[time-nuts] HP Journal 10811 article

2007-10-16 Thread Jose Manuel
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY

I´ve just tried to download this interesting article here: 
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1981-03.pdf,  but page 20 
appears blank. Does anyone have this page?

Thanks, José, EA1PX
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP Journal 10811 article

2007-10-16 Thread GandalfG8
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY

 
In a message dated 16/10/2007 16:11:18 GMT Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I´ve  just tried to download this interesting article here:  
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1981-03.pdf,  but page 20  
appears blank. Does 
anyone have this page?



I've got a lower resolution copy of the complete journal and that has page  
20 ok.
I'll email it to you direct.
 
regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR



   
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] hp journal 1981 03

2007-10-16 Thread Phil Staton
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY

The complete article is available at

http://www.hparchive.com/Journals/Low-Resolution/HPJ-1981-03-Low- 
Resolution.pdf
(4.5 MB)

http://www.hparchive.com/Journals/HPJ-1981-03.pdf (38.2 MB)

previously referenced by

/tvb
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP Journal 10811 article

2007-10-16 Thread Jose Manuel
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY

Nigel and Phil, thanks a lot for the links, now I can read the complete 
article.

Best regards, José, EA1PX





- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP Journal 10811 article



In a message dated 16/10/2007 16:11:18 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I´ve  just tried to download this interesting article here:
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1981-03.pdf,  but page 20 
appears blank. Does
anyone have this page?



I've got a lower resolution copy of the complete journal and that has page
20 ok.
I'll email it to you direct.

regards

Nigel
GM8PZR




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

__ Información de NOD32, revisión 2592 (20071015) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con  NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Improving the stability of crystal oscillators

2007-10-16 Thread Don Collie
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY

Don Collie wrote:
 Gidday Bruce,
Yes, the temperature sensor [a diode or thermistor, etc] would be
 placed in thermal contact with [the plate attached to] the cold side
 of the pile [there would be a finned heatsink attached to the hot
 side, and an expanded polystyrene sheet between the two sides, as much
 as possible]. The voltage developed across the sensor would be fed to
 one input of a comparitor [or what have you - PID controller etc].
 There would be a voltage reference applied to the other input so as to
 make a conventional negative feedback control loop. If the loop gain
 was high enough, the system would operate in switch mode to maintain
 the cold side at a constant temperature. If the gain is lower the loop
 will operate in linear mode [ie : non oscillatory, but sluggish].
The advantage of a high gain loop is that there is no setting up
 necessary [self adjusting] - the thing will find the right
 temperature, and then cycle on/off to maintain it. [providing the
 temps involved are within the compliance of the system [Peltier,
 ambient temp.,etc]]
 Does a PID control loop *always* out-perform an oscilliatory loop?
 [or does that depend on?]
Another way to reduce the change of temperature at the crystal [and
 circuitry], would be to put a substance with thermal resistance
 between the plate [cold side], and a mass of copper or aluminium,
 which housed the crystal etc. This oven would have to be lagged.
 Please correct me if I`m wrong, but as the comparitor gain is
 increased, both the frequency of the temperature variation [at the
 sensor], and its amplitude are reduced.
A PID controller would be the *quickest* way to stabilise the
 temperature, but this is a secondary concideration : the primary
 concideration would be temperature stability - it wouldn`t really
 matter if it took an hour or two to stabilise].
If the object of the exercise is to make a *single* oven, The
 current supplied to the Peltier by the comparitor could be arranged to
 be reversable, depending on whether the temp at the sensor was more,
 or less than the set temp. Thus it would be possible to maintain the
 25 degree temp, as the ambient temp changed from [say] 0 to 70
 degrees. Not quite sure what to do about the [diode-like] barrier
 voltage of the Peltier pile.
Do crystals do better/last longer/less ageing at lower
 temperatures? - you would think so.
 Cheers,..Don.

A temperature control system without an integral term will always have
an offset from the desired setpoint.
The offset will depend on the ambient temperature and the gain.

Depending on the amount of heat being pumped a convection cooled
heatsink will probably be inadequate.
At least a blown heatsink (or better yet a water cooled heatsink) may be
necessary if the heat being pumped is substantial.
For example, try using a 70Watt single stage Peltier module on an
convection cooled heatsink to cool the to surface to below freezing.
At first ice forms on the cold plate, but gradually as the heatsink
warms up the ice melts and the cold plate becomes fairly warm.

It may be possible to use a cpu heatsink with integral heatpipes, at
least some of these allow a reasonable thickness of insulation to be used.

The usual technique is to actually sense and control the Peltier device
current.
Either a high frequency switchmode current controller with an output
filter to reduce the Peltier ripple current or an analog driver can be used.

Surely the oscillation frequency depends primarily on the thermal
transport delays within the system?
If self oscillating temperature controllers are so effective why are
they no longer used for precision temperature control?

If the control loop responds too slowly then it wont effectively correct
the effects of ambient temperature changes.

Placing a large thermal resistance between the cold plate and the oven
mass is somewhat counterproductive.
The oscillator will dissipate power that has to be removed, limiting the
maximum usable oven mass to ambient thermal resistance.
If this thermal resistance is too large most of the heat flow will be
via the oven thermal insulation at which point temperature control tends
to be somewhat ineffective.

Crystals operating at cryogenic temperatures were at one time found to
age very slowly.
However the effect of temperature on aging depends on the aging
mechanism(s) involved.

Peltier devices used to regulate the temperature of large baseplates
typically achieve a temperature stability of around 0.1C.

When used to control the temperature of smaller objects like laser
diodes a baseplate temperature stability of 0.001-0.002C has been achieved.
Objects of intermediate size like some ECDLs routinely achieve a
stability of 0.01C or better when a Peltier cooler is used.

Bruce

- Original Message - 
From: 

[time-nuts] Delusions

2007-10-16 Thread Don Collie
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY

Dear Bruce,

This is Donalds wife can you please explain to me the last sentince of your 
email to my husband. Cause to me it sounds like your giving him a hardtime. 
I hope your feeling alright your self.

Meriam 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Delusions

2007-10-16 Thread Bruce Griffiths
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY

Don Collie wrote:
 Dear Bruce,

 This is Donalds wife can you please explain to me the last sentince of your 
 email to my husband. Cause to me it sounds like your giving him a hardtime. 
 I hope your feeling alright your self.

 Meriam 


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

   
Meriam

Hard time not intended, merely a philosophical comment meant to imply we
all have our blind spots or delusions about how things work.
These areas of technical misunderstanding can often be cleared up by
either personal experience or even better via the experience of others.

Bruce

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.