Re: [time-nuts] What ALL of you Time Nuts really wants for Christmas!

2013-11-18 Thread Rob
I've got one David and for the price they do a reasonable job... I would
strongly suggest that for an extra $ 200 you get the TG model ( DSA815TG )
that has the built in tracking generator.. I pretty much use mine for radio
work and I would be lost without the tracking generator now...
Cheers,
Rob.

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of David J Taylor
Sent: Monday, 18 November 2013 5:25 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] What ALL of you Time Nuts really wants for
Christmas!

I'm considering a spectrum analyser with my pension lump sum cash:

  http://www.rigolna.com/products/spectrum-analyzers/dsa800/dsa815/

and perhaps an iPad Air:

  http://www.apple.com/uk/ipad-air/

More frequency than time, sorry!
 
David
-- 
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What ALL of you Time Nuts really wantsfor Christmas!

2013-11-18 Thread David J Taylor

I've got one David and for the price they do a reasonable job... I would
strongly suggest that for an extra $ 200 you get the TG model ( DSA815TG )
that has the built in tracking generator.. I pretty much use mine for radio
work and I would be lost without the tracking generator now...
Cheers,
Rob.
=

Agreed, the TG option is a must.

I don't have the room (or the weight-lifting strength) for one of the HP 
models you could likely get for the same money.  G.


David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] national nc2001 atomic clock on eBay

2013-11-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 18 November 2013 02:41, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 I have paid a lot of money over the years for “stuff”. I’m not in any way 
 saying that buying “stuff” is a bad idea. If you could make it work, that’s 
 certainly neat stuff. My only issue here is - what’s this going to do for 
 somebody?

The only sort of people I can see might be interested are historians,
or anyone having some emotional attachment to it (e.g. they designed
it). I find it hard to believe anyone in their right mind would buy it
with the intension of restoring it so they have a workable frequency
source.

There are some interesting auctions on eBay. This was one of my all
time favouries, although for some reasons I have put the pages of the
PDF file in revese order

http://www.g8wrb.org/useful-stuff/pdf/bad-amplifier.pdf

Anyone know a quick way of reversing the order of the pages in a document?

Dave
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] national nc2001 atomic clock on eBay

2013-11-18 Thread GandalfG8
Extract and rebuild in Acrobat... on it's way back to you:-)
 
Regards
 
Nigel
GM8PZR
 
 
In a message dated 18/11/2013 09:44:38 GMT Standard Time,  
drkir...@gmail.com writes:

Anyone  know a quick way of reversing the order of the pages in a  document?
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] What happened tohttp://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf ?

2013-11-18 Thread Stephan Sandenbergh
Hi Tom,

Thanks for checking this for me. From where I am I most definitely cannot
access the web site - it keeps timing out. But, when I use an online proxy
server it works fine. A bit of a hack, but luckily I can still access the
material.

Cheers,

Stephan


On 16 November 2013 16:18, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com wrote:

 Stephan,

 Try again. It looks ok to me. Test with:
 http://tf.boulder.nist.gov/general/pdf/1.pdf

 You can also use the search page:
 http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/publications.htm

 /tvb

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] national nc2001 atomic clock on eBay

2013-11-18 Thread Peter Gottlieb
The description made it sound much worse than it was though.  I've seen 
brassboards of ultimately highly successful products which were far worse than that.



On 11/18/2013 4:39 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:

On 18 November 2013 02:41, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:

I have paid a lot of money over the years for “stuff”. I’m not in any way 
saying that buying “stuff” is a bad idea. If you could make it work, that’s 
certainly neat stuff. My only issue here is - what’s this going to do for 
somebody?

The only sort of people I can see might be interested are historians,
or anyone having some emotional attachment to it (e.g. they designed
it). I find it hard to believe anyone in their right mind would buy it
with the intension of restoring it so they have a workable frequency
source.

There are some interesting auctions on eBay. This was one of my all
time favouries, although for some reasons I have put the pages of the
PDF file in revese order

http://www.g8wrb.org/useful-stuff/pdf/bad-amplifier.pdf

Anyone know a quick way of reversing the order of the pages in a document?

Dave
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] national nc2001 atomic clock on eBay

2013-11-18 Thread DaveH
Bob Pease was famous for this. 

https://www.google.com/search?q=bob+pease+desktbm=ischtbo=usource=univsa
=Xei=HkeKUrflDImdiQKnk4C4Agsqi=2ved=0CCoQsAQbiw=2133bih=1239

http://www.philbrickarchive.org/rap.htm

http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=28doc_id=1285208

http://www.ti.com/ww/en/bobpease/index.html  (big PDF of his writings and
engeneering)

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com 
 [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Peter Gottlieb
 Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 05:09
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] national nc2001 atomic clock on eBay
 
 The description made it sound much worse than it was though.  
 I've seen 
 brassboards of ultimately highly successful products which 
 were far worse than that.
 
 
 On 11/18/2013 4:39 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
  On 18 November 2013 02:41, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
  I have paid a lot of money over the years for stuff. I'm 
 not in any way saying that buying stuff is a bad idea. If 
 you could make it work, that's certainly neat stuff. My only 
 issue here is - what's this going to do for somebody?
  The only sort of people I can see might be interested are 
 historians,
  or anyone having some emotional attachment to it (e.g. they designed
  it). I find it hard to believe anyone in their right mind 
 would buy it
  with the intension of restoring it so they have a workable frequency
  source.
 
  There are some interesting auctions on eBay. This was one of my all
  time favouries, although for some reasons I have put the 
 pages of the
  PDF file in revese order
 
  http://www.g8wrb.org/useful-stuff/pdf/bad-amplifier.pdf
 
  Anyone know a quick way of reversing the order of the pages 
 in a document?
 
  Dave
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] LFphoenix still on since last week.

2013-11-18 Thread paul swed
This is one of the longest runs I have seen in a long time.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL Boston
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Mains frequency

2013-11-18 Thread Tom Van Baak
Magnus,

I'm going to push back a bit on your mains sampling claim. Mostly, I'd like to 
see the results of the professional I-Q demodulated gear that you mentioned. 
Can you post raw data, or a sample plot?

I agree that looking at power line voltage with 16- or 24-bits at 1 Msps is 
going to reveal interesting amplitude and phase noise information. But see how 
well a $1 PIC can do.

Attached is a plot made using TimeLab + picPET just now. The picPET is fast 
enough to capture the zero-crossing of every 60 Hz cycle with 400 ns 
resolution; the TimeLab plots have tau0 of 16.67 ms.

-- The blue trace was simply plugging a 9 VAC wall-wart into the picPET though 
a 10k resistor.
-- The pink trace was adding a 10 nF cap across the input.
-- The green trace was unplugging my laptop switching power supply from the 
same outlet!
-- The red trace is replacing the mains wall-wart with a hp 33120A set to 9VAC 
at 60 Hz, a tentative noise floor measurement of the picPET when used this way.

My conclusions are that at least here in the US, or at least at my house, the 
short-term stability of mains hits about 5e-6, at about tau 0.2 seconds. The 
attached short-term plot is also not-inconsistent with the long-term plot at 
http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/

My other conclusion is that the picPET (a simple PIC-based time-stamping 
counter) is doing a pretty good job measuring this. Note, no software or data 
filtering was used. This is just raw serial/USB data going into TimeLab.

/tvb
attachment: mains-picpet-04.gif___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Mains frequency

2013-11-18 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Let’s hope Santa does not bring you an X10 power line based remote control 
system for Christmas….

Bob

On Nov 18, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com wrote:

 Magnus,
 
 I'm going to push back a bit on your mains sampling claim. Mostly, I'd like 
 to see the results of the professional I-Q demodulated gear that you 
 mentioned. Can you post raw data, or a sample plot?
 
 I agree that looking at power line voltage with 16- or 24-bits at 1 Msps is 
 going to reveal interesting amplitude and phase noise information. But see 
 how well a $1 PIC can do.
 
 Attached is a plot made using TimeLab + picPET just now. The picPET is fast 
 enough to capture the zero-crossing of every 60 Hz cycle with 400 ns 
 resolution; the TimeLab plots have tau0 of 16.67 ms.
 
 -- The blue trace was simply plugging a 9 VAC wall-wart into the picPET 
 though a 10k resistor.
 -- The pink trace was adding a 10 nF cap across the input.
 -- The green trace was unplugging my laptop switching power supply from the 
 same outlet!
 -- The red trace is replacing the mains wall-wart with a hp 33120A set to 
 9VAC at 60 Hz, a tentative noise floor measurement of the picPET when used 
 this way.
 
 My conclusions are that at least here in the US, or at least at my house, the 
 short-term stability of mains hits about 5e-6, at about tau 0.2 seconds. The 
 attached short-term plot is also not-inconsistent with the long-term plot at 
 http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/
 
 My other conclusion is that the picPET (a simple PIC-based time-stamping 
 counter) is doing a pretty good job measuring this. Note, no software or data 
 filtering was used. This is just raw serial/USB data going into TimeLab.
 
 /tvb
 mains-picpet-04.gif___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Mains frequency

2013-11-18 Thread Didier Juges
Tom,

Don't confuse everybody with facts, we had a good thread going :)

The PicPet is holding its own very well in that application.

I am surprised at the effect of the laptop supply. I would have certainly 
expected effect on phase noise (smaller taus), but not that close to the 
carrier. Do you know if it is a power factor corrected supply or not?

Didier KO4BB


Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com wrote:
Magnus,

I'm going to push back a bit on your mains sampling claim. Mostly, I'd
like to see the results of the professional I-Q demodulated gear that
you mentioned. Can you post raw data, or a sample plot?

I agree that looking at power line voltage with 16- or 24-bits at 1
Msps is going to reveal interesting amplitude and phase noise
information. But see how well a $1 PIC can do.

Attached is a plot made using TimeLab + picPET just now. The picPET is
fast enough to capture the zero-crossing of every 60 Hz cycle with 400
ns resolution; the TimeLab plots have tau0 of 16.67 ms.

-- The blue trace was simply plugging a 9 VAC wall-wart into the picPET
though a 10k resistor.
-- The pink trace was adding a 10 nF cap across the input.
-- The green trace was unplugging my laptop switching power supply from
the same outlet!
-- The red trace is replacing the mains wall-wart with a hp 33120A set
to 9VAC at 60 Hz, a tentative noise floor measurement of the picPET
when used this way.

My conclusions are that at least here in the US, or at least at my
house, the short-term stability of mains hits about 5e-6, at about tau
0.2 seconds. The attached short-term plot is also not-inconsistent with
the long-term plot at http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/

My other conclusion is that the picPET (a simple PIC-based
time-stamping counter) is doing a pretty good job measuring this. Note,
no software or data filtering was used. This is just raw serial/USB
data going into TimeLab.

/tvb




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

-- 
Sent from my Motorola Droid Razr 4G LTE wireless tracker while I do other 
things.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Mains frequency

2013-11-18 Thread Bill Dailey
tom,

nice plots.  how do you figure out what the contribution of variability vs
noise? In other words there is a differential between the ideal and the
actual a dev curves... is there a way to tease out how much nose contribute
to that differential?  It does seem to me that there should be far less
short term variability ( 100s) than there appears to be.  Clearly in the
very short tau ( 0.1 s) the picPET can't tease that out but as the curves
diverge, how much of that is noise? between say 0.1s and 100s?  Being a
power plant operator I would say quite a bit although I am rethinking that
some due to the way the turbines push and pull each other.  I can envision
some fine whole grid oscillations due to that push and pull.

bill


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com wrote:

 Magnus,

 I'm going to push back a bit on your mains sampling claim. Mostly, I'd
 like to see the results of the professional I-Q demodulated gear that you
 mentioned. Can you post raw data, or a sample plot?

 I agree that looking at power line voltage with 16- or 24-bits at 1 Msps
 is going to reveal interesting amplitude and phase noise information. But
 see how well a $1 PIC can do.

 Attached is a plot made using TimeLab + picPET just now. The picPET is
 fast enough to capture the zero-crossing of every 60 Hz cycle with 400 ns
 resolution; the TimeLab plots have tau0 of 16.67 ms.

 -- The blue trace was simply plugging a 9 VAC wall-wart into the picPET
 though a 10k resistor.
 -- The pink trace was adding a 10 nF cap across the input.
 -- The green trace was unplugging my laptop switching power supply from
 the same outlet!
 -- The red trace is replacing the mains wall-wart with a hp 33120A set to
 9VAC at 60 Hz, a tentative noise floor measurement of the picPET when used
 this way.

 My conclusions are that at least here in the US, or at least at my house,
 the short-term stability of mains hits about 5e-6, at about tau 0.2
 seconds. The attached short-term plot is also not-inconsistent with the
 long-term plot at http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/

 My other conclusion is that the picPET (a simple PIC-based time-stamping
 counter) is doing a pretty good job measuring this. Note, no software or
 data filtering was used. This is just raw serial/USB data going into
 TimeLab.

 /tvb

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Doc

Bill Dailey
KXØO
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Mains frequency

2013-11-18 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

An “ideal” curve would go to the bottom of the scale as soon as the plot 
started. Anything that shows on the ADEV curve is by definition noise. The 
slope of the ADEV curve can help you determine what sort of noise it is. The 
slope(s) on an modified ADEV curve can do that slightly better.

Bob

On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Bill Dailey docdai...@gmail.com wrote:

 tom,
 
 nice plots.  how do you figure out what the contribution of variability vs
 noise? In other words there is a differential between the ideal and the
 actual a dev curves... is there a way to tease out how much nose contribute
 to that differential?  It does seem to me that there should be far less
 short term variability ( 100s) than there appears to be.  Clearly in the
 very short tau ( 0.1 s) the picPET can't tease that out but as the curves
 diverge, how much of that is noise? between say 0.1s and 100s?  Being a
 power plant operator I would say quite a bit although I am rethinking that
 some due to the way the turbines push and pull each other.  I can envision
 some fine whole grid oscillations due to that push and pull.
 
 bill
 
 
 On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com wrote:
 
 Magnus,
 
 I'm going to push back a bit on your mains sampling claim. Mostly, I'd
 like to see the results of the professional I-Q demodulated gear that you
 mentioned. Can you post raw data, or a sample plot?
 
 I agree that looking at power line voltage with 16- or 24-bits at 1 Msps
 is going to reveal interesting amplitude and phase noise information. But
 see how well a $1 PIC can do.
 
 Attached is a plot made using TimeLab + picPET just now. The picPET is
 fast enough to capture the zero-crossing of every 60 Hz cycle with 400 ns
 resolution; the TimeLab plots have tau0 of 16.67 ms.
 
 -- The blue trace was simply plugging a 9 VAC wall-wart into the picPET
 though a 10k resistor.
 -- The pink trace was adding a 10 nF cap across the input.
 -- The green trace was unplugging my laptop switching power supply from
 the same outlet!
 -- The red trace is replacing the mains wall-wart with a hp 33120A set to
 9VAC at 60 Hz, a tentative noise floor measurement of the picPET when used
 this way.
 
 My conclusions are that at least here in the US, or at least at my house,
 the short-term stability of mains hits about 5e-6, at about tau 0.2
 seconds. The attached short-term plot is also not-inconsistent with the
 long-term plot at http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/
 
 My other conclusion is that the picPET (a simple PIC-based time-stamping
 counter) is doing a pretty good job measuring this. Note, no software or
 data filtering was used. This is just raw serial/USB data going into
 TimeLab.
 
 /tvb
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Doc
 
 Bill Dailey
 KXØO
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Mains frequency

2013-11-18 Thread Bill Dailey
I meant ideal at the noise floor of the picPET (i.e in this case the
generated 60Hz).


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:

 Hi

 An “ideal” curve would go to the bottom of the scale as soon as the plot
 started. Anything that shows on the ADEV curve is by definition noise. The
 slope of the ADEV curve can help you determine what sort of noise it is.
 The slope(s) on an modified ADEV curve can do that slightly better.

 Bob

 On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Bill Dailey docdai...@gmail.com wrote:

  tom,
 
  nice plots.  how do you figure out what the contribution of variability
 vs
  noise? In other words there is a differential between the ideal and the
  actual a dev curves... is there a way to tease out how much nose
 contribute
  to that differential?  It does seem to me that there should be far less
  short term variability ( 100s) than there appears to be.  Clearly in the
  very short tau ( 0.1 s) the picPET can't tease that out but as the
 curves
  diverge, how much of that is noise? between say 0.1s and 100s?  Being a
  power plant operator I would say quite a bit although I am rethinking
 that
  some due to the way the turbines push and pull each other.  I can
 envision
  some fine whole grid oscillations due to that push and pull.
 
  bill
 
 
  On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com
 wrote:
 
  Magnus,
 
  I'm going to push back a bit on your mains sampling claim. Mostly, I'd
  like to see the results of the professional I-Q demodulated gear that
 you
  mentioned. Can you post raw data, or a sample plot?
 
  I agree that looking at power line voltage with 16- or 24-bits at 1 Msps
  is going to reveal interesting amplitude and phase noise information.
 But
  see how well a $1 PIC can do.
 
  Attached is a plot made using TimeLab + picPET just now. The picPET is
  fast enough to capture the zero-crossing of every 60 Hz cycle with 400
 ns
  resolution; the TimeLab plots have tau0 of 16.67 ms.
 
  -- The blue trace was simply plugging a 9 VAC wall-wart into the picPET
  though a 10k resistor.
  -- The pink trace was adding a 10 nF cap across the input.
  -- The green trace was unplugging my laptop switching power supply from
  the same outlet!
  -- The red trace is replacing the mains wall-wart with a hp 33120A set
 to
  9VAC at 60 Hz, a tentative noise floor measurement of the picPET when
 used
  this way.
 
  My conclusions are that at least here in the US, or at least at my
 house,
  the short-term stability of mains hits about 5e-6, at about tau 0.2
  seconds. The attached short-term plot is also not-inconsistent with the
  long-term plot at http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/
 
  My other conclusion is that the picPET (a simple PIC-based time-stamping
  counter) is doing a pretty good job measuring this. Note, no software or
  data filtering was used. This is just raw serial/USB data going into
  TimeLab.
 
  /tvb
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 
  --
  Doc
 
  Bill Dailey
  KXØO
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Doc

Bill Dailey
KXØO
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Mains frequency

2013-11-18 Thread Peter Gottlieb
The power supply contribution is interesting.  This might have been a useful 
tool when a year ago I was playing with some very large inverters on a 
microgrid.  I had one inverter as master (in UF mode) and two others as 
grid-connected slaves in PQ mode.  The first slave would come online just fine 
yet when the second was synched the entire microgrid would go unstable.  It was 
noise at the zero crossings but not enough to see on a scope.


With all the distributed generation coming online I would be wary of relying on 
those zero crossings.


Peter



On 11/18/2013 5:15 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:

Magnus,

I'm going to push back a bit on your mains sampling claim. Mostly, I'd like to 
see the results of the professional I-Q demodulated gear that you mentioned. 
Can you post raw data, or a sample plot?

I agree that looking at power line voltage with 16- or 24-bits at 1 Msps is 
going to reveal interesting amplitude and phase noise information. But see how 
well a $1 PIC can do.

Attached is a plot made using TimeLab + picPET just now. The picPET is fast 
enough to capture the zero-crossing of every 60 Hz cycle with 400 ns 
resolution; the TimeLab plots have tau0 of 16.67 ms.

-- The blue trace was simply plugging a 9 VAC wall-wart into the picPET though 
a 10k resistor.
-- The pink trace was adding a 10 nF cap across the input.
-- The green trace was unplugging my laptop switching power supply from the 
same outlet!
-- The red trace is replacing the mains wall-wart with a hp 33120A set to 9VAC 
at 60 Hz, a tentative noise floor measurement of the picPET when used this way.

My conclusions are that at least here in the US, or at least at my house, the 
short-term stability of mains hits about 5e-6, at about tau 0.2 seconds. The 
attached short-term plot is also not-inconsistent with the long-term plot at 
http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/

My other conclusion is that the picPET (a simple PIC-based time-stamping 
counter) is doing a pretty good job measuring this. Note, no software or data 
filtering was used. This is just raw serial/USB data going into TimeLab.

/tvb


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Mains frequency

2013-11-18 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

There is no way to come up with the noise floor of the picPET from that plot. 
In fact coming up with the floor of a single channel device like the picPET is 
not all that easy. First you need an ideal noise free sine wave signal …. I’ve 
spent more than a few hours on that particular project with other list members 
involved as well. As always we kept it off list to keep from offending those 
who place a high value on their bandwidth. 

Bob

On Nov 18, 2013, at 9:11 PM, Bill Dailey docdai...@gmail.com wrote:

 I meant ideal at the noise floor of the picPET (i.e in this case the
 generated 60Hz).
 
 
 On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 An “ideal” curve would go to the bottom of the scale as soon as the plot
 started. Anything that shows on the ADEV curve is by definition noise. The
 slope of the ADEV curve can help you determine what sort of noise it is.
 The slope(s) on an modified ADEV curve can do that slightly better.
 
 Bob
 
 On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Bill Dailey docdai...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 tom,
 
 nice plots.  how do you figure out what the contribution of variability
 vs
 noise? In other words there is a differential between the ideal and the
 actual a dev curves... is there a way to tease out how much nose
 contribute
 to that differential?  It does seem to me that there should be far less
 short term variability ( 100s) than there appears to be.  Clearly in the
 very short tau ( 0.1 s) the picPET can't tease that out but as the
 curves
 diverge, how much of that is noise? between say 0.1s and 100s?  Being a
 power plant operator I would say quite a bit although I am rethinking
 that
 some due to the way the turbines push and pull each other.  I can
 envision
 some fine whole grid oscillations due to that push and pull.
 
 bill
 
 
 On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com
 wrote:
 
 Magnus,
 
 I'm going to push back a bit on your mains sampling claim. Mostly, I'd
 like to see the results of the professional I-Q demodulated gear that
 you
 mentioned. Can you post raw data, or a sample plot?
 
 I agree that looking at power line voltage with 16- or 24-bits at 1 Msps
 is going to reveal interesting amplitude and phase noise information.
 But
 see how well a $1 PIC can do.
 
 Attached is a plot made using TimeLab + picPET just now. The picPET is
 fast enough to capture the zero-crossing of every 60 Hz cycle with 400
 ns
 resolution; the TimeLab plots have tau0 of 16.67 ms.
 
 -- The blue trace was simply plugging a 9 VAC wall-wart into the picPET
 though a 10k resistor.
 -- The pink trace was adding a 10 nF cap across the input.
 -- The green trace was unplugging my laptop switching power supply from
 the same outlet!
 -- The red trace is replacing the mains wall-wart with a hp 33120A set
 to
 9VAC at 60 Hz, a tentative noise floor measurement of the picPET when
 used
 this way.
 
 My conclusions are that at least here in the US, or at least at my
 house,
 the short-term stability of mains hits about 5e-6, at about tau 0.2
 seconds. The attached short-term plot is also not-inconsistent with the
 long-term plot at http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/
 
 My other conclusion is that the picPET (a simple PIC-based time-stamping
 counter) is doing a pretty good job measuring this. Note, no software or
 data filtering was used. This is just raw serial/USB data going into
 TimeLab.
 
 /tvb
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 
 --
 Doc
 
 Bill Dailey
 KXØO
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Doc
 
 Bill Dailey
 KXØO
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Mains frequency

2013-11-18 Thread Bill Dailey
ok Bob,

Then how do you tease out the difference between the clean generated 60Hz
and the mains 60Hz adev curves to determine what is noise and what is the
variability in the 60Hz?  That is the point of my question not semantics
about ideal vs non-ideal.

doc


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:

 Hi

 There is no way to come up with the noise floor of the picPET from that
 plot. In fact coming up with the floor of a single channel device like the
 picPET is not all that easy. First you need an ideal noise free sine wave
 signal …. I’ve spent more than a few hours on that particular project with
 other list members involved as well. As always we kept it off list to keep
 from offending those who place a high value on their bandwidth.

 Bob

 On Nov 18, 2013, at 9:11 PM, Bill Dailey docdai...@gmail.com wrote:

  I meant ideal at the noise floor of the picPET (i.e in this case the
  generated 60Hz).
 
 
  On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 
  Hi
 
  An “ideal” curve would go to the bottom of the scale as soon as the plot
  started. Anything that shows on the ADEV curve is by definition noise.
 The
  slope of the ADEV curve can help you determine what sort of noise it is.
  The slope(s) on an modified ADEV curve can do that slightly better.
 
  Bob
 
  On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Bill Dailey docdai...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  tom,
 
  nice plots.  how do you figure out what the contribution of variability
  vs
  noise? In other words there is a differential between the ideal and
 the
  actual a dev curves... is there a way to tease out how much nose
  contribute
  to that differential?  It does seem to me that there should be far less
  short term variability ( 100s) than there appears to be.  Clearly in
 the
  very short tau ( 0.1 s) the picPET can't tease that out but as the
  curves
  diverge, how much of that is noise? between say 0.1s and 100s?  Being a
  power plant operator I would say quite a bit although I am rethinking
  that
  some due to the way the turbines push and pull each other.  I can
  envision
  some fine whole grid oscillations due to that push and pull.
 
  bill
 
 
  On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com
  wrote:
 
  Magnus,
 
  I'm going to push back a bit on your mains sampling claim. Mostly, I'd
  like to see the results of the professional I-Q demodulated gear that
  you
  mentioned. Can you post raw data, or a sample plot?
 
  I agree that looking at power line voltage with 16- or 24-bits at 1
 Msps
  is going to reveal interesting amplitude and phase noise information.
  But
  see how well a $1 PIC can do.
 
  Attached is a plot made using TimeLab + picPET just now. The picPET is
  fast enough to capture the zero-crossing of every 60 Hz cycle with 400
  ns
  resolution; the TimeLab plots have tau0 of 16.67 ms.
 
  -- The blue trace was simply plugging a 9 VAC wall-wart into the
 picPET
  though a 10k resistor.
  -- The pink trace was adding a 10 nF cap across the input.
  -- The green trace was unplugging my laptop switching power supply
 from
  the same outlet!
  -- The red trace is replacing the mains wall-wart with a hp 33120A set
  to
  9VAC at 60 Hz, a tentative noise floor measurement of the picPET when
  used
  this way.
 
  My conclusions are that at least here in the US, or at least at my
  house,
  the short-term stability of mains hits about 5e-6, at about tau 0.2
  seconds. The attached short-term plot is also not-inconsistent with
 the
  long-term plot at http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/
 
  My other conclusion is that the picPET (a simple PIC-based
 time-stamping
  counter) is doing a pretty good job measuring this. Note, no software
 or
  data filtering was used. This is just raw serial/USB data going into
  TimeLab.
 
  /tvb
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 
  --
  Doc
 
  Bill Dailey
  KXØO
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 
  --
  Doc
 
  Bill Dailey
  KXØO
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




-- 
Doc