DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10036] - Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036 Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-15 22:34 --- *** Bug 25549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10036] - Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036 Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-25 10:33 --- try with jdk 1.3 ... and running - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10036] - Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036 Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-04 17:27 --- *** Bug 14187 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10036] - Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036 Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-28 17:25 --- *** Bug 13999 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10036] - Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036 Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-06-20 18:10 --- The servlet generated by jasper is in package org.apache.jsp. As such, it won't be able to reference any class that is not in a package. This is a Java language rule. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10036] - Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036 Unable to resolve a class name without a package definition --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-06-20 19:21 --- Kin-Man wrote:The servlet generated by jasper is in package org.apache.jsp. As such, it won't be able to reference any class that is not in a package. I first thought Kin-Man was wrong on this, but he's right.You used to be able to do this up to 1.3, but in 1.4 they have tightened upthe compiler. According to http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/compatibility.html:The compiler now rejects import statements that import a type from the unnamed namespace. Previous versions of the compiler would accept such import declarations, even though they were arguably not allowed by the language (because the type name appearing in the import clause is not in scope). The specification is being clarified to state clearly that you cannot have a simple name in an import statement, nor can you import from the unnamed namespace. To summarize, the syntax import SimpleName;is no longer legal. Nor is the syntax import ClassInUnnamedNamespace.Nested;which would import a nested class from the unnamed namespace. To fix such problems in your code, move all of the classes from the unnamed namespace into a named namespace. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
