Re: [time-nuts] Symmetricom TS2100-GPS - 1PPS has 10uS offset

2013-05-12 Thread Esa Heikkinen

Jason Rabel kirjoitti:


I think nobody ever really bothered to fix anything since the NTP time was

 good enough.

Yes - definitely... If it's only used for NTP then the 10 usec error is 
totally insignificiant. NTP solution seems to be quite inaccurate, if I 
poll my server from http://support.ntp.org/ntpq.php the results can vary 
couple of milliseconds every time. However the offset shown by test page 
is always less than 10 milliseconds. Maybe this is because the route is 
too long: delay is more than 230 ms - the test site is far side of the 
world for me... It' the nature of the TCP/IP and Internet that the 
delays are quite random.


Same result if I set up software NTP server which polls many NTP 
servers from the net. The results are always vayring many milliseconds 
and the server will constantly change the best server to follow. I 
think the multitasking operating system will also add some errors to the 
ntp server operation, since the internal system delays will always 
change as well.



The hidden eng menu does have some interesting stuff. I've tweaked

 the offset to bring time in sync with my other NTP servers,

usually around -4000 does the trick since the TS2100 doesn't
use a true NTP implementation (I think it is more SNTP).


According to manual it should support both protocols, but maybe this NTP 
vs SNTP is more like client side difference? I understood that NTP polls 
many servers to get kind of averaged timing, when SNTP uses only one 
server. For example Windows has SNTP only, you can define only one time 
server to use at time. Well of course TS2100 doesn't poll any servers 
and uses only one time source, GPS.



I have seen different offset settings in units, so I would think there
would be *some* way to save the setting, but like you have
not found out a way to do it yet. :(


Yes! That's now the only question...

If this will remain unknown, then maybe I will setup a microcontroller 
connected to the console port and set it to follow somehow, when TS2100 
is restarted. Then it could send the eng tim offset... command via 
serial port to restore the offset setting automatically every time when 
needed. This is quite stupid way to store the setting, but it might be 
the only way if the offical way to store the settings will remain unknown.


--
73s!
Esa
OH4KJU
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] OXCO Issues -- Latest

2013-05-12 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

If they are carbon film, I'd look for cracked end terminations. Hopefully the 
color codes are still readable. That should make the replacement process fairly 
easy.

Another possibility - the thermistor bridge probably is / was regulated. If 
it's a zener diode, it may have opened up. That would boost the input voltage 
and increase the effective gain.  

Bob

On May 12, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Frederick Bray fwb...@mminternet.com wrote:

 Well, I decided to make the Y incision and pulled the circuit board out of 
 the oven.  (Photos later after I crop them.)
 
 Yes, the trimpot is part of the circuit associated with the thermistor.
 
 My plan is to check the resistors (surprisingly most are carbon film except 
 those in the thermistor circuit), look at the circuit board under a 
 magnifier, and stick it back in the foam for testing after making any repairs.
 
 Thanks again for the continuing comments and advice.
 
 Fred
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Resolution T versus Motorola Oncore UT+

2013-05-12 Thread Hal Murray
 because of the  long filter time may not even need saw tooth

You still have the opportunity for hanging bridges.

You may be farther out on the tail of the curve, but the tail is very long.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Symmetricom TS2100-GPS - 1PPS has 10uS offset

2013-05-12 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Esa Heikkinen tn1...@nic.fi wrote:
 Jason Rabel kirjoitti:

 I think nobody ever really bothered to fix anything since the NTP time was

 good enough.

 Yes - definitely... If it's only used for NTP then the 10 usec error is
 totally insignificiant.


A startum one NTP server typically runs with abot 2 uSec error fro
UTC.   ButA stratum two server, that means one that gets time from the
strum one over the network

NTP solution seems to be quite inaccurate, if I poll
 my server from http://support.ntp.org/ntpq.php the results can vary couple
 of milliseconds every time.

Most Statum One NTP server are better then 10 uSec.  2 uSec is about
what you should shoot for.

It shouldn't work that way.  What NTP does is discipline a local
clock.  It take hours or days before it settles and a lot depends on
how good the local oscillator is.  Mostly your local oscillator is
just a TTL can that cost about 50 cents solder to a PC mother board.
The the error in one poll does not matter to much because hundreds
of them will be done and NTP wil make tiny adjustments to the locals
clock's RATE.  NTP is not adjusting the time, it adjusts the rate. (OK
there is  one time exception if the time is found to tbe far off)
It does not do an adverse of servers.  It compares them to find the
best subset.  This stops a broken server from polluting the average.

Yes there might be a 10ms error in a polled time  Bt what NTP is doing
is noteing the local time, letting the local clock run for say 20
minutes then comparing to the server(s) to see if the local clock is
fast or slow.  So that 10ms error is only parts per million.  It is
not a 10ms absolute error in UTC time.

If your local oscillator were better then NTP would open up that 20
minutes window and if the results aren't good it closes it down.   It
tries to keep several of those 20 minute intervals open at once.

On the other hand SMTP, to thing that Windows uses simply gets the
time and jumps the local clock to match and that's it.  It does not
discipline the rate.  SNTP is a one-time thing


--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Resolution T versus Motorola Oncore UT+

2013-05-12 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 13/05/13 00:13, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

Is the M12 going away or they just going through (another) parts change?


You are correct. I read it sloppy, but I did recall that there was 
something going on (easy to check by just reading the link I did provide 
- so brown paper bag on my head this time).


Regardless, one has to be a bit careful in expected lifetime.

Cheers,
Magnus



Bob

On May 12, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Magnus Danielsonmag...@rubidium.dyndns.org  
wrote:


Hi Bert,

On 12/05/13 22:31, ewkeh...@aol.com wrote:

With the availability of Motorola Oncore products and the Synergy pin
compatible it would make sense that some one does a board design that allows
plug in and saw tooth correction. We use a  14 pin PIC and a DS 1023 with
good results. Should also add a survey command. With the increasing cost of
Tbolts this is a nice alternative. The latest Shera makes it a nice GPSDO for
OCXO's and Rb's. The list price for a DS 1023 is just at $ 19 (lot of
silicon)  but if some one does a group buy if the interest is there a $ 25 kit
price would  be attainable. Right now I found a source $ 10 plus shipping I
paid just over $  6, three month ago. using one of these in a Rb application
because of the  long filter time may not even need saw tooth


If it where that simple.

Regarding availability of the iLotus M12M see this on Synergy:

http://www.synergy-gps.com/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=104Itemid=138

Availability: Get it while you can, it's going away.

It looks like you will have to consider using LEA6T or something like that soon 
enough.

I like the openness of the Motorola and Novatel receivers. Which modern 
receivers provide the same level of openness into states and details?

Oh, we should make sure to backup documentation on the Oncores. The early ones 
is already fuzzy.

Cheers,
Magnus
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] OXCO Issues -- Latest

2013-05-12 Thread J. L. Trantham
My guess is that there is a 'test case' that the unit (foam enclosed units
minus the metal case) is placed into that has a hole through which
adjustments can be made.  Then, it is removed and installed in its 'final
resting place' before sealing the unit.

Joe

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Don Latham
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 5:16 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OXCO Issues -- Latest

If there's a pot set that's inside the case, indeed inside the foam
then there has to be a procedure for setting it before final assembly, no?
can't believe an engineering setup that requires tiny tweaks with assembly
and disassembly. . .
Don

Bob Camp
 Hi

 Several outfits made pot set OCXO's for a *long* time. As far as I 
 know there isn't any sort of premature end of life situation with 
 those designs.

 Bob

 On May 12, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Al Wolfe alw.k...@gmail.com wrote:

 Years ago we were taught that it was poor engineering practice to use 
 pots to trim a DC value, especially if any appreciable current was to 
 be drawn from the wiper. (Probably true for any kind of signal on a
 pot) It seems that current through the wiper would eventually erode 
 away the material under the wiper. This is true especially for 
 set-and-forget applications. If the wiper is used only as a voltage 
 reference and very little current drawn then it is probably OK for 
 most situations.

 The above info is mainly for carbon and ceramic pots. Wire wound ones 
 tend to be somewhat more forgiving but they tend to be step-variable 
 between the wire turns. Often the sweet spot is between the steps and 
 they aren't very useful for fine tuning purposes. Sometimes we would 
 use two pots in series. One was set up as a rheostat and was around 5 
 percent of the ohmage of the main one. It was used for fine tuning 
 but the problem of DC current through the wiper remains and is 
 exacerbated.

 Probably the best design is to use fixed resistors for most of the 
 voltage divider circuit and the variable element be a small fraction 
 of the total divider resistance.

 Al


 Well, I decided to make the Y incision and pulled the circuit 
 board out of the oven.  (Photos later after I crop them.)

 Yes, the trimpot is part of the circuit associated with the 
 thermistor.

 My plan is to check the resistors (surprisingly most are carbon film 
 except those in the thermistor circuit), look at the circuit board 
 under a magnifier, and stick it back in the foam for testing after 
 making any repairs.

 Thanks again for the continuing comments and advice.

 Fred

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 
Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind.
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
If you don't know what it is, don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell


Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.