Re: texmfsrc LICENSE

2003-02-02 Thread Roozbeh Pournader 
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Paul Vojta wrote:

> It compiles and works under Debian Linux

And Red Hat Linux 8.0.

roozbeh

Re: texmfsrc LICENSE

2003-02-01 Thread Thomas Esser 
> fixed the problem. I recommend upgrading all config.guess/config.sub
> files in the tree.

Done, thanks.

> I'm also testing on Solaris, HP-UX, IRIX, Redhat Linux, and AIX. I'm
> out for the rest of the day but will continue tomorrow.

Good. omega is known to be broken due to obsolete files in the texmf tree.
Anybody who wants to test it should get
  http://www-b.informatik.uni-hannover.de/~te/omega-update.tar.gz
and unpack it in the texmf tree.

On RedHat, please try lambda on the following file (but make sure to get the
omega-update first):
  \documentclass{article}
  \usepackage{trace}
  \begin{document}
  \traceon
  \leavevmode
  X\font\test cmbx10\relax
  X
  \end{document}
and let me know if it works (or loops with outputting [] forever).

Thomas

Re: texmfsrc LICENSE

2003-02-01 Thread Albert Chin 
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 09:24:37PM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote:
> BTW: I wonder if anybody has successfully compiled and/or tested rc2. I
> did not get much feetback yet...

I'm getting the following error on Tru64 UNIX 5.1:
  checking host system type... config.guess: cannot create a temporary
  directory in /tmp
  configure: error: can not guess host type; you must specify one

Upgrading to the latest config.guess/config.sub files from:
  ftp://ftp.gnu.org/config
fixed the problem. I recommend upgrading all config.guess/config.sub
files in the tree.

I'm also testing on Solaris, HP-UX, IRIX, Redhat Linux, and AIX. I'm
out for the rest of the day but will continue tomorrow.

-- 
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: texmfsrc LICENSE

2003-02-01 Thread Paul Vojta 
> Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 21:24:37 +0100
> From: Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: texmfsrc LICENSE
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> BTW: I wonder if anybody has successfully compiled and/or tested rc2. I
> did not get much feetback yet...

It compiles and works under Debian Linux

--Paul Vojta

Re: texmfsrc LICENSE

2003-02-01 Thread Thomas Esser 
> I'd like to see it at the toplevel, under a different name. It's
> easier to find this way.

Good idea. I will now name the three license files according to their
tarball: LICENSE.src LICENSE.texmf and LICENSE.texmfsrc.

The file LICENSE.texmfsrc will not start with:
  The files within the source directory are all...
  ...

Thanks for your feedback.

BTW: I wonder if anybody has successfully compiled and/or tested rc2. I
did not get much feetback yet...

Thomas

Re: texmfsrc LICENSE

2003-02-01 Thread Albert Chin 
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 06:38:46PM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote:
> I plan to put the texmf license into source/LICENSE in the texmfsrc
> tarball. I don't want to put the file to the toplevel, because it would
> overwrite the texmf LICENSE when unpacked.
> 
> Good idea? Comments welcome.

I'd like to see it at the toplevel, under a different name. It's
easier to find this way.

-- 
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

texmfsrc LICENSE

2003-01-31 Thread Thomas Esser 
I plan to put the texmf license into source/LICENSE in the texmfsrc
tarball. I don't want to put the file to the toplevel, because it would
overwrite the texmf LICENSE when unpacked.

Good idea? Comments welcome.

Thomas