Re: Even though I've set my system to F28 with the fedora-release and fedora-repos packages, it is still pulling from rawhide.

2018-03-05 Thread stan
On Mon, 05 Mar 2018 10:10:12 -0800
Adam Williamson  wrote:

> "Especially since rawhide is disabled in /etc/yum.repos.d"
> 
> That's the key thing - the others don't really matter so much. The key
> is that 'rawhide' repo is disabled and 'fedora' repo is enabled. Can
> you double-check if that's the case? What repo are the 'fc29' packages
> listed as coming from? Thanks!

fedora-rawhide.repo:enabled=0
fedora-rawhide.repo:enabled=0
fedora-rawhide.repo:enabled=0
fedora.repo:enabled=1
fedora.repo:enabled=0
fedora.repo:enabled=0
fedora-updates.repo:enabled=1
fedora-updates.repo:enabled=0
fedora-updates.repo:enabled=0
fedora-updates-testing.repo:enabled=1
fedora-updates-testing.repo:enabled=0
fedora-updates-testing.repo:enabled=0

I notice that the rpmfusion rawhide repos are enabled, but the packages
are

2018-03-03T20:07:55Z INFO Upgraded: nspr-4.19.0-0.1.beta1.fc29.x86_64
2018-03-03T20:07:56Z INFO Upgraded: nss-util-3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29.x86_64
2018-03-03T20:07:57Z INFO Upgraded: 
nss-softokn-freebl-3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29.x86_64
2018-03-03T20:07:58Z INFO Upgraded: nspr-devel-4.19.0-0.1.beta1.fc29.x86_64
2018-03-03T20:08:01Z INFO Upgraded: nss-util-devel-3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29.x86_64
2018-03-03T20:08:02Z INFO Upgraded: nss-softokn-3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29.x86_64
2018-03-03T20:08:02Z INFO Upgraded: 
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29.x86_64
2018-03-03T20:08:03Z INFO Upgraded: nss-softokn-devel-3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29.x86_64

On further search, I find that they came from the firefox-nightly copr.

nspr x86_64 
 4.19.0-0.1.beta1.fc29  
   eclipseo-firefox-nightly  142 
k
 nspr-devel   x86_64
  4.19.0-0.1.beta1.fc29 
eclipseo-firefox-nightly  120 
k
 nss-softokn  x86_64
  3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29   
eclipseo-firefox-nightly  396 
k
 nss-softokn-develx86_64
  3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29   
eclipseo-firefox-nightly   32 k
 nss-softokn-freebl   x86_64
  3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29   
eclipseo-firefox-nightly  236 k
 nss-softokn-freebl-devel x86_64
  3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29   
eclipseo-firefox-nightly   55 k
 nss-util x86_64
  3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29   
eclipseo-firefox-nightly   90 k
 nss-util-devel   x86_64
  3.36.0-2.beta3.fc29   
eclipseo-firefox-nightly

Thanks for the question, since it led to an answer.  That might become
problematic with the regular F28 repositories at some point.  I'll have
to decide whether I should keep running from that copr if I stick with
F28 instead of moving to rawhide again.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Even though I've set my system to F28 with the fedora-release and fedora-repos packages, it is still pulling from rawhide.

2018-03-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2018-03-04 at 11:47 -0700, stan wrote:
> I did a dnf update today, and my supposedly F28 system pulled in F29
> packages.  That doesn't seem right.  Especially since rawhide is
> disabled in /etc/yum.repos.d, and I updated to the fedora-release and
> fedora-repos packages for F28.  The keys are there for F29, since the
> packages did update, but they shouldn't be used.

"Especially since rawhide is disabled in /etc/yum.repos.d"

That's the key thing - the others don't really matter so much. The key
is that 'rawhide' repo is disabled and 'fedora' repo is enabled. Can
you double-check if that's the case? What repo are the 'fc29' packages
listed as coming from? Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Even though I've set my system to F28 with the fedora-release and fedora-repos packages, it is still pulling from rawhide.

2018-03-04 Thread stan
I did a dnf update today, and my supposedly F28 system pulled in F29
packages.  That doesn't seem right.  Especially since rawhide is
disabled in /etc/yum.repos.d, and I updated to the fedora-release and
fedora-repos packages for F28.  The keys are there for F29, since the
packages did update, but they shouldn't be used.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org