Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)
On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 10:38 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 8:44 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > I suppose the intention here is so that someone who installs the library > > for > > > this format gets it automatically working in Gimp. Maybe some of the > > > new-fangled rich dependencies would be be better than a "Recommends". > > > > Yeah, I was gonna suggest that but forgot to get around to it - thanks. > > I forget the syntax, but basically I think there's a "Recommends: foo > > IF bar" syntax, which is what we'd want here - recommend the GIMP > > plugin *if* gimp itself is installed. > > > > Or the Recommends could be added to the gimp package. That would have the same problem in reverse, though - it would cause GIMP users to get jpegxl and its deps even if they had no intention of using the jpegxl image format. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 8:44 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > I suppose the intention here is so that someone who installs the library > for > > this format gets it automatically working in Gimp. Maybe some of the > > new-fangled rich dependencies would be be better than a "Recommends". > > Yeah, I was gonna suggest that but forgot to get around to it - thanks. > I forget the syntax, but basically I think there's a "Recommends: foo > IF bar" syntax, which is what we'd want here - recommend the GIMP > plugin *if* gimp itself is installed. > Or the Recommends could be added to the gimp package. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 14:59 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 09:46:06AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > aom was recently updated in F34 and Rawhide (the update for F33 is > > pending), and the new version of libaom depends on jpegxl-libs...which, > > it turns out, recommends a gimp plugin. Which means if you have libaom > > installed - and it seems to be part of default KDE and GNOME installs - > > updating to the new aom version will wind up pulling in GIMP, if you > > don't already have it installed, and GIMP pulls in Python 2.x and GTK+ > > 2.x if you don't have those installed. That's a lot of unwanted > > packages. > > I suppose the intention here is so that someone who installs the library for > this format gets it automatically working in Gimp. Maybe some of the > new-fangled rich dependencies would be be better than a "Recommends". Yeah, I was gonna suggest that but forgot to get around to it - thanks. I forget the syntax, but basically I think there's a "Recommends: foo IF bar" syntax, which is what we'd want here - recommend the GIMP plugin *if* gimp itself is installed. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 09:46:06AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > aom was recently updated in F34 and Rawhide (the update for F33 is > pending), and the new version of libaom depends on jpegxl-libs...which, > it turns out, recommends a gimp plugin. Which means if you have libaom > installed - and it seems to be part of default KDE and GNOME installs - > updating to the new aom version will wind up pulling in GIMP, if you > don't already have it installed, and GIMP pulls in Python 2.x and GTK+ > 2.x if you don't have those installed. That's a lot of unwanted > packages. I suppose the intention here is so that someone who installs the library for this format gets it automatically working in Gimp. Maybe some of the new-fangled rich dependencies would be be better than a "Recommends". -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)
On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 13:56 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote: > On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 1:50:57 PM EDT Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 2021-06-16 10:08 a.m., Garry T. Williams wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 12:46:06 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 update to get tested so we can > > > > push it stable ASAP: > > > > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d7b1dc57fe > > > > > > > > The above update removes the recommends from jpegxl-libs to break this > > > > chain, so updating libaom will no longer pull in GIMP. Obviously I want > > > > to get it pushed stable ASAP so the issue happens to as few people as > > > > possible. Thanks! > > > > > > I just did an update and this is what got done. Pretty sure that this > > > wasn't intended from your explanation above: > > > > > > Installing dependencies: > > > jpegxl-libs x86_64 0.3.7-2.fc34 updates > > > 932 k > > > > The update version is jpegxl-0.3.7-3.fc34, which doesn't appear to be in > > the updates-testing repo yet. > > Oops. Sorry for the noise. No problem. Sorry, my bad, I should have mentioned it's a very new update so you'll have to grab it via the web interface or Bodhi or Koji CLI. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)
On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 1:50:57 PM EDT Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2021-06-16 10:08 a.m., Garry T. Williams wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 12:46:06 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 update to get tested so we can > >> push it stable ASAP: > >> > >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d7b1dc57fe > >> > >> The above update removes the recommends from jpegxl-libs to break this > >> chain, so updating libaom will no longer pull in GIMP. Obviously I want > >> to get it pushed stable ASAP so the issue happens to as few people as > >> possible. Thanks! > > > > I just did an update and this is what got done. Pretty sure that this > > wasn't intended from your explanation above: > > > > Installing dependencies: > > jpegxl-libs x86_64 0.3.7-2.fc34 updates > > 932 k > > The update version is jpegxl-0.3.7-3.fc34, which doesn't appear to be in > the updates-testing repo yet. Oops. Sorry for the noise. -- Garry T. Williams ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)
On 2021-06-16 10:08 a.m., Garry T. Williams wrote: On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 12:46:06 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 update to get tested so we can push it stable ASAP: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d7b1dc57fe The above update removes the recommends from jpegxl-libs to break this chain, so updating libaom will no longer pull in GIMP. Obviously I want to get it pushed stable ASAP so the issue happens to as few people as possible. Thanks! I just did an update and this is what got done. Pretty sure that this wasn't intended from your explanation above: Installing dependencies: jpegxl-libs x86_64 0.3.7-2.fc34 updates 932 k The update version is jpegxl-0.3.7-3.fc34, which doesn't appear to be in the updates-testing repo yet. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)
On Wednesday, June 16, 2021 12:46:06 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 update to get tested so we can > push it stable ASAP: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d7b1dc57fe > > aom was recently updated in F34 and Rawhide (the update for F33 is > pending), and the new version of libaom depends on jpegxl-libs...which, > it turns out, recommends a gimp plugin. Which means if you have libaom > installed - and it seems to be part of default KDE and GNOME installs - > updating to the new aom version will wind up pulling in GIMP, if you > don't already have it installed, and GIMP pulls in Python 2.x and GTK+ > 2.x if you don't have those installed. That's a lot of unwanted > packages. > > The above update removes the recommends from jpegxl-libs to break this > chain, so updating libaom will no longer pull in GIMP. Obviously I want > to get it pushed stable ASAP so the issue happens to as few people as > possible. Thanks! I just did an update and this is what got done. Pretty sure that this wasn't intended from your explanation above: Upgrading: alsa-libx86_64 1.2.5.1-1.fc34updates-testing 484 k alsa-ucmnoarch 1.2.5.1-1.fc34updates-testing 71 k alsa-utils x86_64 1.2.5.1-1.fc34updates-testing 1.1 M bluez x86_64 5.59-1.fc34 updates-testing 957 k bluez-cups x86_64 5.59-1.fc34 updates-testing 29 k bluez-libs x86_64 5.59-1.fc34 updates-testing 84 k dnf noarch 4.8.0-1.fc34 updates-testing 450 k dnf-datanoarch 4.8.0-1.fc34 updates-testing 47 k dnf-plugins-corenoarch 4.0.22-1.fc34 updates-testing 36 k emacs-filesystemnoarch 1:27.2-3.fc34 updates-testing 8.3 k ffmpeg-libs x86_64 4.4-4.fc34rpmfusion-free-updates 8.4 M fuse-common x86_64 3.10.4-1.fc34 updates-testing 8.5 k fuse3 x86_64 3.10.4-1.fc34 updates-testing 54 k fuse3-libs x86_64 3.10.4-1.fc34 updates-testing 91 k fwupd x86_64 1.5.10-1.fc34 updates 1.5 M fwupd-plugin-flashrom x86_64 1.5.10-1.fc34 updates 39 k fwupd-plugin-modem-manager x86_64 1.5.10-1.fc34 updates 53 k fwupd-plugin-uefi-capsule-data x86_64 1.5.10-1.fc34 updates 1.5 M google-chrome-stablex86_64 91.0.4472.106-1 google-chrome79 M grub2-commonnoarch 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 924 k grub2-efi-ia32 x86_64 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 467 k grub2-efi-ia32-cdboot x86_64 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 1.4 M grub2-efi-x64 x86_64 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 492 k grub2-efi-x64-cdbootx86_64 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 1.4 M grub2-pcx86_64 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 17 k grub2-pc-modulesnoarch 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 906 k grub2-tools x86_64 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 1.8 M grub2-tools-efi x86_64 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 541 k grub2-tools-extra x86_64 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 840 k grub2-tools-minimal x86_64 1:2.06-2.fc34 updates-testing 604 k gstreamer1 x86_64 1.19.1-1.18.4.1.fc34 updates-testing 1.4 M gstreamer1-plugins-base x86_64 1.19.1-1.18.4.1.fc34 updates-testing 2.1 M gstreamer1-plugins-good x86_64 1.19.1-1.18.4.1.fc34 updates-testing 2.0 M gstreamer1-plugins-good-gtk x86_64 1.19.1-1.18.4.1.fc34 updates-testing 30 k gstreamer1-plugins-good-qt x86_64 1.19.1-1.18.4.1.fc34 updates-testing 62 k libaom x86_64 3.1.1-1.fc34 updates 1.6 M libavif x86_64 0.9.0-2.fc34 updates 64 k libcompsx86_64 0.1.17-1.fc34 updates-testing 77 k libdnf x86_64 0.63.1-1.fc34 updates-testing 643 k liberation-fontsnoarch 1:2.1.4-1.fc34updates-testing 8.2 k liberation-fonts-common noarch 1:2.1.4-1.fc34updates-testing 15 k liberation-mono-fonts noarch 1:2.1.4-1.fc34updates-testing 501 k liberation-sans-fonts noarch 1:2.1.4-1.fc34updates-testing 607 k liberation-serif-fonts noarch 1:2.1.4-1.fc34updates-testing 605 k libgcrypt x86_64 1.9.3-3.fc34 updates-testing 507 k librepo x86_64 1.14.1-1.fc34 updates-testing 95 k libuser x86_64 0.63-4.fc34 updates-testing 382 k libvmaf
Priority test request: jpegxl (F34)
Hi folks! Just wanted to flag an F34 update to get tested so we can push it stable ASAP: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d7b1dc57fe aom was recently updated in F34 and Rawhide (the update for F33 is pending), and the new version of libaom depends on jpegxl-libs...which, it turns out, recommends a gimp plugin. Which means if you have libaom installed - and it seems to be part of default KDE and GNOME installs - updating to the new aom version will wind up pulling in GIMP, if you don't already have it installed, and GIMP pulls in Python 2.x and GTK+ 2.x if you don't have those installed. That's a lot of unwanted packages. The above update removes the recommends from jpegxl-libs to break this chain, so updating libaom will no longer pull in GIMP. Obviously I want to get it pushed stable ASAP so the issue happens to as few people as possible. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
