[time-nuts] Some FE405B data
Attila, All oscillators are not the same! Although I find the yield to be better for the FE405B than say the 10811 some are duds like the top trace in Toms data, some are very good like the bottom trace, and some are even better, my plot. I've been very impressed by the 405B performance as I have run through testing a pile of them! Cheers, Corby ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Re: [time-nuts] Some FE405B data
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:36:43 -0700 wrote: > Attached here is a long term AD plot of an FE405B. > > Stays in the 10-13ths all the way up to 10,000 seconds! > > This unit has only been operating for about 2 weeks. This is interesting. Do you have an idea why your unit peforms so much better than those that TvB measured[1]? Attila Kinali [1] http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/fe405/ -- Reading can seriously damage your ignorance. -- unknown ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
[time-nuts] Some FE405B data
Attached here is a long term AD plot of an FE405B. Stays in the 10-13ths all the way up to 10,000 seconds! This unit has only been operating for about 2 weeks. In a month I'll repeat this plot and also include the aging rate. I have found that these oscillators exhibit less drift than most others I have tested! Cheers, Corby Dawson___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.