Re: [time-nuts] Which HP Frequency Counter?

2008-03-09 Thread Ulrich Bangert
Jean-Christophe,

I would like to second Dan's opinion. Despite of owning some HP counters
and a SR620 from Stanford Research i regulary use my good old RACAL DANA
counter. The model 1992 is a standard even at European based surplus
dealers. An even better buy than the 1992 is the not so often seen model
1996 for example at

http://www.rainer-foertig.de/Zaehler.htm

because it has an increased number of measurement facilities. The
trouble with the pushbutton switches is the same with this model. RACAL
DANA has used push buttons over a period where the color ingredients of
the switch body would gas out over the time and ruin the elasticity of
the plastic part closing the switch contact. This is very easy to
diagnose: If you press the button and it does not come back you have a
ruined pushbutton that must be exchanged. 

I did already exchange the complete set of of buttons on my 1996 for two
times. You can imagine that I would not have done this if the device
itself were bad. The last switches that i built in are completely white
and do not have additional color ingredients. This seems to have sold
the problem!

Best regards
Ulrich Bangert

 -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Dan Rae
 Gesendet: Samstag, 8. Marz 2008 18:36
 An: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
 Betreff: Re: [time-nuts] Which HP Frequency Counter?
 
 
 Jean-Christophe Deschamps wrote:
 
 Dear group,
 
 I consider buying a used lab frequency counter / timer --preferably
 HP/Agilent-- covering from few mHz to perhaps 400 MHz.  I'm worried 
 that models handling high frequencies seem to be limited to 
 under 100 
 mV input signal max. I don't want to destroy an input channel each 
 other day when calibrating/repairing some instrument.  Also 
 are there 
 instruments with high impedance input? 50 Ohm is not quite right for 
 investigation in the guts of most designs.
 
 Jean-Christophe,
 
 I know you said HP, but the one instrument that I have on my 
 bench and 
 use all the time that is not by HP is a Racal-Dana 1992 counter.
 
 It has three inputs, the A input can be set to 1 MegOhm impedance and 
 will count up to 160 MHz at good sensitivity, 50 Ohm loads and 
 attenuators and filters also available.  The C input goes to 
 1.3 GHz, 50 
 Ohm only.  The A and B inputs can be used for phase 
 comparisons.  Most 
 of them have a very good quality Ovened timebase, Option 04E.
 
 There are a lot available in the US and not so many in Europe, prices 
 for what they are seem very reasonable; in the US $200 to 
 $300, working.
 
 Some have trouble with the push button switches, these can be 
 replaced, 
 but it is a big job to do, there are a lot.  Apart from that 
 I know of 
 no other common failure modes.  Not a lot of other components inside 
 that cannot be found easily enough.
 
 Manuals are freely available.  And it is quiet.  No fan noise.  My HP 
 counter sits in the garage...
 
 Good luck, 
 
 Dan
 
 
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to 
 https://www.febo.com/cgi- bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and 
 follow the instructions there.
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Which HP Frequency Counter?

2008-03-08 Thread Jean-Christophe Deschamps
Dear group,

I consider buying a used lab frequency counter / timer --preferably 
HP/Agilent-- covering from few mHz to perhaps 400 MHz.  I'm worried 
that models handling high frequencies seem to be limited to under 100 
mV input signal max. I don't want to destroy an input channel each 
other day when calibrating/repairing some instrument.  Also are there 
instruments with high impedance input? 50 Ohm is not quite right for 
investigation in the guts of most designs.


Is it possible to find a not-too-old model under $800?  I would like to 
find something in France or UK or Europe, but it seems hopeless in this 
budget.  I would favor a repairable model (with available service docs 
 schematics).

Your expert advises are more than welcome!

--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]  


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Which HP Frequency Counter?

2008-03-08 Thread Didier Juges
The HP 5334A or B with the C channel option has a sensitivity spec of -30dBm
(from memory) up to 1 GHz or so. The C channel has 15mV rms sensitivity at 1
GHz.

The C channel option is rare, but it only requires 3 parts (a diviser and
two dual-shottkys) and a connector (and a hole in the front panel) to add it
to a 5334B for instance. I have two 5334Bs (one is broken) and both have the
other parts required for the C channel except for these three. There is a
socket for the diviser, the shottkys have to be soldered in.

The C channel input is activated on pressing the '9' key.

Unfortunately, the MB506 diviser (Fujitsu) seems a little hard to find. If
anyone has a spare, let me know. A surface mount equivalent should not be
too hard to put in.

The HP 5316 has similar characteristics and also has a 1 GHz option, which
is also rare.

I also have an Advantest TR5823 counter which has the 1.3 GHz input with
20mV rms sensitivity at 1.3 GHz.

The HP models have reciprocal counting, so they work MUCH better for low
frequency signals.

Didier KO4BB

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Jean-Christophe Deschamps
 Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 10:49 AM
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: [time-nuts] Which HP Frequency Counter?
 
 Dear group,
 
 I consider buying a used lab frequency counter / timer --preferably
 HP/Agilent-- covering from few mHz to perhaps 400 MHz.  I'm 
 worried that models handling high frequencies seem to be 
 limited to under 100 mV input signal max. I don't want to 
 destroy an input channel each other day when 
 calibrating/repairing some instrument.  Also are there 
 instruments with high impedance input? 50 Ohm is not quite 
 right for investigation in the guts of most designs.
 
 
 Is it possible to find a not-too-old model under $800?  I 
 would like to find something in France or UK or Europe, but 
 it seems hopeless in this budget.  I would favor a repairable 
 model (with available service docs  schematics).
 
 Your expert advises are more than welcome!
 
 --
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, 
 go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG. 
 Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1319 - Release 
 Date: 3/8/2008 10:14 AM
  
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1319 - Release Date: 3/8/2008
10:14 AM
 


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Which HP Frequency Counter?

2008-03-08 Thread Dan Rae
Jean-Christophe Deschamps wrote:

Dear group,

I consider buying a used lab frequency counter / timer --preferably 
HP/Agilent-- covering from few mHz to perhaps 400 MHz.  I'm worried 
that models handling high frequencies seem to be limited to under 100 
mV input signal max. I don't want to destroy an input channel each 
other day when calibrating/repairing some instrument.  Also are there 
instruments with high impedance input? 50 Ohm is not quite right for 
investigation in the guts of most designs.

Jean-Christophe,

I know you said HP, but the one instrument that I have on my bench and 
use all the time that is not by HP is a Racal-Dana 1992 counter.

It has three inputs, the A input can be set to 1 MegOhm impedance and 
will count up to 160 MHz at good sensitivity, 50 Ohm loads and 
attenuators and filters also available.  The C input goes to 1.3 GHz, 50 
Ohm only.  The A and B inputs can be used for phase comparisons.  Most 
of them have a very good quality Ovened timebase, Option 04E.

There are a lot available in the US and not so many in Europe, prices 
for what they are seem very reasonable; in the US $200 to $300, working.

Some have trouble with the push button switches, these can be replaced, 
but it is a big job to do, there are a lot.  Apart from that I know of 
no other common failure modes.  Not a lot of other components inside 
that cannot be found easily enough.

Manuals are freely available.  And it is quiet.  No fan noise.  My HP 
counter sits in the garage...

Good luck, 

Dan




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Which HP Frequency Counter?

2008-03-08 Thread Pete
Jean-Christophe,

I have had a very good experience with my
Fluke PM6681 (aka Pendulum CNT-81).
They show up on eBay 2 or 3 times each 
quarter, selling for US$600-800. Since they
are designed  produced in Sweden, I would
expect them to available more easily in Europe.

The PM6681 advertises 50ps single shot TI
resolution, but the GPIB data returns 25ps
data. The frequency mode produces 11 digit/s
readings.

Pete Rawson 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Which HP Frequency Counter?

2008-03-08 Thread Angus

A lot depends on the resolution you need and what all you want to use
it for, but it might also be worth looking at some recent Fluke
counters.

The PM6681 has a nominal rating of 300MHz on it's main input, although
it may read rather higher. It has 1M or 50R input res, and can
tolerate up to 12V rms. Also, its nominal time interval resolution of
50ps single shot and 1ps averaged can be quite useful.

The PM6680B is only rated at 225MHz, but it's cheaper, and sometimes
turns up with a high frequency channel at a reasonable price. GPIB was
an option with this one, so if you want that, you would have to check
that it's fitted.

It might also be worth checking if a separate prescaler would be ok
for your high frequency use, rather than having to find (and pay for)
a counter with a high freq input. 
An active probe could be used to reduce the loading, but they tend to
be expensive to buy.

Sometimes an HP53131A also turns up at a decent price, but probably
not with a high frequency channel. Input damage level is quoted at
5V rms for it. 
Personally, I really like the PM6681 since it's so capable, and I find
it much easier to use if the settings have to be adjusted much - but
the HP has an RS232 port which makes logging the data very simple on
any computer.

Angus.


On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:49:02 +0100, you wrote:

Dear group,

I consider buying a used lab frequency counter / timer --preferably 
HP/Agilent-- covering from few mHz to perhaps 400 MHz.  I'm worried 
that models handling high frequencies seem to be limited to under 100 
mV input signal max. I don't want to destroy an input channel each 
other day when calibrating/repairing some instrument.  Also are there 
instruments with high impedance input? 50 Ohm is not quite right for 
investigation in the guts of most designs.


Is it possible to find a not-too-old model under $800?  I would like to 
find something in France or UK or Europe, but it seems hopeless in this 
budget.  I would favor a repairable model (with available service docs 
 schematics).

Your expert advises are more than welcome!


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.