29:26 2015.
> 
> Once again dnf leaves me baffled.
> 
> Ron

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: problems with redhat bugzilla?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Seg, 2015-09-28 at 13:30 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 28.09.2015 11:09, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> > Hi,
> > can not login to bugzilla, also the bug ID of a known bug is rejected.
> > Currently problems there?
> > Kind Regards
> >
> 
> Hi Joerg,
> 
> I had problems too after RH BZ was updated (week before last): I wasn't 
> able to login, and I had to choose a new password (and was wondering 
> about this fact!)

I had to change my password, but no problem with Firefox, Bugzilla
doesn't not accept weak password anymore . 

> Kind regards
> 
> Joachim Backes
> 
> -- 
> 
> Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three)
> Kernel-4.2.1-300.fc23.x86_64
> 
> 
> Joachim Backes 
> http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: The most recent kernel: Plague of Fives, and fatally inefficient networking

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-09-24 at 15:27 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
> Everyone:
> 
> This morning I updated to the latest kernel. And promptly shut down
> and rebooted the immediate previous kernel, which is the Last Known
> Good.

what kernel ? 
> 
> Here's why:
> 
> 1. The kernel, once again, is prone to an annoying flaw: it produces a
> Plague of Fives. Any time a text box opens up, a string of repeated
> digits 5 appears. The only way to shut it off is to type "5" again.
> 
> 2. The computer became almost inaccessible to other computers on the
> network. File sharing slowed to a totally unacceptable crawl.
> 
> This last was a critical error. And of course it never occurred to me
> to suspect the kernel. That is, until I saw the Plague of Fives
> return.
> 
> No, kernel group! Do not tell me I have a problem with a sticking 5
> key. If that were the problem, then pressing Shift would change
> "555..." to 55%%..." It doesn't. More to the
> point, the Plague of Fives tended to go away with the next iteration
> of the kernel.
> 
> Well, I'm not going to wait that long. I'm not going to use this
> version of the kernel. I will wait for someone to push another one.
> 
> Because when I reverted to the Last Known Good, the Plague of Fives
> disappeared, and the network file-share problem resolved.
> 
> Temlakos
> -- 
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: dnf system-upgrade clean and dnf clean packages does not work

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2015-09-11 at 14:25 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 10/09/2015 alle 18.50 -0400, Donavan Lance ha scritto:
> > using the new 'dnf system-upgrade' utility
> 
> I have try this kind of update, but:
> 
> > [root@dodo:~]# rpm -q dnf
> > dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch
> > [root@dodo:~]# dnf system-upgrade
> > No such command: system-upgrade. Please use /bin/dnf --help
> > It could be a DNF plugin command, try: "dnf install 
> > 'dnf-command(system-upgrade)'"
> > [root@dodo:~]# 
> 
> Some suggest?

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade#How_do_I_use_it.3F

dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade

dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23

dnf system-upgrade reboot


I used (today) version  0.4.0 from fedora 22 updates-testing ,
dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-0.4.0-1.fc22 




> Thanks
> -- 
> Dario Lesca
> (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 22 con Gnome 3.16)

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Virtualbox does not work with Kernel 4.2.x

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2015-09-04 at 10:32 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 09/04/15 08:17, Aka Ídviare wrote:
> > #Output /var/lib/dkms/vboxhost/4.2.32/build/make.log
> > http://www.fpaste.org/263410/
> 
> You seem to be using a rather old version of Vbox at version 4.2.32.   I 
> believe the latest 5.0.X versions of Vbox will solve your problem.

VirtualBox 5.0.4 was released today and changelog [1] says "Linux hosts:
Linux 4.2 fix " , so I believe you will need 5.0.4, also expect updates
(in a few  days) for 4.3.x and 4.2.x ...


[1] https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog

Regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: how do i enable the updates-testing repo?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 06:04 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
 On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Rares Aioanei wrote:
 
  Did you run 'dnf update' after enabling the repo? What does 'dnf
  repolist' say?
 
   i've run sudo dnf update a number of times, tells me Nothing to
 do. and:
 
 $ dnf repolist
 langpacks: No languages are enabled
 Last metadata expiration check performed 2 days, 13:48:11 ago on Thu Jul 23 
 16:13:59 2015.
 repo id   repo name   
  status
 adobe-linux-x86_64Adobe Systems Incorporated  
   2
 *fedora   Fedora 22 - x86_64  
  44,762
 *updates  Fedora 22 - x86_64 - Updates
   7,590
 *updates-testing  Fedora 22 - x86_64 - Test 
 Updates 2,265
 
 so it *seems* like updates-testing is enabled. i'm puzzled.

Hi, hopefully dnf have good documentation : 

googling for : dnf enable

http://dnf-plugins-core.readthedocs.org/en/latest/config_manager.html

so you :
  dnf config-manager --set-enable updates-testing 

and disable with : 
  dnf config-manager --set-disable updates-testing 


You also have the choice of enable or disable repos in dnf command line
with:

  dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing


and you don't need clean metadata anymore, if you want be sure that is
used latest metadata use --refresh: 

  dnf update --refresh 

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: how do i enable the updates-testing repo?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 09:09 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
 This may or may not have anything to do with your problem but it's one
 I ran into with dnf...
 
 
 I was trying to update a package I KNEW was in updates-testing (I
 pushed it myself) but when I asked dnf to update it it gave me the
 Nothing to do message.
 
 
 After that I tried all the dnf clean metadata|all tricks and it still
 wouldn't find the updated package. Then I tried dnf
 --enablerepo=updates-testing list package and lo and behold it was
 there!
 
 
 Then I released that because it was a library, and another package was
 dependent on it, that it was refusing to update the package!
 
 
 While that's certainly the correct behavior, the lack of any sort of
 USEFUL message to the user is extremely confusing and frustrating.
 
 
You could use --best :

dnf update --refresh --best
RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Nonfree - Test Updates   
   45 kB/s | 9.4 kB 00:00
Copr repo for gimp-saveforweb-plugin owned by region51  
  2.2 kB/s | 2.3 kB 00:01
RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Free - Test Updates  
   30 kB/s | 4.7 kB 00:00
Copr repo for buildsforF21 owned by sergiomb
   18 kB/s |  15 kB 00:00
google-talkplugin   
   21 kB/s | 2.7 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Free - Updates   
  633 kB/s | 406 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Nonfree - Updates
  215 kB/s | 148 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Free 
  511 kB/s | 508 kB 00:00
google-chrome   
   29 kB/s | 3.7 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Nonfree  
  349 kB/s | 179 kB 00:00
Copr repo for peazip owned by sergiomb  
  3.8 kB/s | 3.5 kB 00:00
Using metadata from Sun Jul 26 15:25:14 2015 (0:00:22 hours old)
Error: nothing provides kernel-uname-r = 4.0.9-200.fc21.x86_64 needed by 
kmod-VirtualBox-4.0.9-200.fc21.x86_64-4.3.30-1.fc21.2.x86_64



 Thanks,
 Richard
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: proper way to install skype 4.3 on fedora test?

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi,
On Qui, 2015-07-23 at 09:25 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
   (since i have my updates-testing repo enabled, this would seem to be
 the right place to ask this.)
 
   along with many others, i tried to install (actually, upgrade to)
 skype 4.3 on my 64-bit fedora laptop, went to the skype download page,
 selected as my distro Fedora 16 32bit, downloaded the corresponding
 skype-4.3.0.37-fedora.i586.rpm, that installed smoothly, but when i
 click on the skype icon, my first concern is that the initial login
 box shows Skype[TM] 4.2 for Linux, rather than 4.3.
 
   and when i try to log in, i get the dreaded Skype can't connect,
 which typically suggests one needs to upgrade the software ... which i
 just did, of course.
 
   i also found this interesting page:
 
 http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2012/install-skype-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel-scientific-linux-sl/comment-page-3/
 
 which suggests bypassing that rpm and doing things manually.
 
   so i'm open to suggestions as to the best approach.

https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/questions/query:skype/

I use lpf-skype see instructions here [1] 

[1]
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/66586/skype-rpm-build-error/

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: ivtv - firmware - v4l-cx2341x*.fw - Upstream Fedora

[Sérgio Basto]

On Dom, 2015-06-21 at 23:47 +0200, poma wrote:
 Háu kola
 
 
 $ lspci -d :0016 -knn
 01:08.0 Multimedia video controller [0400]: Internext Compression Inc iTVC16 
 (CX23416) Video Decoder [:0016] (rev 01)
   Subsystem: Hauppauge computer works Inc. WinTV PVR 150 [0070:8801]
   Kernel driver in use: ivtv
   Kernel modules: ivtv
 
 
 
 $ dmesg | grep ivtv
 [   10.082881] ivtv: Start initialization, version 1.4.3
 [   10.085644] ivtv0: Initializing card 0
 [   10.088287] ivtv0: Autodetected Hauppauge card (cx23416 based)
 [   10.094502] ivtv0: Unreasonably low latency timer, setting to 64 (was 32)
 [   10.183374] ivtv0: Autodetected Hauppauge WinTV PVR-150
 [   10.240409] cx25840 2-0044: cx25843-23 found @ 0x88 (ivtv i2c driver #0)
 [   10.380617] wm8775 2-001b: chip found @ 0x36 (ivtv i2c driver #0)
 [   10.431991] ivtv0: Registered device video0 for encoder MPG (4096 kB)
 [   10.432151] ivtv0: Registered device video32 for encoder YUV (2048 kB)
 [   10.432256] ivtv0: Registered device vbi0 for encoder VBI (1024 kB)
 [   10.432358] ivtv0: Registered device video24 for encoder PCM (320 kB)
 [   10.432459] ivtv0: Registered device radio0 for encoder radio
 [   10.432473] ivtv0: Initialized card: Hauppauge WinTV PVR-150
 [   10.433869] ivtv: End initialization
 [   11.820105] ivtv :01:08.0: Direct firmware load for v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw 
 failed with error -2
 [   11.820119] ivtv0: Unable to open firmware v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw (must be 
 376836 bytes)
 [   11.820124] ivtv0: Did you put the firmware in the hotplug firmware 
 directory?
 [   11.820129] ivtv0: Retry loading firmware
 [   12.439735] ivtv :01:08.0: Direct firmware load for v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw 
 failed with error -2
 [   12.439747] ivtv0: Unable to open firmware v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw (must be 
 376836 bytes)
 [   12.439752] ivtv0: Did you put the firmware in the hotplug firmware 
 directory?
 [   12.439757] ivtv0: Failed to initialize on device video32
 [   12.439788] ivtv0: Failed to initialize on device video0
 [   12.439953] ivtv0: Failed to initialize on device vbi0
 [   12.439968] ivtv0: Failed to initialize on device video24
 [   12.440110] ivtv0: Failed to initialize on device radio0
 
 
 
 $ modinfo ivtv | grep 'author\|firmware'
 author: Kevin Thayer, Chris Kennedy, Hans Verkuil
 firmware:   v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg
 firmware:   v4l-cx2341x-dec.fw
 firmware:   v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw
 
 
 
 $ rpm -qi linux-firmware
 ...
 Packager: Fedora Project
 Vendor  : Fedora Project
 ...
 Summary : Firmware files used by the Linux kernel
 Description :
 This package includes firmware files required for some devices to
 operate.
 
 ~~~
 
 $ rpm -ql linux-firmware | grep v4l-cx2341x
 $ 
 
 ~~~
 
 # yum install ivtv-firmware
 ...
 No package ivtv-firmware available.
 Error: Nothing to do
 
 
 
 $ rpm -qilp 
 https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/ivtv-firmware/20080701/26/noarch/ivtv-firmware-20080701-26.noarch.rpm
 Name: ivtv-firmware
 Epoch   : 2
 Version : 20080701
 Release : 26
 Architecture: noarch
 Install Date: (not installed)
 Group   : System Environment/Kernel
 Size: 857256
 License : Redistributable, no modification permitted
 Signature   : (none)
 Source RPM  : ivtv-firmware-20080701-26.src.rpm
 Build Date  : Sun 08 Jun 2014 05:38:45 AM CEST
 Build Host  : buildvm-11.phx2.fedoraproject.org
 Relocations : (not relocatable)
 Packager: Fedora Project
 Vendor  : Fedora Project
 URL : http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/ivtv/firmware/
 Summary : Firmware for the Hauppauge PVR 250/350/150/500/USB2 model series
 Description :
 This package contains the firmware for WinTV Hauppauge PVR
 250/350/150/500/USB2 cards.
 /lib/firmware/ivtv-firmware-license-end-user.txt
 /lib/firmware/ivtv-firmware-license-oemihvisv.txt
 /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-dec.fw
 /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw
 /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg
 /lib/firmware/v4l-cx25840.fw
 /lib/firmware/v4l-pvrusb2-24xxx-01.fw
 /lib/firmware/v4l-pvrusb2-29xxx-01.fw
 /usr/share/doc/ivtv-firmware
 /usr/share/doc/ivtv-firmware/license-end-user.txt
 /usr/share/doc/ivtv-firmware/license-oemihvisv.txt
 
 ~
 
 Why these firmwares are not included upstream
 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/
 ?
 
 Why these firmwares are obsoleted(?) downstream
 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ivtv-firmware.git
 ?
 
 Why these firmware are not included downstream
 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/linux-firmware.git
 ?

Hi, 
Maybe this thread could help you :

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-May/210974.html

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-March/209165.html

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: sizeof - w/ rpmbuild

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sáb, 2015-06-20 at 04:10 +0200, poma wrote:
 On 20.06.2015 04:00, Josh Stone wrote:
  On 06/19/2015 06:47 PM, poma wrote:
  On 20.06.2015 03:30, Josh Stone wrote:
  On 06/19/2015 05:51 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
  On 06/19/2015 05:16 PM, poma wrote:
 
  This is exactly the opposite of the case with the kernel
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232206
 
 
  - Local rpmbuild builds:
 
  binutils-2.25-11 - elfutils-0.163-1
  4.9MNetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23.x86_64.rpm
 
  binutils-2.25-10 - elfutils-0.163-1
  4.9MNetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23.x86_64.rpm
 
  binutils-2.25-10 - elfutils-0.162-2
  4.9MNetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23.x86_64.rpm
 
  binutils-2.25-10 - elfutils-0.162-1
  4.9MNetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23.x86_64.rpm
 
  binutils-2.25-10 - elfutils-0.161-8
  4.9MNetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23.x86_64.rpm
 
  binutils-2.25-9 - elfutils-0.161-8
  4.9MNetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23.x86_64.rpm
 
 
  - Local mock build:
 
  /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/
  2.0MNetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23.x86_64.rpm
 
 
  - Koji:
 
  https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/NetworkManager/1.0.4/0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23/x86_64/
  2.0MNetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23.x86_64.rpm
 
 
  Any idea why this multiplying size is happening with the rpmbuild?
 
  NetworkManager is just an example of a general issue.
 
  I'd start with rpm -qvlp foo.rpm to see what exactly is bigger.
  If it's an ELF file, compare eu-readelf -S or even -a.
 
  FWIW, my fedpkg local produced 2.0M too.
 
  Perhaps you have devel packages for some optional NetworkManager
  features that aren't normally enabled?  Or maybe you have the bad
  libelf.so in your path somewhere from testing the strip issue?
 
 
  - rpmbuild runs as:
 
  $ cat ~/.rpmmacros
  %debug_package %{nil}
  
  Doesn't this prevent stripping?
  
  The normal %debug_package sets %global __debug_package 1, which causes
  __spec_install_post to run __debug_install_post, which runs
  find-debuginfo.sh, which is what runs eu-strip to extract debuginfo.
  
  Without that, the debug sections will be left in your files, as readelf
  shows below, so of course they will be bigger!
  
 
 But why is this happening only recently?
 
 I use %debug_package %{nil} to exclude the construction of *debuginfo* 
 packages.
 
 Eee
 Am I really doing it the wrong way, so far!?

Hi, 
AFAIK , We, in package, enable build with debug (./configure
--enable-debug) to create good debuginfo packages. 
I think when rpmbuild begins do debuginfo packages strips the
binaries . 

For example pngquant.spec

./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --enable-debug

file /usr/bin/pngquant

/usr/bin/pngquant: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for
GNU/Linux 2.6.32,
BuildID[sha1]=ef857b7ad50d1791a17a46d2a02c6a502bebdaa0, stripped


  $ rpmbuild -ba NetworkManager.spec
 
 
  - mock runs as:
 
  $ mock --verbose --root=fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --with=baseonly 
  --without=debuginfo --rebuild NM.src.rpm
 
 
  Significant differences:
 
  - rpm-qvlp-NM-rpmbuild-vs-mock.rpm.diff:
 
  31392 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/bin/nm-online
1729192 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/bin/nmcli
   ---
  15344 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/bin/nm-online
 563256 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/bin/nmcli
   ---
  83280 Jun 19 23:54 
  /usr/lib64/NetworkManager/libnm-settings-plugin-ibft.so
   2696 Jun 19 23:54 
  /usr/lib64/NetworkManager/libnm-settings-plugin-ifcfg-rh.so
  38800 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/lib64/pppd/2.4.7/nm-pppd-plugin.so
  18808 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/libexec/nm-avahi-autoipd.action
  19736 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/libexec/nm-dhcp-helper
 152336 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/libexec/nm-dispatcher
4090448 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/libexec/nm-iface-helper
7846824 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/sbin/NetworkManager
   ---
  27456 Jun 19 23:54 
  /usr/lib64/NetworkManager/libnm-settings-plugin-ibft.so
 185104 Jun 19 23:54 
  /usr/lib64/NetworkManager/libnm-settings-plugin-ifcfg-rh.so
  15184 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/lib64/pppd/2.4.7/nm-pppd-plugin.so
  11240 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/libexec/nm-avahi-autoipd.action
  11304 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/libexec/nm-dhcp-helper
  48640 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/libexec/nm-dispatcher
1006808 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/libexec/nm-iface-helper
1875056 Jun 19 23:54 /usr/sbin/NetworkManager
 
 
  - eu-readelf-S-NM-rpmbuild-vs-mock.diff:
 
There are 38 section headers, starting at offset 0x77b228:
   ---
There are 30 section headers, starting at offset 0x1c94f0:
   ---
[27] .comment PROGBITS  001c50e0 
  0058  1 MS 0   0  1
[28] .debug_aranges   PROGBITS  001c5138 
  1d80  00   0  1
[29] .debug_info  PROGBITS  

Re: Virtualbox on FC22

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sáb, 2015-05-09 at 23:30 +1000, Adrian wrote:
 Does anyone have Virtualbox working
 on FC22 ?

yes now we got  on rpmfusion : 

VirtualBox-4.3.26-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm

* Mon May 04 2015 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com - 4.3.26-3
- Added diff_smap_4.patch from https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/13961 ,
  may fix problems for kernel = 3.19 , I still need disable 3D to run
plasma 5

( https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=6t=64452start=15#p320557 )


-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Virtualbox on FC22

[Sérgio Basto]

On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 00:43 +1000, Adrian wrote:
 Yes, Below is why I asked the question ;
 
 [root@fedora22desk ~]#  /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup 
 bash: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv: No such file or directory 
 [root@fedora22desk ~]#  
 
 
 
 root@fedora22desk ~]# rpm -qi VirtualBox 
 Name: VirtualBox 
 Version : 4.3.26 
 Release : 3.fc22 
 Architecture: x86_64 
 Install Date: Sat 09 May 2015 23:43:00 AEST 
 Group   : Development/Tools 
 Size: 61244411 
 License : GPLv2 or (GPLv2 and CDDL) 
 Signature   : RSA/SHA1, Wed 06 May 2015 20:46:45 AEST, Key ID
 81c9b42397f4d1c1 
 Source RPM  : VirtualBox-4.3.26-3.fc22.src.rpm 
 Build Date  : Wed 06 May 2015 20:36:21 AEST 
 Build Host  : builder02.kwizart.net 
 Relocations : (not relocatable) 
 Packager: kwizart 
 Vendor  : rpms.kwizart.net 
 URL : http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/VirtualBox 
 Summary : A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware 
 Description : 
 A general-purpose full virtualizer and emulator for 32-bit and 
 64-bit x86 based PC-compatible machines. 
 [root@fedora22desk ~]# 
 
yum install akmod-VirtualBox kernel-devel-$(uname -r) 

akmods 

systemctl restart systemd-modules-load.service
 
 
 On 10/05/15 00:14, František Zatloukal wrote:
 
  Hi,
  running sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup should help. Command is
  same even with systemd.
  
  
  2015-05-09 16:05 GMT+02:00 Adrian vk4...@bigpond.com:
  
  
  On 09/05/15 23:47, Adrian wrote:
  
   Result Code: 
   
   
   NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x80004005)
   
   
  Did
  
  /etc/init.d/vboxdrv
  
  
  get replaced by something in systemd ? 
  
  Adrian ... vk4tux
  
  
  --
  test mailing list
  test@lists.fedoraproject.org
  To unsubscribe:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
  
  
  
  -- 
  Best regards / S pozdravem,
  
  František Zatloukal
  Web: frantisek.zatloukalu.eu
  
  
 
 -- 
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Virtualbox on FC22

[Sérgio Basto]

On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 01:27 +1000, Adrian wrote:
 
 
 On 10/05/15 00:49, Sérgio Basto wrote:
 
  On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 00:43 +1000, Adrian wrote:
   Yes, Below is why I asked the question ;
   
   [root@fedora22desk ~]#  /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup 
   bash: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv: No such file or directory 
   [root@fedora22desk ~]#  
   
   
   
   root@fedora22desk ~]# rpm -qi VirtualBox 
   Name: VirtualBox 
   Version : 4.3.26 
   Release : 3.fc22 
   Architecture: x86_64 
   Install Date: Sat 09 May 2015 23:43:00 AEST 
   Group   : Development/Tools 
   Size: 61244411 
   License : GPLv2 or (GPLv2 and CDDL) 
   Signature   : RSA/SHA1, Wed 06 May 2015 20:46:45 AEST, Key ID
   81c9b42397f4d1c1 
   Source RPM  : VirtualBox-4.3.26-3.fc22.src.rpm 
   Build Date  : Wed 06 May 2015 20:36:21 AEST 
   Build Host  : builder02.kwizart.net 
   Relocations : (not relocatable) 
   Packager: kwizart 
   Vendor  : rpms.kwizart.net 
   URL : http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/VirtualBox 
   Summary : A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware 
   Description : 
   A general-purpose full virtualizer and emulator for 32-bit and 
   64-bit x86 based PC-compatible machines. 
   [root@fedora22desk ~]# 
   
  yum install akmod-VirtualBox kernel-devel-$(uname -r) 
  
  akmods 
  
  systemctl restart systemd-modules-load.service
  
 I got
 
 [root@fedora22desk ~]# yum install akmod-VirtualBox
 kernel-devel-$(uname -r) 
 Yum command has been deprecated, redirecting to '/usr/bin/dnf install
 akmod-VirtualBox kernel-devel-4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64'. 
 See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information. 
 To transfer transaction metadata from yum to DNF, run: 
 'dnf install python-dnf-plugins-extras-migrate  dnf-2 migrate' 
 
 Last metadata expiration check performed 1:08:35 ago on Sun May 10
 00:16:35 2015. 
 Package akmod-VirtualBox-4.3.26-2.fc22.x86_64 is already installed,
 skipping. 
 Package kernel-devel-4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64 is already installed,
 skipping. 
 Dependencies resolved. 
 Nothing to do. 
 Complete! 
 [root@fedora22desk ~]# akmods 
 Checking kmods exist for 4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64 [  OK  ] 
 [root@fedora22desk ~]#  
 [root@fedora22desk ~]# systemctl restart systemd-modules-load.service 
 Job for systemd-modules-load.service failed. See systemctl status
 systemd-modules-load.service and journalctl -xe for detai
 ls. 
 [root@fedora22desk ~]# systemctl status systemd-modules-load.service 
 ● systemd-modules-load.service - Load Kernel Modules 
   Loaded: loaded
 (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-modules-load.service; static; vendor
 preset: disabled) 
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sun 2015-05-10 01:25:33
 AEST; 20s ago 
 Docs: man:systemd-modules-load.service(8) 
   man:modules-load.d(5) 
  Process: 5599 ExecStart=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-modules-load
 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) 
 Main PID: 5599 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) 
 
 May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: Starting Load Kernel
 Modules... 
 May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd-modules-load[5599]: Failed to
 insert 'vboxdrv': Exec format error 
 May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd-modules-load[5599]: Failed to
 insert 'vboxnetflt': Exec format error 
 May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd-modules-load[5599]: Failed to
 insert 'vboxnetadp': Exec format error 
 May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: systemd-modules-load.service:
 main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE 
 May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: Failed to start Load Kernel
 Modules. 
 May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: Unit
 systemd-modules-load.service entered failed state. 
 May 10 01:25:33 fedora22desk systemd[1]: systemd-modules-load.service
 failed.
 
I don't had problems [1] but my F22 is a vm guest, I don't have any F22
as host ... so is hard to tell .
you may try (although no much hope that will fix things) :

dnf remove kmod-VirtualBox-4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64 
akmods
Checking kmods exist for 4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64 [  OK  ]
 Building and installing VirtualBox-kmod (*again* with latest
sources ... )

and show what gives dmesg or /var/log/messages after : 
modprobe vboxdrv 
modprobe vboxnetflt 
modprobe vboxnetadp 

Thanks for reporting , I will try test it my self ! 
Anyway the better any is one a bug report on :
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedoracomponent=VirtualBox-kmod

Best Regards ,

[1] 
systemctl status systemd-modules-load.service
● systemd-modules-load.service - Load Kernel Modules
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-modules-load.service;
static; vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: active (exited) since Ter 2015-05-05 23:20:42 WEST; 3 days
ago
 Docs: man:systemd-modules-load.service(8)
   man:modules-load.d(5)
  Process: 456 ExecStart=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-modules-load
(code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
 Main PID: 456 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
   CGroup: /system.slice/systemd-modules-load.service

Re: How to know what broken dependencies in F22 with dnf

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-05-07 at 12:23 +0200, poma wrote:
 On 06.05.2015 08:11, Frank Murphy wrote:
  On Wed, 06 May 2015 01:18:09 +0100
  Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
  with: 
  yum update
  I got : 
  Yum command has been deprecated, redirecting to '/usr/bin/dnf update'
  
  locate yum-dep
  man yum-deprecated
  For me meant
  ln */yum-deprecated */yumd
  added one letter to my yum bits.
  
 
 /root/.bashrc
 alias yum='yum-deprecated'
 
 is sufficient, to begin.
 
 It will take time until strange thing called dnf stabilizes,
 so it's always good to have at hand
 http://yum.baseurl.org


That it ! Thanks, 


  I currently use both (testing dnf)
  Having separate caches, means one doesn't bork the other.
  Thought dnf-migrate can remove your cached yum rpm collection
  if not careful.
  
  ___
  Regards
  Frank Murphy
  
 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: How to know what broken dependencies in F22 with dnf

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-05-07 at 12:53 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
 On Qui, 2015-05-07 at 12:23 +0200, poma wrote:
  On 06.05.2015 08:11, Frank Murphy wrote:
   On Wed, 06 May 2015 01:18:09 +0100
   Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
   with: 
   yum update
   I got : 
   Yum command has been deprecated, redirecting to '/usr/bin/dnf update'
   
   locate yum-dep
   man yum-deprecated
   For me meant
   ln */yum-deprecated */yumd
   added one letter to my yum bits.
   
  
  /root/.bashrc
  alias yum='yum-deprecated'
  
  is sufficient, to begin.
  
  It will take time until strange thing called dnf stabilizes,
  so it's always good to have at hand
  http://yum.baseurl.org
 
 
 That it ! Thanks, 

That's it ! Thanks, 

   I currently use both (testing dnf)
   Having separate caches, means one doesn't bork the other.
   Thought dnf-migrate can remove your cached yum rpm collection
   if not careful.
   
   ___
   Regards
   Frank Murphy
   
  
 
 -- 
 Sérgio M. B.
 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: How to know what broken dependencies in F22 with dnf

[Sérgio Basto]

On Seg, 2015-05-04 at 22:21 +0200, poma wrote:
 On 04.05.2015 18:05, Sérgio Basto wrote:
  Hi, 
  yum stops to work on F22 , first, at my point of view, just should be
  marked as obsolete on F23 , is a rule , one release to change the
  default , next release to obsolete it . 
 
 Ha-ha.
 
 Yum does it very well, with Fedora 20, Fedora 21, Fedora 22 and Rawhide - 
 that is what will be Fedora 23, if it is not already.

Hi, Poma , I don't understand what you wrote , you can use yum in F22 ? 

with: 
yum update
I got : 
Yum command has been deprecated, redirecting to '/usr/bin/dnf update'

BTW : I  liked this page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Yum_to_DNF_Cheatsheet 

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

How to know what broken dependencies in F22 with dnf

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 
yum stops to work on F22 , first, at my point of view, just should be
marked as obsolete on F23 , is a rule , one release to change the
default , next release to obsolete it . 

Now, I need to find out what broken dependencies do we have and where ,
and dnf doesn't show it. How I do it now ? 

Thanks, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: vlc and f22

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-04-23 at 08:26 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
 On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:12:48 +0300
 Pavlo Rudyi paulcarr...@riseup.net wrote:
 
  On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 13:38 +0200, František Zatloukal wrote:
   I've rebuilt vlc and missing deps for Fedora 22 (64 bit only):
   https://mega.co.nz/#F!lswAQKYI!3Phi71gm7eTTr020UuA3UA
   
  Great, can you rebuild this in copr? Rpm on filesharing services is't 
  good idea.
 
 Please don't. ;) 
 
 You are only allowed to build in copr those things that are legally
 allowed in Fedora. 
 
 https://fedorahosted.org/copr/wiki/UserDocs#FAQ
 
 Sorry. 

Also you couldn't built it on copr because have dependencies on
rpmfusion packages , needs packages like x264 and libquicktime . 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F22 RC3 no rpmfusion

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2015-03-11 at 10:49 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 Usually they don't branch in the same way as Fedora. They point their
 rawhide repos at Fedora Branched and ignore Fedora Rawhide for some
 months.
 
 Last they did that on 09-Dec-2014:
 
   $ md5sum rpmfusion-free-release-*
   b5e356996f3a9224ecb4797014c9f696
 rpmfusion-free-release-branched.noarch.rpm
   b5e356996f3a9224ecb4797014c9f696
 rpmfusion-free-release-rawhide.noarch.rpm
 
 Odd is that all of the packages still have a .fc21 dist tag, which
 means
 there has not been any rebuild for Rawhide either getting a .fc22 dist
 tag
 before Fedora Rawhide switched to .fc23.

Apart that we should move this discussion to rpmfusion mailing list ,
you got a point:
 http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/ stops totally
on 13-Dec-2014, so we don't have any package for F22 and neither for
rawhide , last updates of rpmfusion are in updates/testing/21/,
updates/21/ and releases/21/Everything/.

So for F22 I mean in /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion-free.repo,
rpmfusion-free-updates.repo and rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo 

You should change $releasever with 21. And you will find, already, some
packages need a rebuild ... 

BTW I'm building a koji server to make local builds of rpmfusion
packages, so this notes clarify what buildroot we should use ... :)
when finish (no ETA) I will announce on rpmfusion mailing lists , of
course . 
 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: VLC player F22 RC3

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2015-03-10 at 08:41 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
 Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: rpmfusion-free/22/x86_64
 [root@linux joerg]# 
 
 Has anyone an idea? But possibly I have to wait for Beta only.

RPMFusion doesn't have F22 branch because we are waiting for a new
infrastructure , but I don't know if we will ever have a new
infrastructure. 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Heads up - Anaconda 22.17 will enforce 'good' passwords

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2015-01-28 at 16:05 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
 
  I *know* this is going to be a bit of a pain to get used to. But the
  increased security is worth it. Super simple passwords will no longer be
  allowed, but it is still easy to come up with one that passes the
  checks. pwgen has lots of suggestions.
 
 It's not worth it. It's a PITA. It's security theater. Windows, OS X,
 Android, iOS - none of these require strong passwords, and the last
 two don't even require passwords at all. The new password requirement
 merely exposes the fact we're deficient in other areas of system
 security, and we're masking that with this insulting baby sitting
 nonsense.
 
 Instead of coercion, it's more polite to call the user names (stupid,
 idiot, moron, imbecile, etc) if they choose weak passwords. Name
 calling is kinder, more convenient, and honest and capitulation is
 optional. This password policy is complete utter bullcrap. This
 doesn't happen on any other OS I use and it pisses me off that Fedora
 is deciding to do this exactly wrong. It's really that offensive.

+1 , I'm against enforce 'good' passwords , it is pretty clear, double
click if you want have an insecure password and system . 

 -- 
 Chris Murphy

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Does anyone reuse /boot or /var partitions ?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2015-01-22 at 13:36 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: 
 There's a proposed anaconda patch ATM which would disallow mounting an 
 existing partition as /boot or /var (or any subdirectory of those 
 except /var/www ) without reformatting it. i.e., you can't reuse an 
 existing partition with those mountpoints.
 
 I'm curious to know if anyone / many people do this, and if so, if 
 there's a particularly good use case for it; if so, we might want to 
 provide that feedback to the anaconda folks.
 
 There are a few references to using shared /boot on Google, but not 
 that many, and mostly for crazy multiboot configurations that we 
 really don't want to be stuck dealing with. Does anyone know of a 
 really sensible use case for this?
 
 For the record, this is actually re-hooking up code that was used in 
 oldUI - that is, F17 and earlier - but in oldUI it just produced a 
 warning you had to click through; the current patch flat disallows it. 
 The main driving force for this is 
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1074358 , as it 
 keeps turning out to be annoyingly tricky to make sure that only newly-
 installed kernels have their initramfs regenerated when installing to a
 shared /boot partition.

My test machine in office got Debian and Fedora and both systems have
same /boot , because /boot can't be on LVM [1], so /boot is just to hold
kernels at boot time for Debian and for Fedora , grub2 from Fedora keeps
boots entries of Debian system . 

[1]
/dev/sda2 2048  1026047   500M Linux filesystem
/dev/sda3  1026048488396799 232,4G Linux LVM



-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rpm database corrupted after fedeup from 20 to 21

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2014-12-23 at 22:27 -0800, Mick wrote: 
 Hi Serge;
   [mick@localhost ~]$ file /var/lib/rpm/Packages
 /var/lib/rpm/Packages: data

/var/lib/rpm/Packages is not an Berkeley DB file ! , It will be hard 

Try follow : 
http://www.rpm.org/wiki/Docs/RpmRecovery 

DB corruption recovery process

 
 On Tue, 12/23/14, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
 
  Subject: Re: rpm database corrupted after fedeup from 20 to 21
  To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 9:45 PM
  
  On Ter, 2014-12-23 at
  19:46 -0800, Mick wrote: 
   Hi Adam;
   thanks for trying.
   It made no difference.
   
   The message was:
   [root@localhost ~]# rpm
  --rebuilddb
   error: rpmdb: BDB0641
  __db_meta_setup: /var/lib/rpm/Packages: unexpected file type
  or format
   error: cannot open Packages
  index using db5 - Invalid argument (22)
  
  
   and looking at the file:
   [root@localhost ~]# ls
  -l /var/lib/rpm/Packages
   -rw-r--r--. 1
  root root 452214784 Dec 20 14:49 /var/lib/rpm/Packages
  
  what you got ? with command :
  
  file /var/lib/rpm/Packages
  
  I got : 
  /var/lib/rpm/Packages: Berkeley DB (Hash,
  version 9, native byte-order)
  
   When I renamed Packages the rpmbuilddb
  error went away.
   However
   [root@localhost rpm]#
  yum update
   CRITICAL:yum.main:
   
   Error: rpmdb failed
  release provides. Try: rpm --rebuilddb
  
  
   From my Google-FU it seems that a full
  re-install (DVD) of F21 is the only cure.
   I am trying to avoid that.
   
   MickM
   
   
   
  
  
   On Tue, 12/23/14, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
  wrote:
   
Subject:
  Re: rpm database corrupted after fedeup from 20 to 21
To: For testing and quality
  assurance of Fedora releases test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 12:13
  PM

On Tue,
  2014-12-23 at
08:06 -0800, Mick
  wrote:
 Hi;
   I was running FC20
  fully
updated.
   
   [root@localhost ~]# 
fedup --network 21
  --product=nonproduct


 Which
  worked.
 Now
when I try to 'yum update'
 [root@localhost ~]#
  yum
update
   
   error: rpmdb: BDB0641
   
  __db_meta_setup: /var/lib/rpm/Packages: 
 unexpected file type or format
 error: cannot open Packages index
  using
db5 - Invalid argument (22) 
 error:
   
  cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
 CRITICAL:yum.main:


 Error: rpmdb open failed
 [root@localhost ~]#
 
 Or
  rpm--rebuilddb
 [root@localhost ~]#
  rpm
--rebuilddb
 error: rpmdb: BDB0641
__db_meta_setup: /var/lib/rpm/Packages:
  
 unexpected file type or
  format
 error: cannot open
  Packages index using
db5 - Invalid
  argument (22) [
 root@localhost ~]#
 
 Any
  ideas?
 Apart from this the
  system is working
fine.
 

Try:

mv
   
  /var/lib/rpm/__db* /tmp
rpm
  --rebuilddb

   
  if it doesn't help, move
the
  __db* files back, you may want to keep 
them in case some RPM guru can help you
  debug.
Hope this helps!
-- 
Adam
Williamson
Fedora
  QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw |
  Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP:
adamw
  AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test
mailing
  list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
   
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
  
  -- 
  Sérgio M.
  B.
  
  -- 
  test
  mailing list
  test@lists.fedoraproject.org
  To unsubscribe:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rpm database corrupted after fedeup from 20 to 21

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2014-12-23 at 19:46 -0800, Mick wrote: 
 Hi Adam;
 thanks for trying.
 It made no difference.
 
 The message was:
 [root@localhost ~]# rpm --rebuilddb
 error: rpmdb: BDB0641 __db_meta_setup: /var/lib/rpm/Packages: unexpected file 
 type or format
 error: cannot open Packages index using db5 - Invalid argument (22)
 
 and looking at the file:
 [root@localhost ~]# ls -l /var/lib/rpm/Packages
 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 452214784 Dec 20 14:49 /var/lib/rpm/Packages

what you got ? with command : 
file /var/lib/rpm/Packages

I got : 
/var/lib/rpm/Packages: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 9, native byte-order)

 When I renamed Packages the rpmbuilddb error went away.
 However
 [root@localhost rpm]# yum update
 CRITICAL:yum.main:
 
 Error: rpmdb failed release provides. Try: rpm --rebuilddb
 
 From my Google-FU it seems that a full re-install (DVD) of F21 is the only 
 cure.
 I am trying to avoid that.
 
 MickM
 
 
 
 
 On Tue, 12/23/14, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 
  Subject: Re: rpm database corrupted after fedeup from 20 to 21
  To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases 
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 12:13 PM
  
  On Tue, 2014-12-23 at
  08:06 -0800, Mick wrote:
   Hi;
 I was running FC20 fully
  updated.
   [root@localhost ~]# 
  fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct
  
  
   Which worked.
   Now
  when I try to 'yum update'
   [root@localhost ~]# yum
  update
   error: rpmdb: BDB0641
  __db_meta_setup: /var/lib/rpm/Packages: 
   unexpected file type or format
   error: cannot open Packages index using
  db5 - Invalid argument (22) 
   error:
  cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
   CRITICAL:yum.main:
  
  
   Error: rpmdb open failed
   [root@localhost ~]#
   
   Or rpm--rebuilddb
   [root@localhost ~]# rpm
  --rebuilddb
   error: rpmdb: BDB0641
  __db_meta_setup: /var/lib/rpm/Packages: 
   unexpected file type or format
   error: cannot open Packages index using
  db5 - Invalid argument (22) [
   root@localhost ~]#
   
   Any ideas?
   Apart from this the system is working
  fine.
   
  
  Try:
  
  mv
  /var/lib/rpm/__db* /tmp
  rpm --rebuilddb
  
  if it doesn't help, move
  the __db* files back, you may want to keep 
  them in case some RPM guru can help you debug.
  Hope this helps!
  -- 
  Adam
  Williamson
  Fedora QA Community Monkey
  IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP:
  adamw AT happyassassin . net
  http://www.happyassassin.net
  
  -- 
  test
  mailing list
  test@lists.fedoraproject.org
  To unsubscribe:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: netinst not part of release?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2014-12-16 at 19:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: 
 On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 09:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
  I just noticed that the Fedora-Server-netinst.iso appears not to be 
  part of F21 release.  I could not find it listed here 
  http://torrents.fedoraproject.org/.  I sometimes find that iso 
  helpful as one can choose the Base Environment, Add-ons, as well as 
  add language support.
  
  Was this ever meant to be in the final release?  If so, why was it 
  eliminated?
 
 It is part of the release. It's on the downloads page and all the 
 mirrors. I guess there isn't a torrent because it's too small to be 
 worthwhile, either that or it's just an oversight.

http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=301937

There are netinstall images only for the Server and Cloud products,
https://getfedora.org/en/server/download/

IIUC, you can use that netinstall the same way you used the one from
F20, i.e. you can select the stuff you want to actually install. 

 -- 
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
 http://www.happyassassin.net
 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: In F21, Samsung ML-1740 laser printer doesn't work immediately, but does after installing splix

[Sérgio Basto]

On Dom, 2014-12-07 at 02:15 +, Andre Robatino wrote: 
 I have a Samsung ML-1740 laser printer which in F20 and below would work
 immediately after install, even though splix wasn't installed. I believe it
 was necessary for foomatic to be installed, and in one previous release it
 wasn't installed by default, but was supposed to be.  

I had use openprinting-splix-2.0.0-2lsb3.2.x86_64.rpm package a long
time ago, it was built on Mai 2009 and still working ... 
I don't knew that splix was packaged for Fedora and it is a good new,
I'm trying it now. 
I need splix drivers to print on my Sansung printer . So it is not
strange that works just after install splix ...
  

 Anyway, in F21 it was
 necessary to install splix. Was the suppport for this printer moved from
 foomatic to splix, 

No, without splix , we couldn't print on this kind of printers, I think.


 and if so, should this be filed as a bug against
 Distribution to have splix installed by default, same as foomatic?


Best regards,  
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: fedup f20-f21 kde broken deps

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2014-12-03 at 10:45 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: 
 Michael Schwendt wrote:
 
  On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 08:07:10 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
  
  fedup gave me the following warnings:
  
 kde-runtime-libs-4.14.3-2.fc20.x86_64 requires exiv2-
  libs-0.23-5.fc20.x86_64,
  OpenEXR-libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64, libgcrypt-1.5.3-2.fc20.x86_64,
  ilmbase-1.0.3-7.fc20.x86_64, libwebp-0.3.1-3.fc20.x86_64
  
  Well, I have yet to hear good things about fedup, so take the following
  with a grain of salt.
  
  # yum list kde-runtime-libs
  Loaded plugins: langpacks
  Available Packages
  kde-runtime-libs.i6864.14.3-2.fc21  
  updates-testing
  kde-runtime-libs.x86_64  4.14.3-2.fc21  
  updates-testing
  
  This only shows that a higher kde-runtime-libs package is available for
  F21, albeit only in the updates-testing repo. Does fedup upgrade to
  updates-testing or just F21 Beta release +/- updates repo?
  
  In case it does not, this is typical upgrade path breakage that has
  plagued Fedora for a long time already. You would strictly need to
  upgrade _to_ F21 updates-testing to avoid this.
  
  Upgrading from an up-to-date F(n-1) to F(n) only works well, if every
  package in F(n) is higher than F(n-1). That assumption breaks easily, if
  somebody has installed latest updates for F(n-1) [possibly even including
  test updates] but upgrades to something older, such as a release without
  updates and/or updates-testing.
  
  
  armadillo-4.500.0-1.fc20.x86_64 requires atlas-3.8.4-13.fc20.x86_64
  
  Same here, a newer armadillo is available for F21, whereas without
  updates-testing it is _older_:
  
  # yum list armadillo atlas
  Loaded plugins: langpacks
  Available Packages
  armadillo.i686   4.550.0-1.fc21 
  updates-testing
  armadillo.x86_64 4.550.0-1.fc21 
  updates-testing
  atlas.i686   3.10.1-16.fc21  fedora
  atlas.x86_64 3.10.1-16.fc21  fedora
  
  # yum list armadillo atlas --disablerepo=updates-testing
  Loaded plugins: langpacks
  Available Packages
  armadillo.i6864.450.0-1.fc21 
  fedora
  armadillo.x86_64  4.450.0-1.fc21 
  fedora
  atlas.i6863.10.1-16.fc21 
  fedora
  atlas.x86_64  3.10.1-16.fc21 
  fedora
  
  kde-workspace-4.11.14-2.fc20.x86_64 requires 
  gpsd-libs-3.9-4.fc20.x86_64
  kwin-4.11.14-2.fc20.x86_64 requires libxcb-1.9.1-3.fc20.x86_64
  Continue with the upgrade at your own risk.
  
  Same here:
  
  # yum list kde-workspace kwin
  Loaded plugins: langpacks
  Available Packages
  kde-workspace.x86_64   4.11.14-2.fc21   
  updates-testing
  kwin.x86_644.11.14-2.fc21   
  updates-testing
  
  # yum list kde-workspace kwin --disablerepo=updates-testing
  Loaded plugins: langpacks
  Available Packages
  kde-workspace.x86_644.11.14-1.fc21   
  fedora
 
 So basically, update f20-f21 is just broken, if you want kde.  I would guess 
 that if I proceed with the update, that kde will not work.  That's a 
 showstopper 
 for me.

I don't read all thread but 

   yum distro-sync

normally solve the problem after update to f21 and enter in level 3 . 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: 2014-11-12 @ 1600 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting Minutes

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 

I'd like add https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088619 
as blocker to release 21 . Please read last comments #95 still #101 


On Qua, 2014-11-12 at 11:26 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote: 
 ==
 #fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
 ==
 
 Meeting started by roshi at 16:03:53 UTC. The full logs are available at
 http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-11-12/f21-blocker-review.2014-11-12-16.03.log.html
 .
 
 Meeting summary
 ---
 * Roll Call  (roshi, 16:03:53)
 
 * (1161779) System fails to boot with rootfs on iSCSI - missing kernel
   parameters  (roshi, 16:07:30)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161779   (roshi,
 16:07:33)
 * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (roshi, 16:07:36)
   * AGREED: - 1161779 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a clear violation of
   the Final criteria: The installer must be able to detect (if
 possible) and install to supported network-attached storage
 devices.  (roshi, 16:14:04)
 
 * (1162215) LV resize does not check filesystem minimum size  (roshi,
   16:14:09)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162215   (roshi,
 16:14:09)
 * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (roshi, 16:14:10)
   * AGREED: - 11662215 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear 
 violation
   of the Final criterion: Any installer mechanism for resizing
 storage volumes must correctly attempt the requested operation.
 (roshi, 16:25:09)
 
 * (1158442) Gnome-initial-setup window doesn't fit to visible with small
   resolution  (roshi, 16:25:59)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158442   (roshi,
 16:26:02)
 * Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup, MODIFIED  (roshi, 16:26:05)
   * AGREED: - 1158442 - Punt - We're going to wait to decide on this
   pending discussion and testing of an existing fix.  (roshi,
   16:37:26)
 
 * (986731) Dual boot of uefi Windows 7 and Fedora 19 fails to boot
   Windows  (roshi, 16:37:41)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986731   (roshi,
 16:37:45)
 * Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW  (roshi, 16:37:47)
   * AGREED: - 986731 - RejectedBlocker - This doesn't seem to be
   reproducible on F21. If it is, please update the bug and 
 reproduce.
   (roshi, 16:42:24)
 
 * (1103496) Installer interface sometimes freezes for a while (but
   install continues, and screen eventually unfreezes)  (roshi, 16:42:27)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103496   (roshi,
 16:42:30)
 * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 16:42:33)
   * LINK:
   
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
   (kparal, 16:58:43)
 * AGREED: - 1103496 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a 
 conditional
 violation of the Final Data Corruption criterion 
 since it creates
 the opportunity of data loss to the user (by 
 making them think the
 install has hung and the user restarts the 
 machine mid-install).
 (roshi, 17:02:22)
 
 * (1144613) [abrt] gnome-tweak-tool: gtk_tree_row_ref_deleted():
   python2.7 killed by SIGSEGV  (roshi, 17:02:37)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144613   (roshi,
 17:02:40)
 * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:02:43)
   * AGREED: - 1144613 - RejectedBlocker - The GNOME tweak tool is not 
 a
   default application for the Workstation product, so this is not
   considered a blocker.  (roshi, 17:10:09)
 
 * (1147670) keyboard layout chooser switches letters while typing
   (roshi, 17:10:18)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147670   (roshi,
 17:10:21)
 * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:10:24)
   * AGREED: - 1147670 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This
   bug is difficult to reproduce and it seems to be very
   system-dependant.  Accepting as an FE because if you do hit 
 it, it
   would be pretty obnoxious. Repropose if more solid 
 reproduction
   steps can be found or there is a concrete system on 
 which it is
   quite difficult to perform Fedora installation. 
  (roshi, 17:43:49)
 
 * (1158968) AttributeError: 'DMRaidArrayDevice' object has no attribute
   'formatClass'  (roshi, 17:44:00)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158968   (roshi,
 17:44:03)
 * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, MODIFIED  (roshi, 17:44:05)
   * AGREED: - 1158968 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a 

Re: fedup with sddm installed

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2014-11-12 at 08:59 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: 
 I'm running an F20/KDE VM with sddm-0.10.0-2.fc20 installed from 
 updates-testing.
 
 In trying to do a
 
 fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct
 
 I get
 
 WARNING: potential problems with upgrade
   sddm-0.10.0-2.fc20.x86_64 (no replacement) requires 
 libxcb-1.9.1-3.fc20.x86_64 (replaced by libxcb-1.11-2.fc21.x86_64)
 
 Should this be reported against fedup or something else?

no, should be reported against sddm , is not fedup fault 

 -- 
 If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: can someone suggest why firefox is so $*^%*#^%* slow?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sáb, 2014-09-27 at 11:01 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: 
 On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:36:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
  On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 10:44 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
 i am at my wit's end with firefox on my fedora rawhide system -- to
   say it's nad-grindingly slow would be charitable. just now, i tried
   clicking on another tab ... some 30 seconds later, i am still waiting
   for the tab to change, oh, wait, there it is.
   
 watching any sort of youtube video is excruciating ... while audio
   is typically, i will frequently get *maybe* one frame change a second,
   i kid you not. i frequently get javascripts that are not responding,
   and i'm asked whether i want to wait for them.
   
 is there *something* i can do to debug this? what firefox
   configuration settings should i be looking at? i'm willing to try
   anything because, at this point, firefox is utterly unusable. even
   something as simple as scrolling in a window is painfully slow.
   
 oh, and i'm on a quad core i7, so i'm pretty sure horsepower isn't
   the problem.
  
  FWIW, I've been seeing some odd 'laggy' behaviour in F21 on my desktop
  lately, which does mostly seem to be in Firefox. I do have sixteen
  zillion tabs open, but I do that a lot and it's not happened before, and
  RAM isn't exhausted (I have 16GB, using about 8GB). I don't have Flash
  installed. Not had time to look into it in more detail yet, but it does
  seem like something squiffy is going on.
  
  The symptoms are basically that things like switching tabs, highlighting
  text, copy/pasting, or input appearing after I start to type lag by 1-3
  seconds, and sometimes presses/characters that occur within the lag time
  are lost.
 
 I'm having problems with FF on Fedora 19 that just started recently,
 maybe related, maybe not.  In my case, the entire desktop is
 freezing--even the mouse cursor won't move for 5-10 seconds.  It
 always seems to happen when opening a new blank tab in FF.

me too , I found that flash stop working in some cases, also swfrender
from swftools and now I have to use chrome which have a bult-in flash
player 11.5.x.x, against the last Linux version 11.2.202.406 , but I
suspect that this last version 11.2.202.406  , also have some problem 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: can someone suggest why firefox is so $*^%*#^%* slow?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2014-09-24 at 11:08 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: 
 On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Nikos Roussos wrote:
 
  On September 24, 2014 5:44:40 PM EEST, Robert P. J. Day 
  rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
watching any sort of youtube video is excruciating ... while audio
  is typically, i will frequently get *maybe* one frame change a second,
  i kid you not. i frequently get javascripts that are not responding,
  and i'm asked whether i want to wait for them.
 
  Since you mention youtube this could be a flash problem, not
  Firefox. Try to disable it from the plugins menu.
 
   you're right, that makes a massive difference. i guess i can live
 without flash for now until i have time to play around more.

No problems here , be sure that you kill all firefox instances  and
plugin containers before start a new firefox  , 

flash plugin for linux stops on 11.2 [1]  

but chrome have a Pepper implementation and brings Adobe Flash Player
- Version: 15.0.0.152.

I start have some problems with flash in some site recently ... 


[1] 
lpf-flash-plugin-11.2.202.406-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
flash-plugin-11.2.202.406-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm


 rday
 
 -- 
 
 
 Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
 http://crashcourse.ca
 
 Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
 LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
 
 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Sound problems with skype in F21

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qui, 2014-09-18 at 12:27 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: 
 Hello F21 testers,
 
 anybody runs skype-4.3.0.37-fc16.i586 in F21 with pulseaudio sound? On
 my box, skype does not produce any sound. Trying the same in F20 runs
 flawlessly (with sound and identical skype rpm).

I have to test it but for uniform tests I use and recomend to use
lpf-skype from rpmfusion 


 Any help is appreciated.
 
 Kind regards
 
 Joachim Backes
 -- 
 
 Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
 Kernel-3.16.3-300.fc21.x86_64
 
 
 Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
 https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Best way to request a backport

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2014-09-16 at 07:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: 
 Not strictly a test question but.
 
 I rebuilt NetworkManager-0.9.10.0-6.git20140704 from F21 for F20 and 
 installed it.  After 2 days I have not seen 
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059597.  It normally crops up 
 within 6 hrs of a reboot.  So, I've fairly high confidence that this has 
 fixed the issue.
 
 How best to go about asking for NetworkManager-0.9.10.0-6 be officially added 
 to F20?  I've made a note in the bugzillabut there doesn't appear to have 
 been any activity on bug since being reported back in January.

backport ? backport means backport cherry pick a patch ,  what patch ? 

On the other hand ,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=335 

F20 have NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-44.git20131003.fc20 and F21 have
NetworkManager-0.9.10.0-6.git20140704.fc21 

upgrade 0.9.9 to 0.9.10 could not ever happen on F20 


-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

how upgrade Fedora 20 to 21

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 
I have 2 machines that I use for tests , I'd like to update them from
Fedora 20 to Fedora 21. 

Where is the boot.iso or dvd.iso for Fedora 21, 
fedup is supposed to work ? 
using yum how I tell to yum that rpmfusion rawhide is relversion 21 ? 

Thanks, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: how upgrade Fedora 20 to 21

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sex, 2014-08-01 at 12:14 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: 
 Hi, 
 I have 2 machines that I use for tests , I'd like to update them from
 Fedora 20 to Fedora 21. 
 
 Where is the boot.iso or dvd.iso for Fedora 21, 
 fedup is supposed to work ? 
 using yum how I tell to yum that rpmfusion rawhide is relversion 21 ? 

I found boot.iso in
https://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21-Alpha-T2/Workstation/x86_64/os/images/
 
and in
https://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21-Alpha-T2/Server/x86_64/os/images/

So, mirrors shouldn't have same structure , I mean instead 

armhfp/ 01-Aug-2014 07:23 - 
i386/   01-Aug-2014 07:23-   
source/ 01-Aug-2014 07:23-   
x86_64/ 01-Aug-2014 07:23-   


something like : 




[DIR] Cloud/  2014-07-24 03:50-   

[DIR] Live/   2014-07-24 15:10-   
[DIR] Server/ 2014-07-24 03:50-   
[DIR] Spins/  2014-07-24 15:10-   
[DIR] Workstation/2014-07-24 03:50-   


btw also on wiki 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_Fedora_install_ISO_for_testing
we need update locations of kickstarts from :
/usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-install-fedora.ks
to one of them 
/usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-install-cloud.ks
/usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-install-server.ks
/usr/share/spin-kickstarts/fedora-install-workstation.ks

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test