Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

[Stephen Farrell]

Looks to me like this is fine to go ahead. So Sean
and Joe, please submit a draft-ietf-tls- version of
this I-D.

Thanks,
S

On 22/10/16 15:30, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Sean and Joe wrote up this IANA registry draft as per
> discussions at WG meetings and on the list. As they've
> done the initial work, but are WG chairs, they wanted
> me (as responsible AD) to call consensus for it. (They
> wrote this up as finding authors for such fairly boring
> stuff was hard - thank them for taking one for us all
> when you see 'em:-)
> 
> Based on the earlier discussions and limited mails on
> this draft, I do think there's consensus to adopt this
> approach and that the text in the I-D [1] is a good
> enough starting point for the WG.
> 
> If you think otherwise, please comment to the list in
> the next week.
> 
> If you've questions about all this from a process-crap
> POV, feel free to ask those on or off the list as you
> think appropriate;-)
> 
> Note that if this is adopted as a WG item, the chairs
> might decide to continue as editors or recruit someone
> else. In the former case, I'm fine with doing the WGLC
> stuff when this is ready (which it nearly is IMO, so
> there may or may not be a need for new authors, depends
> on what the WG think of the text I'd guess).
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

[Andrei Popov]

+1

Definitely good enough starting point.

Cheers,

Andrei

From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xiaoyin Liu
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 10:02 AM
To: Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com>; Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

+1

Xiaoyin

From: Eric Rescorla<mailto:e...@rtfm.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 11:26 AM
To: Stephen Farrell<mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: tls@ietf.org<mailto:tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

+1

This draft just codifies stuff that we had already agreed on but had been 
awkwardly stuffed in TLS 1.3. Having it separate is an improvement.

-Ekr




On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Stephen Farrell 
<stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie<mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>> wrote:

Hi all,

Sean and Joe wrote up this IANA registry draft as per
discussions at WG meetings and on the list. As they've
done the initial work, but are WG chairs, they wanted
me (as responsible AD) to call consensus for it. (They
wrote this up as finding authors for such fairly boring
stuff was hard - thank them for taking one for us all
when you see 'em:-)

Based on the earlier discussions and limited mails on
this draft, I do think there's consensus to adopt this
approach and that the text in the I-D [1] is a good
enough starting point for the WG.

If you think otherwise, please comment to the list in
the next week.

If you've questions about all this from a process-crap
POV, feel free to ask those on or off the list as you
think appropriate;-)

Note that if this is adopted as a WG item, the chairs
might decide to continue as editors or recruit someone
else. In the former case, I'm fine with doing the WGLC
stuff when this is ready (which it nearly is IMO, so
there may or may not be a need for new authors, depends
on what the WG think of the text I'd guess).

Cheers,
S.



[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01


___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org<mailto:TLS@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

[Martin Thomson]

Good plan. I support publishing this doc.

(I haven't reviewed this recently, but will commit to do so.)

On 24 Oct 2016 3:34 AM, "Sean Turner"  wrote:

> Note that I hope that we don’t need to present in Korea.  My opinion is
> that this process mumbo jumbo is important (to some), but I don’t think it
> should occupy the group’s f2f time.  But, it still needs review so please
> do and provide comments either here or via a PR.
>
> spt
>
> > On Oct 22, 2016, at 10:30, Stephen Farrell 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Sean and Joe wrote up this IANA registry draft as per
> > discussions at WG meetings and on the list. As they've
> > done the initial work, but are WG chairs, they wanted
> > me (as responsible AD) to call consensus for it. (They
> > wrote this up as finding authors for such fairly boring
> > stuff was hard - thank them for taking one for us all
> > when you see 'em:-)
> >
> > Based on the earlier discussions and limited mails on
> > this draft, I do think there's consensus to adopt this
> > approach and that the text in the I-D [1] is a good
> > enough starting point for the WG.
> >
> > If you think otherwise, please comment to the list in
> > the next week.
> >
> > If you've questions about all this from a process-crap
> > POV, feel free to ask those on or off the list as you
> > think appropriate;-)
> >
> > Note that if this is adopted as a WG item, the chairs
> > might decide to continue as editors or recruit someone
> > else. In the former case, I'm fine with doing the WGLC
> > stuff when this is ready (which it nearly is IMO, so
> > there may or may not be a need for new authors, depends
> > on what the WG think of the text I'd guess).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > S.
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01
> >
> > ___
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

[Sean Turner]

Note that I hope that we don’t need to present in Korea.  My opinion is that 
this process mumbo jumbo is important (to some), but I don’t think it should 
occupy the group’s f2f time.  But, it still needs review so please do and 
provide comments either here or via a PR.

spt

> On Oct 22, 2016, at 10:30, Stephen Farrell  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Sean and Joe wrote up this IANA registry draft as per
> discussions at WG meetings and on the list. As they've
> done the initial work, but are WG chairs, they wanted
> me (as responsible AD) to call consensus for it. (They
> wrote this up as finding authors for such fairly boring
> stuff was hard - thank them for taking one for us all
> when you see 'em:-)
> 
> Based on the earlier discussions and limited mails on
> this draft, I do think there's consensus to adopt this
> approach and that the text in the I-D [1] is a good
> enough starting point for the WG.
> 
> If you think otherwise, please comment to the list in
> the next week.
> 
> If you've questions about all this from a process-crap
> POV, feel free to ask those on or off the list as you
> think appropriate;-)
> 
> Note that if this is adopted as a WG item, the chairs
> might decide to continue as editors or recruit someone
> else. In the former case, I'm fine with doing the WGLC
> stuff when this is ready (which it nearly is IMO, so
> there may or may not be a need for new authors, depends
> on what the WG think of the text I'd guess).
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01
> 
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

[Xiaoyin Liu]

+1

Xiaoyin

From: Eric Rescorla<mailto:e...@rtfm.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 11:26 AM
To: Stephen Farrell<mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: tls@ietf.org<mailto:tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

+1

This draft just codifies stuff that we had already agreed on but had been 
awkwardly stuffed in TLS 1.3. Having it separate is an improvement.

-Ekr




On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Stephen Farrell 
<stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie<mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>> wrote:

Hi all,

Sean and Joe wrote up this IANA registry draft as per
discussions at WG meetings and on the list. As they've
done the initial work, but are WG chairs, they wanted
me (as responsible AD) to call consensus for it. (They
wrote this up as finding authors for such fairly boring
stuff was hard - thank them for taking one for us all
when you see 'em:-)

Based on the earlier discussions and limited mails on
this draft, I do think there's consensus to adopt this
approach and that the text in the I-D [1] is a good
enough starting point for the WG.

If you think otherwise, please comment to the list in
the next week.

If you've questions about all this from a process-crap
POV, feel free to ask those on or off the list as you
think appropriate;-)

Note that if this is adopted as a WG item, the chairs
might decide to continue as editors or recruit someone
else. In the former case, I'm fine with doing the WGLC
stuff when this is ready (which it nearly is IMO, so
there may or may not be a need for new authors, depends
on what the WG think of the text I'd guess).

Cheers,
S.



[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01


___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org<mailto:TLS@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls


___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Re: [TLS] WG adoption of draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01

[Eric Rescorla]

+1

This draft just codifies stuff that we had already agreed on but had been
awkwardly stuffed in TLS 1.3. Having it separate is an improvement.

-Ekr




On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Stephen Farrell 
wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> Sean and Joe wrote up this IANA registry draft as per
> discussions at WG meetings and on the list. As they've
> done the initial work, but are WG chairs, they wanted
> me (as responsible AD) to call consensus for it. (They
> wrote this up as finding authors for such fairly boring
> stuff was hard - thank them for taking one for us all
> when you see 'em:-)
>
> Based on the earlier discussions and limited mails on
> this draft, I do think there's consensus to adopt this
> approach and that the text in the I-D [1] is a good
> enough starting point for the WG.
>
> If you think otherwise, please comment to the list in
> the next week.
>
> If you've questions about all this from a process-crap
> POV, feel free to ask those on or off the list as you
> think appropriate;-)
>
> Note that if this is adopted as a WG item, the chairs
> might decide to continue as editors or recruit someone
> else. In the former case, I'm fine with doing the WGLC
> stuff when this is ready (which it nearly is IMO, so
> there may or may not be a need for new authors, depends
> on what the WG think of the text I'd guess).
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
>
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sandj-tls-iana-registry-updates-01
>
>
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls