[time-nuts] Frequency doubler 5/10 and distribution amplifier for Lucent KS-24361

2015-04-02 Thread Philip Gladstone
I'm coming late to this thread from January -- but did anybody ever make 
the PCBs for Gerhard's 10MHz output board? I'm interested.


I just got my pair of RFTG's.

Philip
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Striking change in iPhone time accuracy with 8.2

2015-04-02 Thread Paul
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Oz-in-DFW li...@ozindfw.net wrote:

 The phone has to keep synch within a few microseconds of the network.


I suspect only the so-called baseband system needs to  maintain any
synchronization with the RF network and the alarm clock is only loosely
coupled. I have an LTE radio in my iPAD and according to Emerald Time the
alarm clock varies from .5s to .005s error. I'm sure a signifcant fraction
of that is server error but it doesn't seem worth it to do more careful
testing given how fussy Emerald Time can be.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] audio-visual perception of time (was: Striking change in iPhone time accuracy with 8.2)

2015-04-02 Thread Attila Kinali
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:11:54 -0700
Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:

 The key jingle experiment is detecting a phase difference between
 ears.   I was writing about our ability to know if a sound is in
 time with some other sound.  For example if a bass player is keeping
 time with a drummer.   I figure we can do that to about 20 ms or maybe
 a little better. 

Actually, quite a lot better. I cannot give you any hard numbers
as I dont have my perception psychology books with me and my google
skills fail to locate any good website, but quoting from memory:
You can assume that an average human can perceive audio-visual time
differences down to 3-10ms (flash to click), with a bit training probably
better. Just auditory time differences are quite a bit better, in the
couple 100us range (if you can avoid temporal masking effects).

But, a word of caution here: lot of the performance of the sensory
system depends on the training. Most people do not train neither
hearing nor seeing. They are contempt with flickering TV sets or
movies where audio is delayed by 30-40ms. They do not even perceive
it conciously and ignore it unconciously. But on the other side, if
you have someone who trains them, you can have interesting results.
For example ask one of your nices, who play first person shooters a lot,
about the jerking special effects in movies.

Anyways.. so much from my side on this OT.


Attila Kinali

-- 
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All 
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no 
use without that foundation.
 -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Good references on holdover?

2015-04-02 Thread pablo alvarez
Hi Javier,

As far as I understand in WR both references are synchronous. Why don't you
try to track both references (or N references) simultanously? If you take
care of the design, your performance should increase while locked and the
transition from one reference to the other if you ever miss one should be
smoother.

Cheers,

Pablo

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Javier Serrano 
javier.serrano.par...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear all,

 We would like to start working on holdover performance for White
 Rabbit [1]. This is a new domain for us. Our main use case is a WR
 switch losing its reference because someone disconnects a fiber. We
 can have redundancy, but it will take some time for a switch to change
 over to another reference. During this time, the oscillator in that
 switch will be free-running. We want to minimize the phase drift
 during that interval, which we think should be a couple of seconds
 maximum. We have never worked on holdover, and I am wondering if we
 can do something smarter than the obvious feeding of some constant
 voltage to the VCXO, based on averaging during the locked state. Does
 anybody know of any good references on holdover?

 Thanks!

 Javier

 [1] http://www.ohwr.org/projects/white-rabbit/wiki
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Striking change in iPhone time accuracy with 8.2

2015-04-02 Thread Oz-in-DFW

On 4/1/2015 2:31 PM, Paul wrote:

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Reid Oda reid@gmail.com wrote:


This seems to imply that the iPhone does get sub-second timing info from
GPS. Can anyone confirm/deny this?


As of iOS N where I believe N == 5 it does the equivalent of calling
ntpdate every few hours if the network is available.  I assume it uses the
mobile system if the network is unavailable and you have a cellular radio
because the devices (can) have a lot of drift.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
The phone has to keep synch within a few microseconds of the network.  
There was a time when operators were very sloppy about clock time and 
really only worried about network frequency, but most operators are now 
maintaining 50 ns or so at the base stations and have to maintain within 
5 microseconds to meet the LTE specs.  How much of this is preserved 
through to the user interface is anyone's guess.


--
mailto:o...@ozindfw.net
Oz
POB 93167
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport)



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Lucent KS-24361 mystery LED resolved.

2015-04-02 Thread Luke Mester
There are two LED's on the circuit board next to the power supply module.
One is green blinking. I'd never seen the other one on.

I needed to get them off of my bench power supply and onto a permanent
supply. I tried a 24V  3A supply. They must have been cheating a little on
the ratings. The voltage dropped down to about 16V when the oven heaters
fired up. I noticed that the mystery LED was lit. It's red. A good guess is
that it's a power fault indicator. The LED's are next to the black power
supply module. A picture is attached.

Also, Below is a link to some plots from Ulrich Bangert's Z38XX software of
the initial day of operation. The units had about 30 minutes of run time
before I got a permanent power supply, GPS Antenna  and RS-422 connection
set up. I thought it was interesting to see the graph of the EFC Value
slowly flattening out. I guess if I was asleep for 15 years It'd probably
take me a while to get going too :-)

http://mesterhome.com/timenuts/gpsdo/

-- 
Luke Mester
http://mesterhome.com/
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.