[time-nuts] LH Question

2020-08-24 Thread ew via time-nuts
As backup I installed LH 5.0 on a laptop with Windows 7 Pro but no RS232. I 
inserted an USB to Rs232 adapter and it recognizes it as com Port 6. LH shows 
no com port. How can I switch it to com port 6? Thanks    Bert Kehren 

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Dead 5065A - Some comments - Some questions... (II)

2020-08-24 Thread Ulf Kylenfall via time-nuts
Luciano,
Yes, the ovens in the cavity are working correctly.
What destroyed the 5065A in the first place 1988 wasa very high raw input 
voltage approaching 40V(something wrong with the AC Xformer that possibly 
caused the original cavity windings to short circuit ?)

I got help from Corby Dawson how to repair that cavity but some timeafter the 
repair, the magnetic field winding went open circuitand not finding the fault 
location, I could not repairthat cavity one more time. The oven I am using 
nowcomes from the second unit. It was not faulty and 
also equipped with a TED.
The resistor value labeled on its case has been appliedto the regulator 
circuit. After warm-up the readingson the Circuit Check meter is < full scale.
If a voltage transient may appear on the +20V, then Iwill consider some sort of 
over voltage protection.
Also of course replacing the 20V board with the improvedversion besing 
discussed here some weeks agowhen/if it becomes available.

All the best.

Ulf Kylenfall
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Dead 5065A - Some comments - Some questions...

2020-08-24 Thread Ulf Kylenfall via time-nuts


..Continued.
Having discovered that the A3 multiplier went bad the firsttime after a few 
hours of service, I checked the A3 unitfrom a scrapped 5065 on my bench. It was 
neverinserted in the once working unit : DOA

The problem with some of the plastic packaged FETs wasthe same. Also that 
output transistor was bad. That 5065
was salvaged from a shed somewhere. Previous ownertook out the 5MHz XO and I 
remember that there had beensome unsuccessful attempts by previous owner to 
openthat A3. (I take it that he eventually gave up, took out the5MHz XO and 
discarded the rest.)

I am therefore of the opinion that either there is a reliabilityproblem with 
these transistors due to microcracks in the plasticpackages allowing for 
moisture to reach the silicone waferor long term silicone deterioration that 
gets accelleratedby applying supply voltage to them again after 30 yearsor so. 
I have experienced similar problems with other oldinstruments that is powered 
on for the first time in 20-30years. And I do not mean the RIFA power line 
capacitors that more or less always let out their smoke...
+20V is rock stable. I will of course check if there are anyunstabilities once 
all modules are back in place.

The 2N4416 that was previously used as a replacementin my unit did work OK. The 
output transistor as well. 
And - also the 3N128 - That one is TO-18 hermetic...

About A1: it seems that SN74176 (or possibly 74196)is a replacement for the 
1820-0322 - Signetics N8280N. It can not be so difficult to find a modern 
replacement/modification for the 1820-0315 one-shot should it be necessary to 
build a completereplica of the synthesizer.


Cheers.

Ulf Kylenfall




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Dead 5065A - Some comments - Some questions...

2020-08-24 Thread cdelect
Ulf,

The A1 modules are most likely OK.

They do not need stellar performance for the 5065A to easily beat spec.

The A3 modules are another matter!

If you are indeed feeding them with 1VRMS and can't get a good output at
J8 then something is not right!

HP made several versions of the A3, the series 2644A was the last and was
completely redesigned. It is much more reliable!

I've mentioned this before, the ceramic tuning caps seize up and you MUST
break the rotors free before aligning the module!

If you don't you will most likely break the rotor connection!

If they don't turn with MODERATE pressure they need attention.

If the rotor slotted shaft turns but the rotor does not it broken!
Replacing them is a pain so again break them free first.

Using a stiff plastic shaft lever or push horizontally at two spots 90
degrees apart listening for the rotor to "snap" free.

Once you can get the proper A8 RF level the bias pot and matching network
needs to be tuned.

I usually just put the variable inductor slug 1/8" down from the top of
the form and just leave it there.

Cheers,

Corby


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 193, Issue 36

2020-08-24 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi

Normally the parts I am looking at are the run of the mill eBay parts. 
They are < 10 years old, but have been on boards. It is rare that they
will not tune to frequency (if they have output ….). My guess is that the
typical modern OCXO is good for 20+ years before they age out of spec.

Bob

> On Aug 24, 2020, at 4:47 AM, Dave B via time-nuts  
> wrote:
> 
> Of course, they may be pushed out to the surplus market, because they
> have aged/drifted out of spec, before they were removed (however that
> was done) from their original host equipment.
> 
> But junk box storage is often "less than optimum" for lots of stuff, not
> just oscillators and crystals.
> 
> 73.
> 
> Dave B.
> 
> 
> On 23/08/2020 17:00, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com wrote:
>> I?ve tested a lot (like hundreds) of surplus OCXO?s. Well under 10% of them 
>> met their original 
>> performance specs. That?s just for the stuff I can test in the basement, 
>> with better test systems, 
>> the total would be lower. 
> 
> -- 
> Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using free and open 
> source software:
> 
> 
> ___
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to 
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 193, Issue 36

2020-08-24 Thread Dave B via time-nuts
Of course, they may be pushed out to the surplus market, because they
have aged/drifted out of spec, before they were removed (however that
was done) from their original host equipment.

But junk box storage is often "less than optimum" for lots of stuff, not
just oscillators and crystals.

73.

Dave B.


On 23/08/2020 17:00, time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com wrote:
> I?ve tested a lot (like hundreds) of surplus OCXO?s. Well under 10% of them 
> met their original 
> performance specs. That?s just for the stuff I can test in the basement, with 
> better test systems, 
> the total would be lower. 

-- 
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using free and open source 
software:


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Dead 5065A - Some comments - Some questions...

2020-08-24 Thread timeok


   Ulf,

   what you write and that you have found several dead transistors the problem 
could be derived from the power supply. When changing transistors and you did 
the calibrations correctly the HP5065A still does not work means that the 
initial fault was not found.

   The first question that comes to mind is if the two ovens of the physical 
assembly are working, you can check this from the meter on the front panel.

   Anything is possible but it seems strange to me that you have two bad A1 
assemblies. There are many variables about this repair.

   Luciano

   Luciano P. S. Paramithiotti
   tim...@timeok.it
   www.timeok.it

   Da "time-nuts" time-nuts-boun...@lists.febo.com
   A "Discussion of Precise Time and Frequency Measurement" 
time-nuts@lists.febo.com
   Cc "Ulf Kylenfall" ulf_...@yahoo.com
   Data Sun, 23 Aug 2020 21:06:06 + (UTC)
   Oggetto [time-nuts] Dead 5065A - Some comments - Some questions...
   Greetings.

   Having had my 5065 disconnected several months
   due to all sorts of things, and started it up
   yesterday. It was dead. "Pining for the fjords"

   No 2nd harmonic. Just PhotoCurrent. Quick Phase Checkusing a scope in 
X/Y-mode returned a "U" instead of a bump
   And most of the rest was noise.

   I have previously replaced a number of transistors
   in A3 (5 -> 60 MHz Multiplier) during first attempts
   to resurrect this unit and it seems like
   the rest of them were gone (how come?) now.
   Many of them are 1855-0327 which I have replaced
   by 2N4416. Q7 by BC557 (!)
   and Q9 by 2N5109. After this, I have adequate regulation
   and an AGC of > 4V.

   All-in-all: Just about every transistor in A3 was bad.
   There were output at first ~ 10 dBm at J8 but it was not
   possible to increase the output by tuning. Also
   there was no AGC.

   I checked a second unit from a scrapped 5065 on my bench
   and the situation was the same with that A3. Low output
   power. No AGC.

   So now for the question before I put any more
   energy in trying to fix the rest of the old faithful:

   I checked the A1 syntesizer unit which did
   provide correct output frequencies but
   they were not as stable as the internal
   5 MHz Osc. (10811) HP does not mention any
   stability/jitter data for A1. Using a 5370B and 1 second
   gating, the output fq was stable down to
   single kHz figures but jittered further down.
   The 5370B counter is locked to a GPS diciplined
   105B and comparing with the 5065's internal
   10811 (in OpenLoop mode), that oscillator
   is also very stable and settable within spec.

   I have two of these synthesizers, but they are
   both the 1st edition using TO packaged
   IC's that are unobtanium. One of my manuals
   shows a more modern unit with plastic DIP's.
   Some signetics and a one-shot that is unidentifiable.

   IF the A1's are bad - has anybody made some
   reverse engineering trying to fit the
   "DIP-version" with modern available IC's
   or modified it in a way that can be reproduced?


   Best Regards

   Ulf Kylenfall
   SM6GXV



   ___
   time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
   To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
   and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.