Re: teTeX-2.0-rc1
On 2003-01-20 23:00:12 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 10:59:31PM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote: this is the first release candidate for teTeX-2.0. I have put the files to my server, but they'll soon be available for download at CTAN: rpms have been synced: http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/teTeX/ No success on SuSE 7.2: # rpm -ihv perl-Tk-800.024-0at2.i686.rpm Fehler: fehlgeschlagene Paket-Abhängigkeiten: perl(:WITH_ITHREADS) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(:WITH_THREADS) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(:WITH_LARGEFILES) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl = 0:5.00404 wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(AutoLoader) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(base) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(Carp) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(Config) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(Cwd) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(DirHandle) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(DynaLoader) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(English) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(Exporter) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(File::Basename) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(Getopt::Std) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(IO) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(IO::Socket) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(lib) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(overload) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(Socket) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(strict) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(subs) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(Symbol) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(Text::Tabs) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(UNIVERSAL) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht perl(vars) wird von perl-Tk-800.024-0at2 gebraucht # rpm -ihv teTeX-2.0rc1-0at23.i686.rpm Fehler: fehlgeschlagene Paket-Abhängigkeiten: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) wird von teTeX-2.0rc1-0at23 gebraucht libgcc_s.so.1 wird von teTeX-2.0rc1-0at23 gebraucht libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) wird von teTeX-2.0rc1-0at23 gebraucht libstdc++.so.5 wird von teTeX-2.0rc1-0at23 gebraucht libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) wird von teTeX-2.0rc1-0at23 gebraucht perl(File::Path) wird von teTeX-2.0rc1-0at23 gebraucht Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
Re: Problems with 20021209 pretest
On 2002-12-10 10:50:45 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: On 2002-12-10 10:12:38 +0100, Felix Neubauer wrote: Additionanally PDF inclusion seems to be broken again in pdfTeX. Trying to include a PDF image within a pdfLaTeX document gives the following error: Confirmed. I'll look into it. It's fixed in -20021210. The error is in libs/xpdf/xpdf/Makefile.in: @@ -13,7 +15,7 @@ goodir = $(srcdir)/../goo CXXFLAGS = @CXXFLAGS@ -ALLCXXFLAGS = $(CXXFLAGS) @DEFS@ $(XCFLAGS) -I.. -I$(goodir) -I. -I$(srcdir) -DPDF_PARSER_ONLY -DNO_DECRYPTION -DDISABLE_OUTLINE +ALLCXXFLAGS = $(CXXFLAGS) @DEFS@ $(XCFLAGS) -I.. -I$(goodir) -I. -I$(srcdir) +-DPDF_PARSER_ONLY -DNO_DECRYPTION CXX = @CXX@ @@ -53,6 +55,7 @@ $(srcdir)/NameToCharCode.cc \ $(srcdir)/Object.cc \ $(srcdir)/OutputDev.cc \ + $(srcdir)/Outline.cc \ $(srcdir)/PBMOutputDev.cc \ $(srcdir)/PDFDoc.cc \ $(srcdir)/PDFDocEncoding.cc \ @@ -80,7 +83,7 @@ Array.o BuiltinFont.o BuiltinFontTables.o CMap.o Catalog.o \ CharCodeToUnicode.o Decrypt.o Dict.o Error.o FontEncodingTables.o \ FontFile.o Gfx.o GfxFont.o GfxState.o GlobalParams.o JBIG2Stream.o \ - Lexer.o Link.o NameToCharCode.o Object.o OutputDev.o PDFDoc.o \ + Lexer.o Link.o NameToCharCode.o Object.o OutputDev.o Outline.o PDFDoc.o \ Page.o Parser.o PDFDocEncoding.o Stream.o UnicodeMap.o XRef.o \ Function.o PSTokenizer.o Thanks for spotting this. Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
Re: incredibly strange problem distilling a LaTeX--based .ps file
On 2002-12-09 12:26:11 -0800, Gene C. Ruzicka wrote: using gs7.03 - 7.10, and a workaround described at sourceforge, using -dCompatibilityLevel=1.3 in ps2pdf, fixes the problem. interestingly, the gswin32c i've been using is based on Or using ps2pdf13 Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2003/
Re: Mathfrak-bug?
On 2002-11-05 09:43:15 +0100, Erik Frisk wrote: Thanks, I reported it to AMS but maybe that was not the right place. Where should I report the bug? File a LaTeX bug with the category amslatex. Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de
Re: 20021013 pretest
texk/dviljk/Makefile.in and texk/web2c/omegafonts/Makefile.in need a .NOTPARALLEL: target. Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de
Re: Release?
On 2002-05-30 21:28:01 +0200, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: Um, yeah, but spring is already over, even as far north as I live. It Springs ends on --06-21 :-) Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de
Re: Release?
On 2002-05-29 13:42:45 +0200, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: Anyway, I am asking because this time of year is such an excellent time for upgrades, and I want my users to have access to a good pdfTeX. Expect a new pdfTeX (1.01a) this Spring. :-) Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de
Re: inverting ps/pdf
On 2002-04-25 17:13:29 +0200, taupin (wanadoo-lps) wrote: Martin Schroeder wrote: gv currently has no maintainer; your best bet are the developers of GhostScript and GView. No maintainer free of charge. But, AFAIK, there is a site named GhostGum which posts shareware new versions. Look at http://www.ghostgum.com That's http://www.ghostgum.com.au and they provide GView, which is not gv, but also a previewer for GhostScript. Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de
inverting ps/pdf (was: Avoiding dvi files ps files (off topic?))
On 2002-03-28 10:07:59 +0530, Kalyan Mukherjea wrote: TeX document from him/her but it would be preferable if there were a switch in the ps or pdf viewers which would simply interchange ff (white) pixels for (00) black pixels. Is this a stupid/impossible suggestion from a technology-ignorant person or is something available for this purpose? At least GhostScript and xpdf have no such switch. It should be simple to implement; please contact the respective authors. Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: Avoiding dvi files
On 2002-03-26 10:36:26 +, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: You can download the entire spec for PDF from Adobe's web site. I don't think its formally published any more. But of course it is: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0201758393/ :-) Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: teTeX beta 20011202 epstopdf
On 2002-02-10 20:03:12 +, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 07:00:28PM +0100, Siep wrote: I propose that command-line options be added to epstopdf to request prepress-quality pdfs and to suppress jpeg compression; jpeg compression is not a good compression technique for e.g. screenshots. If you have JPEG files, why don't you include them directly? Who go via EPS? She doesn't have jpegs but GhostScript produces PDF with jpeg compression. Any ideas what what the prepress thing actually does, by the way? I suppose it loads some parameters for GhostScript similar to the Prepress parameter settings for Distiller (i.e. mainly high resolution and losless compression). Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: [off topic] equation numbering in appendix
On 2002-02-05 23:24:26 +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
\makeatletter
\renewcommand\theequation{\@arabic\c@equation}
\makeatother
ITIYM \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: problems with eurofont tfm-Files
On 2002-02-04 13:29:04 +0100, Peter Bruehne wrote: mktexpk: Running gsftopk zpeubi 300 gsftopk(k) version 1.17/700 [32gs: Error: /undefined in ɺóåÁå [...] Is this a problem specific to the euro-package or ghostscript or is GhostScript. You need at least gs7.01++ (newest is 7.04). See http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~vojta/gsftopk.html Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: [e]ps file overlaping
On 2002-01-31 13:16:03 +0100, Hendri Hondorp wrote: With fancyhdr you can do this. It's much simpler with eso-pic. Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: latex/pdflatex page size in teTeX
On 2002-01-21 12:25:18 +, John Murdie wrote: I've just had a user here point out to me that a LaTeX document typeset with `latex' (from teTeX 1.0.7) is positioned 0.65 (approx 17mm) further down the page than when it is typeset with pdflatex. I think the DVI-typeset version is correct. The LaTeX source file is: Are you shure that you are not printing with fit to page set? Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: TeX/LaTeX Fonts
On 2001-12-19 16:59:47 +0100, Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote: There is (at least was when I last looked) no [default] mode for dvips above 600dpi. Since recent Laserprinter get even up to 2400dpi it would be nice to have a well suited mode for these. Is this in progress somewhere? Included in teTeX sometime? or laready and I just missed it? Or are There are many modes with more than 600dpi in modes.mf. Just choose the right one for your printer. :-) Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: TeX/LaTeX Fonts
On 2001-12-19 20:08:17 +0100, Thomas Esser wrote: You should avoid these large font bitmaps anyway and use type1 fonts for printers with these resolutions. The size of the pk files shouldn't be a problem in the age of 100 GB harddiscs. Are type1 fonts really better then Metafont at say 1200 dpi? Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: Some more remarks on compiling teTeX 20011202 on Mac OS X 10.1.1
On 2001-12-12 17:02:14 +0100, Gerben Wierda wrote: -- After configuring, there is no libs/xpdf/xpdf/c-auto.h. I went to libs/xpdf and configured again (by hand) and xpdf/c-auto.h was created. This did not happen in the first run (I did a make clean in the root dir and then did another make) which makes me suspect that 'make clean' somehow removed libs/xpfd/xpdf/c-auto.h (and indeed, it is in the teTeX-src tar.gz). This is an error in xpdf as afaik a make clean should not remove the products of configure. I fixed this some time ago and submitted a patch here; it's included in the latest tex-live sources I think. Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
Re: 2001/12/02 pretest
On 2001-12-04 12:38:27 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: Has this been forwarded to Derek? That might not be necessary; Derek has released xpdf 0.93. Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
cm-super (was: finally: new texmf tarball (beta-20011128))
On 2001-11-29 18:00:23 +0100, Thomas Esser wrote: Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it). Is cm-super included? Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2002/
