[time-nuts] HP5061B Peak to Valley Ratios

2017-04-04 Thread Donald E. Pauly
https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-April/104600.html

We did our first Zeeman frequency test on our good cesium 05061-6077
Tube with a 1 Meg scope probe and a 11 Meg Digital Voltmeter in
parallel.  KB7APQ used his digital generator for the variable
frequency.  See paragraph 3-16 on page 3-8.  At 53.53 kc the level
peaked at 3 V peak to peak which is close to the theoretical 1 V rms.
I didn't have a program readily available to do a graph but you can
see the main and upper and lower adjacent peaks. We can compare with
Figure 4-43 (page 4-31) in the service manual for the HP5061B if
anyone can graph this.

We had the C field control at the factory setting of 453.  Our actual
maximum on main peak was 53.657 kc not 53.530 kc.  We got 53.530 kc
with a slightly different new C field setting of 463.  Factor spec is
within 100 cps and we were 127 cps off.  This is probably not a bad
drift for a 30 year old instrument.

https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-April/104600.html

kc  beam (C Field set at 453)
55.03  27
54.93  27
54.83  27
54.73  28
54.63  30
54.53  32
54.43  33
54.33  31
54.23  28
54.13  25
54.03  22
53.93  22
53.83  24
53.73  29
53.63  35
53.53  32
53.43  39
53.33  34
53.23  28
53.13  24
53.03  22
52.93  23
52.83  25
52.73  28
52.63 31
52.53 32
52.43  31
52.33  29
52.23  27
52.13  27
52.03  26

We suspect a bad beam tube on our second instrument and therefore
wanted to practice the Low Frequency Coil test on our known good beam
tube.  It allows the performance of the tube to be checked with no rf
drive.  See paragraph 5-175 (page 5-22) We used 26.765 kc and it also
peaked out at 3 V pp.  I discovered that this is half of the Zeeman
frequency but it is not clear why this is so.  We obtained a beam
current of 23 with rf drive removed from the tube by pulling P2 on
A4A1.  I spoke to Corby Dawson last night.  Among many things, he
reported that you will be able to get 80% to 90% of this beam current
in normal lock mode.  We are getting 87% or 20.

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KVV
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] HP5061B Peak to Valley Ratios

2017-04-03 Thread Donald E. Pauly
https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2017-April/104600.html

We hooked up the oscilloscope directly to the electron multiplier in
the beam tube with a 1 Meg termination.  We were operating open loop
and varying the fine crystal oscillator adjust for the different
photos. Remember that higher beam current is downward in the photo.
Currents listed in nA translate to beam current numbers on the HP5061B
meter.

First photo at http://gonascent.com/papers/hp/hp5061/waveform/centered.jpg
is the frequency swept at a 137 cps rate around the peak of the cesium
resonance.  Ground is at the top of the screen and 5 mV (also 5 nA)
per division.  Horizonal is 4 ms per division.This corresponds to a
peak beam current of -22 nA and a valley current of -17 nA.  One
valley current is below resonance and the other is above resonance.
The waveform is 274 cps.  Sequence is low to high and then high to
low.  No 137 cps is present.

The fine frequency control was adjusted to produce a slight offset
from center for the photo at
http://gonascent.com/papers/hp/hp5061/waveform/smalloff.jpg .   Note
that the peak beam current is still -22 nA but two different valley
currents exist.  One is 17 nA and the other is -18 nA.  Most of the
signal is 274 cps but some asymmetry is present at 137 cps.  One
extreme of the sweep is slightly closer to center frequency than the
other.

Finally the frequency was adjusted to produce a severe offset with all
of the sweep below resonance in the photo of
http://gonascent.com/papers/hp/hp5061/waveform/largeoff.jpg .  The
peak is now slightly below resonance at -21 nA and the valley is far
below resonance at 5 nA.  The signal is all 137 cps with no 274 cps.
See figures 4-43 and 4-44 on page 4-31 of the manual for further
explanation.

We will be finding out the effect on beam current of tests shortly on
the Zeeman coil and LF coil.  We think that the 55.53 kc Zeeman
frequency introduces some AM into the beam frequency but no FM.  What
the LF coil has is unclear at this time.

πθ°μΩω±√·Γλ
WB0KVV
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] HP5061B Peak to Valley Ratios

2017-04-02 Thread cdelect
Donald,

I agree with John, remove the gearing gizmo from the 10811 assy. the
adjust hole lines up any way so no need to drill a hole. you just need a
long insulated tuning tool. Also agree that a quick indication of tube
operation can be seen if the beam current rises when the mod is turned
off.

The Cesium tube test, set seen in
http://leapsecond.com/corby/HP-5071A-with-5061A-4.docx
is essentially a stand alone low frequency coil test. If I can't get a
decent LF coil beam current I scrap the tube as it's a waste of time to
put in in a unit and try the RF tests.

The test set uses a 555 based oscillator.

For low frequency tests in an instrument I use a 651B or 204C.

Set the amplitude and frequency for a peak on the beam current, make sure
mod is off and that you are on the central peak.

The figure of merit test in the manual will give an indication of how
well the tube and instrument are working, but a definitive test is to
perform an Allan deviation of the unit.

Cheers,

Corby

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] HP5061B Peak to Valley Ratios

2017-04-01 Thread John Miles
> We are having trouble getting beam current on our #2 HP5061B.  Ion
> current has gone down in a week from 10 to zero. It looks like the rf
> chain is working normally.  Both HV power supplies had to repaired.
> Beam current is all the way up and which gives 2 on the meter. We are
> preparing to do the Low Frequency Coil test mentioned on page 5-22
> section 5-175.
> 
> I got this idea from that procedure.  On our good #1 instrument we set
> the beam current at 20 with normal lock.  The middle coax J2 which
> carries 12.631 mc to the harmonic generator was removed next.  The
> beam current instantly dropped to 2.  We set the beam current with the
> front panel control at 10 to 30 and all three settings dropped about
> 10 to one when the cable was pulled.  This ratio seems to be a good
> indicator of beam tube quality.  

Other useful cues are the effect on the beam current when you turn the 
modulation off -- it should rise a bit -- and the stability of the meter needle 
in the beam-current position as an indicator of tube noise.  In that regard, 
excess noise from A13CR1 could potentially be mistaken for noise in the tube 
itself.  It could stand a bit more bypassing IMHO.

> I don't see it in the manual, but the
> fine five turn pot oscillator control works much better than the
> course adjustment for setting peak beam current.  It also works better
> for setting the control voltage to zero.  The push to turn course
> frequency control slot has been chewed up by the previous owner.

It's a good idea to remove that contraption altogether.  You don't want 
anything poking into the 10811's trimmer access hole or otherwise touching it.  
Drill a hole in the panel that will let you reach the 10811's trimmer directly 
with an alignment tool.   It will then be easy to follow the guidelines in the 
manual -- i.e., set the OCXO trimmer to the central peak with the pot at 250.  

The intent was probably to achieve a consistent operating point at a linear 
spot in the EFC curve, while discouraging technicians from setting the 5-turn 
pot near either extreme.  By specifying a midscale setting for the pot, they 
were able to maintain a consistent damping factor between units while 
incidentally making it easier to return to the central peak after any temporary 
adjustments.   The 10811-60109s are all labeled with a factory-selected 
resistor value for the same reason.  Overkill, but that's how HP rolled.

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] HP5061B Peak to Valley Ratios

2017-04-01 Thread Donald E. Pauly
We are having trouble getting beam current on our #2 HP5061B.  Ion
current has gone down in a week from 10 to zero. It looks like the rf
chain is working normally.  Both HV power supplies had to repaired.
Beam current is all the way up and which gives 2 on the meter. We are
preparing to do the Low Frequency Coil test mentioned on page 5-22
section 5-175.

I got this idea from that procedure.  On our good #1 instrument we set
the beam current at 20 with normal lock.  The middle coax J2 which
carries 12.631 mc to the harmonic generator was removed next.  The
beam current instantly dropped to 2.  We set the beam current with the
front panel control at 10 to 30 and all three settings dropped about
10 to one when the cable was pulled.  This ratio seems to be a good
indicator of beam tube quality.  I don't see it in the manual, but the
fine five turn pot oscillator control works much better than the
course adjustment for setting peak beam current.  It also works better
for setting the control voltage to zero.  The push to turn course
frequency control slot has been chewed up by the previous owner.

We are planning to get an oscilloscope display of the main and
secondary lobes similar to page 4-31 Figure 4-43.  If it works we will
post it.  It should show both the dc and ac parts of the beam current
as the 137 cps sweep goes from one extreme to the other.  Will anyone
having any experience with the Low Frequency Coil test kindly post on
the subject?  This is NOT the Zeeman frequency test.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.