[time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks

2012-12-11 Thread M. Simon


Typical 32KHz clock crystals are very stable in frequency if you can keep them 
close to the turnover temp. If you can hold 1 degC it is .04 ppm. 
That is 40ppb - very good. If you can hold .1 deg C it is .0004 ppm. 
That is .4 ppb.  Very expensive.  (it goes as the square of the 
difference in temperature from the turn over temp - which varies from crystal 
to crystal. ). The turn over temp 
is around 25 degC. 

I saw some 40mm on a side thermoelectric heaters/coolers  units for $15 at 
Spark Fun. I thought I might 
have some fun. Two units and a power supply. Plus a honking current amp.  
Although with milliwatts for the oscillator it might not take a lot of 
heat pumping to keep the osc at a constant temp. And +/- 10C to 20C is probably 
enough range for experiments. 
 
Be interesting to see if this could be engineered to compete with OCXOs. A 
VariCap would be included in later experiments for tuning. If the initial 
experiments show promise.  6 wires out to start: 2 pwr, 2 thermistor, and 2 
Freq out. with the oscillator in the center of the coolers the material 
arrangement: Osc potted in high thermal conductivity. Void. Outer Insulation. 
With another thermistor or temp sensor in the outer insulation. Another in the 
vicinity on the outside.  I'm open to suggestion. And also possible proof I'm 
barking up the wrong tree. The idea is to keep the whole package as thin as 
possible to minimize heat flow to or from the outside - except through the 
coolers/heaters. 

Some uP to run a PID loop for temp. An update rate of  100 times a second for 
the PID should make it fine grained enough. DACs and ADCs good to 16 bits. 
Initial exploration eqpt need not be so good. Unless it is cheap. And then once 
you have the contraption running, disciplining it with 1 PPS might be of 
further interest. 

I currently have no method for testing such a rig for stability. 

Simon
Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a 
profit.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks

2012-12-11 Thread Tom Van Baak
 Typical 32KHz clock crystals are very stable in frequency if you can keep 
 them 
 close to the turnover temp. If you can hold 1 degC it is .04 ppm. 

That's far better than I thought. Do you have a reference for this spec?

I agree you might be able to make one accurate to 0.04 ppm, however briefly, 
but I've never seen one stable to 0.04 ppm. I mean, that's like 1 second a year.

 I currently have no method for testing such a rig for stability. 

Oh, the slipperly slope you are on. I have just the solution for you ...

/tvb


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks

2012-12-11 Thread M. Simon
http://www.abracon.com/Resonators/AB26T.pdf

This quotes .038 ppm/C^2 delta T from the turn over point:


http://www.iqdfrequencyproducts.com/app-notes/timekeeping/
 
The fly in the ointment is the aging rate of 5 ppm the first year (13ppb/day) 
and 3 ppm (8ppb/day) after. 

I'm sure holding 1 degC is easy.  .1 C with some care and .01 C - my measuring 
eqpt ain't that good. So temperature ceases to be a problem. Is the other stuff 
workable?

I would go with a 32KHz crystal for a production version to make it easy to 
multiply up to 10MHz. 

Simon


Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a 
profit.




 From: Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks
 
 Typical 32KHz clock crystals are very stable in frequency if you can keep 
 them 
 close to the turnover temp. If you can hold 1 degC it is .04 ppm. 

That's far better than I thought. Do you have a reference for this spec?

I agree you might be able to make one accurate to 0.04 ppm, however briefly, 
but I've never seen one stable to 0.04 ppm. I mean, that's like 1 second a 
year.

 I currently have no method for testing such a rig for stability. 

Oh, the slipperly slope you are on. I have just the solution for you ...

/tvb


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks

2012-12-11 Thread Tom Van Baak
Hi Simon,

Thanks for the URL. That's one of those tiny 6x2 mm crystals, 20 ppm crystals 
(ouch). The tempco (-0.034 ± 0.006 ppm/ T²) is excellent, though. Now, you can 
adjust rate; and temperature you can control. Notice they don't specify the 
stability, which is the key to timekeeping.

So I see a very interesting experiment/opportunity for you. Get one of these 
xtals and have it generate 1PPS. Then:
1) measure the accuracy (vs. spec)
2) confirm the tempco (vs. spec)
3) measure the stability (note: no spec given)
4) measure the daily or monthly or annual drift (vs. spec)

If you get one of these 32 kHz xtals, I'm happy to send you the other gear you 
need, if you have the time to do the experiment(s). You'll end up with some 
very nice plots and a wonderful article or series of articles for your 
electronics blog.

/tvb
  - Original Message - 
  From: M. Simon 
  To: Tom Van Baak ; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks


  http://www.abracon.com/Resonators/AB26T.pdf


  This quotes .038 ppm/C^2 delta T from the turn over point:



  http://www.iqdfrequencyproducts.com/app-notes/timekeeping/

  The fly in the ointment is the aging rate of 5 ppm the first year (13ppb/day) 
and 3 ppm (8ppb/day) after. 

  I'm sure holding 1 degC is easy.  .1 C with some care and .01 C - my 
measuring eqpt ain't that good. So temperature ceases to be a problem. Is the 
other stuff workable?

  I would go with a 32KHz crystal for a production version to make it easy to 
multiply up to 10MHz. 

  Simon


  Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a 
profit.




From: Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks


 Typical 32KHz clock crystals are very stable in frequency if you can keep 
them 
 close to the turnover temp. If you can hold 1 degC it is .04 ppm. 

That's far better than I thought. Do you have a reference for this spec?

I agree you might be able to make one accurate to 0.04 ppm, however 
briefly, but I've never seen one stable to 0.04 ppm. I mean, that's like 1 
second a year.

 I currently have no method for testing such a rig for stability. 

Oh, the slipperly slope you are on. I have just the solution for you ...

/tvb


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks

2012-12-11 Thread M. Simon
Yes. I have already decided to do it. I want some feedback from the list before 
I get past the thinking stage though.

Initial rough calibration will be easy once the temp control is functional. Let 
every thing get nice and stable. Read Freq. Step 1 deg C. Wait 10 minutes. Read 
frequency. Step temp. 1 degC. etc. Plot the results.  Compute the aprox peak of 
the parabola. Home in with .1 deg steps. 

OTOH consider the same design with a 40MHz or ???MHz TCVCXO. What would .1C 
(.01C?) room temperature control give you? Lots of different oscs might be 
suitable. 

The power cost will probably be higher than an OCXO - at least to start. But 
the range of things that might be done is wide.

Or consider running an AT Cut crystal at its lower inflection point. It will 
probably age slower. But a thousand hour bake at the higher inflection point 
might be good. As I like to tell beginners - when you get close enough to 
fundamentals it is all made of rubber or silly putty. 


 Simon

Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a 
profit.




 From: Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:20 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks
 
Hi Simon,

Thanks for the URL. That's one of those tiny 6x2 mm crystals, 20 ppm crystals 
(ouch). The tempco (-0.034 ± 0.006 ppm/ T²) is excellent, though. Now, you can 
adjust rate; and temperature you can control. Notice they don't specify the 
stability, which is the key to timekeeping.

So I see a very interesting experiment/opportunity for you. Get one of these 
xtals and have it generate 1PPS. Then:
1) measure the accuracy (vs. spec)
2) confirm the tempco (vs. spec)
3) measure the stability (note: no spec given)
4) measure the daily or monthly or annual drift (vs. spec)

If you get one of these 32 kHz xtals, I'm happy to send you the other gear you 
need, if you have the time to do the experiment(s). You'll end up with some 
very nice plots and a wonderful article or series of articles for your 
electronics blog.

/tvb
  - Original Message - 
  From: M. Simon 
  To: Tom Van Baak ; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks


  http://www.abracon.com/Resonators/AB26T.pdf


  This quotes .038 ppm/C^2 delta T from the turn over point:



  http://www.iqdfrequencyproducts.com/app-notes/timekeeping/

  The fly in the ointment is the aging rate of 5 ppm the first year 
(13ppb/day) and 3 ppm (8ppb/day) after. 

  I'm sure holding 1 degC is easy.  .1 C with some care and .01 C - my 
measuring eqpt ain't that good. So temperature ceases to be a problem. Is the 
other stuff workable?

  I would go with a 32KHz crystal for a production version to make it easy 
to multiply up to 10MHz. 

  Simon


  Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a 
profit.




    From: Tom Van Baak t...@leapsecond.com
    To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
time-nuts@febo.com 
    Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 3:55 AM
    Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Stable Watch Clocks


     Typical 32KHz clock crystals are very stable in frequency if you can 
keep them 
     close to the turnover temp. If you can hold 1 degC it is .04 ppm. 

    That's far better than I thought. Do you have a reference for this spec?

    I agree you might be able to make one accurate to 0.04 ppm, however 
briefly, but I've never seen one stable to 0.04 ppm. I mean, that's like 1 
second a year.

     I currently have no method for testing such a rig for stability. 

    Oh, the slipperly slope you are on. I have just the solution for you ...

    /tvb


    ___
    time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
    To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
    and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.