Re: [time-nuts] Using a common power supply among few time standards

2020-02-06 Thread Will Kimber

Hi,

Usual (best?) is supply slight over voltage and use LDO/RC filtering in
each unit as Bob suggested. But that would require either supplying
24v/12v/5v/-12v (with some margin 10%?) or converting some single supply
of 24v or 48v  in each unit to required voltages at each piece of
equipment.  The later requires switching supplies to get all voltages.


Anybody fancy 400Hz or even higher frequency 48v AC supply?

Will

On 7/02/20 11:52 am, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

Well, I’m sitting here plotting the stability of some eBay “frequency 
standards”. The one thing I *can*
measure is just when the power cords get bumped.

As long as you can hold sub mili-volt sorts of stability on the supplies “as 
delivered” it pretty much does not
matter how you get there. If you get up into the 10’s of mili-volts then it can 
indeed matter on some devices.
Some devices have less sensitivity than others. By the time you get to 100’s of 
mili-volts, you likley are impacting
most devices in a manner you can easily see in the output.

Yes, there are a lot of assumptions in all that. The first is that it is a 12V 
supply and not something odd like 48V.
Scale the numbers if you are using an odd voltage. The next Is that the 
disruption is not simply the lead drop
from the oven current. That *will* have an impact, but it’s going to get mixed 
up with temperature stability. Step /
pop / jump sort of changes will come through to the output fairly quickly. 
Third is that the supply is actually going
into something that matters (like an OCXO heater) and not just the supply lead 
for an opamp. There are a lot
more, but they get a bit fiddly ….

One alternative is to generate something like 13V and run a good LDO at the 
“point of use”. Depending on what
you find for LDO’s you may be able to get quite close to 12V. The power 
“wasted” becomes very small in that case.

Bob


On Feb 6, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Taka Kamiya via time-nuts 
 wrote:

I have been addicted to home brewing GPSDO, Rubidium, OCXO, and etc, etc, etc.  
I don't mean making of these from scratch but taking a surplus unit and encase 
them in ready-to-use form.  Most of them are in U2 rack case.

One part of it that I really do not like is constructing a power supply for 
each and every unit I make.  Good power supplies are essential to clean and 
stable timebase, I know.  It is also heat generating as most of what I make use 
linear regulators.  But it's tedious and mandane to do it every single time!  
So, I wanted to make a large enough power supply to provide +24V, +/- 12V, and 
5V.  My plan was to have independent feed line for each timebase unit.
Is this even a good idea?  I have no experience in this to make a reasonable 
judgement.  This plan would mean these power voltages will be fed to each 
components without any local regulation.  While I do plan to put ferrite chokes 
and bypass capacitors at input, but since the whole point is to eliminate local 
power supply components, there will be nothing else in terms of isolation.
Similarly, I was also thinking of having a large battery bank for 24 volt 
supply.  What type of battery is irrelevant and so as charging method for this 
question.  I have heard of this being done.  But for units that require 24 
volts, that means there is no room for any type of regulation.  Most 24V 
batteries output varying voltage depending on state of charging.  I know 12V 
battery can produce as high as 13.x volt.  Is anyone doing this type of thing 
on this list?  If so, would you be willing to share details?

Appreciate any input.

---
(Mr.) Taka Kamiya
KB4EMF / ex JF2DKG
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Yesterday was the first palindromic date for 909 years

2020-02-03 Thread Will Kimber

What about 9th September 1999.  Only short date both US ( mm-dd-yy) and
UK (dd-mm-yy) 9 9  99

Cheers,


Will

On 4/02/20 3:05 am, time...@metachaos.net wrote:

2021-12-02
12-02-2021

I'm afraid the UK is out of that one though and any 20xx year. Sucks to be
them!

Michael Lee Finney


Bit late, sorry, but I've just heard that yesterday's date was the first
palindromic date for 909 years, and there won't be another for 101 years.
Even more significantly, it's palindromic in all three common 'long' date
formats: UK (dd-mm-), US (mm-dd-year) and ISO (-mm-dd); I  believe
that will never happen again.
Also it's the 33rd day of the  year and there are 333 days remaining in the
year!
See this report:
http://www.thenewportbuzz.com/for-first-time-in-909-years-today-is-a-palindrome-02-02-2020-the-same-forwards-and-backwards-and-it-wont-happen-for-another-101-years/
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.





___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] The forbidden question

2019-06-04 Thread Will Kimber

If I can stir the pot a bit.


What other standards are measured to the same degree of accuracy? i.e.
ppb or better.


The thing with TIME is that its measurement is a abstract concept.  Most
other "standards" have a physical representation.


Cheers,

Will

On 5/06/19 10:21 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:


In message 
, "William H. Fite" writes:


What I am asking is not the validity of the quest for better timing
but rather its tangible applications.

Tangible for who ?

For the average pedestrian there are no *current* tangible applications
where cesium level time-keeping isn't plenty.

However, the same would have been said about chronometers and quartz
clocks at various times in the past.

To answer your question we would need to look about 20-30 years
into the future, which seems to be the median time for better
timekeeping to break through to the wider public, even if they do
not know it has happened, (ie: longitude navigation, digital telephone
networks, GPS.

Peeking 20-30 years into the future is an unsolved problem, so I
would argue that your question is unanswerable at this time.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] new R+S phase noise test set

2019-04-11 Thread Will Kimber

Depends on car $150 000, house $50 000.   You might want car but
possibly not house,


Cheers,

Will

On 12/04/19 6:03 AM, Bernd Neubig wrote:

Hi,
we here at AXTAL do have this FSWP 26 GHz version since about a year. The

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.