Re: [time-nuts] Frequency counter recommendations

2007-03-27 Thread Angus

Hi,

Although they are rather less common and more expensive than the ones
you mentioned, Fluke/Philips 6681 counters are also very good. 

Nominal resolution is 50ps single shot and 1ps repetitive. 
No RS232, but GPIB and a rather basic analogue output are standard.



On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:24:46 -0800, you wrote:

Hi all,
I have a run-of-the-mill frequency counter (8 digits, 0.1 and 1.0 sec gate,
no reference oscillator output or ext. input) and would like to upgrade to
something better. I would initially like to measure frequencies in the 10
MHz or below range with a resolution of better than 0.1 Hz.
From reading this list have picked out a HP 5334 or a Racal-Dana 1991/1992.
Some of these have been recently on ebay, but that is not my preferred
source, the seller often does not state the options installed, as well as
the typical ebay problems.

Are there others someone would recommend, used?
-Dave D.



___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


[time-nuts] 59501A GPIB D/A PRGRMR

2007-03-27 Thread Arnold Tibus
Hello the Time Nuts group, 
perhaps it is not the right place to look for such things, 
but I am searching already a long time, w/o any positive 
results, the user and as well the service manual for the

HP-59501A GPIB D/A PRGRMR, a programmable DC-source .

One could get the impression it was never manufactured,  
at Agilent I just get the answer that this product is obsolete, 
they do not have a manual,
but I do have such thing and I want to play with it 
(discrete setup of a regulator loop), but without 
the command list and some hints on running it I feel lost. 

Could anybody give some help perhaps with a pdf copy?

Many thanks ia,

Arnold



___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Hello

2007-03-27 Thread Hal Murray

 Yes, others working with pendulums have also discovered that they end
 up making crude thermometers, barometers, or seismometers instead of a
 good clock. Still, not a reason to give up. But you know you have a
 world-class pendulum clock when, after having solved every other
 perturbation, you can see the effects of lunar tides in your data (as
 your good pendulum clock demonstrates it is also a fair gravimeter). 

That seems like a neat threshold.  Are current pendulum clocks good enough to 
notice tides?  When was the first published paper?  If not, how close?




-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] 59501A GPIB D/A PRGRMR

2007-03-27 Thread Matt Osborn
These folks list manuals for the HP-59501A.  They can be a bit spendy,
but they are original manuals, not copies.


http://yourmanualsource.com/


On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:44:28 +0200, Arnold Tibus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello the Time Nuts group, 
perhaps it is not the right place to look for such things, 
but I am searching already a long time, w/o any positive 
results, the user and as well the service manual for the

HP-59501A GPIB D/A PRGRMR, a programmable DC-source .

-- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com

___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Hello

2007-03-27 Thread Tom Van Baak
 Yes, others working with pendulums have also discovered that they end
 up making crude thermometers, barometers, or seismometers instead of a
 good clock. Still, not a reason to give up. But you know you have a
 world-class pendulum clock when, after having solved every other
 perturbation, you can see the effects of lunar tides in your data (as
 your good pendulum clock demonstrates it is also a fair gravimeter). 
 
 That seems like a neat threshold.  Are current pendulum clocks good enough to 
 notice tides?  When was the first published paper?  If not, how close?

Yes, it is a neat benchmark. Not a few modern clock makers
have tried to reproduce or improve on the old masters. It turns
out a pendulum clock needs to be accurate (stable) to 1e-7 or
1e-8 for tau from an hour to a day in order for it to detect
tides. See this article I wrote a while back on the subject:

Lunar/Solar Tides and Pendulum Clocks (part 1)
http://www.leapsecond.com/hsn2006/ch1.htm

Not sure what you mean by current pendulum clocks. I think
modern commercial pendulum clocks are nowhere as accurate
as the state-of-the-art pendulum clocks of the 1920's. Quartz
clocks in the 30's and atomic clocks in the 50's put an end to
the market for ultra precise pendulum clocks.

/tvb


___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] Hello

2007-03-27 Thread Neville Michie



 Yes, others working with pendulums have also discovered that they  
 end
 up making crude thermometers, barometers, or seismometers instead  
 of a
 good clock. Still, not a reason to give up. But you know you have a
 world-class pendulum clock when, after having solved every other
 perturbation, you can see the effects of lunar tides in your data  
 (as
 your good pendulum clock demonstrates it is also a fair gravimeter).

 That seems like a neat threshold.  Are current pendulum clocks  
 good enough to
 notice tides?  When was the first published paper?  If not, how  
 close?

 Yes, it is a neat benchmark. Not a few modern clock makers
 have tried to reproduce or improve on the old masters. It turns
 out a pendulum clock needs to be accurate (stable) to 1e-7 or
 1e-8 for tau from an hour to a day in order for it to detect
 tides. See this article I wrote a while back on the subject:

 Lunar/Solar Tides and Pendulum Clocks (part 1)
 http://www.leapsecond.com/hsn2006/ch1.htm

 Not sure what you mean by current pendulum clocks. I think
 modern commercial pendulum clocks are nowhere as accurate
 as the state-of-the-art pendulum clocks of the 1920's. Quartz
 clocks in the 30's and atomic clocks in the 50's put an end to
 the market for ultra precise pendulum clocks.

 /tvb



My work with a pendulum seems to point to the need to know the exact  
phase and amplitude of the pendulum as being a sticking point.
The pendulum can be mounted firmly, with no yielding or flexing of  
brackets on a masonry mount bedded well into the ground.
The pendulum can be made mechanically stable with accurately fitted  
joints between shaft and bob, and shaft and suspension.
The pendulum can be excited with a minute magnet and an air cored  
coil to drive it with a few nanowatts.
The pendulum can be shielded from air currents and vibrations.
However accurate signals for phase and amplitude measurement with  
accuracy of microseconds for phase and microns for amplitude seem to  
be the challenges that must be met, this information is necessary to  
generate the pendulum drive so that the pendulum is the only  
frequency determining element.
Compensation for temperature and barometric pressure are do-able,  
although the legendary clocks were in a vacuum (more or less) and in  
underground clock vaults kept at constant temperature.
I still have hopes of getting great performance from a room  
temperature clock at ambient pressure.
See
http://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/synchronome/photos/view/c1ba?b=1

cheers, Neville Michie



___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts