Re: [time-nuts] more ADEV tools

2014-03-20 Thread John C. Westmoreland, P.E.
Tom,

Thank you for posting this.

Regards,
John Westmoreland
On Mar 20, 2014 3:16 PM, "Tom Van Baak"  wrote:

> I wrote two new ADEV command line tools that some of you may be interested
> in.
>
> adev4 calculates adev for a linear range, from tau to tau step tau.
> adev5 calculates adev for a logarithmic range, from log(tau) to
> log(tau) step log(tau).
>
> The both calculate ADEV, MDEV, HDEV, or TDEV.
> For large data files, performance is ten or a hundred times faster than
> other adev tools.
>
> Grab adev4.c adev5.c (windows: adev4.exe adev5.exe) under
> www.LeapSecond.com/tools/
> In a couple of days I'll post a note which will explain why I needed these
> tools.
>
> /tvb
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Specs for Bliley NV47M1008?

2014-03-20 Thread Chris Albertson
I found a Bliley 10MHz OCXO model NV47M1008

Anyone here know about these?  They seem to be available for about
$11.00 or so.
I looked around on the web and found specs for units that are "kind of
like" this but not this exact model.

You can see one at eBay #171274003103



Thanks,

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing

2014-03-20 Thread Joe Leikhim
I just red somewhere that the last "ping" was the only one recorded by 
Inmarsat system, Pings up to that point were presumed to occur due to 
known reporting intervals. So there is no "track".


The Inmarsat data is a red herring. The plane could have ditched into 
the water 85 minutes after the "incident:, at location near last radar 
contact and floated with Inmarsat operating on service battery for hours.


The ELT's used in this aircraft have been implicated in two fires due to 
shorted lithium battery wires. There was an AD/Recall issued.  No 
reports whatsoever about the ELT being activated, so if it burned.. 
Good only for 48 hours or so anyway if looking in the wrong place.


Maybe there is a market for Orbcomm asset tracking transmitters mounted 
way up in an inaccessible location of the tail with own back up battery 
supply.


--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] more ADEV tools

2014-03-20 Thread Tom Van Baak
I wrote two new ADEV command line tools that some of you may be interested in.

adev4 calculates adev for a linear range, from tau to tau step tau.
adev5 calculates adev for a logarithmic range, from log(tau) to log(tau) 
step log(tau).

The both calculate ADEV, MDEV, HDEV, or TDEV.
For large data files, performance is ten or a hundred times faster than other 
adev tools.

Grab adev4.c adev5.c (windows: adev4.exe adev5.exe) under 
www.LeapSecond.com/tools/
In a couple of days I'll post a note which will explain why I needed these 
tools.

/tvb
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing

2014-03-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , "Stanley" writes:

>Missing plane this ping was not lost why would others be lost ? This ping 
>was retrieved long after (days) it was received why would it be the only one ?

The point is that they might have been able to do more precise pings
in real-time, but now that it's on file in lower resolution, that's
too late.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing

2014-03-20 Thread Stanley
Missing plane this ping was not lost why would others be lost ? This ping 
was retrieved long after (days) it was received why would it be the only one 
?

Stanley

- Original Message - 
From: "Jim Lux" 

To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing



On 3/20/14 8:53 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <40280C39FE7D43C79313A1755BCAF58D@StanleyPC>, "Stanley" 
writes:


Would think they have many other aircraft with known position stationary 
or

moving with location known to help improve the estimate.


They might have been able to do that while the plane responded, but
now that the plane is silent it is too late.



It's also not something they really do as part of regular operations. It's 
probably more like a long term performance monitoring thing to make sure 
the satellite isn't degrading, or mis pointed.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing

2014-03-20 Thread Jim Lux

On 3/20/14 8:53 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

In message <40280C39FE7D43C79313A1755BCAF58D@StanleyPC>, "Stanley" writes:


Would think they have many other aircraft with known position stationary or
moving with location known to help improve the estimate.


They might have been able to do that while the plane responded, but
now that the plane is silent it is too late.



It's also not something they really do as part of regular operations. 
It's probably more like a long term performance monitoring thing to make 
sure the satellite isn't degrading, or mis pointed.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing

2014-03-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <532ae780.4020...@earthlink.net>, Jim Lux writes:
>On 3/20/14 12:07 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>Is there a document that describes the system somewhere?  I've seen 
>various descriptions of what's going on. Do they use timing or amplitude 
>measurements?

It is a timing measurement and it's not really designed to be precise.

I belive the basic timing accuracy just below +/- 1msec.

As the signal flies, that is +/- 300km.

Projecting that onto the spherical planet, with an antenna angle around
40 degrees smears it out by a factor of roughly 1.5 and that's where
the 740 km comes from.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing

2014-03-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <40280C39FE7D43C79313A1755BCAF58D@StanleyPC>, "Stanley" writes:

>Would think they have many other aircraft with known position stationary or 
>moving with location known to help improve the estimate.

They might have been able to do that while the plane responded, but
now that the plane is silent it is too late.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing

2014-03-20 Thread Stanley
Would think they have many other aircraft with known position stationary or 
moving with location known to help improve the estimate.

Stanley
- Original Message - 
From: "Jim Lux" 

To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing



On 3/20/14 12:07 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <279331507.5734621395275538874.JavaMail.actor@webmail5>, 
"iovane@inw

ind.it" writes:

My question was on what would be the expected accuracy of the circle's 
radius.


Projected onto the surface of the earth, the uncertainty leaves a band
approx 740km wide.



Is there a document that describes the system somewhere?  I've seen 
various descriptions of what's going on. Do they use timing or amplitude 
measurements?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing

2014-03-20 Thread Jim Lux

On 3/20/14 12:07 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

In message <279331507.5734621395275538874.JavaMail.actor@webmail5>, "iovane@inw
ind.it" writes:


My question was on what would be the expected accuracy of the circle's radius.


Projected onto the surface of the earth, the uncertainty leaves a band
approx 740km wide.



Is there a document that describes the system somewhere?  I've seen 
various descriptions of what's going on. Do they use timing or amplitude 
measurements?

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Aircraft ping timing

2014-03-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <279331507.5734621395275538874.JavaMail.actor@webmail5>, "iovane@inw
ind.it" writes:

>My question was on what would be the expected accuracy of the circle's radius.

Projected onto the surface of the earth, the uncertainty leaves a band
approx 740km wide.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.