date:20130130

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Segmentation Faults and test failures on ARM (Raspbian/Raspberry Pi)

2013-01-30 Thread Thomas Preud'homme

Le mercredi 30 janvier 2013 06:31:12, Christian Jullien a écrit :
 Hi all,
 
 The only very minor issue I had is that, by default, GNU time is not
 installed on RPi this prevents test/speedtest to work.

Not really an issue I would say, it happens a lot to need additional 
dependency to run a testsuite. And I prefer that people have a failure because 
of missing dependency than no failure and miss a regression due to this test 
being deactivated.

 
 After installing GNU time, all works ROOTB (only got one warning in tccpp.c
 and another with texi2html)
 

Best regards,

Thomas


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing

2013-01-30 Thread Thomas Preud'homme

Le samedi 26 janvier 2013 07:09:11, Feng Nauh a écrit :
 tinycc/tests:
 
 on archlinux x86_64, make weaktest, result as:
 ...
 tcctest.c:391:5: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your
 code
 make: *** [weaktest] Error 1

I think the weaktest is not included in the default tests precisely because 
it's broken.

Best regards,

Thomas


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

[Tinycc-devel] Changelog: call for update before release

2013-01-30 Thread Thomas Preud'homme

Hi there,

I think tinycc is ready for release now and I wanted to do it today before I 
noticed that the Changelog is quite small considering all the time passed 
since the last release. Hence I'm wondering if all the important bits are 
mentionned there.

I'd thus like you to mention me any missing important user-related changes in 
the Changelog. As suggested by Grishka, we wan't to only mention what changes 
for the user of tcc. Please answer me here and I'll commit what I consider is 
missing.

Don't feel offense if a change is not added in the Changelog. It might be very 
important to us tinycc developpers but not so much for the users of tinycc. 
There is a couple of fixes I did myself which I didn't put in the Changelog.

Anyway, in doubt just mention your changes and I'll take the decision to add 
it or not to the Changelog.

Best regards,

Thomas


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing

2013-01-30 Thread Jerry Reed

Works fine on the BeagleBone as long as configured with --with-libgcc.  I
ran the make test many times, no Segmentation faults.  Omitting
--with-libgcc and building still result in this, however:

Test: 11_precedence...
tcc: error: undefined symbol '__aeabi_idiv'

But I am very happy with the way the new release candidate works on both
the Pi and the Bone.  Clearly the Segmentation faults are fixed.

Thanks to all for your great work on this.

Regards,

Jerry

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Preud'homme robo...@celest.frwrote:

 Le samedi 26 janvier 2013 07:09:11, Feng Nauh a écrit :
  tinycc/tests:
 
  on archlinux x86_64, make weaktest, result as:
  ...
  tcctest.c:391:5: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your
  code
  make: *** [weaktest] Error 1

 I think the weaktest is not included in the default tests precisely because
 it's broken.

 Best regards,

 Thomas

 ___
 Tinycc-devel mailing list
 Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel




-- 
Interested in bats?  Check out my blog at: http://www.karaokebats.com/
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Changelog: call for update before release

2013-01-30 Thread grischka


Thomas Preud'homme wrote:

Hi there,

I think tinycc is ready for release now and I wanted to do it today before I 
noticed that the Changelog is quite small considering all the time passed 
since the last release. Hence I'm wondering if all the important bits are 
mentionned there.


I'd thus like you to mention me any missing important user-related changes in 
the Changelog. As suggested by Grishka, we wan't to only mention what changes 
for the user of tcc. Please answer me here and I'll commit what I consider is 
missing.


I did some cleanup.  The idea is to make Changelog more interesting
and readable to the user.

Also I made some few other changes.  Please re-test configure and build.
Also with cross-compilers (configure --enable-cross) and the Out-of-tree
build (../tinycc/configure [--enable-cross])

Anyway, Thomas, if your schedule allows, I'd just wait a week now for
things to settle down.

Thanks,

--- grischka


___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Changelog: call for update before release

2013-01-30 Thread Thomas Preud'homme

Le mercredi 30 janvier 2013 19:00:43, grischka a écrit :
 
 I did some cleanup.  The idea is to make Changelog more interesting
 and readable to the user.

Much better indeed. Thanks.

 
 Also I made some few other changes.  Please re-test configure and build.
 Also with cross-compilers (configure --enable-cross) and the Out-of-tree
 build (../tinycc/configure [--enable-cross])

Out-of-tree works with and without cross-compilation thanks to the just pushed 
patch ;)

With regards to the line CPPFLAGS = -I$(TOP) added in Makefile, if it's 
necessary to compile, then there will be a problem whenever someone build with 
make CPPFLAGS = foo as it will override CPPFLAGS. CPPFLAGS += doesn't work 
either in that case. I thought about using override but then you need to use 
override everytime you want to modify it. Since this line is the only one to 
set the CPPFLAGS, maybe override can be used. What do you think?

 
 Anyway, Thomas, if your schedule allows, I'd just wait a week now for
 things to settle down.

I was enthousiast about releasing tomorrow or friday but if you think it's 
best let's wait next wednesday. It'll give more time for people to show up and 
tell what changes they forgot to put in the Changelog.

 
 Thanks,
 
 --- grischka

Best regards,

Thomas


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Changelog: call for update before release

2013-01-30 Thread grischka


Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
With regards to the line CPPFLAGS = -I$(TOP) added in Makefile, if it's 
necessary to compile, then there will be a problem whenever someone build with 
make CPPFLAGS = foo as it will override CPPFLAGS. CPPFLAGS += doesn't work 
either in that case. I thought about using override but then you need to use 
override everytime you want to modify it. Since this line is the only one to 
set the CPPFLAGS, maybe override can be used. What do you think?


Well, you could do

COMPILE_FLAGS = -I$(TOP) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)

and then use $(COMPILE_FLAGS) instead of $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) everywhere.

I was enthousiast about releasing tomorrow or friday but if you think it's 
best let's wait next wednesday. 


Sure.

It'll give more time for people to show up and 
tell what changes they forgot to put in the Changelog.


You're optimistic to assume people showing up now who did something maybe
two years (or even just two months) ago. ;)

--- grischka

___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

[Tinycc-devel] Small patch

2013-01-30 Thread Ivo van Poorten

Error:

$ ./configure --cc=tcc
Binary  directory   /usr/local/bin
TinyCC directory/usr/local/lib/tcc
Library directory   /usr/local/lib
Include directory   /usr/local/include
Manual directory/usr/local/share/man
Info directory  /usr/local/share/info
Doc directory   /usr/local/share/doc/tcc
Target root prefix  
Source path  /home/ivo/git/tinycc
C compiler   tcc
Target OSLinux
CPU  x86
Big Endian   no
gprof enabledno
cross compilers  no
use libgcc   no
Creating config.mak and config.h
$ make
[..snip..]
gcc -c lib/bcheck.c -o bcheck.o -I. -I/home/ivo/git/tinycc -Wall -g -O2
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -m386 -malign-functions=0 -m32 cc1: error:
unrecognized command line option -m386


88888888

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index d257464..0333ebe 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ libtcc1.a : FORCE
 lib/%/libtcc1.a : FORCE $(PROGS_CROSS)
@$(MAKE) -C lib cross TARGET=$*
 bcheck.o : lib/bcheck.c
-   gcc -c $ -o $@ $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
+   $(CC) -c $ -o $@ $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
 FORCE:
 
 # install

___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch

2013-01-30 Thread Domingo Alvarez Duarte

Hello !
I'm looking again on the reports done with Coverity Scan and found several
things one of it is this:

static void asm_expr_prod(TCCState *s1, ExprValue *pe)
{
int op;
ExprValue e2;

asm_expr_unary(s1, pe);
for(;;) {
op = tok;
if (op != '*'  op != '/'  op != '%' 
op != TOK_SHL  op != TOK_SAR)
break;
next();
asm_expr_unary(s1, e2);
if (pe-sym || e2.sym)
tcc_error(invalid operation with label);
switch(op) {
case '*':
pe-v *= e2.v;
break;
case '/':
if (e2.v == 0) {
div_error:
tcc_error(division by zero);
}
pe-v /= e2.v;
break;
case '%':
if (e2.v == 0)
goto div_error;
pe-v %= e2.v;
break;
case TOK_SHL:
pe-v = e2.v;
break;
default:
case TOK_SAR:this case
after default what does it mean ??
pe-v = e2.v;
break;
}
}
}



On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Ivo van Poorten ivo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Error:

 $ ./configure --cc=tcc
 Binary  directory   /usr/local/bin
 TinyCC directory/usr/local/lib/tcc
 Library directory   /usr/local/lib
 Include directory   /usr/local/include
 Manual directory/usr/local/share/man
 Info directory  /usr/local/share/info
 Doc directory   /usr/local/share/doc/tcc
 Target root prefix
 Source path  /home/ivo/git/tinycc
 C compiler   tcc
 Target OSLinux
 CPU  x86
 Big Endian   no
 gprof enabledno
 cross compilers  no
 use libgcc   no
 Creating config.mak and config.h
 $ make
 [..snip..]
 gcc -c lib/bcheck.c -o bcheck.o -I. -I/home/ivo/git/tinycc -Wall -g -O2
 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -m386 -malign-functions=0 -m32 cc1: error:
 unrecognized command line option -m386


 88888888

 diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
 index d257464..0333ebe 100644
 --- a/Makefile
 +++ b/Makefile
 @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ libtcc1.a : FORCE
  lib/%/libtcc1.a : FORCE $(PROGS_CROSS)
 @$(MAKE) -C lib cross TARGET=$*
  bcheck.o : lib/bcheck.c
 -   gcc -c $ -o $@ $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
 +   $(CC) -c $ -o $@ $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
  FORCE:

  # install

 ___
 Tinycc-devel mailing list
 Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch

2013-01-30 Thread Domingo Alvarez Duarte

Here is some that I found simple to make:

Author: mingodad mingo...@gmail.com  2013-01-31 01:17:50
Committer: mingodad mingo...@gmail.com  2013-01-31 01:17:50
Parent: 1b1e7ee1fd2f269872128dc5e8b830bd55dfa80c (Fix cross-compilation
out-of-tree build)
Branch: vio_patch
Follows: release_0_9_25
Precedes:

Alerts found using Coverity Scan

--- libtcc.c
---
index b0a9b1a..69d9e0d 100644
@@ -479,8 +479,7 @@ ST_FUNC void put_extern_sym2(Sym *sym, Section *section,
 case TOK_strlen:
 case TOK_strcpy:
 case TOK_alloca:
-strcpy(buf, __bound_);
-strcat(buf, name);
+snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), __bound_%s, name);
 name = buf;
 break;
 }

--- tccelf.c
---
index a4dee19..479b2fa 100644
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ ST_FUNC int put_elf_sym(Section *s, uplong value,
unsigned long size,
 if (ELFW(ST_BIND)(info) != STB_LOCAL) {
 /* add another hashing entry */
 nbuckets = base[0];
-h = elf_hash(name) % nbuckets;
+h = name ? elf_hash(name) % nbuckets : 0;
 *ptr = base[2 + h];
 base[2 + h] = sym_index;
 base[1]++;
@@ -3052,7 +3052,7 @@ static int ld_add_file_list(TCCState *s1, const char
*cmd, int as_needed)
 ret = -1;
 goto lib_parse_error;
 }
-strcpy(libname, filename[1]);
+snprintf(libname, sizeof(libname), %s, filename[1]);
 libname_to_filename(s1, libname, filename);
 } else if (t != LD_TOK_NAME) {
 tcc_error_noabort(filename expected);

--- tccgen.c
---
index 4300403..e06a932 100644
@@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ void vpush64(int ty, unsigned long long v)
 CValue cval;
 CType ctype;
 ctype.t = ty;
+ctype.ref = 0;
 cval.ull = v;
 vsetc(ctype, VT_CONST, cval);
 }
@@ -1734,6 +1735,7 @@ ST_FUNC void gen_op(int op)
 }
 vswap();
 type1.t = t;
+type1.ref = 0;
 gen_cast(type1);
 vswap();
 /* special case for shifts and long long: we keep the shift as
@@ -2717,6 +2719,7 @@ static void struct_decl(CType *type, int u)
 v = anon_sym++;
 }
 type1.t = a;
+type1.ref = 0;
 /* we put an undefined size for struct/union */
 s = sym_push(v | SYM_STRUCT, type1, 0, -1);
 s-r = 0; /* default alignment is zero as gcc */
@@ -3396,6 +3399,7 @@ static void gfunc_param_typed(Sym *func, Sym *arg)
 /* default casting : only need to convert float to double */
 if ((vtop-type.t  VT_BTYPE) == VT_FLOAT) {
 type.t = VT_DOUBLE;
+type.ref = 0;
 gen_cast(type);
 }
 } else if (arg == NULL) {
@@ -3592,6 +3596,7 @@ ST_FUNC void unary(void)
 if ((vtop-r  (VT_VALMASK | VT_LVAL | VT_SYM)) == VT_CONST) {
 CType boolean;
 boolean.t = VT_BOOL;
+boolean.ref = 0;
 gen_cast(boolean);
 vtop-c.i = !vtop-c.i;
 } else if ((vtop-r  VT_VALMASK) == VT_CMP)
@@ -4101,6 +4106,7 @@ static void expr_cond(void)
 CType boolean;
 int c;
 boolean.t = VT_BOOL;
+boolean.ref = 0;
 vdup();
 gen_cast(boolean);
 c = vtop-c.i;
@@ -5574,7 +5580,7 @@ ST_FUNC void gen_inline_functions(void)
 str = fn-token_str;
 fn-sym = NULL;
 if (file)
-strcpy(file-filename, fn-filename);
+snprintf(file-filename, sizeof(file-filename), %s,
fn-filename);
 sym-r = VT_SYM | VT_CONST;
 sym-type.t = ~VT_INLINE;




On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte
mingo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Also on this function:

 CID 968150 (#1 of 1): Unchecked return value (CHECKED_RETURN)6.
 check_return: Calling function parse_btype(CType *, AttributeDef *)
 without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 7 out of 8 times).


 /* enum/struct/union declaration. u is either VT_ENUM or VT_STRUCT */
 static void struct_decl(CType *type, int u)
 {
 ...
 bit_pos = 0;
 offset = 0;
 while (tok != '}') {
 parse_btype(btype, ad);  no check made here
 ?
 while (1) {
 bit_size = -1;
 v = 0;
 type1 = btype;



 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte 
 mingo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Also here :

 static void asm_expr_logic(TCCState *s1, ExprValue *pe)
 {
 int op;
 ExprValue e2;

 asm_expr_prod(s1, pe);

 for(;;) {
 op = tok;
 if (op != ''  op != '|'  op != '^')
 break;
 next();

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch

2013-01-30 Thread Domingo Alvarez Duarte

Also on this function:

CID 968150 (#1 of 1): Unchecked return value (CHECKED_RETURN)6.
check_return: Calling function parse_btype(CType *, AttributeDef *)
without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 7 out of 8 times).


/* enum/struct/union declaration. u is either VT_ENUM or VT_STRUCT */
static void struct_decl(CType *type, int u)
{
...
bit_pos = 0;
offset = 0;
while (tok != '}') {
parse_btype(btype, ad);  no check made here
?
while (1) {
bit_size = -1;
v = 0;
type1 = btype;



On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte
mingo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Also here :

 static void asm_expr_logic(TCCState *s1, ExprValue *pe)
 {
 int op;
 ExprValue e2;

 asm_expr_prod(s1, pe);

 for(;;) {
 op = tok;
 if (op != ''  op != '|'  op != '^')
 break;
 next();
 asm_expr_prod(s1, e2);

 if (pe-sym || e2.sym)
 tcc_error(invalid operation with label);
 switch(op) {
 case '':
 pe-v = e2.v;
 break;
 case '|':
 pe-v |= e2.v;
 break;
 default:
 case '^':  ///what this case
 after default mean 
 pe-v ^= e2.v;
 break;
 }
 }
 }



 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte 
 mingo...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello !
 I'm looking again on the reports done with Coverity Scan and found
 several things one of it is this:

 static void asm_expr_prod(TCCState *s1, ExprValue *pe)
 {
 int op;
 ExprValue e2;

 asm_expr_unary(s1, pe);
 for(;;) {
 op = tok;
 if (op != '*'  op != '/'  op != '%' 
 op != TOK_SHL  op != TOK_SAR)
 break;
 next();
 asm_expr_unary(s1, e2);
 if (pe-sym || e2.sym)
 tcc_error(invalid operation with label);
 switch(op) {
 case '*':
 pe-v *= e2.v;
 break;
 case '/':
 if (e2.v == 0) {
 div_error:
 tcc_error(division by zero);
 }
 pe-v /= e2.v;
 break;
 case '%':
 if (e2.v == 0)
 goto div_error;
 pe-v %= e2.v;
 break;
 case TOK_SHL:
 pe-v = e2.v;
 break;
 default:
 case TOK_SAR:this
 case after default what does it mean ??
 pe-v = e2.v;
 break;
 }
 }
 }



 On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Ivo van Poorten ivo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Error:

 $ ./configure --cc=tcc
 Binary  directory   /usr/local/bin
 TinyCC directory/usr/local/lib/tcc
 Library directory   /usr/local/lib
 Include directory   /usr/local/include
 Manual directory/usr/local/share/man
 Info directory  /usr/local/share/info
 Doc directory   /usr/local/share/doc/tcc
 Target root prefix
 Source path  /home/ivo/git/tinycc
 C compiler   tcc
 Target OSLinux
 CPU  x86
 Big Endian   no
 gprof enabledno
 cross compilers  no
 use libgcc   no
 Creating config.mak and config.h
 $ make
 [..snip..]
 gcc -c lib/bcheck.c -o bcheck.o -I. -I/home/ivo/git/tinycc -Wall -g -O2
 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -m386 -malign-functions=0 -m32 cc1: error:
 unrecognized command line option -m386


 88888888

 diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
 index d257464..0333ebe 100644
 --- a/Makefile
 +++ b/Makefile
 @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ libtcc1.a : FORCE
  lib/%/libtcc1.a : FORCE $(PROGS_CROSS)
 @$(MAKE) -C lib cross TARGET=$*
  bcheck.o : lib/bcheck.c
 -   gcc -c $ -o $@ $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
 +   $(CC) -c $ -o $@ $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
  FORCE:

  # install

 ___
 Tinycc-devel mailing list
 Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel




___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch

2013-01-30 Thread Domingo Alvarez Duarte

Also here :

static void asm_expr_logic(TCCState *s1, ExprValue *pe)
{
int op;
ExprValue e2;

asm_expr_prod(s1, pe);
for(;;) {
op = tok;
if (op != ''  op != '|'  op != '^')
break;
next();
asm_expr_prod(s1, e2);
if (pe-sym || e2.sym)
tcc_error(invalid operation with label);
switch(op) {
case '':
pe-v = e2.v;
break;
case '|':
pe-v |= e2.v;
break;
default:
case '^':  ///what this case
after default mean 
pe-v ^= e2.v;
break;
}
}
}



On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte
mingo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello !
 I'm looking again on the reports done with Coverity Scan and found several
 things one of it is this:

 static void asm_expr_prod(TCCState *s1, ExprValue *pe)
 {
 int op;
 ExprValue e2;

 asm_expr_unary(s1, pe);
 for(;;) {
 op = tok;
 if (op != '*'  op != '/'  op != '%' 
 op != TOK_SHL  op != TOK_SAR)
 break;
 next();
 asm_expr_unary(s1, e2);
 if (pe-sym || e2.sym)
 tcc_error(invalid operation with label);
 switch(op) {
 case '*':
 pe-v *= e2.v;
 break;
 case '/':
 if (e2.v == 0) {
 div_error:
 tcc_error(division by zero);
 }
 pe-v /= e2.v;
 break;
 case '%':
 if (e2.v == 0)
 goto div_error;
 pe-v %= e2.v;
 break;
 case TOK_SHL:
 pe-v = e2.v;
 break;
 default:
 case TOK_SAR:this case
 after default what does it mean ??
 pe-v = e2.v;
 break;
 }
 }
 }



 On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Ivo van Poorten ivo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Error:

 $ ./configure --cc=tcc
 Binary  directory   /usr/local/bin
 TinyCC directory/usr/local/lib/tcc
 Library directory   /usr/local/lib
 Include directory   /usr/local/include
 Manual directory/usr/local/share/man
 Info directory  /usr/local/share/info
 Doc directory   /usr/local/share/doc/tcc
 Target root prefix
 Source path  /home/ivo/git/tinycc
 C compiler   tcc
 Target OSLinux
 CPU  x86
 Big Endian   no
 gprof enabledno
 cross compilers  no
 use libgcc   no
 Creating config.mak and config.h
 $ make
 [..snip..]
 gcc -c lib/bcheck.c -o bcheck.o -I. -I/home/ivo/git/tinycc -Wall -g -O2
 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -m386 -malign-functions=0 -m32 cc1: error:
 unrecognized command line option -m386


 88888888

 diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
 index d257464..0333ebe 100644
 --- a/Makefile
 +++ b/Makefile
 @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ libtcc1.a : FORCE
  lib/%/libtcc1.a : FORCE $(PROGS_CROSS)
 @$(MAKE) -C lib cross TARGET=$*
  bcheck.o : lib/bcheck.c
 -   gcc -c $ -o $@ $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
 +   $(CC) -c $ -o $@ $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
  FORCE:

  # install

 ___
 Tinycc-devel mailing list
 Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel



___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Segmentation Faults and test failures on ARM (Raspbian/Raspberry Pi)

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing

[Tinycc-devel] Changelog: call for update before release

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Changelog: call for update before release

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Changelog: call for update before release

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Changelog: call for update before release

[Tinycc-devel] Small patch

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Small patch

12 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information