DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25127] - Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25127

Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-10-19 18:44 ---
*** Bug 31769 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25127] - Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25127

Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-06-19 12:12 ---
>From the comments this appears to be a JDK problem rather than a tomcat. It 
also appears that it only occurs with some of the early 1.3.0 releases.

The simplest solution is to upgrade the JDK. If this option is not available 
then the manual work aorund to remove the index.list files from the jars 
should work.

I am not going to remove the index.list files from the build so the majority 
of users who do not see this problem benefit from improved classloader 
performance.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25127] - Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25127

Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-01-22 17:08 ---
I verified it with some other Java version:
With 1.3.0_05 it worked fine.
With 1.3.0_01 I had the same crash as with the version in my last post (this 
one was included in JBuilder 4)

After some digging in the sun bug database, I came across the following two 
issues: 
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4334201.html
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4401404.html

They sound a bit like the current problem, although I know too little about JAR 
indexing and ResourceBundles.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25127] - Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25127

Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-01-21 22:17 ---
I could not repro the problem on linux, java version "1.3.1_08"

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25127] - Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25127

Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-01-08 11:03 ---
I have the same problem on Win2000, Sun-JDK 1.3.0c.

After same research I found out that the problem are "index.list" files which 
were added to some JARs in the 4.1.29 build.
These files should speed up the classloader (see 
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/guide/jar/jar.html). But somehow they don't 
work in this case.
For testing create a small app which has "tomcat-coyote.jar" in it's classpath, 
and import the "org.apache.coyote.*"-namespace. Then make the following call:
ResourceBundle rb = ResourceBundle.getBundle
("org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.LocalStrings");
You will get the same exception you get with tomcat.

Workaround: Remove the index.list files from ALL the tomcat jars. There are 
some (beetween 5 and 10 I think).
The easiest way (with windows) is to search for the string "index.list" in all 
JAR-Files in the tomcat directory. Then open each with winzip and delete the 
index.list file. 
After this tomcat is starting once again. The only difference should be that 
classloading is as fast/slow as in 4.1.27.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25127] - Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25127

Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-12-02 02:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=9352)
My build.properties

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]