Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

2017-06-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:11:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
> 
> Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide
> composes in a while (13 days as of today).
> 
> This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now
> failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items.
> 
> Here's a partial list:
> 
> 2017-06-01 - lorax traceback, bug 1457055
> 2017-06-02 - another lorax issue, bug 1457906
> 2017-06-03 - cloud base failed in anaconda, bug 1458509
> 2017-06-04 - ditto
> 2017-06-05 - ditto
> 2017-06-06 - pungi bug - https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/641
> 2017-06-07 - ditto
> 2017-06-08 - ditto
> 2017-06-09 - ditto
> 2017-06-10 - ditto
> 2017-06-11 - ditto
> 2017-06-12 - ditto
> 2017-06-12.1 - pungi bug fixed, but hit libgtop2 broken deps in metacity
> that failed the comppose. I fixed those (and control-center) last night.
> 2017-06-13 - still running, cross your fingers.

[snip]

> Anyhow, hopefully we will have a rawhide compose today, and if not I
> will keep poking it to get it going...

Unfortunately while the latest compose succeeded, actually trying to
use the installer resulted in a python traceback pretty much immediately

   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461469

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com  -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

2017-06-13 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:10:58PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now
> > failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items.
> 
> Is there a way we can loosen that up for rawhide and have it tightened
> down for branched. I think it's worth while to have at least a flow of
> the everything repository out on a regular basis like the old pre
> pungi-4 use to do.

I know we're already at new-deliverable explosion, but this seems like
a place where it'd be nice to have Rawhide and Bikeshed (or whatever we
want to call "tested and believed-to-be basically functional Rawhide").
That doesn't seem imminent, though, so Peter's suggestion seems
reasonable. Then maybe we could ask Jan as FPgM to keep track of what's
working and what's broken and help make sure the right people are on
it.


-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

2017-06-13 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide
> composes in a while (13 days as of today).
>
> This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now
> failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items.

Is there a way we can loosen that up for rawhide and have it tightened
down for branched. I think it's worth while to have at least a flow of
the everything repository out on a regular basis like the old pre
pungi-4 use to do.

> Here's a partial list:
>
> 2017-06-01 - lorax traceback, bug 1457055
> 2017-06-02 - another lorax issue, bug 1457906
> 2017-06-03 - cloud base failed in anaconda, bug 1458509
> 2017-06-04 - ditto
> 2017-06-05 - ditto
> 2017-06-06 - pungi bug - https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/641
> 2017-06-07 - ditto
> 2017-06-08 - ditto
> 2017-06-09 - ditto
> 2017-06-10 - ditto
> 2017-06-11 - ditto
> 2017-06-12 - ditto
> 2017-06-12.1 - pungi bug fixed, but hit libgtop2 broken deps in metacity
> that failed the comppose. I fixed those (and control-center) last night.
> 2017-06-13 - still running, cross your fingers.
>
> All of this has been made a bit worse by us having some storage slowness
> which means you can really only do about 2 rawhide compose attempts a
> day. Thats being worked on and hopefully we will get it fixed soon.
>
> You can also see here there were some gaps where we didn't yet have the
> bug tracked down or didn't yet have a fix in place. We need to try and
> do better there. (I was out on vacation last week, so it can't always be
> me).
>
> Anyhow, hopefully we will have a rawhide compose today, and if not I
> will keep poking it to get it going...
>
> kevin
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

2017-06-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings.

Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide
composes in a while (13 days as of today).

This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now
failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items.

Here's a partial list:

2017-06-01 - lorax traceback, bug 1457055
2017-06-02 - another lorax issue, bug 1457906
2017-06-03 - cloud base failed in anaconda, bug 1458509
2017-06-04 - ditto
2017-06-05 - ditto
2017-06-06 - pungi bug - https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/641
2017-06-07 - ditto
2017-06-08 - ditto
2017-06-09 - ditto
2017-06-10 - ditto
2017-06-11 - ditto
2017-06-12 - ditto
2017-06-12.1 - pungi bug fixed, but hit libgtop2 broken deps in metacity
that failed the comppose. I fixed those (and control-center) last night.
2017-06-13 - still running, cross your fingers.

All of this has been made a bit worse by us having some storage slowness
which means you can really only do about 2 rawhide compose attempts a
day. Thats being worked on and hopefully we will get it fixed soon.

You can also see here there were some gaps where we didn't yet have the
bug tracked down or didn't yet have a fix in place. We need to try and
do better there. (I was out on vacation last week, so it can't always be
me).

Anyhow, hopefully we will have a rawhide compose today, and if not I
will keep poking it to get it going...

kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org