[tw5] Re: Leading "." (period) for line break @TonyM

2019-09-19 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
TonyM wrote:
>
> The are three aspects to using the ".", 
>

It might be interesting to play with the JS based parser system in public 
to acheieve what you want.

I don't think it would be too enormously difficult.

TT 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/060dc103-a78b-4004-ba39-c34d1b459aaf%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Leading "." (period) for line break @TonyM

2019-09-18 Thread TonyM
Mat,

The are three aspects to using the ".", 

one is during typing. Just start your sentence with a period and it becomes 
a paragraph. then similar to typing bullets "*" you can type a set of 
paragraphs and they will all behave like paragraphs and be followed by a 
blank line.

The second is after pasting text content from elsewhere. Being able to look 
through the text and add a period to transform a line into a paragraph.

The Third is give a larger body of text pasted into a tiddler, using a 
proposed EditorToolbar button, to select some or all lines and adding the 
leading period. Looking at the html P tag I discovered it handles nicely 
the following situations that occur with texts sourced elsewhere; This is 
after I have placed period at the beginning of each line
.A sentence with more than one line break following it collapses into a 
single paragraph break
.
.
.
.A short sentence
.a second short sentence without any additional line break above
.
.Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. 
Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 
1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to 
make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but 
also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. 
It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets 
containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing 
software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum 

So the P works well in this situation as well.

You can also see that the above is quite helpful now, if you want to 
improve the text, its easy to see extra line breaks and remove them, but no 
need to go inserting double enter/carriage returns to make the text look 
decent. If you do not get around to removing the periods no harm

A sentence with more than one line break following it collapses into a 
single paragraph break



A short sentence
a second short sentence without any additional line break above

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting 
industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever 
since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and 
scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five 
centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining 
essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of 
Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with 
desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of 
Lorem Ipsum
Paste the above in a tiddler to see the result if it was "rendered" as 
proposed.

Regards
Tony

On Thursday, September 19, 2019 at 1:28:29 AM UTC+10, Mat wrote:
>
> In another thread, fellow TonyM wrote:
>
> I have tried to seek support to at least in my own wiki introduce a 
>> leading "." period to wikitext that does the same as ";" without the bold. 
>> Basically a leading period would wrap the line in 
>> .This is a line or paragraph
>>
>> Would render (not insert)
>> This is a line or paragraph
>>
>
> Where did you seek this support? I think this is a very neat idea! But 
> would you agree it should only be "line break" not actually what is seen 
> here (the result would display the same even if the 's were all in one 
> line next to each others):
>
> [image: Capture.PNG]
> i.e the desired effect is rather:
>
> foo
> bar
> baz
>
> ...right?
>
> Is this on github so I can give it a thumbs up?
>
> <:-)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d707ff5c-47b5-4733-98c8-1d4188d8364e%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Leading "." (period) for line break @TonyM

2019-09-18 Thread Mat
coda coder wrote:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywikidev/cf0D9mbvi8g 
>

Thanks. 
...that turns out to be a frustratingly long thread which I guess indicates 
a lot of objections... :-/
<:-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7513f9bd-710a-4785-ac58-84b77697b485%40googlegroups.com.


[tw5] Re: Leading "." (period) for line break @TonyM

2019-09-18 Thread coda coder


On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 10:28:29 AM UTC-5, Mat wrote:
>
> In another thread, fellow TonyM wrote:
>
> I have tried to seek support to at least in my own wiki introduce a 
>> leading "." period to wikitext that does the same as ";" without the bold. 
>> Basically a leading period would wrap the line in 
>> .This is a line or paragraph
>>
>> Would render (not insert)
>> This is a line or paragraph
>>
>
> Where did you seek this support?
>
>
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywikidev/cf0D9mbvi8g 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6e85f808-4bb2-47f6-b40c-a65267115e8f%40googlegroups.com.