DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2   |Connector:JK/AJP
   ||(deprecated)




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-12-22 23:09 ---
Quoting Bill Barker:

quote
Enhancement request at best (and not one that I like).  Security should be
done by Tomcat in this case.  mod_jk/Apache2 bypasses directory_walk, so
'.htaccess' is never looked at.
/quote

On this basis I am marking this as WONTFIX.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-12-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-12-22 23:56 ---
I don't consider this an enhancement, I consider this a bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055

bypass of apache authentication





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-20 18:56 ---
Since the problem seems to lay inside Apache hooks, I spent some time to explore
hooks configuration in Apache 2 mod_jk2/mod_jk modules. 

This is the piece of code involved

static void jk2_register_hooks(apr_pool_t * p)
{
ap_hook_handler(jk2_handler, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
ap_hook_post_config(jk2_post_config, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);

/* Force the mpm to run before us and set the scoreboard image */
ap_hook_child_init(jk2_child_init, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_LAST);

ap_hook_translate_name(jk2_translate, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
ap_hook_map_to_storage(jk2_map_to_storage, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
}

I see nothing about authentication in this. Furthermore,  I don't see where
htaccess handling takes place inside Apache 2 request processing. If anyone has
any idea on how to configure modjk for Apache2, please let us know.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055

bypass of apache authentication





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-16 13:26 ---
See the comment From [EMAIL PROTECTED] in bug 
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29834

htaccess file handling did not change, but the connector module hooks

So, the problem seems to be closed on the Apache side. 

Module hooks is a major issue in Apache 2, particularly when we talk about
priorities between modules. In our problem, mod_jk bypasses the htaccess
authentication in Apache 2. This could be an interesting way of investigation.

I tried again to change the LoadModule order without success. 

Anyone's got an idea ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-09-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055

bypass of apache authentication





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-10 13:52 ---
The link to the same bug submitted in Apache 2 bugzilla. 

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29834

It can be reassigned, but I think  the problem might lay
- either in the mod_jk/mod_jk2 implementation for Apache 2
- or in the Apache 2 API ? 

So, it can be useful to leave it in both databases as long as we don't know
which one is concerned...

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-09-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055

bypass of apache authentication





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-09 17:10 ---
I posted this one in Apache 2.0 bug database.
I think I found the problem but no soltution to it. 
I agree, this is a security issue.

___

There seems to be a difference between Apache 1.3 and 2.0 : they don't handle
htaccess files the same way. 

Let's say I have a site , protected with an authentification module (e.g
mod_auth_pgsql)
The site is opened to eveyone, but some directories are dynamically group protected.

In this case, we have a httpd.conf with :

Directory /var/www/html/mysite
AuthName My Realm
AuthType basic
Auth_PG_host myhost.mydomain.org
Auth_PG_port 5432
Auth_PG_database users
Auth_PG_encrypted off
Auth_PG_user admin
Auth_PG_pwd admin
 Auth_PG_pwd_table users
Auth_PG_uid_field iduser
Auth_PG_pwd_field passwd
Auth_PG_grp_table group
Auth_PG_grp_user_field iduser
Auth_PG_grp_group_field group
AllowOverride All
   /Directory

and a .htaccess file in /var/www/html/mysite/secretdir that requires a
particular group

 Require group secret

This works perfectly in both versions (1.3 and 2.0) with both mod_auth_pgsql
adapted modules. All files within secretdir are protected.

The problem appears you're asking Apache to serve  JSP files, which are handled
by  Tomcat through a mod_jk or mod_jk2 connector (same behavior, I tried it)

- in Apache 1.3, the jsp files are protected like htm files : the .htaccess
directives are taken into acount BEFORE tomcat handles jsp files
- in Apache 2.0, the jsp is handled by tomcat WITHOUT looking to .htaccess (they
are visible by everyone and I can't getRemoteUser - returns null)

I tried to change the modules loading order without success.
I have the same difference with mod_jk and mod_jk2, and with several
Basic Authentication Modules.

Apache 2.0 works if the REQUIRE directive is set in httpd.conf, but this is not
dynamical and therefore doesn't fit  my needs.

I wonder if there is a magic trick to force Apache 2.0 to handle mod_jk like
Apache 1.3 does.

Configuration : (Apache 2.0.49 / Apache 1.3.27 + mod_jk / mod jk2 and tomcat 4.1.29)

Thanks for reading

Alexis

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-09-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055

bypass of apache authentication

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-09 18:36 ---
*** Bug 25367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-09-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055

bypass of apache authentication





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-09 21:19 ---
Can we have a link to the apache bug?  And shouldn't that status of this bug be
changed to ASSIGNED already?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25055] - bypass of apache authentication

2004-02-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25055

bypass of apache authentication

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|getRemoteUser() returns null|bypass of apache
   |- bypass of apache  |authentication
   |authentication  |



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-02 13:10 ---
I had 3 private emails the past week about this issue from people who have the
same problem. I refered them to my comment from 2003-12-02 07:43.

As this is a security issue, I think this bug is important enough to justify a
comment in the release notes of mod_jk... 

I'm also changing the summary to reflect the real problem in this bug report and
not the initial problem I had encountered

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]