Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[Bob Bownes]

Going on recollection. Now I’ll have to go look again. 

> On Oct 23, 2017, at 17:06, Jeremy Elson  wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Bob Bownes  wrote:
>> 
>> Will it work? Probably. Up to a point.
>> 
>> Is is best practice? Not even close.
>> 
>> Each device will (should?) generally present a 50Ω termination. In the case
>> of instruments that provide their own ref output which is then looped back
>> in, they may be different, but I don't recall seeing any that said anything
>> other than nothing or 50Ω.
>> 
> 
> I'm confused: I thought most inputs were relatively high impedance.
> 
> The manual for the 5335a specifies its external timebase input as being
> 1000Ω
> (http://www.dennlec.com/images/manuals/hp-5335a-op-manual.pdf). Maybe not
> "high",
> but it's certainly not 50.
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[Jeremy Elson]

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Bob Bownes  wrote:

> Will it work? Probably. Up to a point.
>
> Is is best practice? Not even close.
>
> Each device will (should?) generally present a 50Ω termination. In the case
> of instruments that provide their own ref output which is then looped back
> in, they may be different, but I don't recall seeing any that said anything
> other than nothing or 50Ω.
>

I'm confused: I thought most inputs were relatively high impedance.

The manual for the 5335a specifies its external timebase input as being
1000Ω
(http://www.dennlec.com/images/manuals/hp-5335a-op-manual.pdf). Maybe not
"high",
but it's certainly not 50.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[Jeremy Elson]

Is there an easy way to measure the per-device load, or do you typically
just go by whatever the datasheet says?

I suppose I could just hook everything up and then check the amplitude of
the signal at the far end.

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:43 PM, John Ackermann N8UR  wrote:

> To some extent, it depends on the load presented by each device.  The "EXT
> REF" input on many pieces of test equipment is fairly high impedance (maybe
> 10k?) and you can drive several of those with a single output, putting a 50
> ohm load at the end of the line to provide a reasonable termination.*  I
> seem to recall that three HP boxes worked nicely off one line, but when I
> added a fourth things got flaky.
>
> But if any of the EXT REF are low-z inputs, that won't work so well.
>
> FWIW, Spectracom had a distribution system (8140 series) that had
> amplified "tap" boxes that were daisy-chained together on a single coax
> run.  The driver put 12 volts DC on the cable along with 10 MHz, and that
> powered the taps.  You could put several taps on a single line.  I once
> measured the phase noise of the system and while it wasn't up to a really
> good distribution amplifier, it was perfectly adequate for normal RF
> testing.
>
> John
>
> * Mismatch causes reflections, which can screw up square wave edges or
> sine wave zero-crossings, increasing jitter.  SWR is usually a bigger issue
> for RF distribution than amplitude loss.
> 
>
> On 10/23/2017 01:49 PM, Jeremy Elson wrote:
>
>> I was about to ask a related question of the list: when do you need a
>> distribution amplifier, and when is it sufficient to just have a single
>> (linear) run of coax?
>>
>> I have a GPSDO (Nick Sayer's device) that I want to use to feed a few
>> other
>> pieces of equipment in my lab (an HP5335A, John Ackermann's beautiful
>> TICC,
>> and a Rigol signal generator). Is it safe to have RG174 coming out of the
>> GPSDO, tapping into it with a BNC T-junction that plugs into the back of
>> each device that needs the 10mhz input, and then terminating the strand
>> with a 50 ohm terminator? (In other words, the way thinnet Ethernet was
>> wired back in the day.) As long as the signal goes in a straight line, not
>> a "Y" (i.e. no cables attached to the t-junction taps, just a direct input
>> into a high-z input) it seems like it should work. Do I need a
>> distribution
>> amplifier? Or is that, say, if the signal needs to split off in multiple
>> directions and you don't want to fill your lab with a space-filling curve
>> of coax?
>>
>> -Jeremy
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Bob kb8tq  wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>>
>>> The correct answer to any real question like this is “that depends”.
>>>
>>> For anything that I normally run as test gear, noise outside a very
>>> narrow
>>> bandwidth really
>>> does not matter much. The test gear *assumes* (by design) that the
>>> reference signal going
>>> into the “ref in” jack is not very clean. It does various tricks with
>>> filters and PLL’s to “scrub”
>>> the input.
>>>
>>> If we are talking about the reference into one side of a phase noise test
>>> set, then
>>> the situation is a bit different. The test set is simply going to tell me
>>> what the combined
>>> noise is on the two inputs. If one is significantly more noisy than the
>>> other, that’s pretty
>>> much all I will see. In this case, my answer is “don’t use a distributed
>>> signal”. Use a
>>> stand alone source as your reference and isolate it from the rest of the
>>> world.
>>>
>>> In any case, making a super duper distribution gizmo and feeding it with
>>> a
>>> noisy signal
>>> is not going to make the signal any better. Most GPSDO’s have relatively
>>> noisy outputs.
>>> Some are better than others. None that I have seen on the surplus market
>>> are what
>>> I would call quiet at the output jack of the GPSDO. They either have an
>>> ocean of spurs
>>> or a lot of phase noise. Some have both ….
>>>
>>> Any time you boost a bunch of signals up to high levels, you create
>>> “crud”
>>> running around your
>>> lab / shack. One of the most basic questions should always be “do I
>>> really
>>> need this signal?”. Next
>>> should be “how can I have a shorter run?”.  I have many pieces of gear
>>> that are rarely used.
>>> They use odd references. When I need to use them I rig a reference. That
>>> gets shut down
>>> once the gear goes back to storage. …. no more birdies every 100 KHz ….
>>> No
>>> need for
>>> tripple shielded coax ….
>>>
>>> Simple answer:
>>>
>>> Square up the 10 MHz (or whatever) by matching it into a 5.5 V powered
>>> high speed CMOS
>>> gate. The NC7SZ series is one of many families you can use. A NC7SZ125 is
>>> not a bad gate
>>> to pick. Distribute the square wave to however many output amps as you
>>> need. Each one
>>> is another of the same gates with the output matched via a 50 ohm to 50
>>> ohm lowpass Tee network
>>> with a low Q ( < 2). Likely pad down the output a bit to keep it at a
>>> 

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[Bob kb8tq]

Hi

The only other thing to consider is switching stuff on and off. A distribution 
amplifier or a 
tap system gives you some isolation between devices. One can go short circuit 
or back
feed a noise burst and the others will not be impacted. 

Does this matter? In a lot of cases the answer is no. If you routinely run very 
long data runs,
the answer might be yes. 

Another datapoint on the 8140:

ADEV through the typical tap comes in around 2x10^-11 at tau = 1 second. That’s 
not terrific 
if you happen to have a Maser as your reference :)  It’s “as good as” most 
small Rb standards.
It’s also not going to hurt most GPSDO’s. 

They are a cute system if you “suddenly” need 100 KHz to run something odd. 
They show up
on eBay from time to time. A complete system consists of a head end box, the 
taps (up to 
some limit I forget at the moment) and the more or less unobtanium DC blocked 
50 ohm 
load for the end of the coax (hint: build one yourself ….). 

Lots of fun !!

Bob

> On Oct 23, 2017, at 4:43 PM, John Ackermann N8UR  wrote:
> 
> To some extent, it depends on the load presented by each device.  The "EXT 
> REF" input on many pieces of test equipment is fairly high impedance (maybe 
> 10k?) and you can drive several of those with a single output, putting a 50 
> ohm load at the end of the line to provide a reasonable termination.*  I seem 
> to recall that three HP boxes worked nicely off one line, but when I added a 
> fourth things got flaky.
> 
> But if any of the EXT REF are low-z inputs, that won't work so well.
> 
> FWIW, Spectracom had a distribution system (8140 series) that had amplified 
> "tap" boxes that were daisy-chained together on a single coax run.  The 
> driver put 12 volts DC on the cable along with 10 MHz, and that powered the 
> taps.  You could put several taps on a single line.  I once measured the 
> phase noise of the system and while it wasn't up to a really good 
> distribution amplifier, it was perfectly adequate for normal RF testing.
> 
> John
> 
> * Mismatch causes reflections, which can screw up square wave edges or sine 
> wave zero-crossings, increasing jitter.  SWR is usually a bigger issue for RF 
> distribution than amplitude loss.
> 
> On 10/23/2017 01:49 PM, Jeremy Elson wrote:
>> I was about to ask a related question of the list: when do you need a
>> distribution amplifier, and when is it sufficient to just have a single
>> (linear) run of coax?
>> I have a GPSDO (Nick Sayer's device) that I want to use to feed a few other
>> pieces of equipment in my lab (an HP5335A, John Ackermann's beautiful TICC,
>> and a Rigol signal generator). Is it safe to have RG174 coming out of the
>> GPSDO, tapping into it with a BNC T-junction that plugs into the back of
>> each device that needs the 10mhz input, and then terminating the strand
>> with a 50 ohm terminator? (In other words, the way thinnet Ethernet was
>> wired back in the day.) As long as the signal goes in a straight line, not
>> a "Y" (i.e. no cables attached to the t-junction taps, just a direct input
>> into a high-z input) it seems like it should work. Do I need a distribution
>> amplifier? Or is that, say, if the signal needs to split off in multiple
>> directions and you don't want to fill your lab with a space-filling curve
>> of coax?
>> -Jeremy
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Bob kb8tq  wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> The correct answer to any real question like this is “that depends”.
>>> 
>>> For anything that I normally run as test gear, noise outside a very narrow
>>> bandwidth really
>>> does not matter much. The test gear *assumes* (by design) that the
>>> reference signal going
>>> into the “ref in” jack is not very clean. It does various tricks with
>>> filters and PLL’s to “scrub”
>>> the input.
>>> 
>>> If we are talking about the reference into one side of a phase noise test
>>> set, then
>>> the situation is a bit different. The test set is simply going to tell me
>>> what the combined
>>> noise is on the two inputs. If one is significantly more noisy than the
>>> other, that’s pretty
>>> much all I will see. In this case, my answer is “don’t use a distributed
>>> signal”. Use a
>>> stand alone source as your reference and isolate it from the rest of the
>>> world.
>>> 
>>> In any case, making a super duper distribution gizmo and feeding it with a
>>> noisy signal
>>> is not going to make the signal any better. Most GPSDO’s have relatively
>>> noisy outputs.
>>> Some are better than others. None that I have seen on the surplus market
>>> are what
>>> I would call quiet at the output jack of the GPSDO. They either have an
>>> ocean of spurs
>>> or a lot of phase noise. Some have both ….
>>> 
>>> Any time you boost a bunch of signals up to high levels, you create “crud”
>>> running around your
>>> lab / shack. One of the most basic questions should always be “do I really
>>> need this signal?”. Next
>>> should be “how can I have a shorter run?”.  I have many pieces 

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[John Ackermann N8UR]

On 10/23/2017 04:52 PM, Hal Murray wrote:

But if any of the EXT REF are low-z inputs, that won't work so well.


Unless there is only one.  Then you can use it as the last one and you don't
need the explicit terminator.


Good point.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[Bob Bownes]

Will it work? Probably. Up to a point.

Is is best practice? Not even close.

Each device will (should?) generally present a 50Ω termination. In the case
of instruments that provide their own ref output which is then looped back
in, they may be different, but I don't recall seeing any that said anything
other than nothing or 50Ω.

That being said, I've daisy chained a few together to get quick results
without trouble.

Bob


On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Jeremy Elson  wrote:

> I was about to ask a related question of the list: when do you need a
> distribution amplifier, and when is it sufficient to just have a single
> (linear) run of coax?
>
> I have a GPSDO (Nick Sayer's device) that I want to use to feed a few other
> pieces of equipment in my lab (an HP5335A, John Ackermann's beautiful TICC,
> and a Rigol signal generator). Is it safe to have RG174 coming out of the
> GPSDO, tapping into it with a BNC T-junction that plugs into the back of
> each device that needs the 10mhz input, and then terminating the strand
> with a 50 ohm terminator? (In other words, the way thinnet Ethernet was
> wired back in the day.) As long as the signal goes in a straight line, not
> a "Y" (i.e. no cables attached to the t-junction taps, just a direct input
> into a high-z input) it seems like it should work. Do I need a distribution
> amplifier? Or is that, say, if the signal needs to split off in multiple
> directions and you don't want to fill your lab with a space-filling curve
> of coax?
>
> -Jeremy
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Bob kb8tq  wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > The correct answer to any real question like this is “that depends”.
> >
> > For anything that I normally run as test gear, noise outside a very
> narrow
> > bandwidth really
> > does not matter much. The test gear *assumes* (by design) that the
> > reference signal going
> > into the “ref in” jack is not very clean. It does various tricks with
> > filters and PLL’s to “scrub”
> > the input.
> >
> > If we are talking about the reference into one side of a phase noise test
> > set, then
> > the situation is a bit different. The test set is simply going to tell me
> > what the combined
> > noise is on the two inputs. If one is significantly more noisy than the
> > other, that’s pretty
> > much all I will see. In this case, my answer is “don’t use a distributed
> > signal”. Use a
> > stand alone source as your reference and isolate it from the rest of the
> > world.
> >
> > In any case, making a super duper distribution gizmo and feeding it with
> a
> > noisy signal
> > is not going to make the signal any better. Most GPSDO’s have relatively
> > noisy outputs.
> > Some are better than others. None that I have seen on the surplus market
> > are what
> > I would call quiet at the output jack of the GPSDO. They either have an
> > ocean of spurs
> > or a lot of phase noise. Some have both ….
> >
> > Any time you boost a bunch of signals up to high levels, you create
> “crud”
> > running around your
> > lab / shack. One of the most basic questions should always be “do I
> really
> > need this signal?”. Next
> > should be “how can I have a shorter run?”.  I have many pieces of gear
> > that are rarely used.
> > They use odd references. When I need to use them I rig a reference. That
> > gets shut down
> > once the gear goes back to storage. …. no more birdies every 100 KHz ….
> No
> > need for
> > tripple shielded coax ….
> >
> > Simple answer:
> >
> > Square up the 10 MHz (or whatever) by matching it into a 5.5 V powered
> > high speed CMOS
> > gate. The NC7SZ series is one of many families you can use. A NC7SZ125 is
> > not a bad gate
> > to pick. Distribute the square wave to however many output amps as you
> > need. Each one
> > is another of the same gates with the output matched via a 50 ohm to 50
> > ohm lowpass Tee network
> > with a low Q ( < 2). Likely pad down the output a bit to keep it at a
> > rational level.  Build up however
> > many you need for however many frequencies you require. Very normal
> linear
> > regulator chips
> > are fine for the power. Careful bypassing and solid ground planes are
> > always a good idea.
> > Parts cost wise, postage is likely to cost you more than the components.
> > There are …. errr…
> > many thousands …. of multi output amps of this basic  design out there ….
> > they seem to
> > work pretty well.
> >
> > Yes, there are *lots* of possible twists and turns to this. I’m only
> > guessing about the gear you
> > are trying to run and what you are trying to do with it.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Tom Van Baak  wrote:
> > >
> > > List -- Don is having email trouble, but here's his posting:
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > From: donaldbcol...@gmail.com
> > > Date: Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:38 AM
> > > Subject:   Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO
> > >
> > > Hello group. I`m intending to distribute, via 50 

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[Hal Murray]

> But if any of the EXT REF are low-z inputs, that won't work so well.

Unless there is only one.  Then you can use it as the last one and you don't 
need the explicit terminator.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[John Ackermann N8UR]

To some extent, it depends on the load presented by each device.  The 
"EXT REF" input on many pieces of test equipment is fairly high 
impedance (maybe 10k?) and you can drive several of those with a single 
output, putting a 50 ohm load at the end of the line to provide a 
reasonable termination.*  I seem to recall that three HP boxes worked 
nicely off one line, but when I added a fourth things got flaky.


But if any of the EXT REF are low-z inputs, that won't work so well.

FWIW, Spectracom had a distribution system (8140 series) that had 
amplified "tap" boxes that were daisy-chained together on a single coax 
run.  The driver put 12 volts DC on the cable along with 10 MHz, and 
that powered the taps.  You could put several taps on a single line.  I 
once measured the phase noise of the system and while it wasn't up to a 
really good distribution amplifier, it was perfectly adequate for normal 
RF testing.


John

* Mismatch causes reflections, which can screw up square wave edges or 
sine wave zero-crossings, increasing jitter.  SWR is usually a bigger 
issue for RF distribution than amplitude loss.


On 10/23/2017 01:49 PM, Jeremy Elson wrote:

I was about to ask a related question of the list: when do you need a
distribution amplifier, and when is it sufficient to just have a single
(linear) run of coax?

I have a GPSDO (Nick Sayer's device) that I want to use to feed a few other
pieces of equipment in my lab (an HP5335A, John Ackermann's beautiful TICC,
and a Rigol signal generator). Is it safe to have RG174 coming out of the
GPSDO, tapping into it with a BNC T-junction that plugs into the back of
each device that needs the 10mhz input, and then terminating the strand
with a 50 ohm terminator? (In other words, the way thinnet Ethernet was
wired back in the day.) As long as the signal goes in a straight line, not
a "Y" (i.e. no cables attached to the t-junction taps, just a direct input
into a high-z input) it seems like it should work. Do I need a distribution
amplifier? Or is that, say, if the signal needs to split off in multiple
directions and you don't want to fill your lab with a space-filling curve
of coax?

-Jeremy

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Bob kb8tq  wrote:


Hi

The correct answer to any real question like this is “that depends”.

For anything that I normally run as test gear, noise outside a very narrow
bandwidth really
does not matter much. The test gear *assumes* (by design) that the
reference signal going
into the “ref in” jack is not very clean. It does various tricks with
filters and PLL’s to “scrub”
the input.

If we are talking about the reference into one side of a phase noise test
set, then
the situation is a bit different. The test set is simply going to tell me
what the combined
noise is on the two inputs. If one is significantly more noisy than the
other, that’s pretty
much all I will see. In this case, my answer is “don’t use a distributed
signal”. Use a
stand alone source as your reference and isolate it from the rest of the
world.

In any case, making a super duper distribution gizmo and feeding it with a
noisy signal
is not going to make the signal any better. Most GPSDO’s have relatively
noisy outputs.
Some are better than others. None that I have seen on the surplus market
are what
I would call quiet at the output jack of the GPSDO. They either have an
ocean of spurs
or a lot of phase noise. Some have both ….

Any time you boost a bunch of signals up to high levels, you create “crud”
running around your
lab / shack. One of the most basic questions should always be “do I really
need this signal?”. Next
should be “how can I have a shorter run?”.  I have many pieces of gear
that are rarely used.
They use odd references. When I need to use them I rig a reference. That
gets shut down
once the gear goes back to storage. …. no more birdies every 100 KHz …. No
need for
tripple shielded coax ….

Simple answer:

Square up the 10 MHz (or whatever) by matching it into a 5.5 V powered
high speed CMOS
gate. The NC7SZ series is one of many families you can use. A NC7SZ125 is
not a bad gate
to pick. Distribute the square wave to however many output amps as you
need. Each one
is another of the same gates with the output matched via a 50 ohm to 50
ohm lowpass Tee network
with a low Q ( < 2). Likely pad down the output a bit to keep it at a
rational level.  Build up however
many you need for however many frequencies you require. Very normal linear
regulator chips
are fine for the power. Careful bypassing and solid ground planes are
always a good idea.
Parts cost wise, postage is likely to cost you more than the components.
There are …. errr…
many thousands …. of multi output amps of this basic  design out there ….
they seem to
work pretty well.

Yes, there are *lots* of possible twists and turns to this. I’m only
guessing about the gear you
are trying to run and what you are trying to do with it.

Bob






On Oct 23, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Tom Van Baak 

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[Jeremy Elson]

I was about to ask a related question of the list: when do you need a
distribution amplifier, and when is it sufficient to just have a single
(linear) run of coax?

I have a GPSDO (Nick Sayer's device) that I want to use to feed a few other
pieces of equipment in my lab (an HP5335A, John Ackermann's beautiful TICC,
and a Rigol signal generator). Is it safe to have RG174 coming out of the
GPSDO, tapping into it with a BNC T-junction that plugs into the back of
each device that needs the 10mhz input, and then terminating the strand
with a 50 ohm terminator? (In other words, the way thinnet Ethernet was
wired back in the day.) As long as the signal goes in a straight line, not
a "Y" (i.e. no cables attached to the t-junction taps, just a direct input
into a high-z input) it seems like it should work. Do I need a distribution
amplifier? Or is that, say, if the signal needs to split off in multiple
directions and you don't want to fill your lab with a space-filling curve
of coax?

-Jeremy

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Bob kb8tq  wrote:

> Hi
>
> The correct answer to any real question like this is “that depends”.
>
> For anything that I normally run as test gear, noise outside a very narrow
> bandwidth really
> does not matter much. The test gear *assumes* (by design) that the
> reference signal going
> into the “ref in” jack is not very clean. It does various tricks with
> filters and PLL’s to “scrub”
> the input.
>
> If we are talking about the reference into one side of a phase noise test
> set, then
> the situation is a bit different. The test set is simply going to tell me
> what the combined
> noise is on the two inputs. If one is significantly more noisy than the
> other, that’s pretty
> much all I will see. In this case, my answer is “don’t use a distributed
> signal”. Use a
> stand alone source as your reference and isolate it from the rest of the
> world.
>
> In any case, making a super duper distribution gizmo and feeding it with a
> noisy signal
> is not going to make the signal any better. Most GPSDO’s have relatively
> noisy outputs.
> Some are better than others. None that I have seen on the surplus market
> are what
> I would call quiet at the output jack of the GPSDO. They either have an
> ocean of spurs
> or a lot of phase noise. Some have both ….
>
> Any time you boost a bunch of signals up to high levels, you create “crud”
> running around your
> lab / shack. One of the most basic questions should always be “do I really
> need this signal?”. Next
> should be “how can I have a shorter run?”.  I have many pieces of gear
> that are rarely used.
> They use odd references. When I need to use them I rig a reference. That
> gets shut down
> once the gear goes back to storage. …. no more birdies every 100 KHz …. No
> need for
> tripple shielded coax ….
>
> Simple answer:
>
> Square up the 10 MHz (or whatever) by matching it into a 5.5 V powered
> high speed CMOS
> gate. The NC7SZ series is one of many families you can use. A NC7SZ125 is
> not a bad gate
> to pick. Distribute the square wave to however many output amps as you
> need. Each one
> is another of the same gates with the output matched via a 50 ohm to 50
> ohm lowpass Tee network
> with a low Q ( < 2). Likely pad down the output a bit to keep it at a
> rational level.  Build up however
> many you need for however many frequencies you require. Very normal linear
> regulator chips
> are fine for the power. Careful bypassing and solid ground planes are
> always a good idea.
> Parts cost wise, postage is likely to cost you more than the components.
> There are …. errr…
> many thousands …. of multi output amps of this basic  design out there ….
> they seem to
> work pretty well.
>
> Yes, there are *lots* of possible twists and turns to this. I’m only
> guessing about the gear you
> are trying to run and what you are trying to do with it.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 23, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Tom Van Baak  wrote:
> >
> > List -- Don is having email trouble, but here's his posting:
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: donaldbcol...@gmail.com
> > Date: Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:38 AM
> > Subject:   Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO
> >
> > Hello group. I`m intending to distribute, via 50 Ohm coax, frequency
> > reference signals to my test equipment in my test bay [no relation to
> eBay,
> > except that most of the equipment came from there]. I`ll be using RG58/U
> > coax, and 50 ohm terminations, with the highest reasonable signal level
> > reticulated. Given that the name of the game seems to be to avoid any
> > severe reduction in SNR of the 10MHz signal comming out of the GPSDO, by
> > the logic dividers, and impedance lowering buffer amplifiers, what
> > considerations should be made regarding the choice of logic families, and
> > transistors to be used? The frequencies required by the test equipment
> vary
> > from 500kHz to 10MHz, and amplitudes from 100mV P-P sinewave, to 5V peak
> > squarewave. 

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[Bob kb8tq]

Hi

The correct answer to any real question like this is “that depends”. 

For anything that I normally run as test gear, noise outside a very narrow 
bandwidth really 
does not matter much. The test gear *assumes* (by design) that the reference 
signal going 
into the “ref in” jack is not very clean. It does various tricks with filters 
and PLL’s to “scrub” 
the input. 

If we are talking about the reference into one side of a phase noise test set, 
then
the situation is a bit different. The test set is simply going to tell me what 
the combined
noise is on the two inputs. If one is significantly more noisy than the other, 
that’s pretty 
much all I will see. In this case, my answer is “don’t use a distributed 
signal”. Use a 
stand alone source as your reference and isolate it from the rest of the world. 

In any case, making a super duper distribution gizmo and feeding it with a 
noisy signal
is not going to make the signal any better. Most GPSDO’s have relatively noisy 
outputs. 
Some are better than others. None that I have seen on the surplus market are 
what
I would call quiet at the output jack of the GPSDO. They either have an ocean 
of spurs
or a lot of phase noise. Some have both ….

Any time you boost a bunch of signals up to high levels, you create “crud” 
running around your
lab / shack. One of the most basic questions should always be “do I really need 
this signal?”. Next
should be “how can I have a shorter run?”.  I have many pieces of gear that are 
rarely used.
They use odd references. When I need to use them I rig a reference. That gets 
shut down 
once the gear goes back to storage. …. no more birdies every 100 KHz …. No need 
for
tripple shielded coax ….

Simple answer: 

Square up the 10 MHz (or whatever) by matching it into a 5.5 V powered high 
speed CMOS
gate. The NC7SZ series is one of many families you can use. A NC7SZ125 is not a 
bad gate
to pick. Distribute the square wave to however many output amps as you need. 
Each one 
is another of the same gates with the output matched via a 50 ohm to 50 ohm 
lowpass Tee network 
with a low Q ( < 2). Likely pad down the output a bit to keep it at a rational 
level.  Build up however 
many you need for however many frequencies you require. Very normal linear 
regulator chips
are fine for the power. Careful bypassing and solid ground planes are always a 
good idea. 
Parts cost wise, postage is likely to cost you more than the components. There 
are …. errr…
many thousands …. of multi output amps of this basic  design out there …. they 
seem to 
work pretty well. 

Yes, there are *lots* of possible twists and turns to this. I’m only guessing 
about the gear you
are trying to run and what you are trying to do with it. 

Bob





> On Oct 23, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Tom Van Baak  wrote:
> 
> List -- Don is having email trouble, but here's his posting:
> 
> --
> 
> From: donaldbcol...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:38 AM
> Subject:   Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO
> 
> Hello group. I`m intending to distribute, via 50 Ohm coax, frequency
> reference signals to my test equipment in my test bay [no relation to eBay,
> except that most of the equipment came from there]. I`ll be using RG58/U
> coax, and 50 ohm terminations, with the highest reasonable signal level
> reticulated. Given that the name of the game seems to be to avoid any
> severe reduction in SNR of the 10MHz signal comming out of the GPSDO, by
> the logic dividers, and impedance lowering buffer amplifiers, what
> considerations should be made regarding the choice of logic families, and
> transistors to be used? The frequencies required by the test equipment vary
> from 500kHz to 10MHz, and amplitudes from 100mV P-P sinewave, to 5V peak
> squarewave. How good must the PSU be to stop the rot getting worse, and is
> 1/f noise in the active devices important? Your thoughts will be
> appreciated.
> 
> P.S.: How accurate is the Trimble Thunderbolt for this
> application?..Thankyou,Don
> Collie.
> 
> --
> 
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

[Tom Van Baak]

List -- Don is having email trouble, but here's his posting:

--

From: donaldbcol...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:38 AM
Subject:   Distribution divider/amplifier for 10MHz GPSDO

Hello group. I`m intending to distribute, via 50 Ohm coax, frequency
reference signals to my test equipment in my test bay [no relation to eBay,
except that most of the equipment came from there]. I`ll be using RG58/U
coax, and 50 ohm terminations, with the highest reasonable signal level
reticulated. Given that the name of the game seems to be to avoid any
severe reduction in SNR of the 10MHz signal comming out of the GPSDO, by
the logic dividers, and impedance lowering buffer amplifiers, what
considerations should be made regarding the choice of logic families, and
transistors to be used? The frequencies required by the test equipment vary
from 500kHz to 10MHz, and amplitudes from 100mV P-P sinewave, to 5V peak
squarewave. How good must the PSU be to stop the rot getting worse, and is
1/f noise in the active devices important? Your thoughts will be
appreciated.

P.S.: How accurate is the Trimble Thunderbolt for this
application?..Thankyou,Don
Collie.

--

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.