Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-28 Thread Attila Kinali
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:38:42 -0700
Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:

  Given that my antenna is just a puck at the peak of the attic (never got 
 around to adding the DIY choke-ring)

A choke ring will not help you much in the attic. You already have lots
of reflecting and refracting surfaces/volumes above the antenna.
Unless you get to the top of your roof, i wouldn't bother adding a choke ring.


Attila Kinali

-- 
I pity people who can't find laughter or at least some bit of amusement in
the little doings of the day. I believe I could find something ridiculous
even in the saddest moment, if necessary. It has nothing to do with being
superficial. It's a matter of joy in life.
-- Sophie Scholl
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-28 Thread Bob Stewart
Hi Attila,


Is wood, nails, and asphalt shingle really that big of a problem at these 
frequencies?  The antenna is within 2 ft of the highest point of the roof.

Bob




 From: Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch
To: Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency 
measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?
 

On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:38:42 -0700



Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:

  Given that my antenna is just a puck at the peak of the attic (never got 
around to adding the DIY choke-ring)

A choke ring will not help you much in the attic. You already have lots
of reflecting and refracting surfaces/volumes above the antenna.
Unless you get to the top of your roof, i wouldn't bother adding a choke ring.


            Attila Kinali
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-28 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 06:30:14 -0700
Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:

 Is wood, nails, and asphalt shingle really that big of a problem at these 
 frequencies?  The antenna is within 2 ft of the highest point of the roof.

Consider this: A lot of people complain about the reflections caused
by trees. But what is a tree? It's mostly air and a few leaves, with
a branch here and there.

Also: 60cm is less than 2λ. ie the roof is in the near field of the
antenna, where everything causes a change of the antenna behaviour
(resonance frequency, radiation pattern, phase centre etc)

Depending on what you do with the GPS signal, you might or might
not care about that. If you are a nutty time-nut and want to
wring out ever last bit of jitter out of your PPS, then you
will care about the effect of the roof.


Attila Kinali

-- 
I pity people who can't find laughter or at least some bit of amusement in
the little doings of the day. I believe I could find something ridiculous
even in the saddest moment, if necessary. It has nothing to do with being
superficial. It's a matter of joy in life.
-- Sophie Scholl
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-28 Thread Dave M

Attila Kinali wrote:

On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 06:30:14 -0700
Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:


Is wood, nails, and asphalt shingle really that big of a problem at
these frequencies? The antenna is within 2 ft of the highest point
of the roof.


Consider this: A lot of people complain about the reflections caused
by trees. But what is a tree? It's mostly air and a few leaves, with
a branch here and there.

Also: 60cm is less than 2λ. ie the roof is in the near field of the
antenna, where everything causes a change of the antenna behaviour
(resonance frequency, radiation pattern, phase centre etc)

Depending on what you do with the GPS signal, you might or might
not care about that. If you are a nutty time-nut and want to
wring out ever last bit of jitter out of your PPS, then you
will care about the effect of the roof.


Attila Kinali



In light of these posts about antennae and reflections, etc., I have a 
similar question.  I'm planning to move my workbench out of my attached 
garage into a separate garage building.  The new garage is about 24' x 36', 
and has a metal roof.  My plan is to mount my GPS antenna atop a metal pipe 
mounted at the peak at the end of the gable roof.
How far above the metal roof should I mount the antenna so reflections will 
be minimized, at least to the point of diminishing returns?
The antenna will have a pretty good view of the sky from that location.  Any 
other issues that I should be aware of when dealing with a metal roof?


Thanks,
Dave M 



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-28 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 09:21:51 -0500
Dave M dgmin...@mediacombb.net wrote:

 How far above the metal roof should I mount the antenna so reflections will 
 be minimized, at least to the point of diminishing returns?

I've been told, that 2m is ok. Sorry, i don't have any hard numbers.

 The antenna will have a pretty good view of the sky from that location.  Any 
 other issues that I should be aware of when dealing with a metal roof?

Heating of the garage due to sun?

Attila Kinali

-- 
I pity people who can't find laughter or at least some bit of amusement in
the little doings of the day. I believe I could find something ridiculous
even in the saddest moment, if necessary. It has nothing to do with being
superficial. It's a matter of joy in life.
-- Sophie Scholl
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-28 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

Simple answer - yes. 

My observation over the years is that your typical roof absorbs quite a bit of 
RF starting way below GPS frequencies. My *guess* is that shingles are a bit 
lossy. Shingles + moisture more so. Shingles + dirt + moisture even worse. I 
also believe that plywood suffers the same way. Also consider that you have 
things like flashing, ridge vents, and gutters involved.  Somewhere below 2 MHz 
or so things begin to get less crazy. 

I’ve spent a lot of time putting antennas up in a lot of attics and then moving 
them outdoors. 

Bob



On Aug 28, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:

 Hi Attila,
 
 
 Is wood, nails, and asphalt shingle really that big of a problem at these 
 frequencies?  The antenna is within 2 ft of the highest point of the roof.
 
 Bob
 
 
 
 
 From: Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch
 To: Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency 
 measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
 Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:15 AM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?
 
 
 On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:38:42 -0700
 
 
 
 Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:
 
   Given that my antenna is just a puck at the peak of the attic (never got 
 around to adding the DIY choke-ring)
 
 A choke ring will not help you much in the attic. You already have lots
 of reflecting and refracting surfaces/volumes above the antenna.
 Unless you get to the top of your roof, i wouldn't bother adding a choke ring.
 
 
 Attila Kinali
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-28 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:
 Hi Attila,


 Is wood, nails, and asphalt shingle really that big of a problem at these 
 frequencies?  The antenna is within 2 ft of the highest point of the roof.

Depends on what you call a problem.  If you are getting a usable
signal then some people would not call it a problem.  When I moved my
GPS antenna from user the roof to a pole mounted above the roof the
signal improved greatly.  The most notable improvements was the signal
to noise ration of satellites near the horizon.

 Bob



 
  From: Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch
 To: Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net; Discussion of precise time and frequency 
 measurement time-nuts@febo.com
 Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 8:15 AM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?


 On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 16:38:42 -0700



 Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:

  Given that my antenna is just a puck at the peak of the attic (never got 
 around to adding the DIY choke-ring)

 A choke ring will not help you much in the attic. You already have lots
 of reflecting and refracting surfaces/volumes above the antenna.
 Unless you get to the top of your roof, i wouldn't bother adding a choke ring.


 Attila Kinali
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.



-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-25 Thread Henry Hallam
I would call that done.

Henry

On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:
 I've had the LEA-6T sitting in survey-in mode for about 17 hours, and at this 
 point, the u-center software says that the Mean 3D Std Dev is 0.109 meters.  
 Given that my antenna is just a puck at the peak of the attic (never got 
 around to adding the DIY choke-ring), has this reached the silly number 
 phase, or should I let is simmer overnight before calling it done?

 Bob - AE6RV
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-25 Thread Bob Camp
Hi

There are some periodic errors in GPS that only get averaged in after a = 48 
hour survey. It’s not so much a specific error level in meters as much as 
averaging in all the “issues”. 

Bob

On Aug 23, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:

 I've had the LEA-6T sitting in survey-in mode for about 17 hours, and at this 
 point, the u-center software says that the Mean 3D Std Dev is 0.109 meters.  
 Given that my antenna is just a puck at the peak of the attic (never got 
 around to adding the DIY choke-ring), has this reached the silly number 
 phase, or should I let is simmer overnight before calling it done?
 
 Bob - AE6RV
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-25 Thread Bob Stewart
Hi Bob,

Thanks for the info.  I'll have to run a long test to see what the difference 
is.  Maybe I can capture the XYZ coordinates to the PC during the run.


Bob




 From: Bob Camp kb...@n1k.org
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?
 

Hi

There are some periodic errors in GPS that only get averaged in after a = 48 
hour survey. It’s not so much a specific error level in meters as much as 
averaging in all the “issues”. 

Bob

On Aug 23, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Bob Stewart b...@evoria.net wrote:

 I've had the LEA-6T sitting in survey-in mode for about 17 hours, and at this 
 point, the u-center software says that the Mean 3D Std Dev is 0.109 meters.  
 Given that my antenna is just a puck at the peak of the attic (never got 
 around to adding the DIY choke-ring), has this reached the silly number 
 phase, or should I let is simmer overnight before calling it done?
 
 Bob - AE6RV
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

[time-nuts] Practical Survey-In Accuracy?

2014-08-23 Thread Bob Stewart
I've had the LEA-6T sitting in survey-in mode for about 17 hours, and at this 
point, the u-center software says that the Mean 3D Std Dev is 0.109 meters.  
Given that my antenna is just a puck at the peak of the attic (never got around 
to adding the DIY choke-ring), has this reached the silly number phase, or 
should I let is simmer overnight before calling it done?

Bob - AE6RV
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.