[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[TW Tones]

Si,

I too take the pragmatic approach however over time I try and develop 
tiddlywiki tools and features all me needs. Over time, in an evolutionary 
way I make the other tools redundant. Mainly because I have development or 
design control over how I use and integrate the results.

Regards
Tones

On Sunday, 25 July 2021 at 04:54:58 UTC+10 Si wrote:

> > I see NO reason NOT to save ourselves universally in our own format 
> already via TW. 
>
> One reason is just that it takes time to build stuff, even in TiddlyWiki, 
> and if a decent tool already exists that time might be better spent 
> elsewhere.
>
> On Saturday, 24 July 2021 at 10:57:26 UTC+1 TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
>> Ciao Si
>>
>> It is a VERY interesting thread!
>>
>> Point being that a solo wiki needs ways to garner the richness of the 
>> uberwelt.
>>
>> BUT I think it COULD, also, be interesting to turn the issue on its head.
>>
>> FOR an instance: What internet  things could TW SERVE? 
>>
>> On Android then QUINOID is a pretty good link collector.
>> As, also, on the other platforms done well by TIDDLYCLIP.
>>
>> *My point. *Does the adjudicative have to be OTHER than TW? 
>> OR can we replete ourselves already?
>> I see NO reason NOT to save ourselves universally in our own format 
>> already via TW.
>>
>> Turning the issue around simply becomes ... 
>> WHICH UNIVERSAL, CROSS-PLATFORM, NET-WORKABLE TW saver is best?
>>
>>*Google Keep?  Forget it!*
>> *  Where is TIDDLER KEEPER?*
>>
>> Just comments
>> TT
>>
>> On Wednesday, 21 July 2021 at 21:10:04 UTC+2 Si wrote:
>>
>>> This question was prompted by a discussion over in the thread on 
>>> incremental note-taking 
>>> .
>>>
>>> In my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well 
>>> suited to quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ae3a1198-ee06-486f-8c26-a2982adba43fn%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[Si]

> I see NO reason NOT to save ourselves universally in our own format 
already via TW. 

One reason is just that it takes time to build stuff, even in TiddlyWiki, 
and if a decent tool already exists that time might be better spent 
elsewhere.

On Saturday, 24 July 2021 at 10:57:26 UTC+1 TiddlyTweeter wrote:

> Ciao Si
>
> It is a VERY interesting thread!
>
> Point being that a solo wiki needs ways to garner the richness of the 
> uberwelt.
>
> BUT I think it COULD, also, be interesting to turn the issue on its head.
>
> FOR an instance: What internet  things could TW SERVE? 
>
> On Android then QUINOID is a pretty good link collector.
> As, also, on the other platforms done well by TIDDLYCLIP.
>
> *My point. *Does the adjudicative have to be OTHER than TW? 
> OR can we replete ourselves already?
> I see NO reason NOT to save ourselves universally in our own format 
> already via TW.
>
> Turning the issue around simply becomes ... 
> WHICH UNIVERSAL, CROSS-PLATFORM, NET-WORKABLE TW saver is best?
>
>*Google Keep?  Forget it!*
> *  Where is TIDDLER KEEPER?*
>
> Just comments
> TT
>
> On Wednesday, 21 July 2021 at 21:10:04 UTC+2 Si wrote:
>
>> This question was prompted by a discussion over in the thread on 
>> incremental note-taking 
>> .
>>
>> In my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well 
>> suited to quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ed19c6fc-d764-4315-b081-1f9d97872855n%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[TiddlyTweeter]

Ciao Si

It is a VERY interesting thread!

Point being that a solo wiki needs ways to garner the richness of the 
uberwelt.

BUT I think it COULD, also, be interesting to turn the issue on its head.

FOR an instance: What internet  things could TW SERVE? 

On Android then QUINOID is a pretty good link collector.
As, also, on the other platforms done well by TIDDLYCLIP.

*My point. *Does the adjudicative have to be OTHER than TW? 
OR can we replete ourselves already?
I see NO reason NOT to save ourselves universally in our own format already 
via TW.

Turning the issue around simply becomes ... 
WHICH UNIVERSAL, CROSS-PLATFORM, NET-WORKABLE TW saver is best?

   *Google Keep?  Forget it!*
*  Where is TIDDLER KEEPER?*

Just comments
TT

On Wednesday, 21 July 2021 at 21:10:04 UTC+2 Si wrote:

> This question was prompted by a discussion over in the thread on 
> incremental note-taking 
> .
>
> In my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well suited 
> to quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f2b5ab27-d383-422c-ada6-61586e4438b3n%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[Ste]

Android note taking apps wot I has used: 
As I have a note9 Fii note is my scribble notes with a stylus. 
Nebo notes is also good. (as is myscipt2 calculator by the same peeps)
For markdown neutriNote is good.
 DroidEdit fills that notepad++ hole
And Quinoid or Tiddloid for the tiddlywiki. 
Snap pad is good for small uber quick jottings. 
Snap desk for a bit more permanance. 





On Friday, 23 July 2021 at 04:47:37 UTC+1 jason...@gmail.com wrote:

> I just worked on a tool for syncing my Keep notes to TW today, it is a JS 
> bookmarklet that loads and executes this gist 
> . I 
> have only tested this on Chrome so far and there are still a couple kinks 
> to work out, but I'm happy with it so far.
>
> 1. Highlight this text and drag it into your bookmarks bar:
>
> javascript:var 
> id%3D"0937d5af819d1914c7803f22ee8752d6"%2Cfile%3D"bookmarklet-export-keep.js"%2Cuser%3D"jasonmhoule"%2Cxhr%3Dnew
>  
> XMLHttpRequest%3Bxhr.overrideMimeType("application%2Fjson")%3Bxhr.open("GET"%2C"https%3A%2F%
> 2Fgist.githubusercontent.com%2F"%2Buser%2B"%2F"%2Bid%2B"%2Fraw%2F"%2Bfile%2B"%3F"%2BMath.random())%3Bxhr.onreadystatechange%3Dfunction()%7Bif(4%3D%3D%3Dxhr.readyState)if(200%3D%3D%3Dxhr.status)console.log("Successfully
>  
> loaded 
> gist%3A"%2C%7Bid%3Aid%2Cfile%3Afile%2Cuser%3Auser%2Cresponse%3Axhr.responseText%7D)%2C(0%2Ceval)(xhr.responseText)%3Belse%7Bvar
>  
> a%3D"GitHub Gist file did not load successfully and instead returned a 
> status code of 
> "%2Bxhr.status%2B"."%3Bconsole.error(a%2C%7Bid%3Aid%2Cfile%3Afile%2Cuser%3Auser%7D)%3Balert(a)%7D%7D%3Bxhr.send(null)%3Bvoid+0
>
> 2. Navigate to Keep. The code will iterate through all the tiddlers that 
> are loaded to the view, so if your Keep is anywhere near as cluttered as 
> mine, I suggest trying this on a subset. For example, I tag certain notes 
> as #export, and then I can open that tag in the Keep web navbar to execute 
> this script just on them.
>
> 3. Once you have the 'target' tiddlers in view, click on the bookmarklet 
> and watch it pop each tiddler open in turn (one per second). Once it is 
> done with this, it will download a keep-notes.json file. You can drag this 
> single file into your wiki and it will import one tiddler per note. Note 
> that I also use (an early version of) Projectify so the code tags each 
> tiddler with "Inbox" and "todo" so that it lands for processing in TW. I 
> have not looked into pulling the other Keep tags into the tiddler but will 
> probably do that.
>
> The code currently does not archive tiddlers automatically - I may add 
> that some day, but want to kick the tires quite a bit more first. Also note 
> that because the bookmarklet loads the gist from GH, if I make any changes 
> in the future, it is the changed code that will be triggered. (I'm not sure 
> if I can pin the bookmarklet down to a single commit, that would probably 
> be useful!)
>
> Anyway, thought I would offer this up to see if there are 
> thoughts/feedback for improvement.
> On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 3:27:21 PM UTC-5 Si wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the responses.
>>
>> I like Keep, very nice level of simplicity and pleasant to use. 
>> Personally I try to avoid Google stuff where I can, but I did notice this 
>> very nice keep-style Android app that has recently appeared on Fdroid: 
>> https://github.com/msoultanidis/quillnote. Unfortunately it's Android 
>> only, but I'll be keeping an eye on it in case they add a way to sync the 
>> notes to a computer as markdown files.
>>
>> @Tones 
>>
>> > I don't concur with your statement Si, as I think I said before  *In 
>> my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well suited to 
>> quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.*
>>
>> I wouldn't want to spend much time defending my view, as I think what 
>> does/doesn't count as friction is pretty subjective. My biggest problems 
>> are on mobile, where saving a single file wiki with Tiddloid takes too long 
>> for me to ever really feel like using it. I had forgotten about 
>> Projectify's quick-add feature though, which I agree is very useful for 
>> quick-capture.
>>
>> > I did look into getting tiddlywiki into a browser side bar in the past. 
>> I believed it worked in FireFox, but if not universal it is less 
>> interesting. 
>>
>> There are a few Firefox extensions for doing this, but I couldn't get any 
>> to work with a local file. Perhaps they will work with the node.js version. 
>> Vivaldi has a built in feature for doing this which works very nicely with 
>> TiddlyWiki: https://help.vivaldi.com/desktop/panels/web-panels/
>> On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 05:35:35 UTC+1 TW Tones wrote:
>>
>>> Keep is popular.
>>>
>>> I did look into getting tiddlywiki into a browser side bar in the past. 
>>> I believed it worked in FireFox, but if not universal it is less 
>>> interesting. That is the advantage of keep if you use a few of googles 
>>> 

[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[Jason Houle]

I just worked on a tool for syncing my Keep notes to TW today, it is a JS 
bookmarklet that loads and executes this gist 
. I 
have only tested this on Chrome so far and there are still a couple kinks 
to work out, but I'm happy with it so far.

1. Highlight this text and drag it into your bookmarks bar:

javascript:var 
id%3D"0937d5af819d1914c7803f22ee8752d6"%2Cfile%3D"bookmarklet-export-keep.js"%2Cuser%3D"jasonmhoule"%2Cxhr%3Dnew
 
XMLHttpRequest%3Bxhr.overrideMimeType("application%2Fjson")%3Bxhr.open("GET"%2C"https%3A%2F%2Fgist.githubusercontent.com%2F"%2Buser%2B"%2F"%2Bid%2B"%2Fraw%2F"%2Bfile%2B"%3F"%2BMath.random())%3Bxhr.onreadystatechange%3Dfunction()%7Bif(4%3D%3D%3Dxhr.readyState)if(200%3D%3D%3Dxhr.status)console.log("Successfully
 
loaded 
gist%3A"%2C%7Bid%3Aid%2Cfile%3Afile%2Cuser%3Auser%2Cresponse%3Axhr.responseText%7D)%2C(0%2Ceval)(xhr.responseText)%3Belse%7Bvar
 
a%3D"GitHub Gist file did not load successfully and instead returned a 
status code of 
"%2Bxhr.status%2B"."%3Bconsole.error(a%2C%7Bid%3Aid%2Cfile%3Afile%2Cuser%3Auser%7D)%3Balert(a)%7D%7D%3Bxhr.send(null)%3Bvoid+0

2. Navigate to Keep. The code will iterate through all the tiddlers that 
are loaded to the view, so if your Keep is anywhere near as cluttered as 
mine, I suggest trying this on a subset. For example, I tag certain notes 
as #export, and then I can open that tag in the Keep web navbar to execute 
this script just on them.

3. Once you have the 'target' tiddlers in view, click on the bookmarklet 
and watch it pop each tiddler open in turn (one per second). Once it is 
done with this, it will download a keep-notes.json file. You can drag this 
single file into your wiki and it will import one tiddler per note. Note 
that I also use (an early version of) Projectify so the code tags each 
tiddler with "Inbox" and "todo" so that it lands for processing in TW. I 
have not looked into pulling the other Keep tags into the tiddler but will 
probably do that.

The code currently does not archive tiddlers automatically - I may add that 
some day, but want to kick the tires quite a bit more first. Also note that 
because the bookmarklet loads the gist from GH, if I make any changes in 
the future, it is the changed code that will be triggered. (I'm not sure if 
I can pin the bookmarklet down to a single commit, that would probably be 
useful!)

Anyway, thought I would offer this up to see if there are thoughts/feedback 
for improvement.
On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 3:27:21 PM UTC-5 Si wrote:

> Thanks for the responses.
>
> I like Keep, very nice level of simplicity and pleasant to use. Personally 
> I try to avoid Google stuff where I can, but I did notice this very nice 
> keep-style Android app that has recently appeared on Fdroid: 
> https://github.com/msoultanidis/quillnote. Unfortunately it's Android 
> only, but I'll be keeping an eye on it in case they add a way to sync the 
> notes to a computer as markdown files.
>
> @Tones 
>
> > I don't concur with your statement Si, as I think I said before  *In my 
> opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well suited to 
> quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.*
>
> I wouldn't want to spend much time defending my view, as I think what 
> does/doesn't count as friction is pretty subjective. My biggest problems 
> are on mobile, where saving a single file wiki with Tiddloid takes too long 
> for me to ever really feel like using it. I had forgotten about 
> Projectify's quick-add feature though, which I agree is very useful for 
> quick-capture.
>
> > I did look into getting tiddlywiki into a browser side bar in the past. 
> I believed it worked in FireFox, but if not universal it is less 
> interesting. 
>
> There are a few Firefox extensions for doing this, but I couldn't get any 
> to work with a local file. Perhaps they will work with the node.js version. 
> Vivaldi has a built in feature for doing this which works very nicely with 
> TiddlyWiki: https://help.vivaldi.com/desktop/panels/web-panels/
> On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 05:35:35 UTC+1 TW Tones wrote:
>
>> Keep is popular.
>>
>> I did look into getting tiddlywiki into a browser side bar in the past. I 
>> believed it worked in FireFox, but if not universal it is less interesting. 
>> That is the advantage of keep if you use a few of googles tools.
>>
>> Tones
>>
>> On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 13:34:37 UTC+10 cj.v...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> I'm thinking it largely depends on the "ecosystem" one may be living in.
>>>
>>> Seeing as I've sold my soul to Google, Google Keep is my goto quick note 
>>> taker.
>>>
>>> I can access the full screen Google Keep, sidebar Google Keep when I'm 
>>> in the other Google Apps, and have the Google Keep Chrome Extension, to 
>>> quickly take notes while viewing some web page.
>>>
>>> So quick note taking for some heavy-duty note making in TiddlyWiki later.
>>>
>>> Mind you, I only 

[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[Si]

Thanks for the responses.

I like Keep, very nice level of simplicity and pleasant to use. Personally 
I try to avoid Google stuff where I can, but I did notice this very nice 
keep-style Android app that has recently appeared on Fdroid: 
https://github.com/msoultanidis/quillnote. Unfortunately it's Android only, 
but I'll be keeping an eye on it in case they add a way to sync the notes 
to a computer as markdown files.

@Tones 

> I don't concur with your statement Si, as I think I said before  *In my 
opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well suited to 
quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.*

I wouldn't want to spend much time defending my view, as I think what 
does/doesn't count as friction is pretty subjective. My biggest problems 
are on mobile, where saving a single file wiki with Tiddloid takes too long 
for me to ever really feel like using it. I had forgotten about 
Projectify's quick-add feature though, which I agree is very useful for 
quick-capture.

> I did look into getting tiddlywiki into a browser side bar in the past. I 
believed it worked in FireFox, but if not universal it is less interesting. 

There are a few Firefox extensions for doing this, but I couldn't get any 
to work with a local file. Perhaps they will work with the node.js version. 
Vivaldi has a built in feature for doing this which works very nicely with 
TiddlyWiki: https://help.vivaldi.com/desktop/panels/web-panels/
On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 05:35:35 UTC+1 TW Tones wrote:

> Keep is popular.
>
> I did look into getting tiddlywiki into a browser side bar in the past. I 
> believed it worked in FireFox, but if not universal it is less interesting. 
> That is the advantage of keep if you use a few of googles tools.
>
> Tones
>
> On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 13:34:37 UTC+10 cj.v...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking it largely depends on the "ecosystem" one may be living in.
>>
>> Seeing as I've sold my soul to Google, Google Keep is my goto quick note 
>> taker.
>>
>> I can access the full screen Google Keep, sidebar Google Keep when I'm in 
>> the other Google Apps, and have the Google Keep Chrome Extension, to 
>> quickly take notes while viewing some web page.
>>
>> So quick note taking for some heavy-duty note making in TiddlyWiki later.
>>
>> Mind you, I only ever use my Chromebook.  I never use my "smart" phone 
>> for anything other than text and phone.
>>
>> Well, it is always a work-in-progress.
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 4:10:04 PM UTC-3 Si wrote:
>>
>>> This question was prompted by a discussion over in the thread on 
>>> incremental note-taking 
>>> .
>>>
>>> In my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well 
>>> suited to quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.
>>>
>>> For this reason I use another app as an "inbox" for quick ideas and 
>>> tasks, which I process later on. Currently I use Evernote, but I'm 
>>> currently in the process of looking for something else (would love to hear 
>>> suggestions for a good replacement). The number one contender at the moment 
>>> is Joplin , but I'm tempted by the 
>>> purity of using text/markdown files if I can find a good way to handle them 
>>> on Android.
>>>
>>> Anyway I thought it would be interesting to prompt a discussion by 
>>> asking the more general question: *What apps or tools do you use that 
>>> you feel compliment TiddlyWiki well?* *What does your workflow look 
>>> like?*
>>>
>>> It doesn't matter the domain - note-taking and productivity are the 
>>> obvious categories, but please be free to share any tool you use in tandem 
>>> with TiddlyWiki.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/295ee80f-44d6-4559-a174-9ba7d3874ebfn%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[TW Tones]

Keep is popular.

I did look into getting tiddlywiki into a browser side bar in the past. I 
believed it worked in FireFox, but if not universal it is less interesting. 
That is the advantage of keep if you use a few of googles tools.

Tones

On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 13:34:37 UTC+10 cj.v...@gmail.com wrote:

> I'm thinking it largely depends on the "ecosystem" one may be living in.
>
> Seeing as I've sold my soul to Google, Google Keep is my goto quick note 
> taker.
>
> I can access the full screen Google Keep, sidebar Google Keep when I'm in 
> the other Google Apps, and have the Google Keep Chrome Extension, to 
> quickly take notes while viewing some web page.
>
> So quick note taking for some heavy-duty note making in TiddlyWiki later.
>
> Mind you, I only ever use my Chromebook.  I never use my "smart" phone for 
> anything other than text and phone.
>
> Well, it is always a work-in-progress.
>
> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 4:10:04 PM UTC-3 Si wrote:
>
>> This question was prompted by a discussion over in the thread on 
>> incremental note-taking 
>> .
>>
>> In my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well 
>> suited to quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.
>>
>> For this reason I use another app as an "inbox" for quick ideas and 
>> tasks, which I process later on. Currently I use Evernote, but I'm 
>> currently in the process of looking for something else (would love to hear 
>> suggestions for a good replacement). The number one contender at the moment 
>> is Joplin , but I'm tempted by the 
>> purity of using text/markdown files if I can find a good way to handle them 
>> on Android.
>>
>> Anyway I thought it would be interesting to prompt a discussion by asking 
>> the more general question: *What apps or tools do you use that you feel 
>> compliment TiddlyWiki well?* *What does your workflow look like?*
>>
>> It doesn't matter the domain - note-taking and productivity are the 
>> obvious categories, but please be free to share any tool you use in tandem 
>> with TiddlyWiki.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c2b59147-58cd-4604-a373-7fd01027a7c5n%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[Charlie Veniot]

I'm thinking it largely depends on the "ecosystem" one may be living in.

Seeing as I've sold my soul to Google, Google Keep is my goto quick note 
taker.

I can access the full screen Google Keep, sidebar Google Keep when I'm in 
the other Google Apps, and have the Google Keep Chrome Extension, to 
quickly take notes while viewing some web page.

So quick note taking for some heavy-duty note making in TiddlyWiki later.

Mind you, I only ever use my Chromebook.  I never use my "smart" phone for 
anything other than text and phone.

Well, it is always a work-in-progress.

On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 4:10:04 PM UTC-3 Si wrote:

> This question was prompted by a discussion over in the thread on 
> incremental note-taking 
> .
>
> In my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well suited 
> to quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.
>
> For this reason I use another app as an "inbox" for quick ideas and tasks, 
> which I process later on. Currently I use Evernote, but I'm currently in 
> the process of looking for something else (would love to hear suggestions 
> for a good replacement). The number one contender at the moment is Joplin 
> , but I'm tempted by the purity of 
> using text/markdown files if I can find a good way to handle them on 
> Android.
>
> Anyway I thought it would be interesting to prompt a discussion by asking 
> the more general question: *What apps or tools do you use that you feel 
> compliment TiddlyWiki well?* *What does your workflow look like?*
>
> It doesn't matter the domain - note-taking and productivity are the 
> obvious categories, but please be free to share any tool you use in tandem 
> with TiddlyWiki.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3df60578-9d63-4ae4-8254-73bd3df0eb9en%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[TW Tones]

Me too like Brian, Keep/tiddlywiki however I expect this to change to 
return to my DS Notes, or mobile tiddlywikis.

A worthy discussion, and I am keen to hear others response's.

I don't concur with your statement Si, as I think I said before  *In my 
opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well suited to 
quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.*
The only exception would be large volumes of media.

   - One way I support quick entry is to use projectify "quick add todo", 
   even if the only thing todo, is to later reclassify the tiddler as a 
   reference an idea etc...
   - Alternatively I use streams or just open a tag for collecting 
   information together eg shopping and do a new here then type. Use <> 
   in the tag tiddler to create a pill to see all so tagged.
   - Or I may assign a project name tag where the project is elsewhere, I 
   move these to the project wiki when working on the project.
   - I also use drag and drop or copy and paste found information a lot, 
   especially onto and into projectify tasks and stream nodes.
  - I can then drag these and drop them on projects, wikis etc..
   - I now use a tiddler inline edit tool to edit the text field without 
   going into edit mode.
   - My main supporting tools are other for purpose tiddlywikis like one 
   with JSON mangle as my data conversion wiki, or sources of icons and system 
   tags etc...
   - Another is I save all my macros and plugins below a folder and use 
   windows explorer to search my "TiddlyWiki intranet" to import tools a 
   tweeks.
   - I also make use of bookmarklets in browsers to drop a bundle of 
   tiddlers or settings on a wiki with a click. 



Tones
On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 05:22:15 UTC+10 Brian Radspinner wrote:

> I use Google Keep to capture thoughts on the fly on my phone. When I get 
> back to my laptop, it's easy to copy and paste from the Keep web interface 
> into TW
>
> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 12:10:04 PM UTC-7 Si wrote:
>
>> This question was prompted by a discussion over in the thread on 
>> incremental note-taking 
>> .
>>
>> In my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well 
>> suited to quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.
>>
>> For this reason I use another app as an "inbox" for quick ideas and 
>> tasks, which I process later on. Currently I use Evernote, but I'm 
>> currently in the process of looking for something else (would love to hear 
>> suggestions for a good replacement). The number one contender at the moment 
>> is Joplin , but I'm tempted by the 
>> purity of using text/markdown files if I can find a good way to handle them 
>> on Android.
>>
>> Anyway I thought it would be interesting to prompt a discussion by asking 
>> the more general question: *What apps or tools do you use that you feel 
>> compliment TiddlyWiki well?* *What does your workflow look like?*
>>
>> It doesn't matter the domain - note-taking and productivity are the 
>> obvious categories, but please be free to share any tool you use in tandem 
>> with TiddlyWiki.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/330f17ea-e38c-4a46-90f1-7d1cac70b2c8n%40googlegroups.com.

[tw5] Re: What other tools compliment TiddlyWiki well? [discussion]

[Brian Radspinner]

I use Google Keep to capture thoughts on the fly on my phone. When I get 
back to my laptop, it's easy to copy and paste from the Keep web interface 
into TW

On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 12:10:04 PM UTC-7 Si wrote:

> This question was prompted by a discussion over in the thread on 
> incremental note-taking 
> .
>
> In my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well suited 
> to quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction.
>
> For this reason I use another app as an "inbox" for quick ideas and tasks, 
> which I process later on. Currently I use Evernote, but I'm currently in 
> the process of looking for something else (would love to hear suggestions 
> for a good replacement). The number one contender at the moment is Joplin 
> , but I'm tempted by the purity of 
> using text/markdown files if I can find a good way to handle them on 
> Android.
>
> Anyway I thought it would be interesting to prompt a discussion by asking 
> the more general question: *What apps or tools do you use that you feel 
> compliment TiddlyWiki well?* *What does your workflow look like?*
>
> It doesn't matter the domain - note-taking and productivity are the 
> obvious categories, but please be free to share any tool you use in tandem 
> with TiddlyWiki.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/396fdb25-5428-4fd0-86aa-e629be4f9212n%40googlegroups.com.