Re: teTeX-2.0.2 file permissions

2003-03-11 Thread Piet van Oostrum
 George White [EMAIL PROTECTED] (GW) wrote:

GW Quoting Piet van Oostrum [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 xdvizilla (in tetex-src-2.0.2/texk/xdvik/) appears to be missing the x
 permission. 

GW On my linux system the x-permission was set (by install -- the default
GW is 755 which is why you need the -m 644 option to install
GW documentation) when the file was installed. Why does the permission in
GW the source tree matter? Are you using a funny version of install?

It was the only thing installed in bin that missed the x permission.
The install is, I think, a home-brewn script. It says:

Usage: install [-c] [-s] [-o own] [-g grp] [-m mode] src dst
Or:install [-o own] [-g grp] [-m mode] -d dir
option c : copy (obsolete)
option s : try to strip dst
option o : (possibly numeric) owner ident
option g : (possibly numeric) group ident
option m : mode (in octal eg 755 )
src : must be readable file
dst : file or directory

The Makefile in xdvik doesn't give any mode parameters, so how should the
install script know that it should add the x permission?

$(INSTALL_SCRIPT) $(srcdir)/xdvizilla $(scriptdir)/xdvizilla
$(INSTALL_SCRIPT) = install -c.
-- 
Piet van Oostrum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet [PGP]
Private email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ANN: teTeX-2.0.2

2003-03-07 Thread Piet van Oostrum
xdvizilla (in tetex-src-2.0.2/texk/xdvik/) appears to be missing the x
permission. 
-- 
Piet van Oostrum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet [PGP]
Private email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]