Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-03 Thread shalimr9
It is not that hard to transmit broad band noise over the entire GPS channel 
and clobber it entirely.

Didier


Sent from my Droid Razr 4G LTE wireless tracker.



-Original Message-
From: johncr...@aol.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

In considering the effect of a simple jammer on a GPS receiver, a 
simple link analysis
is insufficient.

What must also be considered is the anti-jam capability of the receiver
which due to spread spectrum processing gain will reject any simple
jamming signal even though is it 10's of dB stronger than the desired 
signal.

73 -john k6iql

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-03 Thread -Brian, WA1ZMS (iPad)
One of fine units from Hong Kong delivered +32dBm of wide-band FM noise 
centered on 1575MHz!!!  Just a tad more range than 10m I would expect.

-Brian, WA1ZMS
(sent from my over-priced iPad3)

On Oct 3, 2012, at 8:44 AM, shali...@gmail.com wrote:

 It is not that hard to transmit broad band noise over the entire GPS channel 
 and clobber it entirely.
 
 Didier
 
 
 Sent from my Droid Razr 4G LTE wireless tracker.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: johncr...@aol.com
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 9:33 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer
 
 In considering the effect of a simple jammer on a GPS receiver, a 
 simple link analysis
 is insufficient.
 
 What must also be considered is the anti-jam capability of the receiver
 which due to spread spectrum processing gain will reject any simple
 jamming signal even though is it 10's of dB stronger than the desired 
 signal.
 
 73 -john k6iql
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-03 Thread Chris Albertson
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Ron Ward n6idl...@comcast.net wrote:
 Hi:
 Other than a terrorist, who would want to jam GPS?

A delivery truck driver.  His boss installs a GPS tracker on the truck
and the driver wants to take a three hour lunch break.   This is a
pretty common scenario and likely the way most GPS jammers are used.
I'd call it self jamming where you jam your own receiver so other
people will not know where you are.


Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-03 Thread Frederick Bray
Some 20 to 25 years ago a law enforcement agency in California was 
experimenting with GPS in its patrol cars. It required that the officer press 
key to report his/her location. It also had a pinging capability that the 
officers didn't know about. Through pinging, it was discovered that a number of 
the officers an interesting habit. Towards the end of their shift,  their cars 
would be found stationary off the street in industrial areas. While they were 
close enough to their assigned patrol routes to quickly respond to calls, they 
avoided coming upon situations they would have to handle that might involve a 
lot of paperwork or otherwise might hold them past the end of shift. They also 
used the time to finish accumulated paperwork.


I imagine that they would have liked a GPS jammer after they figured out that 
they were being watched.

FWBRAY

Sent from my CP/M machine.

On Oct 2, 2012, at 21:40, Ron Ward n6idl...@comcast.net wrote:

 Hi:
 Other than a terrorist, who would want to jam GPS?
 Ron
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
 Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 2:28 PM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer
 
 On 10/02/2012 11:05 PM, John Lofgren wrote:
 The 0.5 W and + 10 dBm numbers in the specs don't work out.  +10 dBm is 10
 mW.  I suspect that the 1/2 watt is really the DC input power.
 
 Now, that makes sense.
 
 And, I'd agree about the range.  +10 dBm into a dipole at 10 meters gets
 you about -44 dBm at the receiver antenna in a free-space model.  That's
 really loud compared to the nominal -130 to -140 dBm you'd hear from the
 satellites.
 
 Indeed. Even for 10 mW it was not reasonable. No wonders that 1-10 m 
 jammers cause such grief to DHS. Serious overkill.
 
 Cheers,
 Magnus
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-03 Thread Brian, WA1ZMS
Let me just say that that's flea power!
I saw some 80watt jammers being sold for movie theaters and churches.

There is some very black market items from China, via Hong Kong and can 
arrive at your doorstep in just 4 days via DHL! What's out there would scare 
you.

Been dealing with the fall out from such items in my day job.

-Brian

On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:43 PM, J. Forster j...@quikus.com wrote:

 Take a look at the specs of this unit:
 
 http://www.mobilephonejammer.com.au/covert-gps-jammer-portable-p-119.html
 
 The Power Output is 0.5 Watts and it claims a jamming range of 1-10 Meters.
 
 Anybody think there is something wrong?
 
 -John
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-03 Thread Bill Hawkins
Who would want to jam GPS? Haven't heard this one:

Fishing party boat captain - knows where to find the fishing spots
after years of experience. Rotates use of the spots so as not to
over-fish them. Arrives at his spots to find fishermen who had gone
out with him and captured the GPS locations of his spots. Now tells
his customers that any GPS receivers found will be float tested by
throwing them overboard.

Bill Hawkins 


-Original Message-
From: Chris Albertson
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 9:27 AM

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Ron Ward n6idl...@comcast.net wrote:
 Hi: Other than a terrorist, who would want to jam GPS?

A delivery truck driver.  His boss installs a GPS tracker on the truck
and the driver wants to take a three hour lunch break.   This is a
pretty common scenario and likely the way most GPS jammers are used.
I'd call it self jamming where you jam your own receiver so other
people will not know where you are.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread J. Forster
Take a look at the specs of this unit:

http://www.mobilephonejammer.com.au/covert-gps-jammer-portable-p-119.html

The Power Output is 0.5 Watts and it claims a jamming range of 1-10 Meters.

Anybody think there is something wrong?

-John




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Tom Miller

It also says output power +10 dBm.

3 hour Li battery life.

Only for legal use :)


Much does not make sense with this.


Forward a copy to the commission?


Regards


- Original Message - 
From: J. Forster j...@quikus.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com

Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 4:43 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer


Take a look at the specs of this unit:

http://www.mobilephonejammer.com.au/covert-gps-jammer-portable-p-119.html

The Power Output is 0.5 Watts and it claims a jamming range of 1-10 Meters.

Anybody think there is something wrong?

-John




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 10/02/2012 10:43 PM, J. Forster wrote:

Take a look at the specs of this unit:

http://www.mobilephonejammer.com.au/covert-gps-jammer-portable-p-119.html

The Power Output is 0.5 Watts and it claims a jamming range of 1-10 Meters.

Anybody think there is something wrong?


For a 500 mW jammer your jamming range should be much better. That's wrong.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread John Lofgren
The 0.5 W and + 10 dBm numbers in the specs don't work out.  +10 dBm is 10 mW.  
I suspect that the 1/2 watt is really the DC input power.

And, I'd agree about the range.  +10 dBm into a dipole at 10 meters gets you 
about -44 dBm at the receiver antenna in a free-space model.  That's really 
loud compared to the nominal -130 to -140 dBm you'd hear from the satellites.

-John

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf 
Of Magnus Danielson
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 4:02 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

On 10/02/2012 10:43 PM, J. Forster wrote:
 Take a look at the specs of this unit:

 http://www.mobilephonejammer.com.au/covert-gps-jammer-portable-p-119.html

 The Power Output is 0.5 Watts and it claims a jamming range of 1-10 Meters.

 Anybody think there is something wrong?

For a 500 mW jammer your jamming range should be much better. That's wrong.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread David
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 23:01:45 +0200, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:

On 10/02/2012 10:43 PM, J. Forster wrote:
 Take a look at the specs of this unit:

 http://www.mobilephonejammer.com.au/covert-gps-jammer-portable-p-119.html

 The Power Output is 0.5 Watts and it claims a jamming range of 1-10 Meters.

 Anybody think there is something wrong?

For a 500 mW jammer your jamming range should be much better. That's wrong.

Cheers,
Magnus

That is what I was thinking but I am too lazy to work out the math
right now and I do not have a 1.5GHz source for testing at the moment
anyway.  A lot depends on antenna geometry since the jammer may need
to be concealed and is unlikely to be in the high gain portion of the
receiver's antenna pattern.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 10/02/2012 11:05 PM, John Lofgren wrote:

The 0.5 W and + 10 dBm numbers in the specs don't work out.  +10 dBm is 10 mW.  
I suspect that the 1/2 watt is really the DC input power.


Now, that makes sense.


And, I'd agree about the range.  +10 dBm into a dipole at 10 meters gets you 
about -44 dBm at the receiver antenna in a free-space model.  That's really 
loud compared to the nominal -130 to -140 dBm you'd hear from the satellites.


Indeed. Even for 10 mW it was not reasonable. No wonders that 1-10 m 
jammers cause such grief to DHS. Serious overkill.


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Charles P. Steinmetz



The Power Output is 0.5 Watts and it claims a jamming range of 1-10 Meters.
Anybody think there is something wrong?


I'd expect a much greater range with a 0.5 W jammer.  But note that 
0.5 W is the total output power -- the transmit power is only 10 
dBm (0.01 W).  Whatever those terms mean.  (Does total output power 
include far IR and heat?)


Note that The item is for Legal Use only!

Best regards,

Charles





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Bob Camp
HI

At least from here, the link no longer works.

Bob

On Oct 2, 2012, at 7:48 PM, Charles P. Steinmetz 
charles_steinm...@lavabit.com wrote:

 
 The Power Output is 0.5 Watts and it claims a jamming range of 1-10 Meters.
 Anybody think there is something wrong?
 
 I'd expect a much greater range with a 0.5 W jammer.  But note that 0.5 W is 
 the total output power -- the transmit power is only 10 dBm (0.01 W).  
 Whatever those terms mean.  (Does total output power include far IR and 
 heat?)
 
 Note that The item is for Legal Use only!
 
 Best regards,
 
 Charles
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Jim Lux

On 10/2/12 4:48 PM, Charles P. Steinmetz wrote:



The Power Output is 0.5 Watts and it claims a jamming range of 1-10
Meters.
Anybody think there is something wrong?


I'd expect a much greater range with a 0.5 W jammer.  But note that 0.5
W is the total output power -- the transmit power is only 10 dBm
(0.01 W).  Whatever those terms mean.  (Does total output power
include far IR and heat?)



maybe it has some real bright LEDs to indicate it's on?


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread johncroos
In considering the effect of a simple jammer on a GPS receiver, a 
simple link analysis

is insufficient.

What must also be considered is the anti-jam capability of the receiver
which due to spread spectrum processing gain will reject any simple
jamming signal even though is it 10's of dB stronger than the desired 
signal.


73 -john k6iql

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Jim Lux

On 10/2/12 7:33 PM, johncr...@aol.com wrote:

In considering the effect of a simple jammer on a GPS receiver, a simple
link analysis
is insufficient.

What must also be considered is the anti-jam capability of the receiver
which due to spread spectrum processing gain will reject any simple
jamming signal even though is it 10's of dB stronger than the desired
signal.



not most simple GPS receivers which have very little AJ capability. They 
have a single bit quantizer (or maybe a 1.5 or 2 bit) after the LNA.  If 
the LNA doesn't saturate, then the quantizer is captured by the strong 
CW carrier.


This is a classic problem with DSSS receivers and led to a lot of 
research in the 80s on things like adaptive excisers to remove CW 
carriers.


If you built a linear receiver with a lot of dynamic range, then, yes, 
the process gain will suppress the CW tone, but you still have to 
acquire the code, and as Dixon says (paraphrasing) acquisition is the 
secret sauce in spread spectrum systems.  Back when I was doing this 
kind of thing seriously (mid to late 80s), acquisition, particularly 
robust techniques, were literally SECRET (in the DoD sense).



There have been a nice series of articles in GPS World over the past few 
months about the variety of inexpensive GPS jammers out there. (and the 
problems they cause).




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Tom Miller
We don't know that they modulate the jamming signal some what. I bet 10 mW 
would do a good bit of harm to GPS systems even a block away.



- Original Message - 
From: Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net

To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 10:45 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer


On 10/2/12 7:33 PM, johncr...@aol.com wrote:

In considering the effect of a simple jammer on a GPS receiver, a simple
link analysis
is insufficient.

What must also be considered is the anti-jam capability of the receiver
which due to spread spectrum processing gain will reject any simple
jamming signal even though is it 10's of dB stronger than the desired
signal.



not most simple GPS receivers which have very little AJ capability. They
have a single bit quantizer (or maybe a 1.5 or 2 bit) after the LNA.  If
the LNA doesn't saturate, then the quantizer is captured by the strong
CW carrier.

This is a classic problem with DSSS receivers and led to a lot of
research in the 80s on things like adaptive excisers to remove CW
carriers.

If you built a linear receiver with a lot of dynamic range, then, yes,
the process gain will suppress the CW tone, but you still have to
acquire the code, and as Dixon says (paraphrasing) acquisition is the
secret sauce in spread spectrum systems.  Back when I was doing this
kind of thing seriously (mid to late 80s), acquisition, particularly
robust techniques, were literally SECRET (in the DoD sense).


There have been a nice series of articles in GPS World over the past few
months about the variety of inexpensive GPS jammers out there. (and the
problems they cause).



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there. 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Michael Perrett
John,
Coherent reproduction of the spread PRN standard positioning signal (SPS)
signal gives ~30dB of A/J protection, the GPS signal level, as received at
the GPS receiver is on the order of -160 dBW (L1-CA). If the jammer outputs
half a Watt, and is anywhere nearby, the receiver will not maintain lock on
the civilian code as the jammer would overwhelm the receiver front end. A
commercial GPS receiver has a maximum of 20 dB power bandwidth. If the
jammer is present prior to initial acquisition then the receiver would
certainly never acquire lock.

My experience is that the civil signal (SPS) is very easy to jam, where the
precise positioning signal (PPS), using the P(Y) code adds significantly
more protection.

All values are round numbers and the individual receivers signal strategy
can make some difference, as well as GPS aiding (especially a good clock,
known position, velocity and so forth).

Michael, K7HIL

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:33 PM, johncr...@aol.com wrote:

 In considering the effect of a simple jammer on a GPS receiver, a simple
 link analysis
 is insufficient.

 What must also be considered is the anti-jam capability of the receiver
 which due to spread spectrum processing gain will reject any simple
 jamming signal even though is it 10's of dB stronger than the desired
 signal.

 73 -john k6iql


 __**_
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
 mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread gary
I talked to the GPS jamming group at Nellis a few years ago. They use 
broadband noise to jam GPSs. If somebody is going to the Nellis Aviation 
Nation coming up in November, the jammer group always has a static 
display. They have some Soviet jammer gear they acquired.

http://www.nellis.af.mil/aviationnation/



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Ron Ward
Hi:
Other than a terrorist, who would want to jam GPS?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 2:28 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

On 10/02/2012 11:05 PM, John Lofgren wrote:
 The 0.5 W and + 10 dBm numbers in the specs don't work out.  +10 dBm is 10
mW.  I suspect that the 1/2 watt is really the DC input power.

Now, that makes sense.

 And, I'd agree about the range.  +10 dBm into a dipole at 10 meters gets
you about -44 dBm at the receiver antenna in a free-space model.  That's
really loud compared to the nominal -130 to -140 dBm you'd hear from the
satellites.

Indeed. Even for 10 mW it was not reasonable. No wonders that 1-10 m 
jammers cause such grief to DHS. Serious overkill.

Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread bownes
Many folks.

The paranoid tinfoil hat crowd

Folks who are concerned that law enforcement has placed a GPS tracker on their 
car. 

Truckers avoiding log enforcement

Truckers who want to sleep rather than drive. 

Ambulance drivers who want to sleep but claim to have been held up at hospital. 

Emergency services personnel (fire,ems,law enforcement) who want to take the 
company vehicle where they are not supposed to.


Just a few of the many I can think of!

On Oct 3, 2012, at 0:40, Ron Ward n6idl...@comcast.net wrote:

 Hi:
 Other than a terrorist, who would want to jam GPS?
 Ron
 -Original Message-
 From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
 Behalf Of Magnus Danielson
 Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 2:28 PM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer
 
 On 10/02/2012 11:05 PM, John Lofgren wrote:
 The 0.5 W and + 10 dBm numbers in the specs don't work out.  +10 dBm is 10
 mW.  I suspect that the 1/2 watt is really the DC input power.
 
 Now, that makes sense.
 
 And, I'd agree about the range.  +10 dBm into a dipole at 10 meters gets
 you about -44 dBm at the receiver antenna in a free-space model.  That's
 really loud compared to the nominal -130 to -140 dBm you'd hear from the
 satellites.
 
 Indeed. Even for 10 mW it was not reasonable. No wonders that 1-10 m 
 jammers cause such grief to DHS. Serious overkill.
 
 Cheers,
 Magnus
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Hal Murray
 Other than a terrorist, who would want to jam GPS?

Generic bad guys who don't want the FBI tracking them.  The civil liberties 
types are suing the FBI to make sure the get a court document before they 
install GPS trackers on suspects cars.

Truckers who don't want their boss to know what they are actually doing.  The 
FAA test in NJ had troubles because of truckers using GPS jammers on the 
nearby NJ Turnpike.


There is also jamming from broken gear, perhaps broken by (mis)design.  The 
classic is a TV repeater on a boat that wiped out Monterrey Bay.  GPS World 
used to have a good article on-line, but the URL I had bookmarked is now 404. 
 Anybody got a working URL?
  The Hunt for RFI
  Unjamming a Coast Harbor
  James R. Clynch, Andrew A. Parker, George Badger,
  Wilbur R. Vincent, Paul McGill, Richard W. Adler
  GPS World, Jan 1, 2003

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

2012-10-02 Thread Ron Ward
Hi all:
Thanks for your response to my question.
I had no idea!
Ron

-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Hal Murray
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 10:07 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Jammer

 Other than a terrorist, who would want to jam GPS?

Generic bad guys who don't want the FBI tracking them.  The civil liberties 
types are suing the FBI to make sure the get a court document before they 
install GPS trackers on suspects cars.

Truckers who don't want their boss to know what they are actually doing.
The 
FAA test in NJ had troubles because of truckers using GPS jammers on the 
nearby NJ Turnpike.


There is also jamming from broken gear, perhaps broken by (mis)design.  The 
classic is a TV repeater on a boat that wiped out Monterrey Bay.  GPS World 
used to have a good article on-line, but the URL I had bookmarked is now
404. 
 Anybody got a working URL?
  The Hunt for RFI
  Unjamming a Coast Harbor
  James R. Clynch, Andrew A. Parker, George Badger,
  Wilbur R. Vincent, Paul McGill, Richard W. Adler
  GPS World, Jan 1, 2003

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.