done: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/614
On Thursday, 1 September 2016 09:19:46 CEST Eric Rescorla wrote: > This should be prohibited. A PR for this would be welcome. > > -Ekr > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I didn't notice in the -15 draft anything explicitly prohibiting sending a > > TLSv1.3 Client Hello inside established TLSv1.x connection (where x < 3). > > > > Is this something that the protocol should allow? If yes, > > renegotiation_info > > extension status would probably need to be updated. If not, then I think > > the > > document should be a bit more explicit about it. > > -- > > Regards, > > Hubert Kario > > Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team > > Web: www.cz.redhat.com > > Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic > > _______________________________________________ > > TLS mailing list > > TLS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
