Re: [time-nuts] help with initial setup for Motorola M12+T GPS? is my board dead?

2011-03-05 Thread Stijn
Looking at your pictures on Picasa, I can see that the backup battery is 
mounted upside down.

I would at least turn this over and check again.

Stijn

Op 05-03-11 08:54, John Beale schreef:

I just received my first real piece of time hardware, a M12+T timing
GPS. At least, that's what it's supposed to be, it doesn't actually have
any label saying so. I got it online from this seller:

http://www.ioffer.com/i/Motorola-ONCORE-M12+T-timing-gps-receiver-1pps-100hz-105387652


The board I received looks like this:
https://picasaweb.google.com/bealevideo/GPS#5580118907079326290

I got the 2x5 0.05 connector, built a 3.0V power supply, and hooked up
the serial lines to a FTDI USB-to-serial (3.3V logic level) board, and
am trying to talk Motorola Binary at 9600 baud to it using WinOncore12.
I tried the setup receiver wizard, the GPS self-test, and uploading
an almanac. My scope shows the serial data from the PC going into the
board, but no signals ever come out. The TX line out of the board just
sits quietly at +3V. Is there anything obvious I should be trying?
Thanks for any help!

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] help with initial setup for Motorola M12+T GPS? is my board dead?

2011-03-05 Thread John Beale

On 3/4/2011 11:54 PM, John Beale wrote:
 The TX line out of the board just sits

quietly at +3V. Is there anything obvious I should be trying?


Er.. nevermind. It seems that swapping TX and RX helped. Sigh.
---

COPYRIGHT 1991-2000 MOTOROLA INC.
SFTW P/N # 61-G10002A
SOFTWARE VER # 1
SOFTWARE REV # 3
SOFTWARE DATE  Mar 13 2000
MODEL #P183T12N12
HWDR P/N # 1
SERIAL #   P0171Z
MANUFACTUR DATE 1J12

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread Don Latham
Hello all:
I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator circuit
built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and there is a
small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would rather
simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal oscillator with an
external reference signal of the right frequency.
Anyone out there tried this?
Thanks
Don



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread lists
A crystal is a high Q circuit. You can't pull them much. I think your first 
idea about yanking the crystal and just driving the pin is a better idea.

If the part has a shutdown feature, it would pay to determine the state of the 
crystal input pins when in the shutdown mode. 

 
-Original Message-
From: Don Latham d...@montana.com
Sender: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 02:06:18 
To: time nutstime-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

Hello all:
I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator circuit
built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and there is a
small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would rather
simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal oscillator with an
external reference signal of the right frequency.
Anyone out there tried this?
Thanks
Don



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread J. Forster
Capacitively couple a Varactor (or back biased diode) to the circuit and
vary the diode bias to tune.

-John




 Hello all:
 I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
 circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator circuit
 built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and there is a
 small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
 The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
 I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
 non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would rather
 simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal oscillator with an
 external reference signal of the right frequency.
 Anyone out there tried this?
 Thanks
 Don



 --
 Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
 as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
 R. Bacon
 If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
 Ghost in the Shell


 Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
 Six Mile Systems LLP
 17850 Six Mile Road
 POB 134
 Huson, MT, 59846
 VOX 406-626-4304
 www.lightningforensics.com
 www.sixmilesystems.com


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread paul swed
I might ask the question how much pulling are you looking to do???
Regards

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:09 AM, J. Forster j...@quik.com wrote:

 Capacitively couple a Varactor (or back biased diode) to the circuit and
 vary the diode bias to tune.

 -John

 


  Hello all:
  I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
  circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator circuit
  built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and there is a
  small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
  The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
  I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
  non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would rather
  simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal oscillator with an
  external reference signal of the right frequency.
  Anyone out there tried this?
  Thanks
  Don
 
 
 
  --
  Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
  as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
  R. Bacon
  If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
  Ghost in the Shell
 
 
  Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
  Six Mile Systems LLP
  17850 Six Mile Road
  POB 134
  Huson, MT, 59846
  VOX 406-626-4304
  www.lightningforensics.com
  www.sixmilesystems.com
 
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 



 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread Rick Karlquist


paul swed wrote:
 I might ask the question how much pulling are you looking to do???
 Regards


Yes, your request is meaningless without this number.

Having said that, you have 2 strikes against you.  Trying
to pull an oscillator that wasn't designed to be pulled
is a problem.  Secondly, the circuit you described works
in so called parallel resonant mode.  For optimum pullability,
you want series resonant mode.  Do yourself a favor, now
that inexpensive VCXO's are available, patch in one of those.

Rick Karlquist N6RK


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread Adrian

Don,

if you have a reference oscillator of the right frequency, what's the 
the purpose of trying to pull a CMOS oscillator to the same frequency, 
rather than just using the reference frequency?

Please be more specific on whant your requirements are.

Adrian

Don Latham schrieb:

Hello all:
I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator circuit
built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and there is a
small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would rather
simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal oscillator with an
external reference signal of the right frequency.
Anyone out there tried this?
Thanks
Don



   



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread Said Jackson
Hi Don,

I wrote a design idea about designing that circuit in EDN in 2003.

Search google for Jackson Vcxo

Not that hard to do if you can add a number of passive components to your pcb.

Bye,
Said

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 5, 2011, at 1:06, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote:

 Hello all:
 I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
 circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator circuit
 built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and there is a
 small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
 The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
 I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
 non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would rather
 simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal oscillator with an
 external reference signal of the right frequency.
 Anyone out there tried this?
 Thanks
 Don
 
 
 
 -- 
 Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
 as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
 R. Bacon
 If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
 Ghost in the Shell
 
 
 Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
 Six Mile Systems LLP
 17850 Six Mile Road
 POB 134
 Huson, MT, 59846
 VOX 406-626-4304
 www.lightningforensics.com
 www.sixmilesystems.com
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread Don Latham
The crystal oscillators are reference oscillators in 2 meter ham radios. I
wanted to make the least perturbation in the radio, hence pulling instead
of simply introducing the correct reference. I will be using a reference
of the nominal frequency the radio should have, so really should not need
to pull more than a few ppm if that? also not woried about the phase
noise, either. Will derive the driving signal from my gps 10 mhz or from
one of my FEI Rb devices. I need the accurate frequencies, or at least I
think I do, because the 2 meter radio will drive a transverter to 2.4 GHz
moonbounce.
Sorry about not knowing how far I need to pull, or the specs of what's
there. I suspect there has been some drift since the radio was made.
Putting in a vcxo or varactor simply puts off the problem, as then I have
to monitor that frequency and control it. I could cobble in a little
tuning cap, but still would be left with a pretty temp sensitive
reference.
Hope the question is clearer, and thanks to all who replied!
Don

Adrian
 Don,

 if you have a reference oscillator of the right frequency, what's the
 the purpose of trying to pull a CMOS oscillator to the same frequency,
 rather than just using the reference frequency?
 Please be more specific on whant your requirements are.

 Adrian

 Don Latham schrieb:
 Hello all:
 I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
 circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator circuit
 built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and there is a
 small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
 The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
 I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
 non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would rather
 simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal oscillator with
 an
 external reference signal of the right frequency.
 Anyone out there tried this?
 Thanks
 Don






 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread Rix Seacord

Don
If you search the web, someone used inductive coupling to the inductor 
in the oscillator ckt of a 706. I don't recall if it had the high 
precision osc in it. they were using the rig for satellite work.

good luck

Rix Seacord K2AVP
eseac...@verizon.net

845-628-0892
914-262-9186


On 3/5/2011 2:52 PM, Don Latham wrote:

The crystal oscillators are reference oscillators in 2 meter ham radios. I
wanted to make the least perturbation in the radio, hence pulling instead
of simply introducing the correct reference. I will be using a reference
of the nominal frequency the radio should have, so really should not need
to pull more than a few ppm if that? also not woried about the phase
noise, either. Will derive the driving signal from my gps 10 mhz or from
one of my FEI Rb devices. I need the accurate frequencies, or at least I
think I do, because the 2 meter radio will drive a transverter to 2.4 GHz
moonbounce.
Sorry about not knowing how far I need to pull, or the specs of what's
there. I suspect there has been some drift since the radio was made.
Putting in a vcxo or varactor simply puts off the problem, as then I have
to monitorthat  frequency and control it. I could cobble in a little
tuning cap, but still would be left with a pretty temp sensitive
reference.
Hope the question is clearer, and thanks to all who replied!
Don

Adrian

Don,

if you have a reference oscillator of the right frequency, what's the
the purpose of trying to pull a CMOS oscillator to the same frequency,
rather than just using the reference frequency?
Please be more specific on whant your requirements are.

Adrian

Don Latham schrieb:

Hello all:
I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator circuit
built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and there is a
small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would rather
simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal oscillator with
an
external reference signal of the right frequency.
Anyone out there tried this?
Thanks
Don






___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] difference between Oncore M12 and M12+T (useful when buying online)

2011-03-05 Thread John Beale
In case anyone else is shopping online for a used Motorola Oncore M12+T 
timing GPS, it's probably useful to know what I just learned:


Some online sellers offering M12+T 100 pps GPS may instead send you a M12 
Navigation (non-timing) GPS. The differences:


Motorola Oncore M12 Navigation GPS:
---
* Supports Motorola Binary and NMEA output
* does not have 100 Hz output
* does not have TRAIM (Timing Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitor)
* does not have sawtooth correction output
* 1 PPS 500 ns timing

crystal nearest MMCX antenna connector is two-lead can style with bent 
leads for surface mounting

example p/n label: P183T12N12   (final N = Navigation?)

photos:
http://www.wa5rrn.com/GPS%20Other/Motorola%20M12/m12.pdf
https://picasaweb.google.com/bealevideo/GPS#5580118907079326290

Motorola Oncore M12+T Timing GPS:
---
* Supports Motorola Binary output only
* 1 Hz or 100 Hz output selectable
* TRAIM (Timing Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitor)
* sawtooth correction (clock granularity) message available
* 1 pps 2nS 1 Sigma, 6nS 6 Sigma (using sawtooth correction message)
* 1 pps 10nS 1 Sigma, 20nS 6 Sigma (without correction)

smaller leadless surface-mount crystals
example p/n label: P283T12T17(final T = Timing?)

photos:
http://www.wa5rrn.com/GPS%20Other/Motorola%20M12/m12plusbrochure.pdf
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?VISuperSizeitem=290308535362

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Arduino Thunderbolt GPS

2011-03-05 Thread James Fournier
Thanks Didier, lots of useful information on there!

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Didier Juges shali...@gmail.com wrote:

 James,

 The data stream is not that difficult to decode. You can look at the source
 code for my GPSMonitor project:

 http://www.ko4bb.com/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=precision_timing:gps_monitor

 Didier KO4BB

 On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:37 PM, James Fournier ja...@jfits.ca wrote:

  Hello All, Has any one managed to use an Arduino to read the RS232 output
  of
  a Trimble Thunderbolt? If so what libraries did you use?
 
  --
  Best Regards,
 
  James
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Best Regards,

James
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] difference between Oncore M12 and M12+T (useful when buying online)

2011-03-05 Thread paul swed
Indeed its not easy to tell whats, what either until you paid for it.
I purchased from Fluke.I and my modules is a M12 +. But who knows maybe I
was just lucky.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, John Beale be...@bealecorner.com wrote:

 In case anyone else is shopping online for a used Motorola Oncore M12+T
 timing GPS, it's probably useful to know what I just learned:

 Some online sellers offering M12+T 100 pps GPS may instead send you a M12
 Navigation (non-timing) GPS. The differences:

 Motorola Oncore M12 Navigation GPS:
 ---
 * Supports Motorola Binary and NMEA output
 * does not have 100 Hz output
 * does not have TRAIM (Timing Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitor)
 * does not have sawtooth correction output
 * 1 PPS 500 ns timing

 crystal nearest MMCX antenna connector is two-lead can style with bent
 leads for surface mounting
 example p/n label: P183T12N12   (final N = Navigation?)

 photos:
 http://www.wa5rrn.com/GPS%20Other/Motorola%20M12/m12.pdf
 https://picasaweb.google.com/bealevideo/GPS#5580118907079326290

 Motorola Oncore M12+T Timing GPS:
 ---
 * Supports Motorola Binary output only
 * 1 Hz or 100 Hz output selectable
 * TRAIM (Timing Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitor)
 * sawtooth correction (clock granularity) message available
 * 1 pps 2nS 1 Sigma, 6nS 6 Sigma (using sawtooth correction message)
 * 1 pps 10nS 1 Sigma, 20nS 6 Sigma (without correction)

 smaller leadless surface-mount crystals
 example p/n label: P283T12T17(final T = Timing?)

 photos:
 http://www.wa5rrn.com/GPS%20Other/Motorola%20M12/m12plusbrochure.pdf
 http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?VISuperSizeitem=290308535362

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] difference between Oncore M12 and M12+T (useful when buying o...

2011-03-05 Thread GandalfG8
 
In a message dated 05/03/2011 22:16:39 GMT Standard Time,  
be...@bealecorner.com writes:

In case  anyone else is shopping online for a used Motorola Oncore M12+T 
timing  GPS, it's probably useful to know what I just learned:

Some online  sellers offering M12+T 100 pps GPS may instead send you a 
M12 
Navigation  (non-timing) GPS. The differences:




Hi John
 
I'm sorry to hear you came unstuck with your purchase, as Paul commented  
it's difficult to know what you're getting at times when buying online,  
especially from China, but Bob (fluke.l) is well known here and one of the  
more 
dependable suppliers.
Amongst other things, I've bought two M12+ modules from him, similar  
auction to the one you provided a link for, and both were timing versions as  
expected.
 
A further word of warning though, there are also two versions of the M12+,  
one for positioning and one for timing, and the M12+ brochure you've linked 
 to at
 
_http://www.wa5rrn.com/GPS%20Other/Motorola%20M12/m12plusbrochure.pdf_ 
(http://www.wa5rrn.com/GPS%20Other/Motorola%20M12/m12plusbrochure.pdf) 
 
has the spec for the positioning version, note that the timing  accuracy is 
indicated as less than 500nS as you mentioned for the  M12M.
 
There's a data pack available of assorted M12 and M12+ files, I've added  
the M12+ manual to that which includes specs for both positioning and timing  
versions, and will email it direct after sending this.
It's just under 7MB so should be ok for most ISPs but if it doesn't arrive, 
 or if there's any problems, let me know and I'll try again.
 
regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] difference between Oncore M12 and M12+T (useful when buying o...

2011-03-05 Thread GandalfG8
Just for reference, these are the variant numbers I have for the  M12+...
 
Timer --No Battery - P273T12T1x

Timer - With Battery -- P283T12T1x

Navigation -- No Battery - P273T12N1x

Navigation -- With Battery -- P283T12N1x
 
regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] oscillator pulling.

2011-03-05 Thread Don Latham
Ok,OK already. all i had to do was have a look at:
http://www.ko4bb.com/~bruce/InjectionLocking.html
our old friend k04bb.
doh!
Thanks all.
Don



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread Stan Searing
The on chip inverter is usually pretty weak and often designed to
have a high impedance output.  When intended as a transconductance
amp, the output mostly looks like a current source (hence the
high impedance).  Some oscillators use a resistor outside the IC in
series with the inverter output to help control maximum crystal
drive level, reduce chances of overtone oscillation, or in hopes
of improving the overall Q.

If the series resistor is present, there are three places you can
inject your signal: at the inverter output, between the resistor
and crystal and at the inverter input.

With a weak on-chip inverter, you can overdrive the inverter output
over a large frequency range.  Phase noise could be an issue,
but was not a problem with my application when I've used this method.
Be careful not to exceed the voltage range of the chip.

If you stay close to the crystal resonate frequency, injecting
the pulling signal in between the series resistor and crystal
can be similar to injecting at the inverter input.  But it's not
a good place to inject the signal as you get further from the
frequency the loaded crystal wants to sing at.

Injecting at the input of the inverter has worked OK for me.
The further you go off frequency, the larger signal you need.
If you want to drive a ways off, the load capacitor and the
crystal shunt capacitance in series with the other load capacitor
just become a capacitive load.

If the resistor is not present outside the IC, then the first
two cases become the same.  You may be able to overdrive the
inverter output, but have to also consider the load of the
crystal and crystal load caps.

If you stay close enough in frequency that the crystal is singing
along with your source, than I'd guess the phase noise should be on the
order of the un-pulled oscillator or the pulling source (whichever is
worse).
(And in the cases where I pulled way off [20 %], the crystal went
pretty quiet and I didn't notice any phase noise [although I wasn't
really looking for phase noise].)

Good luck,
Stan



-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Don Latham
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 11:52 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

The crystal oscillators are reference oscillators in 2 meter ham radios. I
wanted to make the least perturbation in the radio, hence pulling instead of
simply introducing the correct reference. I will be using a reference of the
nominal frequency the radio should have, so really should not need to pull
more than a few ppm if that? also not woried about the phase noise, either.
Will derive the driving signal from my gps 10 mhz or from one of my FEI Rb
devices. I need the accurate frequencies, or at least I think I do, because
the 2 meter radio will drive a transverter to 2.4 GHz moonbounce.
Sorry about not knowing how far I need to pull, or the specs of what's
there. I suspect there has been some drift since the radio was made.
Putting in a vcxo or varactor simply puts off the problem, as then I have to
monitor that frequency and control it. I could cobble in a little tuning
cap, but still would be left with a pretty temp sensitive reference.
Hope the question is clearer, and thanks to all who replied!
Don

Adrian
 Don,

 if you have a reference oscillator of the right frequency, what's the 
 the purpose of trying to pull a CMOS oscillator to the same frequency, 
 rather than just using the reference frequency?
 Please be more specific on whant your requirements are.

 Adrian

 Don Latham schrieb:
 Hello all:
 I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll 
 circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator 
 circuit built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and 
 there is a small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
 The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
 I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the 
 non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would 
 rather simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal 
 oscillator with an external reference signal of the right frequency.
 Anyone out there tried this?
 Thanks
 Don






 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread Don Latham
Thanks Stan. I think I'll try it. I thought I'd seen something before,
indeed there was a flurry of injection locking on time-nuts just last
month. I simply forgot the right terminology!
The R is built into the chip in both radios. The Icom 260A has a 5.12 MHz
xtal and does have a trim cap. The Yaesu 290L has a 5.76 MHz reference,
and no trim cap. I'll try the Icom first, I think. It'll take a while...
Don

Stan Searing
 The on chip inverter is usually pretty weak and often designed to
 have a high impedance output.  When intended as a transconductance
 amp, the output mostly looks like a current source (hence the
 high impedance).  Some oscillators use a resistor outside the IC in
 series with the inverter output to help control maximum crystal
 drive level, reduce chances of overtone oscillation, or in hopes
 of improving the overall Q.

 If the series resistor is present, there are three places you can
 inject your signal: at the inverter output, between the resistor
 and crystal and at the inverter input.

 With a weak on-chip inverter, you can overdrive the inverter output
 over a large frequency range.  Phase noise could be an issue,
 but was not a problem with my application when I've used this method.
 Be careful not to exceed the voltage range of the chip.

 If you stay close to the crystal resonate frequency, injecting
 the pulling signal in between the series resistor and crystal
 can be similar to injecting at the inverter input.  But it's not
 a good place to inject the signal as you get further from the
 frequency the loaded crystal wants to sing at.

 Injecting at the input of the inverter has worked OK for me.
 The further you go off frequency, the larger signal you need.
 If you want to drive a ways off, the load capacitor and the
 crystal shunt capacitance in series with the other load capacitor
 just become a capacitive load.

 If the resistor is not present outside the IC, then the first
 two cases become the same.  You may be able to overdrive the
 inverter output, but have to also consider the load of the
 crystal and crystal load caps.

 If you stay close enough in frequency that the crystal is singing
 along with your source, than I'd guess the phase noise should be on the
 order of the un-pulled oscillator or the pulling source (whichever is
 worse).
 (And in the cases where I pulled way off [20 %], the crystal went
 pretty quiet and I didn't notice any phase noise [although I wasn't
 really looking for phase noise].)

 Good luck,
 Stan



 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Don Latham
 Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 11:52 AM
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

 The crystal oscillators are reference oscillators in 2 meter ham radios. I
 wanted to make the least perturbation in the radio, hence pulling instead
 of
 simply introducing the correct reference. I will be using a reference of
 the
 nominal frequency the radio should have, so really should not need to pull
 more than a few ppm if that? also not woried about the phase noise,
 either.
 Will derive the driving signal from my gps 10 mhz or from one of my FEI Rb
 devices. I need the accurate frequencies, or at least I think I do,
 because
 the 2 meter radio will drive a transverter to 2.4 GHz moonbounce.
 Sorry about not knowing how far I need to pull, or the specs of what's
 there. I suspect there has been some drift since the radio was made.
 Putting in a vcxo or varactor simply puts off the problem, as then I have
 to
 monitor that frequency and control it. I could cobble in a little tuning
 cap, but still would be left with a pretty temp sensitive reference.
 Hope the question is clearer, and thanks to all who replied!
 Don

 Adrian
 Don,

 if you have a reference oscillator of the right frequency, what's the
 the purpose of trying to pull a CMOS oscillator to the same frequency,
 rather than just using the reference frequency?
 Please be more specific on whant your requirements are.

 Adrian

 Don Latham schrieb:
 Hello all:
 I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
 circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator
 circuit built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and
 there is a small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
 The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
 I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
 non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would
 rather simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal
 oscillator with an external reference signal of the right frequency.
 Anyone out there tried this?
 Thanks
 Don






 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



 --
 Neither 

[time-nuts] found another oldie Trek 8821

2011-03-05 Thread Pete Lancashire
Uses a Magnavox GPS Engine

https://picasaweb.google.com/111617808980322733757/Trek_8821#

Someone have or can point me to a manual ?
and someone know what it wants for an antenna ?

thanks

-pete

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

2011-03-05 Thread gary
The resistor is needed because the crystal doesn't conduct DC. If a DC 
path isn't present, then the inverter will not self-bias.


The inverter is weak, but this is all kind of relative. The channel 
length is made long to minimize the current of the inverter since it 
sits in the linear part of the transfer function. But the inverter is 
still plenty strong.


If the resistor is internal, you can still jam the signal. It just means 
power will be lost in the resistor.



On 3/5/2011 4:58 PM, Stan Searing wrote:

The on chip inverter is usually pretty weak and often designed to
have a high impedance output.  When intended as a transconductance
amp, the output mostly looks like a current source (hence the
high impedance).  Some oscillators use a resistor outside the IC in
series with the inverter output to help control maximum crystal
drive level, reduce chances of overtone oscillation, or in hopes
of improving the overall Q.

If the series resistor is present, there are three places you can
inject your signal: at the inverter output, between the resistor
and crystal and at the inverter input.

With a weak on-chip inverter, you can overdrive the inverter output
over a large frequency range.  Phase noise could be an issue,
but was not a problem with my application when I've used this method.
Be careful not to exceed the voltage range of the chip.

If you stay close to the crystal resonate frequency, injecting
the pulling signal in between the series resistor and crystal
can be similar to injecting at the inverter input.  But it's not
a good place to inject the signal as you get further from the
frequency the loaded crystal wants to sing at.

Injecting at the input of the inverter has worked OK for me.
The further you go off frequency, the larger signal you need.
If you want to drive a ways off, the load capacitor and the
crystal shunt capacitance in series with the other load capacitor
just become a capacitive load.

If the resistor is not present outside the IC, then the first
two cases become the same.  You may be able to overdrive the
inverter output, but have to also consider the load of the
crystal and crystal load caps.

If you stay close enough in frequency that the crystal is singing
along with your source, than I'd guess the phase noise should be on the
order of the un-pulled oscillator or the pulling source (whichever is
worse).
(And in the cases where I pulled way off [20 %], the crystal went
pretty quiet and I didn't notice any phase noise [although I wasn't
really looking for phase noise].)

Good luck,
Stan



-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Don Latham
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 11:52 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] pulling oscillators

The crystal oscillators are reference oscillators in 2 meter ham radios. I
wanted to make the least perturbation in the radio, hence pulling instead of
simply introducing the correct reference. I will be using a reference of the
nominal frequency the radio should have, so really should not need to pull
more than a few ppm if that? also not woried about the phase noise, either.
Will derive the driving signal from my gps 10 mhz or from one of my FEI Rb
devices. I need the accurate frequencies, or at least I think I do, because
the 2 meter radio will drive a transverter to 2.4 GHz moonbounce.
Sorry about not knowing how far I need to pull, or the specs of what's
there. I suspect there has been some drift since the radio was made.
Putting in a vcxo or varactor simply puts off the problem, as then I have to
monitorthat  frequency and control it. I could cobble in a little tuning
cap, but still would be left with a pretty temp sensitive reference.
Hope the question is clearer, and thanks to all who replied!
Don

Adrian

Don,

if you have a reference oscillator of the right frequency, what's the
the purpose of trying to pull a CMOS oscillator to the same frequency,
rather than just using the reference frequency?
Please be more specific on whant your requirements are.

Adrian

Don Latham schrieb:

Hello all:
I've developed a need for pulling crystal oscillators built in to pll
circuits. These are cmos, and have the common style oscillator
circuit built in. The crystal is across an inverter in the chip, and
there is a small cap between each end of the crystal and ground.
The chips are pll's in radio transceivers, early at that.
I could carefully remove the crystals and caps, simply driving the
non-inverting input on the chip with the reference, but I would
rather simply tack on a very small cap and pull the crystal
oscillator with an external reference signal of the right frequency.
Anyone out there tried this?
Thanks
Don







___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.







Re: [time-nuts] found another oldie Trek 8821

2011-03-05 Thread GandalfG8
 
In a message dated 06/03/2011 02:43:53 GMT Standard Time,  
p...@petelancashire.com writes:

Uses a  Magnavox GPS  Engine

https://picasaweb.google.com/111617808980322733757/Trek_8821#

Someone  have or can point me to a manual ?
and someone know what it wants for an  antenna ?



--
If you mean Trak I may have a manual, need to check in the  morning now, 
but in the meantime the Trak 8820 manual is  here...
 
_http://www.to-way.com/tf.html_ (http://www.to-way.com/tf.html) 
 
regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] found another oldie Trek 8821

2011-03-05 Thread Pete Lancashire
yes .. read before hitting send .. read before hitting send ...
(repeat 100 times)

-pete

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:54 PM,  gandal...@aol.com wrote:

 In a message dated 06/03/2011 02:43:53 GMT Standard Time,
 p...@petelancashire.com writes:

 Uses a  Magnavox GPS  Engine

 https://picasaweb.google.com/111617808980322733757/Trek_8821#

 Someone  have or can point me to a manual ?
 and someone know what it wants for an  antenna ?



 --
 If you mean Trak I may have a manual, need to check in the  morning now,
 but in the meantime the Trak 8820 manual is  here...

 _http://www.to-way.com/tf.html_ (http://www.to-way.com/tf.html)

 regards

 Nigel
 GM8PZR

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.