DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003

JK2 documentation and usage issues





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-28 17:44 ---
Oh, and 6) /examples/ no longer exists. The two URIs /jsp-examples/ and
/servlets-examples/ have replaced it.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003

JK2 documentation and usage issues





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-28 17:57 ---

Just a quick reply...
You are right, the JNI in 2.0.4 is quite unusable thought, and we didn't touch 
it for this release.
Some of the reasons are like you said classname changes,
different dependencies, and the fact that it theroreticaly works on the single 
child server, and those are only win and netware.
In general IMO the only place where JNI would be useful is in the
embeded TC.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003

JK2 documentation and usage issues

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003

JK2 documentation and usage issues





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-28 19:23 ---
Hello,

you must add your tools.jar to your classpath to compile jsp's
OPT=-Djava.class.path=D:/java/j2sdk1.4.2_03/lib/tools.jar;C:/tomcat5/jakarta-tomcat-5/build/server/lib/tomcat-jni.jar;C:/tomcat5/jakarta-tomcat-5/bin/jmx.jar;C:/tomcat5/jakarta-tomcat-5/build/bin/bootstrap.jar

s. working worker2.properties for Jk2.0.4 Tomcat 5.0.20 (CVS Head 10.3.2004)
at
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167

Regards
Peter

PS: why we can't really configure which JDK we wán't use for JNI ?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread Bill Barker

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues


 DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
 RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003.
 ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
 INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003

 JK2 documentation and usage issues

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

What|Removed |Added
 --
--
  Status|NEW |RESOLVED
  Resolution||INVALID


Other than the fact that JBoss doesn't use JK2, this is invalid why?

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the 
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and 
CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or 
distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in 
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this 
message and any attachments.

In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the 
Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as 
social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and 
passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28003] - JK2 documentation and usage issues

2004-03-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote:
Other than the fact that JBoss doesn't use JK2, this is invalid why?
I don't find general comments on the docs to be very useful in a bug 
report. Patches I can understand.

JBoss obviously uses JK 2.

Rémy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]