Re: [time-nuts] New Zealand, Iceland, Haiti

2010-09-08 Thread Steve Rooke
On 8 September 2010 12:49, jimlux jim...@earthlink.net wrote:
 Kiwi Geoff wrote:

 Brooke Clarke wrote:

 When you look at the time difference between the recent events on a
 geologic
 scale you could say they all happened at the same time.

 Hi Brooke, I'm writing from my home in Christchurch, New Zealand.

 Local Time of the event  is an important variable.

 Last Saturday we had a 7.1 Richter magnitude event here, which was
 higher than that of Haiti (where there were 230,000 deaths). We had no
 loss of life in Christchurch mainly because it happened at 4:35 am
 local time, and because of our building code, as per:

 http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/4096880/Why-we-re-not-Haiti

 We are still experiencing magnitude 5 aftershocks here as I speak, and
 for those who like graphs, here is a live feed of the seismograph from
 Christchurch.

 http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/drums/mqz-drum.html

 I now know my home can withstand a magnitude 7.1 earthquake, but it is
 a test that many houses in Christchurch have failed.


 What you really want to know is the surface motion *at your house* during
 the quake.

 The Northridge earthquake (6.7) was striking because of the radical
 difference in damage from houses that were close together.  Subsurface
 geology had a big effect. I'm about 15 km from the epicenter, and we had
 essentially no damage or even permanent effects (although it certainly woke
 us all up).  A friend who also lives 15 km away, but in a different
 direction, lost all their dishes and glassware when they were launched
 across the room ( as were he and his girlfriend).  The difference was that I
 had a strong motion of less than 0.1 g and he had 1 g.. peak surface
 acceleration (1.7g) was some 7km from the epicenter.

 For the most part, the damage level was continuous (e.g. adjacent houses
 were damaged about the same amount) but there were some striking anomalies
 that could not be explained by construction technique, etc. It's theorized
 that there were reflections and refractions in the subsurface structures
 that resulted in some places with peaks and nulls.

 That's aside from things like subsidence and liquefaction, which have big
 effects on damage.

One point to understand is that the original 7.1 quake was just 10km
below the surface but we have been experiencing a lot of after-shocks
that are up to 5.4 which have been closer the the surface and closer
to Christchurch as well. This morning at around 8am was a 5.1 that was
just across the other side from the harbour and just 6km deep. These
after-shocks seem to be doing more damage than the initial quake as
more and more buildings and roads are affected. Believe me, even
though it's only a 5.1, when it's that close and shallow, it feels
like a massive shake. There have been about 150 after-shocks so far
and each days max quake is well over 5. The official estimate of the
damage has now doubled to $4bn and it looks like it will take more
like years to put everything right here.

Certainly the building codes here have saved peoples lives but the
fact that we reside on a gravel bed has still rendered a lot of
building damage, even to new properties, due to the liquefaction and
uneven subsidence. But watch this space as many people fear another
big one may occur, as there are new quakes occurring which are not on
the same fault line as the initial ones. Anyone got a spare room :)

Steve

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
- Einstein

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread Pierpaolo Bernardi
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 02:16, jimlux jim...@earthlink.net wrote:
 Mark J. Blair wrote:
 On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:30 AM, jimlux wrote:

 Yes.. except that the cable's physical and electrical length *do* vary with
 temperature, so if you're looking at the gnat's eyelash sort of thing, you
 need to take that into account.  Maybe 10 ppm/degree, so a 20 meter run will
 change a bit less than a millimeter.  That's down in the fractional
 picoseconds time-wise.

 It's an issue if you're doing things like interferometry at higher
 frequencies..

Would be possible for the receiver to take into account automatically
the delay of the antenna cable, by measuring the delay of an echo of
a signal it sends towards the antenna?  Do such receivers exists?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread Bob Camp

Hi

Setups like that do exist and are fairly common. I have never seen the 
technique integrated into a GPS receiver. It's normally done with a 
secondary setup. My observation is that something like 99% of the GPSDO's 
out there never get their antenna delay set to the proper number. It's 
commonly done for surveying work, but not so much for timing. The cell phone 
guys can get away without that fine an adjustment, so they ignore it.


Bob

--
From: Pierpaolo Bernardi olopie...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 6:35 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com

Subject: Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?


On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 02:16, jimlux jim...@earthlink.net wrote:

Mark J. Blair wrote:

On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:30 AM, jimlux wrote:


Yes.. except that the cable's physical and electrical length *do* vary 
with
temperature, so if you're looking at the gnat's eyelash sort of thing, 
you
need to take that into account.  Maybe 10 ppm/degree, so a 20 meter run 
will

change a bit less than a millimeter.  That's down in the fractional
picoseconds time-wise.

It's an issue if you're doing things like interferometry at higher
frequencies..


Would be possible for the receiver to take into account automatically
the delay of the antenna cable, by measuring the delay of an echo of
a signal it sends towards the antenna?  Do such receivers exists?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-08 Thread Rob Kimberley
Got this post 5 times - you still getting aftershocks??

:-)

Rob K

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Steve Rooke
Sent: 07 September 2010 11:06 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

Burt,

On 8 September 2010 01:45, Burt I. Weiner b...@att.net wrote:
 Steve,

 Depending on the type of antenna used for your GPS, you might want to 
 check the Zenith or vertical angle, and if possible, compare that to 
 pre-quake positioning.  Your antenna may now be seeing a change in 
 multipath from some nearby environmental change (no pun intended under 
 the circumstances) that could cause a difference in reflected signals
arriving at the antenna.

With that in mind I've just changed the default 10 deg elevation mask angle
to 30 deg and will see what effects that has. Looking closely at the antenna
mounting I cannot see any change in it's angle or position but there may
have been some movement of this area as we are on an artificial bank
abutting the wetland wildfowl park. What I really need is a real GPS survey
system to determine my correct location.

 Many years ago I ran into a combined group on Mt. Wilson, our local 
 broadcast farm in the mountains, from Cal Tech and MIT that was 
 measuring the movement between Southern California mountains using 
 lazers.  While this was scientifically fascinating, it gave me the
willies.

Yes, it really brings it home that we live on just the skin of a rice
pudding. This sort of thing must be a nightmare for the ground stations in
control of the GPS system. What happens if the 0 deg meridian (used to be
the Greenwich meridian) physically moves, do they account for this I wonder.
Considering that the American continent and Europe/Africa are constantly
moving apart, and Asia and the Americas are moving closer, this must mean
that the position of basically most places on the Earth are constantly
changing anyway. Makes you feel like saying, where am I today.

73,
Steve ZL3TUV

 Burt, K6OQK


 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:08:31 +1200
 From: Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Freestanding mast


 Well, Steve has been experiencing a LOT of after-shocks, some of 
 which are still big enough to move things around and I found I had to 
 grab hold of my cup of tea to stop it shaking onto the floor last 
 night. In fact these after-shocks are still opening up new cracks in 
 roads and causing buildings to fall.

 As for my height position, I have run a few surveys but I'm getting 
 varying readings and I wonder if the after-shocks are messing up the 
 survey results. The latest one which was during a fairly stable 
 period was 6.8 MSL.

 The mast could have sunk a bit or even this whole area could have 
 done as I live on reclaimed marsh-land. My Mothers 3 year old house 
 looks like it has sunk a bit at one and and risen at the other, ie. 
 it looks like it has tipped slightly as her house is built on a 
 concrete pontoon.

 It wouldn't surprise me if they adjust the height of MSL but I would 
 have thought they would have moved it the other way in an attempt to 
 forestall fears of the effects of Global Warming.

 Regards from Quake City,
 Steve

 Burt I. Weiner Associates
 Broadcast Technical Services
 Glendale, California  U.S.A.
 b...@att.net
 www.biwa.cc
 K6OQK

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
- Einstein

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread Rob Kimberley
It's usually a manual setting of antenna delay on receivers I've used, and 
based on assumed delay in the particular cable  connectors. You can tweak 
things closer if you have a good 1PPS to compare with.

Rob K

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of Pierpaolo Bernardi
Sent: 08 September 2010 11:36 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 02:16, jimlux jim...@earthlink.net wrote:
 Mark J. Blair wrote:
 On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:30 AM, jimlux wrote:

 Yes.. except that the cable's physical and electrical length *do* vary 
 with temperature, so if you're looking at the gnat's eyelash sort of 
 thing, you need to take that into account.  Maybe 10 ppm/degree, so a 
 20 meter run will change a bit less than a millimeter.  That's down in 
 the fractional picoseconds time-wise.

 It's an issue if you're doing things like interferometry at higher 
 frequencies..

Would be possible for the receiver to take into account automatically the delay 
of the antenna cable, by measuring the delay of an echo of a signal it sends 
towards the antenna?  Do such receivers exists?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Gaia Satellites time challenge

2010-09-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp

GAIA is the successor satellite to the improbably successfull
Hipparcos satellite which gave us the most precise star-catelog we
have ever had.

The most recent newsletter from the data processing consortium
has a short overview of their time-keeping challenge:  Put a Rb
at L2, synchronize (relativistically) to 1microsecond.

http://www.rssd.esa.int/SA/GAIA/docs/DPAC/web/DPAC_NL_009.pdf

Poul-Henning

PS:

Amongst many other interesting features, GAIA will sport a focal
plane covered with a half sqaremeter of CCDs, and the entire optical
bench, including mirors, is built out of SiC for thermal performance:


http://www.rssd.esa.int/index.php?project=GAIApage=picture_of_the_weekpow=119


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread jimlux

Tom Holmes wrote:

One other delay contributor  would appear to be processing delay in the
receiver, which thus begs the question of how the PPS signal is actually
synchronized to the GPS system.



The GPS nav messages is synchronized to the seconds, so it's a matter of 
making sure the output pulse is synced to the appropriate time in the 
GPS signal.  The delay in the receiver is (reasonably) constant, so the 
mfr essentially calibrates it out.


It's not done precisely like this, but conceptually, you have a 1pps on 
the spacecraft driven by a Cs clock, you receive the signal in your 
receiver (some time later than the actual change of second) and 
subtract out the light time delay from satellite to you. (or, more 
accurately, delay the signal from the receiver to the next second).


It's controlling for that light time delay that's the tricky part, 
since it varies depending on the degree of ionization of the ionosphere.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread jimlux

Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 02:16, jimlux jim...@earthlink.net wrote:

Mark J. Blair wrote:

On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:30 AM, jimlux wrote:



Yes.. except that the cable's physical and electrical length *do* vary with
temperature, so if you're looking at the gnat's eyelash sort of thing, you
need to take that into account.  Maybe 10 ppm/degree, so a 20 meter run will
change a bit less than a millimeter.  That's down in the fractional
picoseconds time-wise.

It's an issue if you're doing things like interferometry at higher
frequencies..


Would be possible for the receiver to take into account automatically
the delay of the antenna cable, by measuring the delay of an echo of
a signal it sends towards the antenna?  Do such receivers exists?



Not for GPS, to my knowledge, but in other time distribution systems, 
certainly. It's also used in antenna ranges when you need phase 
information (as in a near field range).  It's also been done over the 
air in radio telescope arrays (e.g. VLA).


At JPL, we navigate spacecraft in deep space by very accurately 
measuring the time delay of a round trip to the spacecraft from earth 
and back. These days, position uncertainties are in the cm range and 
velocity in the mm/s, implying measurements of picoseconds in a round 
trip time of 10,000 seconds.  All of this implies that the entire 
measurement chain (including the cables carrying the maser reference 
signal) are carefully characterized and controlled.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread Tom Holmes
Thanks, Jim.

I assume that neither the satellite nor the receiver knows what the
variation in the light time delay is, so it must be small enough to allow
the claimed nanosecond accuracy of the PPS edge. 

Although one sat is sufficient for time work, would using more improve the
PPS accuracy? Seems like having more inputs would help with the light delay
and other corrections, but it probably is no different than having multiple
Rb's in the lab (the guy with two is never quite sure and all that).

Mostly just curious, as my Z3801 is quite good enough for my needs. 

Tom Holmes, N8ZM
Tipp City, OH
EM79


 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of jimlux
 Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 9:42 AM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?
 
 Tom Holmes wrote:
  One other delay contributor  would appear to be processing delay in the
  receiver, which thus begs the question of how the PPS signal is actually
  synchronized to the GPS system.
 
 
 The GPS nav messages is synchronized to the seconds, so it's a matter of
 making sure the output pulse is synced to the appropriate time in the
 GPS signal.  The delay in the receiver is (reasonably) constant, so the
 mfr essentially calibrates it out.
 
 It's not done precisely like this, but conceptually, you have a 1pps on
 the spacecraft driven by a Cs clock, you receive the signal in your
 receiver (some time later than the actual change of second) and
 subtract out the light time delay from satellite to you. (or, more
 accurately, delay the signal from the receiver to the next second).
 
 It's controlling for that light time delay that's the tricky part,
 since it varies depending on the degree of ionization of the ionosphere.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] watch innards video

2010-09-08 Thread normn3ykf
Hi all!!
If you don't know a mainspring from an escapement, watch this video. 
I was wondering about the physics of the hairspring, jewel pin and 
escapement/pallete arm. 
Cool stuff.
Norm n3ykf

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] watch innards video

2010-09-08 Thread David Smith

Norm, the link was stripped out of your message. Please send it to me directly.
 
Thanks,
 
Dave W6TE
 
 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:32:52 -0400
 From: normn3...@stny.rr.com
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] watch innards video
 
 Hi all!!
 If you don't know a mainspring from an escapement, watch this video. 
 I was wondering about the physics of the hairspring, jewel pin and 
 escapement/pallete arm. 
 Cool stuff.
 Norm n3ykf
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread jimlux

Tom Holmes wrote:

Thanks, Jim.

I assume that neither the satellite nor the receiver knows what the
variation in the light time delay is, so it must be small enough to allow
the claimed nanosecond accuracy of the PPS edge. 




Well.. that's the difference between a L1 only and a L1/L2 receiver.  If 
you measure the same signal at two different frequencies, you can use 
that to estimate the total electron content (TEC) of the path, which in 
turn can be turned into a delay correction.


The uncertainties are on the order of meters/few ns, so keeping the 1pps 
to within 10ns is doable with a L1 receiver.






Although one sat is sufficient for time work, would using more improve the
PPS accuracy? Seems like having more inputs would help with the light delay
and other corrections, but it probably is no different than having multiple
Rb's in the lab (the guy with two is never quite sure and all that).



One sat works *if* you know where it and you are.  In practice, though, 
you look at multiple satellites and solve for position and time offset 
simultaneously.  The secret sauce in GPS receivers that distinguishes 
one from another is:
1) acquisition  (how long does it take to find the signal and start 
tracking)

2) how do you best form the estimate of position and clock offset.

Typically it's done with some form of Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) so 
you also wind up with estimates of the covariance matrix.  Whether or 
not that gets shoved out to the user is another matter.


the timing receivers separate the where am I and the what time is it 
questions.. you do a survey mode to get a precise position, then lock 
that down, and go to timing only mode, essentially averaging the time 
info from multiple satellites (not true averaging, almost always a 
weighted average)


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New Zealand, Iceland, Haiti

2010-09-08 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi Steve:

The Ricter scale was developed based on pendulum seismometers and that 
the P wave arrives first then the S.  The time delay between the P 
and S wave gives the distance to the epicenter (time nuts connection). 
The magnitude of the S wave (adjusted for the distance) gives a Ricter 
magnitude.  But this system does not relate to the energy contained in 
the quake.

http://www.prc68.com/I/Seismometer.shtml

At the time of the Loma Prieta quake I was standing in front of the 
company where I worked and watched the windows oil can with the 
magnitude of the in-out motion increasing with each cycle.  If the quake 
had lasted a few seconds longer they would have exploded, either sending 
glass into or out of the building.  We were all starting to lay flat on 
the ground in case the glass was coming out. Then the quake ended.


The subject locations are all on or adjacent to the Pacific plate as is 
California.


Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


Steve Rooke wrote:

On 8 September 2010 12:49, jimluxjim...@earthlink.net  wrote:
   

Kiwi Geoff wrote:
 

Brooke Clarke wrote:
   

When you look at the time difference between the recent events on a
geologic
scale you could say they all happened at the same time.
 

Hi Brooke, I'm writing from my home in Christchurch, New Zealand.

Local Time of the event  is an important variable.

Last Saturday we had a 7.1 Richter magnitude event here, which was
higher than that of Haiti (where there were 230,000 deaths). We had no
loss of life in Christchurch mainly because it happened at 4:35 am
local time, and because of our building code, as per:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/4096880/Why-we-re-not-Haiti

We are still experiencing magnitude 5 aftershocks here as I speak, and
for those who like graphs, here is a live feed of the seismograph from
Christchurch.

http://www.geonet.org.nz/earthquake/drums/mqz-drum.html

I now know my home can withstand a magnitude 7.1 earthquake, but it is
a test that many houses in Christchurch have failed.

   

What you really want to know is the surface motion *at your house* during
the quake.

The Northridge earthquake (6.7) was striking because of the radical
difference in damage from houses that were close together.  Subsurface
geology had a big effect. I'm about 15 km from the epicenter, and we had
essentially no damage or even permanent effects (although it certainly woke
us all up).  A friend who also lives 15 km away, but in a different
direction, lost all their dishes and glassware when they were launched
across the room ( as were he and his girlfriend).  The difference was that I
had a strong motion of less than 0.1 g and he had1 g.. peak surface
acceleration (1.7g) was some 7km from the epicenter.

For the most part, the damage level was continuous (e.g. adjacent houses
were damaged about the same amount) but there were some striking anomalies
that could not be explained by construction technique, etc. It's theorized
that there were reflections and refractions in the subsurface structures
that resulted in some places with peaks and nulls.

That's aside from things like subsidence and liquefaction, which have big
effects on damage.
 

One point to understand is that the original 7.1 quake was just 10km
below the surface but we have been experiencing a lot of after-shocks
that are up to 5.4 which have been closer the the surface and closer
to Christchurch as well. This morning at around 8am was a 5.1 that was
just across the other side from the harbour and just 6km deep. These
after-shocks seem to be doing more damage than the initial quake as
more and more buildings and roads are affected. Believe me, even
though it's only a 5.1, when it's that close and shallow, it feels
like a massive shake. There have been about 150 after-shocks so far
and each days max quake is well over 5. The official estimate of the
damage has now doubled to $4bn and it looks like it will take more
like years to put everything right here.

Certainly the building codes here have saved peoples lives but the
fact that we reside on a gravel bed has still rendered a lot of
building damage, even to new properties, due to the liquefaction and
uneven subsidence. But watch this space as many people fear another
big one may occur, as there are new quakes occurring which are not on
the same fault line as the initial ones. Anyone got a spare room :)

Steve

   

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

 



   


--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Actually they do know a bit about the light delay. They include that data in
the information the stat's broadcast. The data is fairly coarse grained. I
posted some links a week or so back that go into all the grubby details.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Tom Holmes
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:19 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

Thanks, Jim.

I assume that neither the satellite nor the receiver knows what the
variation in the light time delay is, so it must be small enough to allow
the claimed nanosecond accuracy of the PPS edge. 

Although one sat is sufficient for time work, would using more improve the
PPS accuracy? Seems like having more inputs would help with the light delay
and other corrections, but it probably is no different than having multiple
Rb's in the lab (the guy with two is never quite sure and all that).

Mostly just curious, as my Z3801 is quite good enough for my needs. 

Tom Holmes, N8ZM
Tipp City, OH
EM79


 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of jimlux
 Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 9:42 AM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?
 
 Tom Holmes wrote:
  One other delay contributor  would appear to be processing delay in the
  receiver, which thus begs the question of how the PPS signal is actually
  synchronized to the GPS system.
 
 
 The GPS nav messages is synchronized to the seconds, so it's a matter of
 making sure the output pulse is synced to the appropriate time in the
 GPS signal.  The delay in the receiver is (reasonably) constant, so the
 mfr essentially calibrates it out.
 
 It's not done precisely like this, but conceptually, you have a 1pps on
 the spacecraft driven by a Cs clock, you receive the signal in your
 receiver (some time later than the actual change of second) and
 subtract out the light time delay from satellite to you. (or, more
 accurately, delay the signal from the receiver to the next second).
 
 It's controlling for that light time delay that's the tricky part,
 since it varies depending on the degree of ionization of the ionosphere.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] watch innards video

2010-09-08 Thread normn3ykf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiCPu0SjEW4

OHH!!! If I didn't find electronics so fascinating, I'd be going to 
school for an ME degree rather than an EE..

 David Smith w...@msn.com wrote: 
 
 Norm, the link was stripped out of your message. Please send it to me 
 directly.
  
 Thanks,
  
 Dave W6TE
  
  Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:32:52 -0400
  From: normn3...@stny.rr.com
  To: time-nuts@febo.com
  Subject: [time-nuts] watch innards video
  
  Hi all!!
  If you don't know a mainspring from an escapement, watch this video. 
  I was wondering about the physics of the hairspring, jewel pin and 
  escapement/pallete arm. 
  Cool stuff.
  Norm n3ykf
  
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to 
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Possibly OT: Maintenance manual for Racal 1998 and 1999 now available for download

2010-09-08 Thread David C. Partridge
I just received an email from EADS (used to be Racal Instruments):


Dear David,
The 1998/9 Maintenance Manual has now been scanned and is available for 
download from our web-site.  Please use the link below to access the downloads 
page.
 
http://www.eads-ts.com/index.php?url=Customer%20Support/Reference%20Library/index.php


Many thanks are due from all of us to the folks at EADS who made this happen.  
They know who they are!

Regards,
David Partridge



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Possibly OT: Maintenance manual for Racal 1998 and 1999 now available for download

2010-09-08 Thread Robert Atkinson
Here Here,
I also hope that any other company lurkers realise that availability of 
support old equipment for us hobbyists can impact their current business. When 
looking at new equipment for the day job the availabilty of support for older 
products does have an effect on supplier choice. This ranges from the good who 
actively provide data and manuals through those who don't care down to the 
worst who actively suppress distribution of manuals. 
Well Done EADS (and David)
 
Robert G8RPI.

--- On Wed, 8/9/10, David C. Partridge david.partri...@perdrix.co.uk wrote:


From: David C. Partridge david.partri...@perdrix.co.uk
Subject: [time-nuts] Possibly OT: Maintenance manual for Racal 1998 and 1999 
now available for download
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' 
time-nuts@febo.com, teksco...@yahoogroups.com, tekscop...@yahoogroups.com, 
hp_agilent_equipm...@yahoogroups.com, manual_excha...@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, 8 September, 2010, 16:57


I just received an email from EADS (used to be Racal Instruments):


Dear David,
The 1998/9 Maintenance Manual has now been scanned and is available for 
download from our web-site.  Please use the link below to access the downloads 
page.

http://www.eads-ts.com/index.php?url=Customer%20Support/Reference%20Library/index.php


Many thanks are due from all of us to the folks at EADS who made this happen.  
They know who they are!

Regards,
David Partridge



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



  
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New Zealand, Iceland, Haiti

2010-09-08 Thread jimlux

Brooke Clarke wrote:

Hi Steve:

The Ricter scale was developed based on pendulum seismometers and that 
the P wave arrives first then the S.  The time delay between the P 
and S wave gives the distance to the epicenter (time nuts connection). 
The magnitude of the S wave (adjusted for the distance) gives a Ricter 
magnitude.  But this system does not relate to the energy contained in 
the quake.



That's why they use moment magnitude these days, rather than straight 
Richter (which after all is the log of the deflection reported on a 
particular kind of seismograph).




http://www.prc68.com/I/Seismometer.shtml

At the time of the Loma Prieta quake I was standing in front of the 
company where I worked and watched the windows oil can with the 
magnitude of the in-out motion increasing with each cycle.  If the quake 
had lasted a few seconds longer they would have exploded, either sending 
glass into or out of the building.  We were all starting to lay flat on 
the ground in case the glass was coming out. Then the quake ended.


The subject locations are all on or adjacent to the Pacific plate as is 
California.


Most of California is on the North American Plate. The San Andreas fault 
is roughly the dividing line.  Los Angeles is on the Pacific Plate. 
Half of San Francisco is on each side(!).. Berkeley, Oakland, etc, are 
all on the NA plate.






___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

2010-09-08 Thread Steve Rooke
On 9 September 2010 00:51, Rob Kimberley r...@timing-consultants.com wrote:
 Got this post 5 times - you still getting aftershocks??

That must be level 5 on the posting scale:)

Don't know why you got 5 copies of it as I had no problem sending it
but my apologies to all if you've received multiple copies of this.

And yes, we are still receiving after-shocks but they seem to have
quietened down in the last 24 hours.

Steve

 :-)

 Rob K

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Steve Rooke
 Sent: 07 September 2010 11:06 PM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Steve's new QTH...

 Burt,

 On 8 September 2010 01:45, Burt I. Weiner b...@att.net wrote:
 Steve,

 Depending on the type of antenna used for your GPS, you might want to
 check the Zenith or vertical angle, and if possible, compare that to
 pre-quake positioning.  Your antenna may now be seeing a change in
 multipath from some nearby environmental change (no pun intended under
 the circumstances) that could cause a difference in reflected signals
 arriving at the antenna.

 With that in mind I've just changed the default 10 deg elevation mask angle
 to 30 deg and will see what effects that has. Looking closely at the antenna
 mounting I cannot see any change in it's angle or position but there may
 have been some movement of this area as we are on an artificial bank
 abutting the wetland wildfowl park. What I really need is a real GPS survey
 system to determine my correct location.

 Many years ago I ran into a combined group on Mt. Wilson, our local
 broadcast farm in the mountains, from Cal Tech and MIT that was
 measuring the movement between Southern California mountains using
 lazers.  While this was scientifically fascinating, it gave me the
 willies.

 Yes, it really brings it home that we live on just the skin of a rice
 pudding. This sort of thing must be a nightmare for the ground stations in
 control of the GPS system. What happens if the 0 deg meridian (used to be
 the Greenwich meridian) physically moves, do they account for this I wonder.
 Considering that the American continent and Europe/Africa are constantly
 moving apart, and Asia and the Americas are moving closer, this must mean
 that the position of basically most places on the Earth are constantly
 changing anyway. Makes you feel like saying, where am I today.

 73,
 Steve ZL3TUV

 Burt, K6OQK


 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:08:31 +1200
 From: Steve Rooke sar10...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Freestanding mast


 Well, Steve has been experiencing a LOT of after-shocks, some of
 which are still big enough to move things around and I found I had to
 grab hold of my cup of tea to stop it shaking onto the floor last
 night. In fact these after-shocks are still opening up new cracks in
 roads and causing buildings to fall.

 As for my height position, I have run a few surveys but I'm getting
 varying readings and I wonder if the after-shocks are messing up the
 survey results. The latest one which was during a fairly stable
 period was 6.8 MSL.

 The mast could have sunk a bit or even this whole area could have
 done as I live on reclaimed marsh-land. My Mothers 3 year old house
 looks like it has sunk a bit at one and and risen at the other, ie.
 it looks like it has tipped slightly as her house is built on a
 concrete pontoon.

 It wouldn't surprise me if they adjust the height of MSL but I would
 have thought they would have moved it the other way in an attempt to
 forestall fears of the effects of Global Warming.

 Regards from Quake City,
 Steve

 Burt I. Weiner Associates
 Broadcast Technical Services
 Glendale, California  U.S.A.
 b...@att.net
 www.biwa.cc
 K6OQK

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 --
 Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
 The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
 - Einstein

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
- Einstein

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] watch innards video

2010-09-08 Thread jimlux

normn3...@stny.rr.com wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiCPu0SjEW4

OHH!!! If I didn't find electronics so fascinating, I'd be going to 
school for an ME degree rather than an EE..




Even cooler is building the large models.  At my former work, we used to 
do a bit of this for museum displays and the like.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Small DMTD project parts

2010-09-08 Thread Stanley Reynolds
I not able to organize a parts order but did notice a break in price on the 
transformers at mini-circuits at quantity 10, went from  $9.95 to $2.29 this 
maybe a mistake, as this is the only part that had such a break.

Stanley

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] watch innards video

2010-09-08 Thread Flemming Larsen
When I was a kid, I loved to watch the pendulum swing back and forth and listen 
to
the tick-tock of my grandparents old wall clock. When I was about five, I 
completely
disassembled my parent's mantle clock. It wasn't until many years later that I 
learned
to put them back together and learn about what makes them work.
 
For an interesting document about clock and watch escapements, check this out:
 
   http://www.angelfire.com/ut/horology/EscMechanics.pdf
 
For endless hours of entertainment, watch the animated drawings on this website:
 
  http://www.angelfire.com/ut/horology/escapement.html
 
-- FL


--- Den ons 8/9/10 skrev normn3...@stny.rr.com normn3...@stny.rr.com:


Fra: normn3...@stny.rr.com normn3...@stny.rr.com
Emne: Re: [time-nuts] watch innards video
Til: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Dato: onsdag 8. september 2010 08.45


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiCPu0SjEW4

OHH!!! If I didn't find electronics so fascinating, I'd be going to 
school for an ME degree rather than an EE..

 David Smith w...@msn.com wrote: 
 
 Norm, the link was stripped out of your message. Please send it to me 
 directly.
  
 Thanks,
  
 Dave W6TE
  
  Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:32:52 -0400
  From: normn3...@stny.rr.com
  To: time-nuts@febo.com
  Subject: [time-nuts] watch innards video
  
  Hi all!!
  If you don't know a mainspring from an escapement, watch this video. 
  I was wondering about the physics of the hairspring, jewel pin and 
  escapement/pallete arm. 
  Cool stuff.
  Norm n3ykf
  
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to 
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
                
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Possibly OT: Maintenance manual for Racal 1998 and 1999 now available for download

2010-09-08 Thread paul swed
Boy do I agree with your comments.
I know it effects my thinking and spending

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Robert Atkinson robert8...@yahoo.co.ukwrote:

 Here Here,
 I also hope that any other company lurkers realise that availability of
 support old equipment for us hobbyists can impact their current business.
 When looking at new equipment for the day job the availabilty of support
 for older products does have an effect on supplier choice. This ranges from
 the good who actively provide data and manuals through those who don't care
 down to the worst who actively suppress distribution of manuals.
 Well Done EADS (and David)

 Robert G8RPI.

 --- On Wed, 8/9/10, David C. Partridge david.partri...@perdrix.co.uk
 wrote:


 From: David C. Partridge david.partri...@perdrix.co.uk
 Subject: [time-nuts] Possibly OT: Maintenance manual for Racal 1998 and
 1999 now available for download
 To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' 
 time-nuts@febo.com, teksco...@yahoogroups.com, tekscop...@yahoogroups.com,
 hp_agilent_equipm...@yahoogroups.com, manual_excha...@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wednesday, 8 September, 2010, 16:57


 I just received an email from EADS (used to be Racal Instruments):

 
 Dear David,
 The 1998/9 Maintenance Manual has now been scanned and is available for
 download from our web-site.  Please use the link below to access the
 downloads page.

 
 http://www.eads-ts.com/index.php?url=Customer%20Support/Reference%20Library/index.php
 
 

 Many thanks are due from all of us to the folks at EADS who made this
 happen.  They know who they are!

 Regards,
 David Partridge



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 09/08/2010 04:51 PM, jimlux wrote:

Tom Holmes wrote:

Thanks, Jim.

I assume that neither the satellite nor the receiver knows what the
variation in the light time delay is, so it must be small enough to allow
the claimed nanosecond accuracy of the PPS edge.



Well.. that's the difference between a L1 only and a L1/L2 receiver. If
you measure the same signal at two different frequencies, you can use
that to estimate the total electron content (TEC) of the path, which in
turn can be turned into a delay correction.

The uncertainties are on the order of meters/few ns, so keeping the 1pps
to within 10ns is doable with a L1 receiver.





Although one sat is sufficient for time work, would using more improve
the
PPS accuracy? Seems like having more inputs would help with the light
delay
and other corrections, but it probably is no different than having
multiple
Rb's in the lab (the guy with two is never quite sure and all that).



One sat works *if* you know where it and you are. In practice, though,
you look at multiple satellites and solve for position and time offset
simultaneously. The secret sauce in GPS receivers that distinguishes
one from another is:
1) acquisition (how long does it take to find the signal and start
tracking)
2) how do you best form the estimate of position and clock offset.

Typically it's done with some form of Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) so
you also wind up with estimates of the covariance matrix. Whether or not
that gets shoved out to the user is another matter.

the timing receivers separate the where am I and the what time is it
questions.. you do a survey mode to get a precise position, then lock
that down, and go to timing only mode, essentially averaging the time
info from multiple satellites (not true averaging, almost always a
weighted average)


Missing is the RAIM and in timing context the T-RAIM.

RAIM helps to drop false-tickers from the solution and this process is 
done dynamically for every solution. It is fairly straightforward.


The remaining sources forms an average after the RAIM.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What position is measured?

2010-09-08 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 09/08/2010 05:34 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

Actually they do know a bit about the light delay. They include that data in
the information the stat's broadcast. The data is fairly coarse grained. I
posted some links a week or so back that go into all the grubby details.


Coarse grain is certainly a good way of saying it. The ionosphere 
corrections are based on a simplification and then fitting data to the 
model curve. The way to improve on this is to use DGPS sources such as 
WAAS/EGNOS, which should be good enough for most timing purposes of the 
hobbyist.


Estimating ionospheric delay using dual frequency beats that. Still 
leaves tropospheric delays thought. Reference network helps for that.


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] OT: Christchurch NZ Quake Map

2010-09-08 Thread Steve Rooke
Sorry this is a bit OT but various people have shown interest in what
is happening over here so you might like to look at this animated map
showing the progress of the quakes in chronological order. This was
designed and produced by Paul Nicholls of the University of
Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

http://www.christchurchquakemap.co.nz/

Steve
-- 
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV  G8KVD
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once.
- Einstein

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Possibly OT: Maintenance manual for Racal 1998 and 1999 now available for download

2010-09-08 Thread EB4APL

David,

Thank you very much for your efforts.  And BTW, any PTS 040 manual around?

Best regards
Ignacio, EB4APL

David C. Partridge wrote:

I just received an email from EADS (used to be Racal Instruments):


Dear David,
The 1998/9 Maintenance Manual has now been scanned and is available for 
download from our web-site.  Please use the link below to access the downloads 
page.
 
http://www.eads-ts.com/index.php?url=Customer%20Support/Reference%20Library/index.php



Many thanks are due from all of us to the folks at EADS who made this happen.  
They know who they are!

Regards,
David Partridge



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

  


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.