Re: [time-nuts] In the atomclock repairshop...

2012-04-26 Thread Rob Kimberley
Nice article. Good to see a fellow 'Nut enjoying his hobby.

...now to brush up on my Swedish

Have fun!

Rob Kimberley

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
Sent: 25 April 2012 20:06
To: Time-Nuts
Subject: [time-nuts] In the atomclock repairshop...

Fellow time-nuts,

Oh, ok. So now it is public, so I better tell you about it...

Jörgen Städje is a tech-writer which enjoys writing articles where he dips
into some system and writes about it. Trying to teach things. 
Demystify things. So, when you read it, please recall that the audience is
not very into the subject. It's in Swedish, but since you all know it by
heart (or maybe using Babelfish) I think you surely enjoy it...

http://www.idg.se/2.1085/1.443818/i-atomurmakarens-verkstad

The photo-session was not all that well-planned, but enjoy the more intimate
photos of among others my Russian CH1-78 / HG414A. Various splashes of
instruments.

One of the photos has direct inspiration from an LP. Extra points from
identifying which album. :)

Oh well. Hope you enjoy it for what it is. Hope you can handle the chock of
seeing photos of me.

Cheers,
Magnus - another time-nut outed by a journalist

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?...nanode

2012-04-26 Thread Andrew Back
On 26 April 2012 01:27, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi


 I just read the above page.  The Raspberry contains close source drivers
 and binary blob graphics firmware.   That is an 100% deal killer.

It's unfortunate that it makes use of binary drivers but Broadcom have
a history of not being the best in this respect. However, I'm prepared
to put up with this for a 700MHz ARM/Linux SBC for $25+VAT (if you
don't need Ethernet). If someone else comes up with, say, a TI
OMAP-based board for that price, great... But until then I'm not going
to complain when the Broadcom SoC is making this price point
possible...

As to the GPU firmware — are there many modern GPUs where you get the
source to their firmware?

Regards,

Andrew

--
Andrew Back
http://carrierdetect.com

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread EWKehren
Has any one considered asking Richard. As far as logic is concerned a 200  
MHz Altera MAX 3000A makes a perfect substitute at a cost of $ 2.50  that 
includes a very solderable socket. Works
Bert Kehren  
 
 
In a message dated 4/25/2012 3:16:51 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz writes:

Chris  Albertson wrote:
 On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Don  Lathamd...@montana.com  wrote:

 
 I forgot to add that a simple redrafting of the II as an Arduino  shield
 with appropriate chips and chip passives would accomplish  the desired
 end without losing the very careful engineering and  testing that has
 already been done?
 Would be nice to  have a way to change caps without soldering as well,
 maybe just  some .1 jumpers?
  

 Yes, MOST  of the design could be re-used.  As an Arduino shield there is 
no
  need for a PIC or RS-232 interface becusethe Arduino does that  function.
   You'd need to replace the 74ACT175 part but that  is not hard.

 About changing the cap values without  soldering.  I guess you could push
 the leads into a 0.1 inch  header strip or install several and use a DIP
 switch to select which  are in.   But I don't know if the extra 
inductance
 al that  wiring adds is enough to worry about.


The  time to digital converter (TDC) section is merely an interpolator 
that  measures the delay of a synchroniser.
The TDC range should be about 2 clock  periods to accommodate the range 
of synchroniser delays and to facilitate  calibration.
Unless one is changing the synchroniser clock period there is  no need to 
vary the TDC gain.
The SR620 uses a similar interpolator and  has only a single interpolator 
range.
The range is extended by counting  the number of synchroniser clock 
periods between synchroniser output  transitions of interest.
When measuring the time interval between 2 signals  a pair of 
synchronisers and interpolators are used.

Interpolator  nonlinearity can be measured by using a statistical fill 
the buckets  technique which uses nothing but a pair of noisy 
asynchronous oscillators  with high reverse isolation to avoid injection 
locking.

If a  suitable ADC is used the interpolator can be simplified 
considerably  whilst improving its performance.
Minor nonlinearities are of little  significance, as long as they are 
repeatable and relatively stable they  can be easily corrected in  software.

Bruce

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Antique Rubidium Standard Questions

2012-04-26 Thread paul swed
Some pix of the rg would be great

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Ed Palmer ed_pal...@sasktel.net wrote:

 Paul,

 Good suggestion, but I don't think pop rivets had been invented when they
 built this thing! :-D   It's built like a piece of mil-spec equipment.
  When I google for individual parts, I keep tripping over NSN numbers.  Now
 that I look closely at it, I realize that the case is just the case with no
 electrical connection between it and the circuit other than the BNC jacks
 on the front panel.  The concept of 'chassis ground' is an unknown concept.
  I don't think there's even one chassis ground lug anywhere.  Even when I'm
 poking around inside the unit, there are no live wires that I can touch,
 everything is insulated.  The build quality is very high.

 But now that you've got me thinking about it, I think there's something
 weird about the grounding in the physics package.  I've got to take another
 look at that.

 Thanks!

 Ed


 On 4/25/2012 8:59 PM, paul swed wrote:

 Ed look for pop rivetted ground logs. Famous for going bad. HP even used
 them.
 Drill em out and put real bolts and lock washers in

 On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Ed Palmered_pal...@sasktel.net  wrote:

  Paul,


 On 4/24/2012 5:24 PM, paul swed wrote:

  When all else fails check the grounds. Especially 40 year old screws.

  Been there, done that.  This unit had multiple problems with bad
 soldered
 ground connections.  I went through the unit and resoldered everything
 that
 looked the least bit odd.  I didn't find any screws that were
 electrically
 significant.  Maybe I should look again!

 Ed

  On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:13 PM, ed breyae...@telight.com   wrote:

  Ed,

 Tuning the cavity should peak everything - it just maximizes the
 excitation power at the microwave frequency, so you get the most output
 from the Rb light wavelengths. A mechanical cavity resonator will have
 a
 very wide (compared to the modulation frequencies you're looking for)
 bandwidth, so unless something happened to it physically, it should be
 OK
 as originally built or adjusted. However, you may want to look at the
 multiplier chain and SRD bias circuit components and adjustments -
 those
 could have drifted quite a bit over forty years, limiting the microwave
 power due to being off-frequency, or having poor multiplication
 efficiency.

 I'm guessing that the second harmonic is indeed present, but just
 buried
 in the noise, and the loop still can lock because of the further
 signal
 processing, even though you don't see the evidence - remember it's a
 lock-in amplifier capable of digging a tiny signal out of the noise. If
 you
 go through the multiplier and check and tweak things, you may get more
 excitation power and signs that it's getting back to normal. Once you
 get
 enough power, if the Rb cells are still good, the second harmonic
 signal
 should show up large enough for the circuit to detect sufficient S/N
 ratio
 and provide a valid lock indication.

 Ed Breya


 Ed Palmer wrote:

 Could the drift be at least partially responsible for the lack of
 second
 harmonic?  A message on the list (
 http://www.febo.com/**pipermail/time-nuts/2006-**
 April/020562.htmlhttp://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2006-April/020562.html
 http://www.**febo.com/**pipermail/time-**
 nuts/2006-**April/020562.htmlhttp://www.febo.com/**pipermail/time-nuts/2006-**April/020562.html
 **)
 said that you could peak the second harmonic by adjusting the cavity
 tuning.
 If the cell and the cavity are out of sync would that kill the second
 harmonic?  How close to they have to be?  If this thing has a cavity
 tuning adjustment I haven't found it.


 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Dan Kemppainen
I have a friend who builds and sells power supply units that I 
designed. He may be interested in building some of these.
If I had to guess, he'd be willing to build units and sell them on his 
web site.


Who owns the IP for this project? Maybe we could get some input or 
direction...


Contact me off list for more information...

Thanks
Dan


On 4/25/2012 2:42 PM, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote:

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:44:30 -0500
From: Stanleytimen...@n4iqt.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?
Message-ID:4795269806DF49A7B26877D7EB657063@StanleyPC
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original

I still have a supply of boards and most parts including the 74ac175 but no
interest in assembly or the kitting process. If someone would like to take
this on then I could provide the boards etc ... in bulk. Because of my
limited space the kitting process takes several hours to do them one at time
:-(

Stanley


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] In the atomclock repairshop...

2012-04-26 Thread Magnus Danielson

Hi,

On 26/04/12 10:53, Rob Kimberley wrote:

Nice article. Good to see a fellow 'Nut enjoying his hobby.


Oh yes, I do enjoy it.


...now to brush up on my Swedish


Hej Rob, svenska är ju enkelt, eller hur?


Have fun!


As always. Thanks!

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?...nanode

2012-04-26 Thread Don Latham
I tried to find a site to at least get the particulars for the Nanode.
Sure it's not a Monode made of doped Nonobtanium?
Alan Melia
 Mmmm not too impressive a web site thoughthe link to the buy page
 doesnt
 work backing up to the home the tabs in light grey on a white background
 are
 almost unreadabletoo must geewhizz and not the right HF input I
 suspectstill looks an interesting product.

 Alan
 G3NYK

 - Original Message -
 From: Andrew Back and...@carrierdetect.com
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:39 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?


 On 25 April 2012 19:09, Randy D. Hunt randy_hunt...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Then there is also the matter of surface mount components. Some people
 my
 not physically be able to work with them, learning to solder or not. I
 am
 rapidly joining that group be cause of my vision.

 Since Arduino has been mentioned I feel obliged to provide a link for
 Nanode, an Arduino-compatible that integrates Ethernet and low power
 wireless (e.g. 868MHz) for around the same price of an Arduino. It's
 supplied as a kit of through-hole components...

 http://wiki.london.hackspace.org.uk/view/Project:Nanode

 Or a nice alternative might be a daughterboard for a Raspberry Pi,
 which would give you an ARM/Linux base for not much more money, and
 you could use it to create a standalone system that drives an old
 monitor for a display.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi

 Regards,

 Andrew

 --
 Andrew Back
 http://carrierdetect.com

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
R. Bacon
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Hal Murray

albertson.ch...@gmail.com said:
 2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable.  It is truly identical on all
 platforms.  Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal with gcc or
 even know what gcc is.  Same with saving your code, hit just puts it some
 place and keeps track of it 

Do I have to use their particular style/GUI?  Or can I drive it from make, 
mixing in pieces I like?

How is the documentation on the tool chain and libraries?  Are their good man 
pages?



-- 
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Antique Rubidium Standard

2012-04-26 Thread Geoff Blake
On 26 April 2012 11:08,  time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote:
 Send time-nuts mailing list submissions to
        time-nuts@febo.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        time-nuts-requ...@febo.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
        time-nuts-ow...@febo.com

Ed Palmer wrote:

 but I don't think pop rivets had been invented when
 they built this thing! :-D

Just as a matter of interest, the humble pop-rivet was first patented
in 1917  by Hamilton Neil Wylie, a Royal Navy Reservist and an
improved version in 1927 when he was working for Armstrong-Whitworth,
then a UK aircraft manufacturer.

I don't think that the Quartz Crystal standard had been invented in 1917

Geoff

-- 
#
Geoff Blake,   G8GNZ    JO01fq:   Chelmsford,  Essex,  UK
ge...@palaemon.co.uk    or   melecert...@gmail.com
Using Linux: Ubuntu 11.04 on Intel or Debian on UltraSparc
and even on the NAS.     Avoiding Micro$oft like the plague.
#

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] In the atomclock repairshop...

2012-04-26 Thread Jim Lux

On 4/26/12 11:56 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote:

Hi,

On 26/04/12 10:53, Rob Kimberley wrote:

Nice article. Good to see a fellow 'Nut enjoying his hobby.


Oh yes, I do enjoy it.


...now to brush up on my Swedish





And, since NASA pays my salary, at least indirectly, nice to see you 
wearing a shirt with a NASA logo on it...



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Jim Lux

On 4/26/12 1:24 PM, Hal Murray wrote:


albertson.ch...@gmail.com said:

2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable.  It is truly identical on all
platforms.  Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal with gcc or
even know what gcc is.  Same with saving your code, hit just puts it some
place and keeps track of it


Do I have to use their particular style/GUI?  Or can I drive it from make,
mixing in pieces I like?

How is the documentation on the tool chain and libraries?  Are their good man
pages?






The Arduino IDE is NOT make compatible, as far as I know..

The documentation is mostly wiki-like, as well as several books out 
there. Lots of online forums


It's not like a gcc toolchain where you have a separate compiler, 
linker, binhex, etc and utilities..


It's an *integrated* development environment.


If you want a free Java based cross platform IDE that is compatible with 
make and extensible, etc. look at Eclipse.  It's what I use at work for 
(mostly) C development on Windows, Linux, and RTEMS targets (using cross 
compilers).  It's VERY cool, there's tons of documentation, there's tons 
of useful plugins for lots of languages and capabilities (cvs, svn, git, 
etc.)


What's nice is that the UI is really the same between my mac laptop, my 
windows desktop machine, and the linux boxes down in the lab (although, 
I confess that recently, I've been doing more ssh -X labmachine, 
because it's hooked up to the target).




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Sub mm measurements with gps timing antennas?

2012-04-26 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 04/25/2012 07:05 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:

Hi Attila,

Are you sure the customer said sub-mm and not sub-meter? I know
post-processing is really helpful, but the LEA-6 is a single frequency
receiver so all the advantage of L2 is lost for this customer. The
bullet antenna's don't even have an arrow for North ;-)


Actually, if you do both code and carrier phase you can make ionspheric 
measures on L1 alone. This is well known and documented, but I wonder 
how many actually attempts it. The thing is, the phase shift due to 
ionspheric dispersion has the same size, but different sign as you do 
code and carrier phase. What you can do is to resolve the bias between 
them and then make ionspheric observations and compensate for it. I've 
reported on this before, and Oncore VP receivers where used between a 
pair of caesium clocks.


It would be a step up from carrier phase smoothed code measures.


One thought -- seeing how this is a research project. It might be
possible to cross-correlate the post-processed data against the
Az-El of each SV along with ambient temperature over days or
weeks and thus actually measure the phase center profile as well
as tempco of the system. This would be no small effort, depending
on the math and programming skills of the researcher(s), but the
advantage for them is that is costs time instead of money. Then
armed with this calibration data (possibly unique to each unit),
it would be possible to reduce these effects, improving precision.
I have no idea how much. Still, an interesting project.

A simple test that could be done locally (refrigerator, sauna, etc.)
would be to measure the tempco of the entire system (antenna,
cables, LEA-6T) before they deploy it to a mountain. It may also
be the case that the system has both a temperature coefficient
and a temperature change coefficient so it's not a simple 2-point
test. You can probably ignore humidity and barometric pressure.

Another test would be to rotate the antenna at 1 RPH (revolution
per hour) and then look for modulation in the post-processed
solution. This would give a hint of the quality of the antenna. As
a baseline, try the same test using a precision gps antenna. I
have spare pin-wheel, choke-ring, and ground-plane antennas
that I could loan, but surely these are available where you are,
and probably cheaper than postage from here.

It seems that everyone else that does sub-ns precision timing or
mm positioning uses a large combination of tricks: dual-frequency
antenna and receiver, geodetic-quality antenna, passive or
active temperature control, phase-stabilized cables, GPS and
Glonass, external frequency reference, and post-processing.
Your customer is only using one from this long, expensive list.
So there may be a lesson there.


External frequency reference in terms of a rubidium should get you quite 
far in that regard, without much funds being used.



Can you share any data they have collected already? I would be
interested to know how far one could push a LEA-6T.


That would be interesting. Getting one to play with would be fun.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Sub mm measurements with gps timing antennas?

2012-04-26 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 04/25/2012 08:42 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:

Moin,

On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:05:00 -0700
Tom Van Baakt...@leapsecond.com  wrote:


Are you sure the customer said sub-mm and not sub-meter? I know
post-processing is really helpful, but the LEA-6 is a single frequency
receiver so all the advantage of L2 is lost for this customer. The
bullet antenna's don't even have an arrow for North ;-)


Yes, it is sub-mm. They are already doing sub-cm with the current
setup, but it isn't precise enough yet. IIRC during the first tests
last year they got4mm precision. And yes, using a LEA6-T with a Trimble
Bullet antenna. I don't know what they actually do with the raw phase
data, beside that they average over several hours and use a 100m baseline
reference consisting of two stations mounted at a fixed position.


One thought -- seeing how this is a research project. It might be
possible to cross-correlate the post-processed data against the
Az-El of each SV along with ambient temperature over days or
weeks and thus actually measure the phase center profile as well
as tempco of the system. This would be no small effort, depending
on the math and programming skills of the researcher(s), but the
advantage for them is that is costs time instead of money. Then
armed with this calibration data (possibly unique to each unit),
it would be possible to reduce these effects, improving precision.
I have no idea how much. Still, an interesting project.


Hmm.. That would be an idea, but i don't know whether it is feasible.

Maybe i should here expand a little bit what the project actually is.
The effort is part of the Permasense[1] Project, which does measurements
of different parameters of permafrost soil/rock in high alpine regions.
The idea of this sub-project is to measure the exact movement of rocks
and other solid and unmovable things with regard to weather conditions.

Beside the harsh environment, this also means that the devices cannot be
reached for most of the year (there is usually a 3 months window when
the devices can be accessed)..and some years they cannot access them at all
(adverse weather conditions preventing ascend). For installation, a helicopter
has to fly everything up into the mountains, which means that pre-assembled
stuff cannot be transported, because it's too bulky (prevents whole
system calibration in a climate chamber). After installation the system
runs on solar power with a backup battery. But this doesn't guarrantee
power at all. The solar panel could be below a meter or two of snow.
Hence the whole system has to cope with periodic power los and has to
be as low power as possible (ie no OCXO, no Rb, no temperature stabilization).

The snow also prevents the use of choke rings, because they would accumulate
a lot of snow and ice, which would then cover the whole antenna.


If you buy the right choke rings, they come with a plastic cover with 
fairly steep slopes, so snow-buildup would not be dramatic. Just bring 
it up from the ground with good support.



But at least, there is hardly any electronic interference, a good sky
view (no trees), unless the system is mounted near a wall. And the
antenna cable is quite short (it was 15cm in the previous version
of the device and should be50cm in the next)


You get a well defined phase-center, and also known. You can then bring 
in calibration files and reduce the phase-center in the post-processing. 
This is standard stuff, and there is plenty of information online on it.


Consider that the C/A code has a rate of 1,023 Mchip/s, so anything 
within 150m will not be de-correlated by the C/A code. Here is another 
benefit of the P(Y) recievers, they bring this into 15m radius.



A simple test that could be done locally (refrigerator, sauna, etc.)
would be to measure the tempco of the entire system (antenna,
cables, LEA-6T) before they deploy it to a mountain. It may also
be the case that the system has both a temperature coefficient
and a temperature change coefficient so it's not a simple 2-point
test. You can probably ignore humidity and barometric pressure.


I think the ETH has climate chambers that could run such tests.
But i'm not sure how you'd test the antenna in such a chamber.


1) Network analyzer measuring phase delay and group delay in the range 
of interest.


2) GPS simulator times from a rubidium, and then compare how timing 
deviates.



Another test would be to rotate the antenna at 1 RPH (revolution
per hour) and then look for modulation in the post-processed
solution.


Hmm.. that's actually a quite nice test. Cool idea, thanks!


This would give a hint of the quality of the antenna. As
a baseline, try the same test using a precision gps antenna. I
have spare pin-wheel, choke-ring, and ground-plane antennas
that I could loan, but surely these are available where you are,
and probably cheaper than postage from here.


Yes. The problem is, antennas that perform well in a city environment,
where temperature swings are quite limited, fail in 

Re: [time-nuts] In the atomclock repairshop...

2012-04-26 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 04/26/2012 11:48 PM, Jim Lux wrote:

On 4/26/12 11:56 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote:

Hi,

On 26/04/12 10:53, Rob Kimberley wrote:

Nice article. Good to see a fellow 'Nut enjoying his hobby.


Oh yes, I do enjoy it.


...now to brush up on my Swedish





And, since NASA pays my salary, at least indirectly, nice to see you
wearing a shirt with a NASA logo on it...


Hehe, yes. They had an exhibit touring the world that started in 
Stockholm, so I was there on the last weekend. I just pulled the next 
t-shirt in the pile that morning, so it was not on intention.


So far NASA hasn't sponsered me in any way, except for the helping hand 
of a few researchers, but I'm sure I could make room for a spare H-maser 
or so. ;-)


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Antique Rubidium Standard

2012-04-26 Thread Ed Palmer

Wow!  I stand corrected.  I had no idea that they were that old.

Thanks,
Ed


On 4/26/2012 3:20 PM, Geoff Blake wrote:

Ed Palmer wrote:


but I don't think pop rivets had been invented when
they built this thing! :-D

Just as a matter of interest, the humble pop-rivet was first patented
in 1917  by Hamilton Neil Wylie, a Royal Navy Reservist and an
improved version in 1927 when he was working for Armstrong-Whitworth,
then a UK aircraft manufacturer.

I don't think that the Quartz Crystal standard had been invented in 1917

Geoff



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Antique Rubidium Standard Questions

2012-04-26 Thread Ed Palmer

I wondered if anyone would ask for pictures.  They'll be ready soon.

Ed


On 4/26/2012 6:21 AM, paul swed wrote:

Some pix of the rg would be great

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Ed Palmered_pal...@sasktel.net  wrote:


Paul,

Good suggestion, but I don't think pop rivets had been invented when they
built this thing! :-D   It's built like a piece of mil-spec equipment.
  When I google for individual parts, I keep tripping over NSN numbers.  Now
that I look closely at it, I realize that the case is just the case with no
electrical connection between it and the circuit other than the BNC jacks
on the front panel.  The concept of 'chassis ground' is an unknown concept.
  I don't think there's even one chassis ground lug anywhere.  Even when I'm
poking around inside the unit, there are no live wires that I can touch,
everything is insulated.  The build quality is very high.

But now that you've got me thinking about it, I think there's something
weird about the grounding in the physics package.  I've got to take another
look at that.

Thanks!

Ed


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote:


 albertson.ch...@gmail.com said:
  2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable.  It is truly identical on
 all
  platforms.  Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal with gcc
 or
  even know what gcc is.  Same with saving your code, hit just puts it
 some
  place and keeps track of it

 Do I have to use their particular style/GUI?  Or can I drive it from make,
 mixing in pieces I like?

 How is the documentation on the tool chain and libraries?  Are their good
 man
 pages?


The tools are pretty much the standard GCC, and then avrdude.   It's all
open source.   But if you are going to do this your self why not simply use
a bare AVR chip?

Documentation of the libraries is very good.  First their is the Adruino
web site which is enough if you already had a preference for tools.  Then
their are dozens of books you can find.   Go to Amazon.com and search for
Arduino.   Man Pages??? that is a command line thing from the previous
century, docs now days are in HTML

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Don Latham d...@montana.com wrote:

 OK, Chris, I'll bite. What the heck is a tool chain?


It is the series (or chain) of software tools you need to use.  Text
editor, compiler, linker and whatever you need to program the chip and then
maybe a debugger and maybe version control

With Arduino there is no chain got the one Java program.  Wellit calls
other stuff but most users never notice.

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Andrew Rodland
Hal Murray hmurray@... writes:

 
 
 albertson.chris@... said:
  2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable.  It is truly identical on 
all
  platforms.  Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal with gcc or
  even know what gcc is.  Same with saving your code, hit just puts it some
  place and keeps track of it 
 
 Do I have to use their particular style/GUI?  Or can I drive it from make, 
 mixing in pieces I like?
 

You can use make, as does my project. In fact, I have a system that compiles
the bulk of the project twice; once for the Arduino, and once in a simulator
harness where I can test things like the PLL response.


 How is the documentation on the tool chain and libraries?  Are their good man 
 pages?
 

The toolchain is of course avr-gcc and avr-binutils, and the library is
mostly avr-libc, which is very well documented; the remainder is the Arduino
libraries, which are in C++ and have mediocre (but existent, at least)
documentation. I'd like to point out that using the Arduino libs is 
*optional*; while the main target audience certainly will be using them,
there's nothing about the hardware that prevents you from writing code in
plain C and uploading it, or picking and choosing which parts of a project
will make use of the Arduino libs and which will access the bare metal. 
Again, I've done this with my project. The Serial library is pleasant enough
to use; the Ethernet is marginal (no interrupt support, but I had an easier
time hacking around that than attempting to rewrite the driver); the timing 
code is of course useless for my purposes so I stay away from it.
I never call attachInterrupt(), which involves a trampoline, but instead
declare my own ISRs -- the mixing is mostly unproblematic. It's been pretty
pleasant for me overall.

Andrew


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Antique Rubidium Standard Questions

2012-04-26 Thread paul swed
Nothing like looking at the ole antiques

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Ed Palmer ed_pal...@sasktel.net wrote:

 I wondered if anyone would ask for pictures.  They'll be ready soon.

 Ed



 On 4/26/2012 6:21 AM, paul swed wrote:

 Some pix of the rg would be great

 On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Ed Palmered_pal...@sasktel.net
  wrote:

  Paul,

 Good suggestion, but I don't think pop rivets had been invented when they
 built this thing! :-D   It's built like a piece of mil-spec equipment.
  When I google for individual parts, I keep tripping over NSN numbers.
  Now
 that I look closely at it, I realize that the case is just the case with
 no
 electrical connection between it and the circuit other than the BNC jacks
 on the front panel.  The concept of 'chassis ground' is an unknown
 concept.
  I don't think there's even one chassis ground lug anywhere.  Even when
 I'm
 poking around inside the unit, there are no live wires that I can touch,
 everything is insulated.  The build quality is very high.

 But now that you've got me thinking about it, I think there's something
 weird about the grounding in the physics package.  I've got to take
 another
 look at that.

 Thanks!

 Ed


 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Z3801A Power Connector

2012-04-26 Thread Larry McDavid
I unexpectedly came into a small supply of the 3-pin Universal 
Mate-N-Lock connectors that plug into the power connector on the rear 
panel of the HP Z3801A GPSDO. If you need one of these and can't readily 
find it locally, contact me off-list.


--
Best wishes,

Larry McDavid W6FUB
Anaheim, CA  (20 miles southeast of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread Dennis Ferguson

On 27 Apr, 2012, at 02:57 , Chris Albertson wrote:
 Closed source drivers and binary blob firmware.I'd have nothing to do
 with a project that includes either of those. I'd require a open source
 platforms with a 100% free tool chain.   Also, it is a bit of overkill
 after all a bare PIC works fine for this application.

The only thing binary blob about the Raspberry Pi that I can see seems
to be the stuff associated with the graphics accelerator.  This is unfortunate,
but unless you are into bare-metal programming of high resolution graphics/video
(you can do that with an Arduino?) I'm not quite sure how that is relevant.

The programming interfaces for all peripherals on the SoC not associated with 
the
GPU seem to be well documented in the Broadcom data sheet:

   
http://www.designspark.com/files/ds/supporting_materials/Broadcom%20BCM2835.pdf

I don't know of anything useful which is missing, and I know a port of a 
non-Linux
operating system (NetBSD) to the board is being done using nothing that is 
non-public.
You can leave the graphics binary blob out if you find that offensive and 
have no
use for it anyway.

I think the most annoying thing about the Raspberry Pi is that a lot of the GPIO
signals aren't brought out to connectors, perhaps to save money on the board.

Dennis Ferguson
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] PICTIC II ready-made?

2012-04-26 Thread cfo
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:58:26 -0700, Jim Lux wrote:

 On 4/26/12 1:24 PM, Hal Murray wrote:

 albertson.ch...@gmail.com said:
 2) The IDE is written in Java and is portable.  It is truly identical
 on all platforms.  Yes it uses gcc but the end user never has to deal
 with gcc or even know what gcc is.  Same with saving your code, hit
 just puts it some place and keeps track of it

 Do I have to use their particular style/GUI?  Or can I drive it from
 make, mixing in pieces I like?

 How is the documentation on the tool chain and libraries?  Are their
 good man pages?




 
 The Arduino IDE is NOT make compatible, as far as I know..
 
The Arduino IDE is basically an advanced JAVA Editor , that hides avr-gcc 
for you.

The IDE part is that it knows how/where to include/look for the CPP 
libraries.

 It's not like a gcc toolchain where you have a separate compiler,
 linker, binhex, etc and utilities..

It uses a 100% standard avr-gcc toolchain as backend , and just creates 
the commandline call for using that.
So avr-gcc , avr-as , avr-ar , avr-objcopy etc. are used behind the 
curtains.

For uploading the program , it uses avrdude. 
And expects a STK-500 V1 (the old protocol) bootloader to be installed in 
the chip.

Make compatible .
Well it's a bit of a challenge to use make , as you have to tell/teach 
make about the location of the libraries. That the IDE java code already 
knows about .
But it's certainly possible.


As i see it : 
Arduino HW is a standard AVR microprocessor board , that can be used with 
any editor/compiler. The thing that makes the HW Arduino compatible is 
the installing of the bootloader. 
So take any ATmega328 board with a 16Mhz Xtal (The libs expect 16Mhz).
Install the bootloader , add a serial interface. 
And you have an Arduino.

The main advantage of the Arduino layout , is that anyone can walk into a 
RadioSchack and buy one. No soldering required , if one wishes that.

As there is a bootloader installed you don't need to have an AVR-ISP 
programmer , the programming is done via Serial RS-232. So all you need 
is a COM-Port/ttyxx on your pc.

The other advantage is that there are so many premade/downloadable 
libraries out there , that you can make : ie. a PID controller wo. 
knowing much about PID. And you can add a Temp sensor  a LCD wo. ever 
having opened a datasheet.

The disadvantage is that due to the hiding/hw-abstraction layer , the 
generated standard librarycode tends to be slow. 
But in many cases ie. a DS1820B temp sensor can only make a measurement 
every 700 ms. So who cares if the 16Mhz was able to query it 1000 times/
sec , in optimized C.

But absolutely nothing prevents you to , combine your own Optimized C / 
asm code , with the arduino libraries. And get the best from both worlds.

CFO - Denmark
(Bingo on AVRFreaks.net)


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.