Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-07-10 Thread Ronald Klop
Hello,

About the 4.1.25 tagging which is taking place.
What is going to be the status of http gzip compression in 4.1.25? See bug 
18073.
Or will there follow a 4.1.26-BETA in the near future with some enhanced 
functionality?

Greetings,

Ronald.

On Wednesday 02 April 2003 11:37, Remy Maucherat wrote:
 Hi,

 As far as I am concerned, the focus for the next stable 4.1.x release
 will be on small fixes. I do not want to introduce new features or
 changes which would affect Tomcat's behavior. I think the ETA for that
 next stable release could be within one to two months.

 So I would need to compile a list of issues which should be fixed in the
 next release.

 As a starting point:
 - Fix HTTP compression check (I think a small refactoring is needed to
 make the feature cleaner).
 - Fix FORM processing for more complex requests (bug 10229).
 - Error message when the Java compiler is not found by Ant (if this is
 fixable; Costin ?).
 - Double wrapping of session objects.

 I'm waiting for some input to fill up the list. Note that for low
 priority bugs, a patch will be required. The patch would need to:
 - have a low impact
 - be of good quality (no performance/scalability impact, clean code)

 Thanks,
 Remy


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi,

As far as I am concerned, the focus for the next stable 4.1.x release 
will be on small fixes. I do not want to introduce new features or 
changes which would affect Tomcat's behavior. I think the ETA for that 
next stable release could be within one to two months.

So I would need to compile a list of issues which should be fixed in the 
next release.

As a starting point:
- Fix HTTP compression check (I think a small refactoring is needed to 
make the feature cleaner).
- Fix FORM processing for more complex requests (bug 10229).
- Error message when the Java compiler is not found by Ant (if this is 
fixable; Costin ?).
- Double wrapping of session objects.

I'm waiting for some input to fill up the list. Note that for low 
priority bugs, a patch will be required. The patch would need to:
- have a low impact
- be of good quality (no performance/scalability impact, clean code)

Thanks,
Remy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote:

 Hi,
 
 As far as I am concerned, the focus for the next stable 4.1.x release
 will be on small fixes. I do not want to introduce new features or
 changes which would affect Tomcat's behavior. I think the ETA for that
 next stable release could be within one to two months.
 
 So I would need to compile a list of issues which should be fixed in the
 next release.
 
 As a starting point:
 - Fix HTTP compression check (I think a small refactoring is needed to
 make the feature cleaner).
 - Fix FORM processing for more complex requests (bug 10229).
 - Error message when the Java compiler is not found by Ant (if this is
 fixable; Costin ?).
 - Double wrapping of session objects.

- The jk bugs that Jeff mentioned
- the context facade and filters problem.


 
 I'm waiting for some input to fill up the list. Note that for low
 priority bugs, a patch will be required. The patch would need to:
 - have a low impact
 - be of good quality (no performance/scalability impact, clean code)

Will the patch be a set of .jars, or a full release ?

Costin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Filip Hanik
 -Original Message-
 From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Costin Manolache
 Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 10:18 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [4.1.x] Next release


 Remy Maucherat wrote:

  Hi,
 
  As far as I am concerned, the focus for the next stable 4.1.x release
  will be on small fixes. I do not want to introduce new features or
  changes which would affect Tomcat's behavior. I think the ETA for that
  next stable release could be within one to two months.
 
  So I would need to compile a list of issues which should be fixed in the
  next release.
 
  As a starting point:
  - Fix HTTP compression check (I think a small refactoring is needed to
  make the feature cleaner).
  - Fix FORM processing for more complex requests (bug 10229).
  - Error message when the Java compiler is not found by Ant (if this is
  fixable; Costin ?).
  - Double wrapping of session objects.

 - The jk bugs that Jeff mentioned
 - the context facade and filters problem.



  I'm waiting for some input to fill up the list. Note that for low
  priority bugs, a patch will be required. The patch would need to:
  - have a low impact
  - be of good quality (no performance/scalability impact, clean code)

 Will the patch be a set of .jars, or a full release ?

 Costin

allow proxy support for the JK connectors (just like http), I'll submit a
patch

Filip


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:


Hi,

As far as I am concerned, the focus for the next stable 4.1.x release
will be on small fixes. I do not want to introduce new features or
changes which would affect Tomcat's behavior. I think the ETA for that
next stable release could be within one to two months.
So I would need to compile a list of issues which should be fixed in the
next release.
As a starting point:
- Fix HTTP compression check (I think a small refactoring is needed to
make the feature cleaner).
- Fix FORM processing for more complex requests (bug 10229).
- Error message when the Java compiler is not found by Ant (if this is
fixable; Costin ?).
- Double wrapping of session objects.


- The jk bugs that Jeff mentioned
- the context facade and filters problem.
Could I get some details on that filter/facade bug ?

I'm waiting for some input to fill up the list. Note that for low
priority bugs, a patch will be required. The patch would need to:
- have a low impact
- be of good quality (no performance/scalability impact, clean code)


Will the patch be a set of .jars, or a full release ?
I think this is going to be a full release when(ever) everything is in.

Remy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote:

 Could I get some details on that filter/facade bug ?

Yes, Filter.init() is called with the Context object instead of the 
facade. While Servlet.init() is called correctly. 

This may allow access to the internals, and is just weird ( getting 
different context objects in the same app for a servlet and a filter ).

Costin



 
I'm waiting for some input to fill up the list. Note that for low
priority bugs, a patch will be required. The patch would need to:
- have a low impact
- be of good quality (no performance/scalability impact, clean code)
 
 
 Will the patch be a set of .jars, or a full release ?
 
 I think this is going to be a full release when(ever) everything is in.
 
 Remy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:


Could I get some details on that filter/facade bug ?


Yes, Filter.init() is called with the Context object instead of the 
facade. While Servlet.init() is called correctly. 

This may allow access to the internals, and is just weird ( getting 
different context objects in the same app for a servlet and a filter ).
Does JFA patch fix this also ?

I'm going to add a bug list in CVS so we can easily edit it.

Remy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Jean-Francois Arcand


Costin Manolache wrote:

Remy Maucherat wrote:

 

Could I get some details on that filter/facade bug ?
   

Yes, Filter.init() is called with the Context object instead of the 
facade. While Servlet.init() is called correctly. 

This may allow access to the internals, and is just weird ( getting 
different context objects in the same app for a servlet and a filter ).

Fixed. I have ported the patch from Tomcat 5 (where no regression has 
been found).

-- Jeanfrancois

Costin



 

I'm waiting for some input to fill up the list. Note that for low
priority bugs, a patch will be required. The patch would need to:
- have a low impact
- be of good quality (no performance/scalability impact, clean code)
   

Will the patch be a set of .jars, or a full release ?
 

I think this is going to be a full release when(ever) everything is in.

Remy
   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Jean-Francois Arcand


Remy Maucherat wrote:

Costin Manolache wrote:

Remy Maucherat wrote:


Could I get some details on that filter/facade bug ?


Yes, Filter.init() is called with the Context object instead of the 
facade. While Servlet.init() is called correctly.
This may allow access to the internals, and is just weird ( getting 
different context objects in the same app for a servlet and a filter ).


Does JFA patch fix this also ? 
Yes.

-- Jeanfrancois



I'm going to add a bug list in CVS so we can easily edit it.

Remy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote:

 Costin Manolache wrote:
 Remy Maucherat wrote:
 
 
Could I get some details on that filter/facade bug ?
 
 
 Yes, Filter.init() is called with the Context object instead of the
 facade. While Servlet.init() is called correctly.
 
 This may allow access to the internals, and is just weird ( getting
 different context objects in the same app for a servlet and a filter ).
 
 Does JFA patch fix this also ?


Yes. It needs to be backported.

Regarding the other issue - can we at least have the .jars released
separately - say for developer use ( for build ) or without any particular 
support ? ( i.e. no updater or patch release )


Costin

 
 I'm going to add a bug list in CVS so we can easily edit it.
 
 Remy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Bill Barker

- Original Message - 
From: Jean-Francois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [4.1.x] Next release


 
 
 Costin Manolache wrote:
 
 Remy Maucherat wrote:
 
   
 
 Could I get some details on that filter/facade bug ?
 
 
 
 Yes, Filter.init() is called with the Context object instead of the 
 facade. While Servlet.init() is called correctly. 
 
 This may allow access to the internals, and is just weird ( getting 
 different context objects in the same app for a servlet and a filter ).
 
 Fixed. I have ported the patch from Tomcat 5 (where no regression has 
 been found).
 

Now you just have to hope that the tab police don't catch you ;-).

 -- Jeanfrancois
 
 
 Costin
 
 
 
   
 
 I'm waiting for some input to fill up the list. Note that for low
 priority bugs, a patch will be required. The patch would need to:
 - have a low impact
 - be of good quality (no performance/scalability impact, clean code)
 
 
 Will the patch be a set of .jars, or a full release ?
   
 
 I think this is going to be a full release when(ever) everything is in.
 
 Remy
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
   
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [4.1.x] Next release

2003-04-02 Thread Glenn Nielsen
+1 for the next 4.1 release to include only bug fixes.

A quick query of bugzilla found 744 bugs for Tomcat 4 which are not
either closed or resolved.
Ouch!

Perhaps we should set a goal for how much this number should be
reduced before doing the release.
Some of these are quite old and perhaps only need to be checked
to see if they are still valid.
Some are for mod_webapp.  Since there is no volunteer to maintain
this and we have removed it from the distribution, these could
probably be closed as WONT FIX.
Regards,

Glenn

Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,

As far as I am concerned, the focus for the next stable 4.1.x release 
will be on small fixes. I do not want to introduce new features or 
changes which would affect Tomcat's behavior. I think the ETA for that 
next stable release could be within one to two months.

So I would need to compile a list of issues which should be fixed in the 
next release.

As a starting point:
- Fix HTTP compression check (I think a small refactoring is needed to 
make the feature cleaner).
- Fix FORM processing for more complex requests (bug 10229).
- Error message when the Java compiler is not found by Ant (if this is 
fixable; Costin ?).
- Double wrapping of session objects.

I'm waiting for some input to fill up the list. Note that for low 
priority bugs, a patch will be required. The patch would need to:
- have a low impact
- be of good quality (no performance/scalability impact, clean code)

Thanks,
Remy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]