Re: texlinks

2003-02-06 Thread Dr. Werner Fink
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:33:07PM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote:
> > +# History:
> > +#   Tue Apr  9 22:46:34 CEST 2002, te:
> > +#   do not create symlinks for cont-??, metafun and mptopdf
> > 
> > This is IMHO a bad idea, if one enables a format he/she wants
> > to use it.
> 
> ConTeXt supports these formats by its helper scripts, e.g. texexec and
> mptopdf (both wrappers to perl scripts).

Thanks for the hint.  This is also what I've determind and therefore
I've add some scripts which will echo a hint about texexec
and mptopdf.  Only for users which arn't familiar with ConTeXt.

   Werner



Re: texlinks

2003-02-05 Thread Thomas Esser
> +# History:
> +#   Tue Apr  9 22:46:34 CEST 2002, te:
> +#   do not create symlinks for cont-??, metafun and mptopdf
> 
> This is IMHO a bad idea, if one enables a format he/she wants
> to use it.

ConTeXt supports these formats by its helper scripts, e.g. texexec and
mptopdf (both wrappers to perl scripts).

Thomas



texlinks

2003-02-05 Thread Dr. Werner Fink

... /usr/bin/texlinks

+# History:
+#   Tue Apr  9 22:46:34 CEST 2002, te:
+#   do not create symlinks for cont-??, metafun and mptopdf

This is IMHO a bad idea, if one enables a format he/she wants
to use it.

   Werner



Re: 'texconfig', 'texlinks' and multiple platforms

2001-11-26 Thread Thomas Esser

> 'texlinks' are run by 'texconfig' when adding a new format. On a multiple
> platform installation of teTeX this isn't behaving as expected /
> wanted. When I generate a new format (which is the same for all the
> platforms) I expect links from format to engine to be added for _all_
> platforms - not just the one 'texconfig' / 'texlinks' is currently running
> on. Since 'texlinks' has a '--multiplatform' switch I expect that the fix
> is to add the switch to every occurrence of 'texlinks' in 'texconifg'.
> Is that correct?
>
> I really think this should be the default behaviour of 'texconfig' - or at
> least an option.

Well, I just have done the suggested change. It will be in the next pretest.

Thomas