Re: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

2015-07-18 Thread billriches
FYI Wildwood eLoran will be fired up 1300Z Saturday (today) and 1900Z Monday
thru Thursday.  Happy listening.  Any reports would be appreciated and I
will pass them along to the engineer that is driving the train.

73,

Bill, WA2DVU
Cape Mahy

-Original Message-
From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net] 
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:04 PM
To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...


FYI GRI for Wildwood is 8970.

Bill, WA2DVU
Cape May


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors

2015-07-18 Thread Alex Pummer
noise figure, noise voltage, noise current: 
http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slyt094/slyt094.pdf



On 7/18/2015 2:16 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:25:10 -0400
Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:


A pair of Zetex (Diodes, Inc.)
ZTX849 or FZT849 actually have significantly lower voltage noise than
either the LM394 or MAT12.

I always wonder how you figure out whether a transistor is low noise
or not. What part of the datasheet hints at which transistors have low
noise and which have not? Even if it's just try and measure, how
do you find good candidates to measure?

Attila Kinali



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Rohde Schwarz frequency standard and controller

2015-07-18 Thread KA2WEU--- via time-nuts
Good morning,
 
I have 3 working XSRM Rubidium RS standards in use, at 60 KHz , the  short 
term stability is better  then the more modern ones but the internal  
battery system does not work (well) . External 24 V  charger is  better.
 
Ulrich, N1UL 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/18/2015 10:25:58 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
robe...@dcsi.net.au writes:

Hello  Group,
I recently acquired a couple of R  S XSD frequency standards  and XKE 
frequency controllers ( circa mid 1960's ) as well as the manuals  that 
go with them.
I've had a quick look on the net and haven't found  much in the way of 
documentation so I have scanned the manuals into PDF  files. They include 
schematics, parts lists, operation and fault finding  with the XSD manual 
coming in at 79 Meg and the XKE manual coming in at 41  Meg.
I have put them up on Didier's website for access.
Cheers  Everyone,
Rob  VK3BRS
___
time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 5 x 2 x 3 = 30 MHz

2015-07-18 Thread Jim Lux
The whole USO is about $1M, the vast majority of which is labor.  

Analysis, testing, paperwork, etc

Jim






 Original message 
From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org 
Date: 07/18/2015  02:10  (GMT+00:00) 
To: tim...@timeok.it, Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com 
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 5 x 2 x 3 = 30 MHz 

Hi

The basic space grade crystal is in the $400 to $1000 range (depends on 
quantity). After they
do the 10:1 sort, the resulting ones are (effectively) $4K to $10K each. The 
cost just goes 
up from there.If you count in the labor, it probably adds another 30% to the 
cost. 

If you don’t do the sorts, the basic crystal is not (on average) much better 
than any other 5MHz
unit with the same blank size. Yield through the whole process is dependent on 
the batch they get.
It *may* be  10%. 

Bob

 On Jul 17, 2015, at 5:50 AM, tim...@timeok.it wrote:
 
 
 I an curious to know the price of this crystal.
 
 Luciano
 
 
 
 On Fri 17/07/15 00:02 , KA2WEU--- via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:
 
 I am working with this .. amazing device, Ulrich N1UL
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts [1]
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 Links:
 --
 [1]
 http://webmail.timeok.it/parse.php?redirect=https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ma
 ilman/listinfo/time-nuts
 
 Message sent via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 5 x 2 x 3 = 30 MHz

2015-07-18 Thread KA2WEU--- via time-nuts
Good morning,
 
the AT Cut is inherently noisier then the SC cut but the SC has some  
spurious resonances  modes. Measurements below 1 Hz are very tricky as the  
oscillator must be (more or less) insulated from hum, infrared (heater) .  Here 
I 
am still struggling .
 
Ulrich N1UL
 
 
In a message dated 7/17/2015 9:59:55 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
n1...@dartmouth.edu writes:

He  doesn't mention that that crystal is used in New Horizons:  
http://www.bliley.com/products/crystals-precision-standard/vacuum-sealed/

Nice.   I have a similar crystal from Valpey-Fischer, 5 MHz 5th overtone 
AT-cut  (as opposed to your 3rd overtone SC-cut).  I would be interested 
in  what you would use for an oscillator circuit.

David N1HAC


On  7/17/15 4:27 PM, paul swed wrote:
 Ulrich,
 Nice picture. What  are you doing with the crystal? I have several older
 crystals that are  nice but have never done anything with them.
 Regards
  Paul
 WB8TSL

 On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, KA2WEU---  via time-nuts 
time-nuts@febo.com
  wrote:

 I am working with this .. amazing device,  Ulrich N1UL
  ___
 time-nuts mailing  list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow  the instructions there.

  ___
 time-nuts mailing list  -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the  instructions  there.

___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Firmware and antenna for Stanford Research FS700 Loran C frequency standard

2015-07-18 Thread Ole Stender Nielsen

I had a few LM394CN left and used one for the pre-amp.
I would try to use another low-noise transistor. Furthermore, you do not 
necessarily need a matched pair. The transistor on the right in the 
schematic is merely used for biasing the amplifying transistor on the 
left. The prices for matched pairs can get ridiculously high, so I too 
would try to look for alternatives. If you still want a matched pair, 
there's the SSM2212 from Analog Devices, which is priced lower than the 
MAT12. You may also be able to find the earlier SSM2210, which now is 
obsolete. Another alternative is the THAT300 from THAT Corporation, 
which has 4 low-noise NPNs in a 14-pin DIP (great for experiments...)
Useful single NPN transistors I can think of would likely be the BC337 
or perhaps the 2SC3324 which both have low Rbb, and they are quite cheap.


The Ca. 3 Ohm was indeed the estimated input resistance, including the 
series resistance of the input capacitor as I recall.


Best regards
Ole

Den 17-07-2015 kl. 22:49 skrev Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd):

On 16 July 2015 at 08:05, Ole Stender Nielsen ols...@mail.tele.dk wrote:


I use a home-made untuned loop antenna with 4 windings of 2.5 mm2
insulated wire on a 80 x 80 cm wooden frame, and with a grounded base
pre-amplifier mounted on the antenna frame. A schematic is enclosed for you
to copy.
The pre-amplifier is powered through the cable, and loads the FS700 input
as required.
I live about 290 km from the island of Sylt, and get nice noise margin
figures from the FS700, normally about 40 dB, often up to 46 dB.


A couple of questions

1) Do you have any suggestions for a replacement for the LM394CN, which is
obsolete and unobtainable from any reputable source? There are plenty on
eBay for a few $'s from China, but the probability of them being fakes is
greater than 0.99. The MAT12 seems to be one possible candidate for a
replacement and while not cheap, is available from reputable sources like
Farnell.

2) What is the Ca. 3 Ohm to the left of your circuit? Is that what you
estimate the input impedance is? I've got 95 m of 2.5 mm^2 wire. The
resistance of that is about 7.41 mOhm/m so my 95 m would have a DC
resistance of around  7 Ohms if I used it all.

I have built the loop 1.0 x 1.2 m. Hopefully that will be ok to receive at
least one or both of

* Lessay, France, power = 250 kW, distance = 321 km, bearing = 211 degrees.
* Anthorn, England, power =- 250 kW, distance = 419 km, bearing 331 degrees.

I now need to work out how many turns to put on it.

Dave
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Firmware and antenna for Stanford Research FS700

2015-07-18 Thread Alex Pummer
generally larger transistors running at much lower current than they 
inteded for have lover noise figure, but much larger input and [Cbe] and 
feedback Ccb] capacitance, the same effect could be achieved putting 
--for AC!-- low noise transistors paralell [ signal voltage adds 
arithmetically, noise voltage adds vectorial -- quadratic like power ] 
most of the case power transistors are also not so fast lower fT.


On 7/18/2015 3:16 AM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:

On 18 July 2015 at 04:25, Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:


Dave wrote:

  1) Do you have any suggestions for a replacement for the LM394CN, which is

obsolete and unobtainable from any reputable source? There are plenty on
eBay for a few $'s from China, but the probability of them being fakes is
greater than 0.99. The MAT12 seems to be one possible candidate for a
replacement and while not cheap, is available from reputable sources like
Farnell.


The MAT12 should certainly work, but there is *plenty* of DC degeneration
in the circuit (1v at each emitter), so there is no advantage to matched
transistors.  A pair of Zetex (Diodes, Inc.) ZTX849 or FZT849 actually have
significantly lower voltage noise than either the LM394 or MAT12.

Best regards,

Charles


Do you really mean the ZTX849? It is a power transistor (5A continuous
current collector current, 20 A peak collector current), with no
specification for noise on the data sheet. It would on the face of it
hardly seem a wise choice for a low noise amplifier, but perhaps you know
something I don't.

The LM394CN or MAT12 are at least a low-noise devices, even if the matching
between the two transistors in the package is not needed.

Dave
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Rohde Schwarz frequency standard and controller

2015-07-18 Thread roberts

Hello Group,
I recently acquired a couple of R  S XSD frequency standards and XKE 
frequency controllers ( circa mid 1960's ) as well as the manuals that 
go with them.
I've had a quick look on the net and haven't found much in the way of 
documentation so I have scanned the manuals into PDF files. They include 
schematics, parts lists, operation and fault finding with the XSD manual 
coming in at 79 Meg and the XKE manual coming in at 41 Meg.

I have put them up on Didier's website for access.
Cheers Everyone,
Rob VK3BRS
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors (was: Firmware and antenna for Stanford Research FS700)

2015-07-18 Thread Attila Kinali
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:25:10 -0400
Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:

 A pair of Zetex (Diodes, Inc.) 
 ZTX849 or FZT849 actually have significantly lower voltage noise than 
 either the LM394 or MAT12.

I always wonder how you figure out whether a transistor is low noise
or not. What part of the datasheet hints at which transistors have low
noise and which have not? Even if it's just try and measure, how
do you find good candidates to measure?

Attila Kinali

-- 
I must not become metastable. 
Metastability is the mind-killer.
Metastability is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my metastability. 
I will permit it to pass over me and through me. 
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. 
Where the metastability has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Firmware and antenna for Stanford Research FS700

2015-07-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 18 July 2015 at 04:25, Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:

 Dave wrote:

  1) Do you have any suggestions for a replacement for the LM394CN, which is
 obsolete and unobtainable from any reputable source? There are plenty on
 eBay for a few $'s from China, but the probability of them being fakes is
 greater than 0.99. The MAT12 seems to be one possible candidate for a
 replacement and while not cheap, is available from reputable sources like
 Farnell.


 The MAT12 should certainly work, but there is *plenty* of DC degeneration
 in the circuit (1v at each emitter), so there is no advantage to matched
 transistors.  A pair of Zetex (Diodes, Inc.) ZTX849 or FZT849 actually have
 significantly lower voltage noise than either the LM394 or MAT12.

 Best regards,

 Charles


Do you really mean the ZTX849? It is a power transistor (5A continuous
current collector current, 20 A peak collector current), with no
specification for noise on the data sheet. It would on the face of it
hardly seem a wise choice for a low noise amplifier, but perhaps you know
something I don't.

The LM394CN or MAT12 are at least a low-noise devices, even if the matching
between the two transistors in the package is not needed.

Dave
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors (was: Firmware and antenna for Stanford Research FS700)

2015-07-18 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

You have (and always have had) two basic choices:

1) Buy a very expensive part from somebody who has gone to the trouble 
of characterizing the noise performance and will guarantee at least some
of what they show on the data sheet. 

2) Buy a bunch of cheap transistors and test them. Lock in on a
specific part and vendor. Keep monitoring what you get in case they “improve”
their process and the magic goes away. 

How do you select candidates? That’s never been easy, there is less and
less data on the sheets every day. Normally the first step is to look at
a vendor that you have had luck with in the past. The next step is to ask them…

Bob 



 On Jul 18, 2015, at 5:16 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:
 
 On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:25:10 -0400
 Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:
 
 A pair of Zetex (Diodes, Inc.) 
 ZTX849 or FZT849 actually have significantly lower voltage noise than 
 either the LM394 or MAT12.
 
 I always wonder how you figure out whether a transistor is low noise
 or not. What part of the datasheet hints at which transistors have low
 noise and which have not? Even if it's just try and measure, how
 do you find good candidates to measure?
 
   Attila Kinali
 
 -- 
 I must not become metastable. 
 Metastability is the mind-killer.
 Metastability is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
 I will face my metastability. 
 I will permit it to pass over me and through me. 
 And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. 
 Where the metastability has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Firmware and antenna for Stanford Research FS700

2015-07-18 Thread Charles Steinmetz

Dave wrote:


Do you really mean the ZTX849? It is a power transistor (5A continuous
current collector current, 20 A peak collector current), with no
specification for noise on the data sheet. It would on the face of it
hardly seem a wise choice for a low noise amplifier, but perhaps you know
something I don't.


Yep.  They are not marketed (yet) for low noise amplification, but 
they have about the lowest voltage noise you can get while at the 
same time not having huge junction capacitances and exhibiting good 
current gain down to 1mA and below.  Innovative process features that 
were developed to provide very low saturation voltage also produced 
benefits that were not targeted by the designers -- in this case, 
very low voltage noise.


Attila wrote:


I always wonder how you figure out whether a transistor is low noise
or not. What part of the datasheet hints at which transistors have low
noise and which have not? Even if it's just try and measure, how
do you find good candidates to measure?


Noise in BJTs is well correlated with the base spreading 
resistance, Rbb.  But Rbb is almost never given on datasheets, 
except in the case of a very few transistors marketed specifically as 
low-noise amplifiers (e.g., the obsolete Rohm 2SB737 and 2SD786).  It 
is well known that Rbb goes down as the die size increases, so large 
power transistors have sometimes been used as low-noise, small-signal 
amplifiers.  However, the current gain of 20 amp power transistors 
(TO-3, TO-220) generally falls off severely at the low currents used 
for small-signal amplifiers, and the large die have very large 
junction capacitances, which severely limits bandwidth.  Zetex makes 
a series of high-current, low Vsat transistors on much smaller die, 
using a new process that also maintains high current gain below 10 
mA.  I've been using the 849s as low-noise amplifiers since last 
century, and have recommended them a number of times both here and on 
the volt-nuts list.  As those who have read the new 3rd edition of 
The Art of Electronics know, the authors recommend the 849's cousin, 
ZTX/FZT851, in this same role.


One finds good candidates to measure by applying an understanding of 
basic solid state physics to what manufacturers *do* say about their 
products.  Or now, by reading the 3rd edition of The Art of 
Electronics.  (Like its predecessors, I consider this an absolutely 
indispensable book for anyone who dabbles with circuit design, from 
the newbie nimrod to the crusty old designer who has forgotten more 
than any newly-minted PhD/EE knows.)


I posted a lab note on measuring base spreading resistance to 
Didier's site long ago:


http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=06_Misc_Test_Equipment/3_Manuals_to_be_sorted/Measuring_base_spreading_resistance.pdf


Best regards,

Charles


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

2015-07-18 Thread billriches
Correction on times for Mon - thurs - start 900 edst - 1300Z


-Original Message-
From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net] 
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 7:05 AM
To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

FYI Wildwood eLoran will be fired up 1300Z Saturday (today) and 1300Z Monday
thru Thursday.  Happy listening.  Any reports would be appreciated and I
will pass them along to the engineer that is driving the train.

73,

Bill, WA2DVU
Cape Mahy

-Original Message-
From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:04 PM
To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...


FYI GRI for Wildwood is 8970.

Bill, WA2DVU
Cape May


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

2015-07-18 Thread paul swed
OK LORAN is on the air up in Boston.
I had just turned off various equipment this morning.
So starting it back up after testing it yesterday.
Lots of large static crashes.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 7:04 AM, billriches bill.ric...@verizon.net wrote:

 FYI Wildwood eLoran will be fired up 1300Z Saturday (today) and 1900Z
 Monday
 thru Thursday.  Happy listening.  Any reports would be appreciated and I
 will pass them along to the engineer that is driving the train.

 73,

 Bill, WA2DVU
 Cape Mahy

 -Original Message-
 From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net]
 Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:04 PM
 To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
 Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...


 FYI GRI for Wildwood is 8970.

 Bill, WA2DVU
 Cape May


 ---
 This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
 https://www.avast.com/antivirus

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

2015-07-18 Thread Scott McGrath
What GRI is in use I'll fire up my austron as well Central NH location

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

 On Jul 18, 2015, at 1:42 PM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Bill I will let you know what the Austrons say for signal level. Fact is
 they locked up fast.
 My FS700 is taking its time.
 
 Graham it will sound different as there are no competing stations on other
 GRIs. Thats the very first thing that hits you. Additionally its only 1
 station. But that same station is sending the master and secondary delayed
 emission. Its simply not the same ole sound. But it still works very well
 for checking frequency.
 
 Regards
 Paul
 WB8TSL
 
 On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, billriches bill.ric...@verizon.net
 wrote:
 
 Correction on times for Mon - thurs - start 900 edst - 1300Z
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net]
 Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 7:05 AM
 To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
 Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...
 
 FYI Wildwood eLoran will be fired up 1300Z Saturday (today) and 1300Z
 Monday
 thru Thursday.  Happy listening.  Any reports would be appreciated and I
 will pass them along to the engineer that is driving the train.
 
 73,
 
 Bill, WA2DVU
 Cape Mahy
 
 -Original Message-
 From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net]
 Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:04 PM
 To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
 Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...
 
 
 FYI GRI for Wildwood is 8970.
 
 Bill, WA2DVU
 Cape May
 
 
 ---
 This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
 https://www.avast.com/antivirus
 
 
 ---
 This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
 https://www.avast.com/antivirus
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

2015-07-18 Thread billriches
Hi Paul - how do you figure boston?  The only station up is Wildwood, NJ

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 1:15 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

OK LORAN is on the air up in Boston.
I had just turned off various equipment this morning.
So starting it back up after testing it yesterday.
Lots of large static crashes.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 7:04 AM, billriches bill.ric...@verizon.net wrote:

 FYI Wildwood eLoran will be fired up 1300Z Saturday (today) and 1900Z 
 Monday thru Thursday.  Happy listening.  Any reports would be 
 appreciated and I will pass them along to the engineer that is driving 
 the train.

 73,

 Bill, WA2DVU
 Cape Mahy

 -Original Message-
 From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net]
 Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:04 PM
 To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
 Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...


 FYI GRI for Wildwood is 8970.

 Bill, WA2DVU
 Cape May


 ---
 This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
 https://www.avast.com/antivirus

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors

2015-07-18 Thread KA2WEU--- via time-nuts
Good afternoon,
 
There is a problem in the literature that people confuse the  spot noise 
figure and the large signal  noise properties. Here AF and KF  needs to be 
known and considered.
 
 
Here is the mathematical correct  formula in a Word for Windows Form  
attached file.
If you use it for publications, please quote me . Thanks 
 
My advise is take a BIP transistor , fT not much more then 20 x operating  
frequency  (lower flicker component) and operate it at 15 to 20 % of  ICmax.
 
 The BFG540 is amongst the best Oscillators  oscillators 
 
http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/BFG540_X_XR_N.pdf
 
Now you outperform most colleagues 
 
73 de Ulrich N1UL
 

x
 
 
In a message dated 7/18/2015 1:19:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
p...@petelancashire.com writes:



https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=measuring+transistor+noisehl=enas_sdt
=0as_vis=1oi=scholart





OscPN.docx
Description: Binary data
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors

2015-07-18 Thread Alex Pummer
but be sure that you have a hp4470B --a transistor noise analyzer  [ 
http://www.testequipmenthq.com/datasheets/Agilent-4470B-Datasheet.pdf ]

73
Alex

On 7/18/2015 8:47 AM, Pete Lancashire wrote:

I agree with Bob, find a vendor you can trust and make sure you buy from an
authorized distributor or if just need two or three parts try to get them
as samples.directly from the manufacturer. The reason for this is you may
get a fake or reject part and you will never know.

Trying to do the measurements yourself is pretty much out of the question
today.. Every improvement made it harder in that the equipment had to
itself be lower in noise

If interested

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=measuring+transistor+noisehl=enas_sdt=0as_vis=1oi=scholart





.

-pete



On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote:


Hi

You have (and always have had) two basic choices:

1) Buy a very expensive part from somebody who has gone to the trouble
of characterizing the noise performance and will guarantee at least some
of what they show on the data sheet.

2) Buy a bunch of cheap transistors and test them. Lock in on a
specific part and vendor. Keep monitoring what you get in case they
“improve”
their process and the magic goes away.

How do you select candidates? That’s never been easy, there is less and
less data on the sheets every day. Normally the first step is to look at
a vendor that you have had luck with in the past. The next step is to ask
them…

Bob




On Jul 18, 2015, at 5:16 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:25:10 -0400
Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:


A pair of Zetex (Diodes, Inc.)
ZTX849 or FZT849 actually have significantly lower voltage noise than
either the LM394 or MAT12.

I always wonder how you figure out whether a transistor is low noise
or not. What part of the datasheet hints at which transistors have low
noise and which have not? Even if it's just try and measure, how
do you find good candidates to measure?

   Attila Kinali

--
I must not become metastable.
Metastability is the mind-killer.
Metastability is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my metastability.
I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the metastability has gone there will be nothing. Only I will

remain.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors

2015-07-18 Thread John Miles
  The BFG540 is amongst the best Oscillators  oscillators
 
 http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/BFG540_X_XR_N.pdf
 
 Now you outperform most colleagues
 
 73 de Ulrich N1UL

Last time buy 31-Dec-15. :(   Have you heard of any good substitutes?  

I've built a lot of amps with BFG591s, and they also got the axe recently.
Small-signal RF bipolars seem to be an endangered species.

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] manual upload

2015-07-18 Thread Don Latham

Uploaded to KO4BB:
Kode Odetics 3100 time interval analyzer op manual
100 ps min timebase, 10 ps error a boatanchor but IEEE488 output. access
instructions in the manual. Will take intervals less than 1 us apart.
about $250 on ebay. Originally for hard disk drive measurements. Set up to use
x10 probes; has a risetime calibrator. accepts 5 MHz external standard.
During my search, found that Odetics had a patent on the interpoltion timing
scheme.
manual also at https://www.febo.com/pages/hardware/kode/kode_tia3100.pdf

Don


-- 
If you don't know what it is,
don't poke it.
Ghost in the Shell
---
Noli sinere nothos te opprimere

Dr. Don Latham, AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLC, 17850 Six Mile Road
Huson, MT, 59846
mailing address:  POBox 404
Frenchtown MT 59834-0404

VOX 406-626-4304
CEL 406-241-5093
Skype: buffler2
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] E4437B phase noise spurs. Any ideas?

2015-07-18 Thread Wolfgang DL1SKY

Hi Bill,

Thank you for your detailed response.

First of all, I'm happy with the SMIQ and I included that only
to show that the spurs do not come out of the spectrum analyzer
(which is an FSU indeed).

Regarding the E4437B: You are right that the data sheet specs
allow this but I find it rather unusual for such a high profile
device, especially since it's the high spectral purity version.
I have an E4432 (3 GHz and not designed for high spectral
purity) and an SMIQ and they both do not show such strong and
so many spurs.

Also, the phase noise plots in the data sheet do (in my view)
show fairly narrow features; at least don't look like highly
smoothed plots.

The E4437B spurs appear only above 2.4 GHz. Virtually no spurs
are visible below 2.4 GHz. And they look quite exactly the same
for every frequency above 2.4 GHz. Same offset, similar amplitude.
Both when changing the frequency a couple of kHz and when changing
by GHz.

Also, I find that asymmetry relative to the carrier interesting.

So what I would like to understand is if I caught an unlucky
device of the E443x series and can expect to see better
performance with other ones. Or if that is a pre-failure sign.
And if other people are seeing them as well.

Thanks,
Wolfgang DL1SKY

On 2015-07-17 07:47, Bill Byrom wrote:

Hi, Wolfgang. Both of your generators appear to be well within their
datasheet specifications based on the spectrums you posted.

The datasheet for that ESG-DP (digital modulation with high spectral
purity) model is at:
http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/5965-3096E.pdf

The E4437B nonharmonic spur specification is on page 5 (use the ESG-
DP columns):

So according to that table, above 2 GHz the E4437B spurs at 3 kHz
offset **should be below -68 dBc**. It appears to me that the largest
spur at such offsets (at about +3.5 kHz offset from the carrier) is
**actually about -74 dBc**. The largest spur is about -63 dBc at +1 
kHz

offset (which is closer than the spur specs).


The RS SMIQ03B specs are:


The SMIQ03B nearby spurs in your screen capture are at about +/- 9 
kHz
offset from the carrier (about -85 dBc), so are too close to be 
covered

by the spec above. The spurs at 10 kHz offset are about -90 dBc.

I'm guessing that the spurs might be affected by several adjustments
performed during factory alignment. In most modern complex 
instruments
(including both of these signal generators, I believe) there are far 
too

many alignments to be made by a human, and a long automated process
using a rack of equipment is used to align the instrument and store
certain constants in nonvolatile memory in the instrument. But there 
is

no reason to worry based on your results, since they are well within
instrument specifications.

So ... assuming that the spurs aren't coming from your spectrum 
analyzer

or other sources (and I'm guessing that's a FSU which is very good),
both generators appear to be within specifications (after warmup 
within

the calibration interval, of course).
 * *The E4437B closest spur covered by the 3 kHz spec is at about 
+3.5

   kHz, and it's about 6 dB better than the spec.*
 * The SMIQ03B has a 6 dB better spurious spec than the E4437B 
between 2
   and 3 GHz, but the SMIQ offset for their spur spec is wider than 
the

   ESG (10 kHz rather than 3 kHz).
 * At other carrier frequencies the spurs may be higher or lower in
   amplitude (and at different offsets). Try tuning the frequency in 
1

   kHz steps over a wide range -- I would guess that the spur offsets
   and levels will change in a complex fashion due to the 
synthesizer.
 * The phase noise specifications normally apply to a smoothed trace 
and

   do not include narrowband spurs such as the ones you see in your
   screen capture.
--
Bill Byrom N5BB
Tektronix RF Application Engineer


On Thu, Jul 16, 2015, at 04:15 AM, Wolfgang DL1SKY wrote:

Hi,

I just got a used/refurbished E4437B which I wanted to use as a
all-purpose RF generator primarily for 3-4 GHz.

Unfortunately, I'm seeing strange spurs for frequencies above 2.4 
GHz,

see the green curve in the attached image.
The yellow curve is an SMIQ03 for comparison.

Observations:

- For frequencies below 2.4 GHz none of the spurs appear.

- It has an OCXO and I left the device in standby (oven on) for
  12 hours.

- If I leave the device ON for 1-2 hours, the spurs go down.

Anybody else seeing this? Any ideas how to fix this? Does this look
like a pre-failure sign?

Regards,
Wolfgang DL1SKY
_
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Email had 1 attachment:




 * E4437B-phase_noise_problem-1.png
  34k (image/png)


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.


--

Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors (was: Firmware and antenna for Stanford Research FS700)

2015-07-18 Thread Pete Lancashire
I agree with Bob, find a vendor you can trust and make sure you buy from an
authorized distributor or if just need two or three parts try to get them
as samples.directly from the manufacturer. The reason for this is you may
get a fake or reject part and you will never know.

Trying to do the measurements yourself is pretty much out of the question
today.. Every improvement made it harder in that the equipment had to
itself be lower in noise

If interested

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=measuring+transistor+noisehl=enas_sdt=0as_vis=1oi=scholart





.

-pete



On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org wrote:

 Hi

 You have (and always have had) two basic choices:

 1) Buy a very expensive part from somebody who has gone to the trouble
 of characterizing the noise performance and will guarantee at least some
 of what they show on the data sheet.

 2) Buy a bunch of cheap transistors and test them. Lock in on a
 specific part and vendor. Keep monitoring what you get in case they
 “improve”
 their process and the magic goes away.

 How do you select candidates? That’s never been easy, there is less and
 less data on the sheets every day. Normally the first step is to look at
 a vendor that you have had luck with in the past. The next step is to ask
 them…

 Bob



  On Jul 18, 2015, at 5:16 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote:
 
  On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:25:10 -0400
  Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:
 
  A pair of Zetex (Diodes, Inc.)
  ZTX849 or FZT849 actually have significantly lower voltage noise than
  either the LM394 or MAT12.
 
  I always wonder how you figure out whether a transistor is low noise
  or not. What part of the datasheet hints at which transistors have low
  noise and which have not? Even if it's just try and measure, how
  do you find good candidates to measure?
 
Attila Kinali
 
  --
  I must not become metastable.
  Metastability is the mind-killer.
  Metastability is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
  I will face my metastability.
  I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
  And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
  Where the metastability has gone there will be nothing. Only I will
 remain.
 
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

2015-07-18 Thread paul swed
Bill I will let you know what the Austrons say for signal level. Fact is
they locked up fast.
My FS700 is taking its time.

Graham it will sound different as there are no competing stations on other
GRIs. Thats the very first thing that hits you. Additionally its only 1
station. But that same station is sending the master and secondary delayed
emission. Its simply not the same ole sound. But it still works very well
for checking frequency.

Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, billriches bill.ric...@verizon.net
wrote:

 Correction on times for Mon - thurs - start 900 edst - 1300Z


 -Original Message-
 From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net]
 Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 7:05 AM
 To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
 Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

 FYI Wildwood eLoran will be fired up 1300Z Saturday (today) and 1300Z
 Monday
 thru Thursday.  Happy listening.  Any reports would be appreciated and I
 will pass them along to the engineer that is driving the train.

 73,

 Bill, WA2DVU
 Cape Mahy

 -Original Message-
 From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net]
 Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:04 PM
 To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
 Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...


 FYI GRI for Wildwood is 8970.

 Bill, WA2DVU
 Cape May


 ---
 This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
 https://www.avast.com/antivirus


 ---
 This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
 https://www.avast.com/antivirus

 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...

2015-07-18 Thread Graham
As expected, loud and clear near Ottawa Canada, approximately 380 
nautical miles.


It does sound different from my recollection of Loran. However, this is 
only one station transmitting where as before it would have been several 
at the same time with different GRI's.


cheers, Graham ve3gtc



On 2015-07-18 11:04, billriches wrote:

FYI Wildwood eLoran will be fired up 1300Z Saturday (today) and 1900Z Monday
thru Thursday.  Happy listening.  Any reports would be appreciated and I
will pass them along to the engineer that is driving the train.

73,

Bill, WA2DVU
Cape Mahy

-Original Message-
From: billriches [mailto:bill.ric...@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:04 PM
To: 'billriches'; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: RE: [time-nuts] Loran C returning to a station near you...


FYI GRI for Wildwood is 8970.

Bill, WA2DVU
Cape May


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors

2015-07-18 Thread John Miles

 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of KA2WEU--
 - via time-nuts
 Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 3:40 PM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Cc: akpod...@synergymwave.com; alexander.r...@rohde-schwarz.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors
 
 BFG540
 
 

That's what I mean -- both BFG540 and BFG591 have been discontinued by NXP.  
Guess they don't sell enough of them these days.

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors

2015-07-18 Thread KA2WEU--- via time-nuts
BFG540 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/18/2015 6:37:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
j...@miles.io writes:

Last  time buy 31-Dec-15. :(   Have you heard of any good  substitutes?  

I've built a lot of amps with BFG591s, and they  also got the axe recently.
Small-signal RF bipolars seem to be an  endangered species.

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design  LLC

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] how to find low noise transistors

2015-07-18 Thread KA2WEU--- via time-nuts
Good afternoon,
 
another low noise recommended transistor is the 
 
http://www.cel.com/pdf/datasheets/ne856m02.pdf and  for frequencies below 
10 Mhz
 
the 2N2857.  This nice  fact is that the AF and KF values  are published, 
the bad part is the the AF=1 value violates the law of  physics.
 
http://www.microsemi.com/existing-parts/parts/47966
 
http://espice.ugr.es/espice/src/modelos_subckt/spice_complete/RF.LIB
 
Be careful !
 
Who says EE is easy.
 
Best regards , Ulrich N1UL 
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/18/2015 3:56:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
time-nuts@febo.com writes:

Good  afternoon, 

There is a problem in the literature that people confuse  the  spot noise 
figure and the large signal  noise properties.  Here AF and KF  needs to 
be 
known and considered.


Here is  the mathematical correct  formula in a Word for Windows Form   
attached file.
If you use it for publications, please quote me . Thanks  

My advise is take a BIP transistor , fT not much more then 20 x  operating  
frequency  (lower flicker component) and operate it  at 15 to 20 % of  
ICmax.

The BFG540 is amongst the best  Oscillators  oscillators  

http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/BFG540_X_XR_N.pdf

Now  you outperform most colleagues 

73 de Ulrich  N1UL


x


In  a message dated 7/18/2015 1:19:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,   
p...@petelancashire.com  writes:



https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=measuring+transistor+noisehl=enas_sdt
=0as_vis=1oi=scholart





___
time-nuts  mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to  
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the  instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.