Re: [time-nuts] Si5351A harmonics question

2019-06-06 Thread Joe Leikhim

Have you read this??

https://www.qrp-labs.com/ultimate3/u3info/u3pa.html

--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Garmin GPS12XL V3.51

2019-04-08 Thread Joe Leikhim

John; Try the tool Peter found.
I thought the GPS-12 lacked a serial port and the GPS-12XL had both a serial 
port and external antenna port. Both good to have for a differential station.

"Message: 9
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 01:52:20 +
From: John Reid
To:"time-nuts@lists.febo.com"  
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Garmin GPS12XL V3.51
Message-ID:



Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I checked today the GPS12XL I have, and that came up with a date in
August 99, before dying a few minutes later. Firmware 4.57.


The only thought I had was that the GPS 12 (still working, still showing
"19" as the year) was bought new around 2002 with a differential
receiver. Perhaps there was something different for that?


John"

--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Garmin GPS12XL V3.51

2019-04-06 Thread Joe Leikhim

I just checked the Garmin site and indeed there are upgrades to versions 4.60 
and 3.53. It seems that since I have V3.51 I can jump to 3.53 but not 4.60. I 
assume my hardware precedes yours.

"Mine had the batteries out for about a year.? Put some fresh ones in, turned it
on and set it outside for several minutes. It located position and is showing
today's date and time just fine.? Software version on mine is 4.58.

Wes"

--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Garmin GPS12XL V3.51

2019-04-06 Thread Joe Leikhim
Thanks! I don't ever think I relied on the date in the unit.  It is 
going to get some use soon. I would have no idea what to replace it with.


Next I need to check out my Symmetricom / /Datum 9390/-/6000/ EXACTIME 
next. The antenna has been off \for a while. It was updated some years 
back to what was the latest and last version.



On 4/6/2019 1:04 AM, Peter Putnam wrote:

From the Garmin web-site at:
https://support.garmin.com/en-US/?faq=jXw3hvTdo24PunZy4yOpX8=87=date%20error=topics


  GPS 12 Time and Date are Incorrect

We’ve identified an issue with this product that causes the date 
and/or time to be wrong after the GPS Rollover on April 6th, 
2019. However, all functions not dependent on date and/or time will 
continue to work normally. Due to the age of the device we have 
determined we will not fix this issue.


*What does that mean for my Garmin**?*

  * The date and/or time determined by the GPS will be wrong
  * Position, velocity, navigation, and all other functionality not
dependent on date and/or time will continue to work normally

*What is GPS Week Rollover?*

The GPS satellite system communicates the date via a week number that 
is limited to 1024 weeks (about 20 years). On April 6th, 2019 the week 
numbers broadcast by the satellites will “rollover” to zero. If GPS 
receivers don’t account for this rollover in their software, it will 
calculate the wrong date and/or time.




On 4/5/2019 8:40 PM, Joe Leikhim wrote:
Just checked my wonderful Garmin GPS12XL tonight. before midnight UTC 
I checked navigation and UTC time and all was well. I did not bother 
to check date for some reason. Well now April 6 2019 at 03:39:19 UTC 
I see the time is 21 August 99 and no apparent way to change. The 
navigation and time seem correct.


I heard there was a way to reset these to current date. Any thoughts? 
Can I still use this as a tool for gathering waypoints with precision?





<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient> 
	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=emailclient> 



<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>


--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Garmin GPS12XL V3.51

2019-04-05 Thread Joe Leikhim
Just checked my wonderful Garmin GPS12XL tonight. before midnight UTC I 
checked navigation and UTC time and all was well. I did not bother to 
check date for some reason. Well now April 6 2019 at 03:39:19 UTC I see 
the time is 21 August 99 and no apparent way to change. The navigation 
and time seem correct.


I heard there was a way to reset these to current date. Any thoughts? 
Can I still use this as a tool for gathering waypoints with precision?


--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] 4.19 MHz xtal

2019-04-01 Thread Joe Leikhim
That same frequency 4.19304 MHz was used in the infamous Lockerbie 
flight 103 bom b timer, the Swiss made MEBO MST-13. The design of that 
timer was such that it could be optioned to be set up to  hours.


Why I know this? I was reading the history of this the other day and 
FBI's involvement etc.


--
Joe

K4SAT


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Re; Motorola MC68HC11 Crystal (Robert LaJeunesse)

2019-03-07 Thread Joe Leikhim

Thanks Bob, Bob L, and Hugh.

I will look further into the exact specs of this 68HC11. Being this is a 
small densely packed portable radio, the circuit foils are very tiny, 
the stray capacitance is probably lower than typical design. Good point 
on using the div/4 pin to measure the clock and to isolate the pulling 
circuit. I will take a spare mother board and make a test jig for the 
capacitors. I will have to search for some 15 pf crystals as this is an 
unusual package.


I have in past changed these crystals with OEM parts without trouble. 
When they fail, by listening with a SW radio, instead of a clean tone 
you get what sounds like RTTY which I interpret roughly as "A quick 
Brown Fox Wants you To Change the Crystal Now Please". {:^) But now 
without a ready supply of qualified OEM parts and the cheap replacements 
not working on several radios, I am chasing myself.


--
Joe K4SAT


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Re; Motorola MC68HC11 Crystal

2019-03-06 Thread Joe Leikhim
The circuit was an attachment and it showed 24 pf caps on the legs of 
the micro. It appears it is being scrubbed in the mailserver.


Am I using the correct load capacitance for the application?

Here are my assumptions:

CL=(24pf x 24pf)/24pf+24pf) + 6pf (stray is a guesstimate) = 18 pf


On 3/7/2019 1:41 AM, Joe Leikhim wrote:
Roger, does the 18 pf load, crystal I have chosen for replacement seem 
correct for the design (attached)?


Joe


e:



"Greetings Joe,

Except for the difference in the marked frequency, there is no 
difference between the so-called "parallel resonant" and "series 
resonant" crystals.  There is a minute difference in the physical 
dimensions and/or the angle of the cut(s) relative to the 
crystallographic axes to hit the desired frequency.  The description 
of the OEM part "XTAL ANTIRES" shows that it is "parallel resonant" 
with the capacitance specified by the crystal manufacturer (typically 
20 pF (sometimes less), 30 pF, or 50 pF) appearing in parallel with 
the crystal. This is the reason behind the use of a small-value 
variable capacitance in parallel with the crystal to trim the 
frequency to exactly that specified or desired at constant 
temperature though the trim range is relatively small.  The design of 
crystals is something of a "black art".


The so-called "series resonant" crystals are sometimes described as 
for use in a "resonant" mode while the so-called "parallel resonant" 
crystals are sometimes described as for use in an "anti-resonant" 
mode.  This is technical gibberish but the "parallel resonant" and 
"series resonant" descriptions are a useful guide for the designer of 
the amplifier in which the crystal acts as narrow band filter in the 
feedback circuit and controls the frequency of the resultant 
oscillation.


There are many considerations, such as the drive level (particularly 
for physically very small and very large crystals!) which have to be 
considered but if the equipment used to work correctly in the long 
term it is unlikely that there is a problem with the crystal.  From 
your description, I doubt if the fault is in the crystal and you will 
need to look elsewhere for the fault.


I hope that this may help you."

Regards,
Roger



--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Motorola MC68HC11 Crystal

2019-03-05 Thread Joe Leikhim

Hi Bob; Jim;

After I wrote that I did take a look at RS232 serial specs and yes, they are 
quite permissive.
The programmer I have is simply an IBM PS2/E "pizza box" which is a 486 machine 
running DOS.
Motorola was not very competent in their design of radio service software and 
as such,
the speed of the PC processor can affect the serial connection. That said, I 
use this same computer,
cables and RIB (RS232 to TTL) interface box on many of the same radios without 
a problem.
It is so critical that I have a back up PS2/E because no modern computer will 
do.

The radio service manual points to the crystal in the event of serial 
communications error.
I would not be surprised if the designers of the software were targeting a much 
tighter
timing window than sensible industry standards.

So I am back to the question as to my part substitution being proper as they 
are a common
failure component because these radios, though built to MIL-810D standards, get 
dropped often.

I have not as yet encountered "birdies" because I have been unable to load the 
frequencies
I wish to use in these few "broken" radios. Generally, when working properly, 
these radios
normally don't suffer from RF design problems as they were top tier radios at 
the time. In fact,
the portable products made since are inferior.

This is the work zone:

http://www.leikhim.com/attachments/Image/P1130492a.JPG

Joe K4SAT

"Async communications will usually tolerate an timing error of about 0.5 bit
time in 10 bits or about 5%. So if your oscillator is within 1% (10,000
ppm) you should be OK in that regard.

I suspect your serial communication problem is coming from someplace else.
Maybe the radio needs real RS-232 voltages, or you have a bad interface
chip or power supply for the RS-232, or you need a null modem cable that
swaps the Rx and Tx data lines."

"Hi

First off, the programmer will work with any of the crystals you are talking 
about.
You should be fine at 0.1% which would be +/- 7.4 KHz relative to 7.3728 MHz.
Indeed you should find that serial com will work fine at offsets even greater 
than this.

In terms of birdies - does the radio work? If not is it an IF issue or a front 
end problem?

If none of the replacement crystals oscillate, that’s probably a good sign that 
the problem
is not the crystal …..

Bob"

--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Motorola MC68HC11 Crystal

2019-03-05 Thread Joe Leikhim

It seems some Crystal experts are on line, so here goes with my question.

I have this microcomputer circuit (attached) that is in a Motorola 
Systems Saber radio.  It contains a 68HC11 uC that requires Y400 which 
is a 7.3728 MHz crystal.  Motorola no longer provides an OEM replacement 
for this part number 4805664G32. The description is simply "XTAL 
ANTIRES". -- Is that Parallel Resonant? These are those tubular 3 x 8 mm 
style like the 32Khz crystals used in early watches.


There are two critical stability requirements of this crystal. _First 
_it runs the external RS232 programmer at 9600 baud. If bad the radio 
cannot be read or written to, and _secondly_ the harmonics could fall on 
operating channels. The network of Q403/L400 and C409 are to shift/pull 
the frequency where a known harmonic might occur.  -- I don't know the 
normal stray load this network imparts.


So far I have purchased some generic crystals from e-bay but they don't 
seem to be solving the immediate problem which is serial communications 
error.


The crystal I removed from circuit oscillated at 7.3708 MHz per the CW 
zero beat on my Icom shortwave radio. (I know, yes, it is set to WWV)  
or 2 KHz low. The 10 replacement crystals sampled in at around 2.47 KHz 
low. An OEM crystal that I have (the last one) 4.36 KHz low. In my 
estimation, these parts should be within 30 ppm or +/- 222 Hz


I do not know if the crystal pull network is running when I made these 
measurements. It is a possibility. It is switched in and out depending 
upon the radio RX frequency. I have no control over those until the 
radio is read and rewritten to which I cannot in this condition.


---

The E-bay generic parts:

Frequency: 7.3728Mhz

Frequency Tolerance: ±30ppm

Load Capacitance: 18pF

Mounting Type: Through Hole

-

Am I using the wrong load capacitance for the application?

Here are my assumptions:

CL=(24pf x 24pf)/24pf+24pf) + 6pf (stray is a guesstimate) = 18 pf

There is not enough board space to add parts. My estimation of stray 
capacitance may be high.


I am trying to get to square one and buy the correct parts. Or maybe 
this is as good as it gets and my problem is elsewhere?


--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] MEMS oscillators

2018-10-31 Thread Joe Leikhim
Thanks that was a very cool presentation. Amazing that they made a 
sustainable commercial success out of something so wildly impractical. 
And the fact they made incremental improvements on the concept instead 
of giving it up for some different scheme is amazing.


I got a sense that the engineer I met was doing something similar with a 
spinning acrylic disc. Maybe same modulation technique with a solid 
instead of a liquid hydrocarbon.  I will have to research this some 
more. I don't recall his name, we (My employer Motorola) needed an 
expert witness at the time and this guy was probably from IEEE. I was 
there to give him some technical input on an 800 MHz communications 
system sale that was involved in a legal contest.


Joe

On 10/31/2018 5:54 PM, Julien Goodwin wrote:

Reminds me a little of the crazy Eidophor projectors.

"An Eidophor was a television projector used to create theater-sized
images. The name Eidophor is derived from the Greek word-roots ‘eido’
and ‘phor’ meaning 'image' and 'bearer' (carrier). Its basic technology
was the use of electrostatic charges to deform an oil surface."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-BvMcqEc98

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eidophor

On 31/10/18 04:39, Joe Leikhim wrote:

This is fascinating. I am a bit skeptical if this actually happened.

I had an opportunity to meet an engineer that was involved with early
HDTV development. Apparently early in his career he invented a color
projection CRT for cinema. It had some sort of target inside of it (I
think plastic) that was subjected to the electron beam but would outgas
hydrogen in significant amounts and that hydrogen would ionize in the
electron beam which was undesired. So they incorporated a band of
titanium around the neck of the tube and the titanium apparently allows
hydrogen to collect and migrate through it even though there is a vacuum
inside the tube. It worked as intended. Then the Chinese tried to
replicate the design and did not use a titanium band because they had no
idea it had a purpose. Their tubes failed miserably.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com



--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] MEMS oscillators

2018-10-30 Thread Joe Leikhim

This is fascinating. I am a bit skeptical if this actually happened.

I had an opportunity to meet an engineer that was involved with early 
HDTV development. Apparently early in his career he invented a color 
projection CRT for cinema. It had some sort of target inside of it (I 
think plastic) that was subjected to the electron beam but would outgas 
hydrogen in significant amounts and that hydrogen would ionize in the 
electron beam which was undesired. So they incorporated a band of 
titanium around the neck of the tube and the titanium apparently allows 
hydrogen to collect and migrate through it even though there is a vacuum 
inside the tube. It worked as intended. Then the Chinese tried to 
replicate the design and did not use a titanium band because they had no 
idea it had a purpose. Their tubes failed miserably.



--
Joe Leikhim


Leikhim and Associates

Communications Consultants

Oviedo, Florida

jleik...@leikhim.com

407-982-0446

WWW.LEIKHIM.COM


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.