DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34183] - org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl pooling should be configurable
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-26 09:27 --- As you said, in the end, it is up to me. The obvious benefit of open source is that, if you do not agree, you can experiment in any way you would like. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34183] - org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl pooling should be configurable
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-25 19:14 --- I disagree with this. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34183] - org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl pooling should be configurable
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-25 20:27 --- This can be useful for trouble shooting purposes, avoiding memory leaks due to bugs, etc., Also Sun recommends against implementing object pools. It is all about choice. If some one wants to use pooling they can use it, if others do not want it, they should be able to turn it off. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34183] - org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl pooling should be configurable
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-25 22:30 --- If Sun recommended to jump off a cliff, would you ? Remember those are the same guys who told you to use Swing in JDK 1.2 to build all your desktop apps. Let's say that since you're the first one who has a need for this (like you were the first one to use close inside your tags), then the feature is not actually needed, and would be bloat. If you really want it, it can be compiled easily. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34183] - org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl pooling should be configurable
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34183 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-26 03:01 --- I do evaluate Sun or any other vendor's guidelines/recommendations first, and if it makes sense I follow them. In the case of Sun's recommendation against object pooling it makes sense. We tried to implement object pooling in our apps and found that it is not worth the trouble. Modern hotspot JVMs are so mucch better at allocating memory and garbage collecting them compared to older JVMs. Also, when recyling objects state should be cleared properly to avoid risk of memory leaks/bugs. This is the same case with Jasper runtime too. I have said many times, that we do not call close() from the JSP tags. The tags are either jakarta taglibs tags or struts tags. Any one has access to the source code. Why do you keep telling we have close() from tags? Have you ever looked at the source code for these tags? I can certainly make code changes myself and get these missing functionality. This is not good for maintanenace of our apps as we do want to keep upgrading to newer versions of open source software we use. If you are not interested in making fixes/enhancements based on customer needs that is really up to you. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
