[time-nuts] HP 5334 oscillator performance

2006-12-07 Thread Colin Bradley
I recently took one of my 5334A’s off of the house standard to lend to a 
friend. I thought it a good idea to check the onboard oscillator before lending 
it out. Both of my 5334A’s lack Opt 10 oscillators. This particular unit was 
almost 40Hz high in frequency. I tried to set it to frequency and had trouble 
getting it closer than 2Hz. The set-ability was very poor. I checked the 
service manual and found that HP only specified a final frequency within 8Hz. I 
can now see why. I then turned the instrument off for 12 hours. The next day I 
powered the unit back up. The oscillator was 20Hz higher than where I had 
measured it at shutdown the night before. It took well over an hour for it to 
re-stabilize and overshot the previous set point by 2Hz. At this point I 
decided to lend a Heathkit IM-2420 to the friend and continued experiments with 
the 5334A. 
 
I now took the second 5334A down and ran the same tests on it. This instrument 
was somewhat better but still shared many of the problems the first unit.
1)  60+ minutes to stabilize after power-up. Oscillators would 
start out 9 – 19Hz high and settle in at +- 1Hz.
2)  Poor retrace at turn on. Final settling frequency can vary 
by 1Hz.
3)  Poor set-ability due to the ceramic trimmer.
4)  Oscillator pulling of 2 – 3Hz when I connected another 
counter to the rear panel oscillator jack. The oscillator buffer is on the same 
ECL chip as the oscillator.
After looking at the circuit I decided that a new TCXO would be a better 
solution than trying to modify the existing circuit for better performance. 
Since these units are used at room temp most of the time, I need not worry 
about a wide temp range specification.
 
I set the following goals for the replacement oscillator. 
1)  Improvement of stability by an order of magnitude and 
set-ability of two orders of magnitude.
2)  Replacement to be built on a circuit board that would mount 
in the oven oscillator connector on the main circuit board.
3)  Use of the full time 24vdc at this connector to power the 
oscillator at all times. Use of an on-card battery supply for oscillator 
backup. 
4)  Cheap
5)  Use of readily available TCXO oscillator module. After 
checking Mouser and Digi-Key I settled on a Mouser supplied FOX801BE 10mHz unit 
@ $13.46. to start my experiments. This oscillator draws only 2ma. and 
frequency is set by an external trim pot.
 
I would be interested in the experiences of others with respect to the 
performance of their non-oven 5334’s (or 5328’s) and ideas that support the 
design goals. Thanks
Colin


 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] HP 5334 oscillator performance

2006-12-07 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi Colin:

A year or so ago I purchased a number of unit oscillators form a number 
of sources like Digi-Key, Jameco, eBay, etc.  These were all XOs, not 
TCXOs.  Some had no markings some were from well known makers.  Almost 
all of them showed high aging rates indicating leaking packages, i.e. 
they were slowing down and the rate was not getting smaller.

You might want to run the unit in a temperature controlled environment 
for a few days to be sure it's not defective.  I did this using a lunch 
bucket which is an insulated cylinder with an opening of about 5 and 
about 6 deep.  I used a home brewed heater set to the turnover 
temperature of the XO.

Does the 5334 have an external reference input?

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke

w/Java http://www.PRC68.com
w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml
http://www.precisionclock.com



Colin Bradley wrote:

I recently took one of my 5334A’s off of the house standard to lend to a 
friend. I thought it a good idea to check the onboard oscillator before 
lending it out. Both of my 5334A’s lack Opt 10 oscillators. This particular 
unit was almost 40Hz high in frequency. I tried to set it to frequency and had 
trouble getting it closer than 2Hz. The set-ability was very poor. I checked 
the service manual and found that HP only specified a final frequency within 
8Hz. I can now see why. I then turned the instrument off for 12 hours. The 
next day I powered the unit back up. The oscillator was 20Hz higher than where 
I had measured it at shutdown the night before. It took well over an hour for 
it to re-stabilize and overshot the previous set point by 2Hz. At this point I 
decided to lend a Heathkit IM-2420 to the friend and continued experiments 
with the 5334A. 
 
I now took the second 5334A down and ran the same tests on it. This instrument 
was somewhat better but still shared many of the problems the first unit.
1)  60+ minutes to stabilize after power-up. Oscillators would 
start out 9 – 19Hz high and settle in at +- 1Hz.
2)  Poor retrace at turn on. Final settling frequency can vary 
by 1Hz.
3)  Poor set-ability due to the ceramic trimmer.
4)  Oscillator pulling of 2 – 3Hz when I connected another 
counter to the rear panel oscillator jack. The oscillator buffer is on the 
same ECL chip as the oscillator.
After looking at the circuit I decided that a new TCXO would be a better 
solution than trying to modify the existing circuit for better performance. 
Since these units are used at room temp most of the time, I need not worry 
about a wide temp range specification.
 
I set the following goals for the replacement oscillator. 
1)  Improvement of stability by an order of magnitude and 
set-ability of two orders of magnitude.
2)  Replacement to be built on a circuit board that would 
mount in the oven oscillator connector on the main circuit board.
3)  Use of the full time 24vdc at this connector to power the 
oscillator at all times. Use of an on-card battery supply for oscillator 
backup. 
4)  Cheap
5)  Use of readily available TCXO oscillator module. After 
checking Mouser and Digi-Key I settled on a Mouser supplied FOX801BE 10mHz 
unit @ $13.46. to start my experiments. This oscillator draws only 2ma. and 
frequency is set by an external trim pot.
 
I would be interested in the experiences of others with respect to the 
performance of their non-oven 5334’s (or 5328’s) and ideas that support the 
design goals. Thanks
Colin


 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

  



___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


Re: [time-nuts] HP 5334 oscillator performance

2006-12-07 Thread Rick Karlquist
I was the project manager of the 5334B, which was a reduced
factory cost replacement for the 5334A.  Of course I thoroughly
evaluated the 5334A before deciding what changes to make.  I will
apologize on behalf of the company for that oscillator
in the 34A.  It is a really poor design.  Giving the 5334A project
team the benefit of the doubt, I guess the philosophy was that
the built in oscillator is for very non-critical applications and
they didn't want to increase the cost to those users but putting
a decent oscillator in the standard counter.  Many users were like
us and had a house frequency standard, so we never used a built in
oscillator in a counter.  Due to time and cost pressures, we unfortunately
inherited the same oscillator in the 5334B.

So in both products, please plan on getting a 10811 or using an
external frequency reference.

Rick Karlquist N6RK
Project manager, 5334B, circa 1986



Colin Bradley wrote:
 I recently took one of my 5334A’s off of the house standard to lend to a
 friend. I thought it a good idea to check the onboard oscillator before
 lending it out. Both of my 5334A’s lack Opt 10 oscillators. This
 particular unit was almost 40Hz high in frequency. I tried to set it to
 frequency and had trouble getting it closer than 2Hz. The set-ability was
 very poor. I checked the service manual and found that HP only specified a
 final frequency within 8Hz. I can now see why. I then turned the
 instrument off for 12 hours. The next day I powered the unit back up. The
 oscillator was 20Hz higher than where I had measured it at shutdown the
 night before. It took well over an hour for it to re-stabilize and
 overshot the previous set point by 2Hz. At this point I decided to lend a
 Heathkit IM-2420 to the friend and continued experiments with the 5334A.

 I now took the second 5334A down and ran the same tests on it. This
 instrument was somewhat better but still shared many of the problems the
 first unit.
 1)  60+ minutes to stabilize after power-up. Oscillators
 would start out 9 – 19Hz high and settle in at +- 1Hz.
 2)  Poor retrace at turn on. Final settling frequency can
 vary by 1Hz.
 3)  Poor set-ability due to the ceramic trimmer.
 4)  Oscillator pulling of 2 – 3Hz when I connected another
 counter to the rear panel oscillator jack. The oscillator buffer is on the
 same ECL chip as the oscillator.
 After looking at the circuit I decided that a new TCXO would be a better
 solution than trying to modify the existing circuit for better
 performance. Since these units are used at room temp most of the time, I
 need not worry about a wide temp range specification.

 I set the following goals for the replacement oscillator.
 1)  Improvement of stability by an order of magnitude and
 set-ability of two orders of magnitude.
 2)  Replacement to be built on a circuit board that would
 mount in the oven oscillator connector on the main circuit board.
 3)  Use of the full time 24vdc at this connector to power
 the oscillator at all times. Use of an on-card battery supply for
 oscillator backup.
 4)  Cheap
 5)  Use of readily available TCXO oscillator module. After
 checking Mouser and Digi-Key I settled on a Mouser supplied FOX801BE 10mHz
 unit @ $13.46. to start my experiments. This oscillator draws only 2ma.
 and frequency is set by an external trim pot.

 I would be interested in the experiences of others with respect to the
 performance of their non-oven 5334’s (or 5328’s) and ideas that support
 the design goals. Thanks
 Colin



 
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
 http://new.mail.yahoo.com
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list
 time-nuts@febo.com
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts





___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts