Re: Rawhide, Systemd, and Samba
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 09:25 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: […] > > It's already been rebuilt a while ago, but rawhide composes have been > failing so the fixed samba version isn't yet in repos. You could get > it > from koji or just wait for the next completed compose. […] Ah, OK so everything is in hand. I am away from sane Internet connection for a couple of weeks so will not be able to do my usual daily updates. I suspect by the time I get back not only will everything be sorted out, I will have couple of GB of updates for each of the four machines :-) -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Rawhide, Systemd, and Samba
On Thu, 26 May 2016 10:42:39 +0100 Russel Winderwrote: > Hi, > > Systemd is currently blocked from upgrading for me due to a problem > with a samba dependency. Trying to remove the Samba dependency so as > to do the upgrade indicates that gdm and much of GNOME Shell would be > removed – clearly not an option. It's already been rebuilt a while ago, but rawhide composes have been failing so the fixed samba version isn't yet in repos. You could get it from koji or just wait for the next completed compose. > > Is it really the case that Samba is so hard wired into the Fedora > package dependencies? Sure, otherwise the deps wouldn't be there. ;) samba uses (optiionally) systemd logging. samba libs are linked to by a lot of things to provide samba support. kevin pgpNiFB2uYo4Y.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Rawhide, Systemd, and Samba
Hi, Systemd is currently blocked from upgrading for me due to a problem with a samba dependency. Trying to remove the Samba dependency so as to do the upgrade indicates that gdm and much of GNOME Shell would be removed – clearly not an option. Is it really the case that Samba is so hard wired into the Fedora package dependencies? -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org